Population Reduction Ahead

Pinheads suggest per­haps, some sort of mass casualty/ pandemic/ world war would be helpful.

Population reduction white paper argues that the killing of 2 billion people still isn’t enough.  Posted on November 17, 2014 Written by naturalnews.com

In the mod­ern era, uber-left wing aca­d­e­mics who view envi­ron­men­tal­ism as a reli­gion and take on blind faith that the world is being destroyed by the infes­ta­tion of human beings have long con­sid­ered and dis­cussed how best to achieve “pop­u­la­tion con­trol” and even pop­u­la­tion reduction.

Most have been care­ful not to actu­ally state what it is they would really like to see: the mass mur­der of bil­lions of peo­ple, so they could “save” the planet through avoid­ance of destruc­tion by humans. But even a rea­son­ably astute observer can see through the veneer of their “con­cern” and fig­ure out what they really want.

One recent aca­d­e­mic paper serves as a per­fect exam­ple of this hid­ing our zest for depop­u­la­tion by any means men­tal­ity. Corey J. A. Brad­shaw and Barry W. Brook, both of the Envi­ron­ment Insti­tute and School of Earth and Envi­ron­men­tal Sci­ences at the Uni­ver­sity of Ade­laide in Ade­laide, Aus­tralia, note that even a loss of 2 bil­lion peo­ple over the course of five years still would not be enough of a depop­u­la­tion effort to do the earth much good.

‘Cat­a­strophic human event’ needed?

The paper, titled, “Human pop­u­la­tion reduc­tion is not a quick fix for envi­ron­men­tal prob­lems,” states the issue thusly, in a sum­mary; note that the authors have already essen­tially con­cluded what the prob­lem is and who is respon­si­ble (my emphasis):

The planet’s large, grow­ing, and over­con­sum­ing human pop­u­la­tion, espe­cially the increas­ing afflu­ent com­po­nent, is rapidly erod­ing many of the Earth’s nat­ural ecosys­tems. How­ever, society’s only real pol­icy lever to reduce the human pop­u­la­tion humanely is to encour­age lower per capita fer­til­ity. How long might fer­til­ity reduc­tion take to make a mean­ing­ful impact? We exam­ined var­i­ous sce­nar­ios for global human pop­u­la­tion change to the year 2100 by adjust­ing fer­til­ity and mor­tal­ity rates (both chronic and short-term inter­ven­tions) to deter­mine the plau­si­ble range of out­comes. Even one-child poli­cies imposed world­wide and cat­a­strophic mor­tal­ity events would still likely result in 5–10 bil­lion peo­ple by 2100. Because of this demo­graphic momen­tum, there are no easy ways to change the broad trends of human pop­u­la­tion size this cen­tury.

Except, per­haps, some sort of mass casualty/ pandemic/ world war ? That is the pos­si­bil­ity the authors exam­ine in the body of their work. In the paper’s abstract, the authors talk of the “inex­orable demo­graphic momen­tum” of the grow­ing human pop­u­la­tion, which is, of course, “rapidly erod­ing Earth’s life-support sys­tem” (though there is no proof of this, notice how the authors state it as fact).

The authors also state that there “are con­se­quently more fre­quent calls to address envi­ron­men­tal prob­lems,” which must be dealt with using “fur­ther reduc­tions in human fer­til­ity.” And here is the crux of the authors’ study vari­ables (note my emphasis):

To exam­ine how quickly this could lead to a smaller human pop­u­la­tion, we used scenario-based matrix mod­el­ing to project the global pop­u­la­tion to the year 2100. Assum­ing a con­tin­u­a­tion of cur­rent trends in mor­tal­ity reduc­tion, even a rapid tran­si­tion to a world­wide one-child pol­icy leads to a pop­u­la­tion sim­i­lar to today’s by 2100. Even a cat­a­strophic mass mor­tal­ity event of 2 bil­lion deaths over a hypo­thet­i­cal 5-y win­dow in the mid-21^st cen­tury would still yield around 8.5 bil­lion peo­ple by 2100. In the absence of cat­a­stro­phe or large fer­til­ity reduc­tions (to fewer than two chil­dren per female world­wide), the great­est threats to ecosystems–as mea­sured by regional pro­jec­tions within the 35 global Bio­di­ver­sity Hotspots–indicate that Africa and South Asia will expe­ri­ence the great­est human pres­sures on future ecosystems.

They have to sound rea­son­able to be taken seriously So, buried in their paper is the hoped-for solu­tion: Some sort of “cat­a­strophic mass mor­tal­ity” that would dra­mat­i­cally reduce the Earth’s pop­u­la­tion because, you know, that’s what has to hap­pen if we are to save the planet.

To cover for this hoped-for con­clu­sion, how­ever, the authors real­ize that they must at least sound rea­son­able:

Humanity’s large demo­graphic momen­tum means that there are no easy pol­icy levers to change the size of the human pop­u­la­tion sub­stan­tially over com­ing decades, short of extreme and rapid reduc­tions in female fer­til­ity; it will take cen­turies, and the long-term tar­get remains unclear.

Brad­shaw and Brook also noted that “some reduc­tion” in human pop­u­la­tion could be reached “by mid­cen­tury,” in some man­ner, which would at least result in “hun­dreds of mil­lions fewer peo­ple to feed.”

Related Posts

• Sci­en­tists Warn Geo-Engineering Can Kill Bil­lions of People
• Agenda 21 For Dum­mies: New World Order Depop­u­la­tion Exposed
• Obama Has Begun to Sys­tem­at­i­cally Depop­u­late and Dein­dus­tri­al­ize the Suburbs
• Glob­al­ists Tak­ing Charge: Agenda 21’s Global Depop­u­la­tion Agenda
• The Tar­get Date for America’s Depop­u­la­tion Has Been Set
• It’s Not Fear­mon­ger­ing or a Con­spir­acy The­ory when Elit­ists Are on Record for 95% of the Pop­u­la­tion to be Eliminated
  Filed Under: Agenda 21, depopulation, New World Order, Sustainability, United Nations
   
  Source:http://agenda21news.com/2014/11/population-reduction-white-paper-argues-killing-2-billion-people-still-isnt-enough/
  Comments
  Current UN Agenda 21 implementation in the US includes the “Wilding Project”.  You will see the federal government seizing private property to add corridors for wild animals between federally administered land, restricting zoning and making sections “off limits to humans”.  Any questions ?
  Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader