Regional or widespread war, terrorism, cyber attacks,
etc., are all useful vehicles to conjure mass confusion, and can also be used
as scapegoats for the eventual downfall of our economy. That said, a viral
pandemic truly surpasses them all in effectiveness. All other tragedies could
easily be tied to the first “domino” or “linchpin” (as Rand Corporation calls
it) of Ebola transmission, but the strategy goes deeper than this.
This is an incredibly useful strategy when
used on the ignorant. And as I pointed out last week in my column, “U.S.
government fails to stop yet another invasion,” it’s a sad fact that most
of the people you meet in this life are fundamentally and
functionally ignorant. So I believe the spread of Ebola may be desired by
certain power brokers. Here’s why.
It’s the perfect cover event
I
have been warning for quite some time that the banking establishment in
particular is well aware that an economic collapse of incredible proportions is
coming. In fact, they have done everything in their power to make one possible.
This collapse, according to my research, is designed to clear the way through
monetary carpet bombing for a new international Bretton Woods-style agreement
which will plant the foundation of a truly global economic system centralized and
controlled by a highly select few elites. Needless to say, the
internationalists would prefer not to take the blame for such a calamity.
An act of nature
Even
though most people are well aware of the fact that governments have been
engineering biological weapons for decades, few people think political
leadership would ever use them at all, let alone use them on the people they
are tasked to protect. Even with the complacency and inaction of our government
in terms of the response to Ebola, the general assumption by most of the
American population will be that any viral outbreak is a product of nature, not
of men.
Acts
of nature are not things that the common man can easily rebel against. People
rebel against governments and corrupt despots all the time, but not the plague.
If a viral pandemic strikes, nearly everything a government does after the
fact, no matter how corrupt or destructive, can be rationalized as necessary
for the greater good of the greater number. If anyone does rebel, they will be
labeled as pure evil, for they are now disrupting the government’s ability to
stop the pandemic from spreading, and thus, are partly responsible for the mass
deaths that follow.
During
a viral outbreak, government becomes mother, father, nurse and protector. No matter
how abusive they are, most people will still look to them for safety and
guidance, primarily because they have no understanding of disease. What they do
not understand, they will fear, and fear always drives the ignorant into the
arms of tyrants.
Rationalized economic collapse
Who
would question the event of an economic collapse in the wake of an Ebola-soaked
nightmare? Who would want to buy or sell? Who would want to come in contact
with strangers to generate a transaction? Who would even leave their house?
Ebola treatment in First World nations has advantages of finance and a cleaner
overall health environment, but what if economic downturn happens
simultaneously? America could experience Third World status very quickly, and
with it, all the unsanitary conditions that result in an exponential Ebola
death rate.
The
Treasury and Labor departments and private Federal Reserve have gone to vast
lengths to skew statistics and rig markets with trillions in fiat dollars.
Despite historic numbers of Americans falling off unemployment rolls and the
U.S. teetering on the edge of global “de-dollarization,” a large portion of the
citizenry has been led to believe that economic recovery is assured. What they
do not understand is that fiscal implosion is unavoidable, and the whole bull
market is a circus designed to distract.
Amidst
even a moderate or controlled viral scenario, stocks and bonds will undoubtedly
crash, a crash that was going to happen anyway. The international banks that
created the mess get off blameless, while Ebola, an act of nature, becomes the
ultimate scapegoat for every disaster that follows.
Rationalized travel restrictions
If
you want to lock down the movement of a population to prevent the spread of
dissenting groups or ideas, I can’t think of a better way than to claim it is
to prevent the spread of a deadly virus. Our government and world health
officials are approaching Ebola with an attitude of nonchalance right now,
because prevention is
not
part of the plan. When Ebola strikes hard within our country, that is when the government will finally
decide that strict measures are needed. Suddenly, those borders that could
never be secured will become impassable for you and me. And traveling between
states or perhaps even counties may be extraordinarily difficult. “Papers
please…” will become the new mantra of petty authority.
Forced health measures
Do
not be surprised if an Ebola vaccine of some kind suddenly appears on the
market just as the situation begins to turn tragic. And, do not be surprised if
said vaccine is a total sham that ends up making more people sick. Expect that
forced vaccinations will take place, especially as a prerequisite for receiving
treatment from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or Federal Emergency
Management Agency hazmat facilities. Expect that these facilities will become
nothing more than obscure prisons for the sick where people quietly die. Expect
that every American will be required to be tested and screened, with biometric
data carefully stored. The options are endless for abuse in terms of
totalitarian health laws when the public thinks they could end up bleeding from
every orifice and dying of liver failure.
Rationalized martial law
Imagine
if some Americans decide they don’t like being poked, prodded, tagged and
bagged by the establishment. Imagine they decide to fight back, Ebola be
damned. An already uphill battle becomes an epic struggle when a large
percentage of the population thinks you are a monster that wants to hasten the
spread of Ebola. Not that the ignorant count for much in the grand scheme of
history, but waking at least some of them up in the future to the bigger threat
(the globalists) is hard to do when all they can see is devilish microbes.
Those who plan to combat the rise of the internationalists, as I plan to,
should accept now the likelihood that the only people we will have on our side
tomorrow are the people we have been able to wake up today. Martial law will be
welcomed by the rest.
International response
An
international response is almost guaranteed during a major pandemic.
Sovereignty will be tossed in the dirt. United Nations and World Health
Organization teams, and perhaps even troops, could accompany an aid package to
the U.S. Think of the glorious propaganda, as globalists tell stories of how
they “saved humanity” by surpassing the barbaric practices of national and
individual sovereignty, defeated the Ebola virus (after millions of deaths, of
course), and out of the ashes, the “phoenix” of global governance was born. If they
succeed, imagine what the history books will say for the next several
centuries.
What do we do?
There
are no silver bullet solutions. There never have been and there never will be.
People looking for them will be sorely disappointed and ill prepared after
wasting so much time searching for an easy out. The only answer is for
communities of people to take their own survival into their own hands and
become as self-sufficient as possible. This means that neighborhoods, towns and
counties will have to take precautions now to steel themselves for a pandemic
event, instead of simply sitting on their hands and expecting government
officials to save them.
The
treatments for Ebola in most cases involve nothing more than the steady
replacement of vital fluids, electrolytes and plasma until the patient’s body
can build up an immunity to the virus. Those with stronger immune systems
before contraction are more likely to survive and beat back the disease.
Government care, for the most part, is not going to save many people either way.
That is to say, your survival will depend on you and your immune system, not
them. Communities that make efforts to prevent contact and that strengthen
individual immunity will have a better chance of survival than going into any
government run hazmat facility. Government is not needed, and will often end up
being more of a threat than the virus itself. Groups I work closely with and
talk with, many with their own doctors and nurses, are already setting
prevention guidelines in motion.
If
you can prove you don’t need the system to save you, their rationale for
attempting to control you is weakened. The ignorant will still try to demonize
us for our efforts, but self-sufficiency is all we have in the face of this
kind of storm. If we can lead by example with our own successful health
standards while saving people where the establishment could not, perhaps we can
turn the tide.
-Brandon Smith
Source:
http://personalliberty.com/ebola-outbreak-advantageous-globalists/
No comments:
Post a Comment