The Obama
administration is no longer investigating just mortgage lenders for allegedly
discriminating against blacks and Latinos. It's now also targeting banks making
auto and student loans.
Opening
a new front in the war on banks, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is
investigating and preparing to sue Ally Financial Inc. and at least three other
major auto lenders for allegedly overcharging minority borrowers.
"A
persistent problem is the evil of discrimination," proclaimed Richard
Cordray, the bureau's recess-appointed director.
Though
financial reforms don't authorize the new credit watchdog to probe auto
dealers, "auto lending is within our jurisdiction," Cordray asserted.
"We
are examining institutions around auto lending just as we are looking at them
on mortgage, credit cards, student loans."
The
bureau is pursuing racism charges based on "disparate impact," a
dubious legal theory that uses statistical models to prove bias. "It makes
no practical difference whether a lender consciously intended to
discriminate," Cordray warned.
As
with home loans, blacks and Latinos historically have been found to pay more
for car loans than whites.
But the
administration's "discriminatory effects" analysis excludes key
credit factors explaining racial gaps.
It
also ignores stats showing Asian minorities tend to get better deals than
whites.
CFPB
is expected to adopt tactics used by the Justice Department against the auto
industry.
In
2010, a U.S. district judge scolded the department for filing a
"deficient" complaint against Los Angeles auto lenders and dealers
for pricing discrimination. He said prosecutors "did not consider other
factors" affecting loan rates in their disparate impact analysis, and
dismissed the case.
In
appealing the decision, Justice admitted using "an approximation" to
show non-Asian minorities "are almost 50% more likely than white
borrowers" to pay higher rates on car loans.
Moreover,
the department merely assumed the race of non-Asian minority borrowers, based
on photos and surnames vs. self-identifying data.
Such
use of "proxies" creates unreliable demographic data which further
cast doubt on disparate-impact comparisons.
"The
precise scope of the discrimination against non-Asians can be fleshed out
during discovery," Justice argued in its brief to California's liberal
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which has agreed to let the case go forward.
"Specific facts are not necessary."
Despite
the questionable methods, CFPB recently signed a memorandum of understanding
with Justice to "wage an aggressive, coordinated effort" against
lending bias.
Also
in their crosshairs: private lenders that underwrite student loans.
The
administration blames "unaffordable" financing for surging minority
default rates on college debt. CFPB recently warned that the use of cohort
default rates by lenders to "determine loan eligibility, underwriting and
pricing may have a disparate impact on minority students."
With
regulators casting a wider net, despite scant evidence of overt racism in
lending, suspicions are growing that the administration is using racism charges
as a pretext to force private lenders to subsidize favored political groups.
"It's
about reallocating capital for ideological and political ends," said
former chief Fannie Mae credit officer Edward Pinto, now a senior American
Enterprise Institute fellow.
By
criminalizing traditional methods of underwriting and pricing for risk, he says
the Justice Department already has redirected billions of dollars in capital
from the creditworthy to the credit poor. CFPB plans to rechannel even more.
"All
Americans saw drops in their household wealth, but African-Americans and
Hispanics experienced the steepest drops," Cordray said. "This
inequity is compounded by unequal access to responsible credit, which makes it
difficult or even impossible to achieve their financial goals."
"It
seems clear that the administration is trying to turn economic inequality into
a civil rights issue," said former Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission
member Peter Wallison, author of "Bad History, Worse Policy."
But
it could end up doing its political base more harm than good.
"Minorities
will be hurt the most by policies that blindly promote underwriting standards
that consistently finance failure," Pinto said.
Also,
the losses from defaults and other risks — in addition to the billions in new
"fair lending" compliance and legal costs — will be passed on to all
bank customers, including the most financially responsible.
Wallison
thinks a lot of banks will get out of the mortgage business, and possibly auto
lending, "when they realize the spot they're in."
That
reduced competition will only drive up the cost of financing for consumers.
Source:
Investor's Business Daily: 3/6/13, by
Paul Sperry
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials-perspective/030613-647029-cfpb-to-sue-racist-auto-student-lenders.htm#ixzz2MoGGtd5G
Comments:
The business
principles required to maintain free enterprise in a free society do not
include racial discrimination laws. The
latest reaction to this kind of scheme was to bundle up bad loans, slice them
up and sell them as mortgage backed securities.
This caused the 2008 Meltdown. After
that Meltdown, all lenders were encouraged to restore prudent lending practices.
So, why are we targeting auto loans for destruction ? Could automobiles be the real target ?
This
forces private businesses to abandon entire markets. These markets are then gobbled up by our
socialist federal government hastening our sovereign demise.
Most
of the $1 trillion in outstanding student loans held by Sallie Mae are
uncollectible. That turns into inflation and YOU pay the cost for government’s
generosity.
How
do you think this will end ? When will
automobile prices double like they did in 1978 ? Countries who have allowed government to squeeze
out private enterprise end up with no economy.
Countries who have converted to Communism have killed large portions of their
populations and ended up broke.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
Great article! Me and insurance USA fins it really helpful and informative. Keep sharing
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI had pretty bad credit for a while. I recently purchased a brand new car because my last one was totaled by my insurance company when someone hit it while parked on the street in the city i live in. the insurance money combined with the cash from cash from structured settlement, I was able to get away with a very low monthly payment.
ReplyDelete