Top Ten Things Parents Hate About
the Common Core
“It’s the first school year most parents have heard
about Common Core. And they don’t like it one bit.”
This is the year new national Common Core tests kick in,
replacing state tests in most locales, courtesy of an eager Obama administration
and the future generation’s tax dollars. It’s also the first year a majority
of people interviewed tell pollsters they’ve actually heard of Common
Core, four years after bureaucrats signed our kids onto this complete overhaul
of U.S. education.
Common Core has impressed everyone from Bill Gates to U.S.
Education Secretary Arne Duncan. So why do 62 percent of parents
think it’s a bad idea? For one, they can count. But their kids can’t.
1. The Senseless, Infuriating Math
Common Core math,
how do we hate thee? We would count the ways, if Common Core hadn’t deformed
even the most elementary of our math abilities so that simple addition
now takes dots, dashes, boxes, hashmarks, and foam cubes, plus an inordinate
amount of time, to not get the right answer.
There are so
many examples of this, it’s hard to pick, but a recent one boomeranging the
Internet has a teacher showing how to solve 9 + 6 the Common Core way. Yes,
it takes nearly a minute.
Despite claims to the contrary, Common Core
does require bad math like this. The Brookings Institution’s Tom Loveless says
the curriculum mandates contain “dog whistles” for fuzzy math proponents,
the people who keep pushing ineffective, devastating, and
research-decimated math instruction on U.S. kids for ideological reasons.
The mandates also explicitly require kids to learn the least efficient ways
of solving basic problems one, two, and even three grade levels before they
are to learn the traditional, efficient ways. There are
ways for teachers to fill in the gaps and fix this, but this means a
kid’s ability to get good math instruction depends on the luck of having an
extra-savvy teacher. That’s especially a downer for poor and minority kids,
who already
get the greenest and lowest-quality teachers
2. The Lies
The American Enterprise
Institute’s Rick Hess recently
wrote about Common Core’s “half-truths,” which Greg Forster pointedly
demonstrated he should have called “lies.” These include talking points essential
to selling governors and other state leaders on the project, such as that
Common Core is: “internationally benchmarked” (“well, we sorta looked at
what other nations do but that didn’t necessarily change anything we did”);
“evidence based” (“we
know there is not enough research to undergird any standards, so we just
polled some people and that’s our evidence“); “college– and career-ready” (“only
if you mean community-college ready“); “rigorous” (as long as rigorous indicates
“rigid”); and “high-performing nations nationalize education” (so do
low-performing nations).
3. Obliterating Parent Rights
Common Core has
revealed the contempt public “servants” have for the people they are supposedly
ruled by—that’d be you and me. Indiana firebrand Heather Crossin, a mom whose
encounter with Common Core math turned her into a nationally known activist,
went with other parents to their private-school principal in an attempt to
get their school’s new Common Core textbooks replaced. “Our principal in
frustration threw up his hands and said, ‘Look, I know parents don’t like
this type of math because none of us were taught this way, but we have to teach
it this way because this is how it’s going to be on the new [standardized]
assessment,” she says. “And that was the
moment when I realized control of what was being taught in my child’s classroom
— in a parochial Catholic school — had not only left the building,
it had left the state of Indiana.”
A Maryland dad who
stood up to complain that Common Core dumbed down his kids’ instruction was
arrested and thrown out of a public meeting. See the video.
Parents regularly fill my inbox, frustrated
that even when they do go to their local school boards, often all they get are
disgusted looks and a bored thumb-twiddling during their two-minute public
comment allowance. A New Hampshire dad was also arrested for going over his
two-minute comment limit in a local school board meeting parents packed to
complain about graphic-sex-filled literature assignments. The way the
board treats him and his fellow parents is repulsive.
The bottom line is,
parents have no choice about whether their kids will learn Common Core, no
matter what school they put them in, if they want them to go to college,
because the SAT and ACT
are being redesigned to fit the new national program for education. Elected
school boards pay parents no heed, and neither do state departments of education,
because the feds deliberately use our tax dollars to put themselves in the
education driver’s seat, at our expense. So much for “by the people, for the
people, of the people.”
4. Dirty Reading Assignments
A red-haired mother
of four kids read to our Indiana legislature selections from a Common
Core-recommended book called “The Bluest Eyes,” by Toni Morrison. I’m a
grown, married woman who enjoys sex just fine, thank you, but I sincerely
wish I hadn’t heard her read those passages. I guess some people don’t find
sympathetically portrayed rape scenes offensive, but I do. So I won’t
quote them at you. If you have a perv-wish, Google will fill you in. Other
objectionable books on the Common Core-recommended list include “Make Lemonade” by Virginia Euwer
Wolff, “Black
Swan Green” by David Mitchell, and “Dreaming
in Cuban” by Cristina Garcia.
There are so many
excellent, classic works of literature available for children and young
adults that schools can’t possibly fit all the good ones into their curriculum.
So why did Common Core’s creators feel the need to recommend trash? Either
they want kids to read trash or they don’t think these are trash, and both are
disturbing.
5. Turning Kids Into Corporate Cogs
The workforce-prep
mentality of Common Core is written into its DNA.
Start with its slogan, which is now written into federal mandates on state
education systems: “College and career readiness.” That is the entire Common
Core conception of education’s purpose: Careers. Job training. Workforce
skills. There’s not a word about the reasons our state constitutions give
for establishing public education, in which economic advancement is
largely considered a person’s personal affair. (Milton
Friedman takes the same tack, by the way.) State constitutions typically
mimic the
Northwest Ordinance’s vision for public education (the ordinance was the
first U.S. law to discuss education): “Religion, morality, and knowledge,
being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools
and the means of education shall forever be encouraged.”
Common Core makes no
promises about fulfilling public education’s purpose of producing citizens
capable of self-government. Instead, it focuses entirely on the materialistic
benefits of education, although human civilization has instead long considered
education a part of acculturating children and passing down a people’s
knowledge, heritage, and morals. The workforce talk certainly tickles the
ears of Common Core’s corporate supporters. Maybe that was the intent all
along. But in what world do corporations get to dictate what kids learn,
instead of the parents and kids themselves? Ours, apparently.
6. The Data Collection and Populace Management
Speaking of corporate
cronyism, let’s talk about how Common Core enables the continued theft of
kids’ and teachers’ information at the behest of governments and businesses,
furthering their bottom lines and populace-control fantasies at the expense
of private property and self-determination. Well, I coauthored a
400-footnote paper on this very topic. I’ll just summarize the list of direct
connections between intrusive data-mining and Common Core from my favorite
passage (in the section starting on page 52):
1.
The
documents that ‘created the (dubious) authorization for Common Core
define the initative as curriculum mandates plus tests. The tests are the
key instrument of data collection.
2.
Common
Core architect David Coleman has confirmed that special-interests deliberately
packaged data mining into Common Core.
3.
Common
Core creates an enormous system of data classification for education.
It’s probably easiest to think of it as an enormous filing system, like
the equivalent of the Dewey Decimal System for lessons, textbooks, apps,
and everything else kids learn. That’s by design.
4.
States
using the national, federally funded Common Core tests have essentially
turned over control of what data they collect on children to private organizations
that are overseen by no elected officials. Those organizations have
promised complete access to kids’ data to the federal government.
5.
Common
Core and data vacuuming are philosophically aligned—they both justify
themselves as technocratic, progressive solutions to human problems. The
ultimate goal is using data to “seamlessly integrate” education and the
economy. In other words, we learned nothing from the USSR.
7. Distancing Parents and Children
A recent study found
that the
Common Core model of education results in parents who are less engaged in
their kids’ education and express more negative attitudes about schools
and government. Does it need to be noted that kids desperately need their
pre-existing, natural bond with their parents to get a good start in life,
and anything that attacks this is bad for both the kids and society?
In addition, math
even highly educated engineers and math professors can’t understand obviously
has the effect of placing a teacher and school between a child and his parent.
Parents are rife with stories about how they tried to teach their kids “normal”
math, but it put pressure on the tots because teacher demanded one thing and
mom demanded another, which ended up in frustration, confusion, and resentment.
That won’t make a kid hate school, right?
8. Making Little Kids Cry
It’s one thing to
teach a child to endure life’s inevitable suffering for a higher purpose.
It’s another thing to inflict children with needless suffering because
you’ve got a society to remake, and “it takes a few broken eggs to make an
omelet.” One is perhaps the essence of character. The other is perhaps the
essence of cruelty.
There have been
reports nationwide from both teachers and a litany of child psychologists
that Common Core inflicts poorly designed instruction on children, thus
stressing them out and turning them off academics.The video below, courtesy
of Truth in American Education and a Louisiana mother, shows a second
grader crying over her math homework. A SECOND
GRADER. You know, when the little people are still
learning addition?
Below, find a picture from a New York mother
and photographer Kelly Poynter. This is her second-grade daughter, utterly
frustrated at her math homework. The little girl is a cancer survivor, Poynter
explains, so she doesn’t lack persistence or a fighting spirit.
Incomprehensible math problems downed a child that cancer couldn’t.
9. The Arrogance
So imagine you’re a
mom or dad whose small child is sobbing at the table trying to add two-digit
numbers. Then you hear your elected representatives talking about Common
Core. And it’s not to offer relief. It’s to ridicule your pain—no, worse. It’s
to ridicule your child’s pain.
Florida Senate President Don Gaetz said of Common
Core:
“You can’t dip [Common Core mandates] in milk and hold them over a candle
and see the United Nations flag or Barack Obama’s face. They’re not some federal
conspiracy.” Ohio House Education Chairman Gerald Stebelton
(R-Lancaster) called
Common Core opposition a “conspiracy theory.” Wisconsin state Sen.
John Lehman (D-Racine) told a packed audience state hearings
on the topic were “crazy” and “a show.” Delaware Gov. Jack Markell (D)
has called opponents a
“distract[ing]” “fringe movement.” Missouri Rep. Mike Lair put
$8 into the state budget for tinfoil hats for Common Core supporters.
Since when is it okay
for lawmakers to ridicule their employers? Aren’t they supposed to be “public
servants”? What part of “this math is from hell” sounds like “I think Barack
Obama wrote this math curriculum”? Those lawmakers must have encountered
an early form of Common Core in school, because they can’t comprehend their
way out of a paper bag.
It gets even worse. I
thought racial slurs were wrong, but Education Secretary Arne Duncan has
no problems slinging those around in his disdain for people who disagree
with him on Common Core. You may recall that he
dismissed them as
“white suburban moms who—all of a sudden—their child isn’t as brilliant as
they thought they were.” So only white moms
hate crappy curriculum?
And then parents
have to endure a litany of pompous, sickeningly well-paid experts all over
the airwaves telling us it’s a) good
for them that our babies are crying at the kitchen table or b) not
really Common Core’s fault or 3) they
don’t really get what’s going on because this newfangled way of adding 8 + 6
is so far above the average parent’s ability to understand.
10. The Collectivism
It’s easy to see Common
Core appeals to those anal-retentive types who cannot function unless U.S.
education has some sort of all-encompassing organizing principle.
But there’s more. Common
Core supporters will admit that several states had better curriculum
requirements than Common Core. Then they typically say it’s still better
for those states to have lowered their expectations to Common Core’s level,
because that way we have more curricular unity. That’s what the Fordham
Institute’s Mike Petrilli told Indiana legislators when he came to our
state to explain why, even though Fordham graded Indiana’s former curriculum
requirements higher than Common Core, Indiana should remain a step below its
previous level. One main reason was that we’d be able to use all the curriculum
and lesson plans other teachers in other states were tailoring (to lower
academic expectations, natch). Yay, we get to be worse than we were, but
it’s okay, because now we’re the same as everyone else!
Tech
companies are uber excited about Common Core because it
facilitates a nationwide market for their products. Basically every other
education vendor feels the same way, except those who already had nationwide
markets because they accessed pockets of the population not subject to
mind-numbing state regulations such as home and private schools. But the
diversity of the unregulated private market far, far outstrips that of
the Common Core market. There are, you know, actual niches, and education
styles, and varying philosophies, rather than a flood of companies all trying
to package the same product differently. The variety is one of substance,
not just branding. In other words, it’s true diversity, not fake diversity.
What would you rather
have: Fake freedom, where others choose your end goal and end product, but
lets you decide some things about how to achieve someone else’s vision for education,
which by the way has to be the same for everyone everywhere; or genuine freedom,
where you both pick your goals and how to achieve them, and you’re the one
responsible for the results? Whoops, that’s a trick question, moms and dads.
In education, no one can pick the latter, because our overlords have
already picked for us. Common Core or the door, baby.
Related Posts
Source:
http://agenda21news.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment