Wednesday, October 15, 2014

Unconstitutional Federal Regionalism


By Committee to Restore the Constitution ®

The Silent Revolution of Federal Regionalism - A Solution Part 9 Regionalism: the Quiet Revolution

 

"New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned, as well as the Congress".

 

UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION Art. IV, section 3, paragraph 1

 

Transformation of the United States Republic to a dictatorship of the "financial elite", the New World Order fashioned for Americans by the Council on Foreign Relations, reached political reality in 1972 under the administration of President Richard M. Nixon.

 

Although given little publicity, the White House, on March 27, 1969, pronounced that the United States had been divided into ten Metro regions.1 In doing so, President Nixon and his controllers set in motion a series of pre-planned events which would, by February 12, 1972, place virtually every facet of the lives of U.S. citizens under the domination of socialist planners.

 

Flouting the prohibitions of Article IV, United States Constitution, Mr. Nixon, in his statement of 1969, "Restructuring of Government Service Systems", purported to "streamline" the Department of Labor, the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Office of Economic Opportunity, and the Small Business Administration by establishing "uniform boundaries and regional office locations".

 

Significantly, regional boundaries and the boundaries of major United Nations programs, and Federal Reserve System areas, in the United States were made co-terminus.

 

Few realized then, or comprehend now, that regional governance is a new form of government which has been covertly engineered to replace the city, county, state, and school district system. Boundary lines of these familiar political subdivisions are to be dropped and a new set of geo-political lines followed.2

 

Under regional government there are now ten U.S. provinces, or regions. Each province has a designated "capitol" to handle all matters within that particular province. Offices of HUD, OEO, SBA, and Labor were moved into the new capitols of each province, with more agencies added later. The objective is to establish the mechanics for controlling the lives and ambitions of the people from a central authority in Washington, and to direct their efforts into channels ordered by a Bureaucratic Civil Service.

 

An examination of the type of government proposed under regional government shows that it is a government by appointed rather than elected officials. Under regional government dis-franchised U.S. Citizens are to be held in bondage, in perpetuity, as producers and servers for a self-appointed Oligarchy.

 

The ten new political subdivisions to which the fifty States have been allocated by this unconstitutional decree are:

 

REGION 1 - Capitol: Boston

Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont.

 

REGION II - Capitol: New York City

New York, New Jersey, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands

 

REGION III - Capitol: Philadelphia

Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, District of Columbia

 

REGION IV - Capitol: Atlanta

Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee

 

REGION V - Capitol: Chicago

Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin

 

REGION VI - Capitol: Dallas - Fort Worth

Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas

 

REGION VII - Capitol: Kansas City

Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska

 

REGION VIII - Capitol: Denver

Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming

 

REGION IX - Capitol: San Francisco

Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada

 

REGION X - Capitol: Seattle

Alaska, Oregon, Washington, Idaho

 

One of the federal money bills designed to finance Metro governance in the nation was H.R. 2519, introduced by Congressman Reuss, January, 1969. This bill was to provide bloc grants if regional "modernization" conditions were met by the States.

 

To qualify for the promised grants the States were required to enact legislation enabling, or mandating in some instances, the collectivizing of counties into subregions which would fit neatly into the federal ten-region governance formed by Presidential proclamation.

 

Following the White House pronouncement of March 27, 1969, the same measure was renumbered H.R. 11764 and reintroduced on May 28 by the same congressman. Sections were added to give control over twenty-two and a half billion tax dollars for Metro funding to one man, President Nixon.

 

On February 12, 1972, Mr. Nixon dropped the other shoe.

 

By Executive Order 11647, Federal Regional Councils (Federal Register No. 30) the President authorized staffing of the ten regional capitols and effected appointment of a chairman, or commissar for each province.3

 

"Three years ago", said Mr. Nixon in his order, "I directed the senior regional officials of certain of the grant-making agencies to convene themselves in regional councils to better coordinate their services to Governors, Mayors and the Public.

 

"Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority vested in me as President of the United States it is hereby ordered as follows:

 

SECTION 1, Federal Regional Councils (a) There is hereby established a Federal Regional Council for each of the ten standard Federal regions. Each Council shall be composed of the directors of the regional offices of the Department of Labor, Health, Education, and Welfare, and Housing and Urban Development, the Secretarial Representative of the Department of Transportation, and the directors of the regional offices of the Office of Economic Opportunity, and the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration. The President shall designate one member of each such Council as Chairman of that Council and such Chairman shall serve at the pleasure of the President. Representatives of the Office of Management and Budget may participate in any deliberations of each Council".

 

It is intended, of course, that regional council members will assume all real authority over State governments and the people they represent. The people and the States will be reduced to political impotency.

 

The image of a police state becomes chillingly real under the provisions of Executive Order 11490, "Assigning Emergency Preparedness Functions to Federal Departments" (Federal Register, October 30, 1969). By this order regional council members, under color of law, can control all food supply, money and credit, transportation, communications, public utilities and other facets of the lives of every citizen.4, 5, 6, 7

 

Seizure of private property [homes, businesses, and farms] via the ploy of reassessment under United Nations tax guidelines is a concurrent objective of the madmen who now direct national policy.

 

Robert C. Weaver, former Chief, Department of Housing and Urban Development, said of Metro governance:

 

"Regional government means absolute Federal control over all property and its development regardless of location, anywhere in the United States, to be administered n the Federal official's determination. It [regional government] would supersede state and local laws. Through this authority we seek to recapture control of the use of land, most of which the government has already given to the people".

 

World government planners hope to achieve federalization of all land, resources, and production facilities under regional government authority without serious public challenge. Self-rule and self-determination are to be phased out of the society, the Constitution overthrown, and the citizen made an economic serf in the country that once was his.

 

President Nixon, in his plea for cooperation in "revenue sharing" (another technique for financing Metro governance) admitted that we are experiencing a "New American Revolution". Proof that the "New American Revolution" is an actual revolution is born out by evidence from "Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Urban Affairs of the Joint Economic Committee", United States Congress, May 19-26, 1971:

 

"Local Government is changing itself in an effort to better meet the needs of the people. Across the nation, cities, counties, towns, and school districts that serve a common area are joining together in a regional effort to solve mutual problems. In a quiet way, regionalism is a revolution in the structure of our Federal system."

 

The impact of Metro governance on the freedoms of person and property formerly guaranteed to the people by the Constitution is obvious.

 

Interlocking subversion in government departments can, however, be successfully challenged by an informed electorate motivated to act within the authority of the U.S. Constitution.

 

The law involved is the fundamental law of agency: Actions of an agent are not binding on the principal if those actions are not authorized by the principal. Constitutionally, States are Principals and federal departments are Agents of the State.

 

To escape the "New World Order" being prepared for us by the Council on Foreign Relations and the aristocracy of finance. Americans must demand that their State lawmakers investigate the illegal actions of federal agents who attempt to abridge the U.S. Constitution in violation of their oath of office.

 

EXHIBITS DELETED FOR LACK OF SPACE.

 

1. Exhibit A: STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT ON RESTRUCTURING OF GOVERNMENT SERVICE SYSTEMS, The White House, March 27, 1969. (deleted)

 

2. Exhibit B: PRESS CONFERENCE OF DANIEL P. MOYNIHAN, ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT FOR URBAN AFFAIRS; PHILIP S. HUGHES, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF THE BUDGET; AND RON ZIEGLER, PRESS SECRETARY TO THE PRESIDENT, Office of the White House Press Secretary, March 27, 1969. (deleted)

 

3. Exhibit C: EXECUTIVE ORDER 11647, "Federal Regional Councils", The President, Federal Register No. 30, February 12, 1972. (deleted)

 

4. Exhibit D: STATE OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY AND EXECUTIVE ORDERS, Hon. John R. Rarick, The Congressional Record, September 27, 1972 (deleted)

 

5. Exhibit E. EXECUTIVE ORDER 11615, "Providing for the stabilization of prices, rents, wages, and salaries", (From the Federal Register, Vol. 36, No. 159, August 17, 1971) Hon. John R. Rarick, The Congressional Record, September 27, 1971. (deleted)

 

6. Exhibit F. EXECUTIVE ORDER 11490, "Assigning Emergency Preparedness Functions To Federal Departments and Agencies", (From the Federal Register, vol. 34, No. 209, October 30, 1969) Hon. John R. Rarick, The Congressional Record, September 27, 1971. (deleted)

 

7. Exhibit G: STATE OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY LEGALIZES THE EXECUTIVE ORDERS, by Archibald E. Roberts, LtCol, AUS, ret (from the Borger (Tex) News Herald, Sept. 19, 1971) Entered in The Congressional Record, September 27, 1971, by the Hon. John R. Rarick. (deleted)

 

8. Exhibit H: THE "NEW LOOK" OF THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, Don Bell Reports May 5, 1972. (deleted)

 Source:<https://web.archive.org/web/20050814084047/http:/www.webaccess.net/~comminc/index.html> CRC Logo

Go back to the homepage for The Committee to Restore the Constitution.

 

<mailto:comminc@webaccess.net> mailbox Send a message

To Col. Roberts.

 

bin/counter.exe?link=www.webaccess.net/comminc&style=led&width=7" align=bottom>

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment