The Global Cabal - Too Big to Fail Banks

Here they are. The Financial Stability Board has released a list of 29 banks that it considers global systemically important financial institutions (G-SIFISs) and thus considered Too Big To Fail. The initial list of G-SIFIS:

§ Belgium: Dexia

§ China: Bank of China

§ France: Banque Populaire, BNP Paribas, Crédit Agricole, Société Générale

§ Germany: Commerzbank, Deutsche Bank

§ Italy: Unicredit

§ Japan: Mitsubishi, Mizuho, Sumitomo Mitsui

§ Netherlands: ING

§ Spain: Santander

§ Sweden: Nordea

§ Switzerland: Credit Suisse, UBS

§ UK: Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, Royal Bank of Scotland

§ US: Bank of America, Bank of New York Mellon, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, State Street, Wells Fargo            

According to the FSB, Systemically Important Financial Institutions are

firms whose disorderly failure, because of their size, complexity and

systemic interconnectedness, would cause significant disruption to the wider financial system and economic activity. Bottom line: These are the banks through which the banksters operate. Of note, apologist for TBTF bailouts, Warren Buffett holds major positions in at least three of these banks: Bank of America, Bank of New York Mellon and Wells Fargo.

Let's map it out, shall we? I'll note that Bank of China and Nordea did not show on the mapper, so they aren't included.  <http://mapper.nndb.com/maps/738/000021675/> link.

Just look down that list of names; if you look at them individually and flesh them out, I would not be surprised to find just about every Fortune 100 corporation represented. You will notice that these corporations go all-in for the green agenda. Why? Because it benefits them.

 

They rigged the carbon swap thing to benefit them. They also want to dramatically dial back the human race, but that motive bridges over into the spiritual realm. You will also see these Fortune 100s promote homosexuality, which also feeds into the zero population agenda. They are done with the excess population, and due to automation they have no use for us. Recall that the control of sex was a central theme in the story, 1984.

So we see that they've positioned themselves so that they will not bear any consequences from the house of fiat money they've built up. Nor will they suffer any losses from the huge amount of social engineering and manipulations their banks have financed all around the world. The saying is true, he who has all the gold, makes the rules, or so they would like to think.

Sources:  Posted: 19 Oct 2012 11:17 AM PDT, Victoria Baer

<http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheRepublicanMother/~3/m42w7vks5Rk/too-big-to-fail banks.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email>

From  <http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/> Economic Policy Journal via <http://lewrockwell.com/wenzel/wenzel146.html> Lew Rockwell from awhile back:

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2914413525684497615-7593080892194899212?l=therepublicanmother.blogspot.com

http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheRepublicanMother/~4/m42w7vks5Rk?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email

Comments:

We believe that banks who mal-invest and lose money, should take the losses without a government bail-out of any kind.  They may need to sell assets and reduce expenses.  If these losses are large enough, they will need to reorganize under their bankruptcy laws.  Until this is the case, these banks will continue to make bad deals and lose money and hand taxpayers the tab..

 

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader