Hillary's Dumb Idea: Americans Should Empathize With Our
Enemies, by DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN, (LIKE WHO? IRAN? ISIS? ASSAD? PUTIN? OSAMA BIN LADEN?)
In a speech to a half-empty auditorium at Georgetown
University that her spin doctors would undoubtedly describe as half-full,
former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton may have sealed her presidential
ambitions.
At the very least, she raised serious questions about her
fitness to be Commander-in-Chief. She's
dangerous. We need to keep her far, far
away from that Oval Office.
In a momentous statement, she called on Americans to
"understand" and "empathize" with the "perspective and
point of view" of our enemies, helping to "define the problems,
determine the solutions." She said
"Smart Power" left "no one on the sidelines" and used
"every possible tool and partner to advance peace and security." Clinton even called for "respect"
for our enemies. How crazy is this?
Clinton's "Smart Power" is nothing but a dumb idea.
She sounded like a new age philosopher about to belt out a
line from The Age of Aquarius at a 60's peace rally. You could almost hear the words: "Then
peace will guide the planets and love will steer the stars." But the fact
is she was apparently serious about her ridiculous proposal.
Perhaps we should ask her which of our enemies she would
have us "empathize with? ISIS, who
beheads reporters on the internet? Iran,
who tortures and kills thousands of political dissidents every year and foments
terrorism? Or North Korea that starves
its own people to death? How about Assad
who gases them? Putin who boldly annexes
his neighbors by force, ignoring international law?
Are we supposed to actually ponder -- alongside Hamas and
Hezbollah -- about how evil Jews are and then seek to "define the
problems, determine the solutions?"
Should we respect terrorists because they are unhappy with the world?
How about Hitler?
Should we have sought to enlist him as a "partner to advance peace
and security?" Neville Chamberlain
thought so.
And how can we possibly "understand...the perspective
and point of view" of an enemy like Osama bin Laden? Should we channel him (as Hillary once did
Eleanor Roosevelt) and engage in a dialogue about our faults, our unforgivable
imperialism? Should we try to imagine
and feel the depth of his hatred for Americans? And then what? Should we announce our forgiveness once we
understand his twisted thinking? And
should we show compassion to Al Qaeda and invite them in from the sidelines
once we show them our respect?
What about the terrorists who killed Ambassador Chris
Stevens in Benghazi? Do they too deserve
our full empathy and understanding?
Think about it. They despised
Americans. Can we take a deep breath, as
Hillary loves to say, and feel their pain, their alienation, their hatred of
us?
Will Hillary channel Syrian President Assad's inner feelings
about the need to gas and exterminate his own people? Should we attempt to stand in his shoes and
appreciate the depth and sincerity of his beliefs? And what is the end result
of this asinine exercise? That we all
hold hands and sing Kumbaya?
Let's take her inane idea a step further. Try, for a moment, to imagine an American
President calling for all Americans to respect and understand the perspective
of Al Qaeda after it attacked us and murdered 3000 innocent people in the Twin
Towers. It's inconceivable. But that's what she is talking about.
It's become obvious: Hillary should not be President. She cannot speak as she does and pretend to
be able to be the protector of this nation.
Her statement is particularly scary because she implicitly
rejects the idea of evil and the use of force.
How can you empathize with someone when you are sending troops to kill
them?
What's gotten into her?
This woman who maintains the largest, most comprehensive, expansive, and
growing list of personal and political enemies of any American political
figure? Who dug up blackmail material on
her husband's mistresses to cow them into silence? Now she wants us to be forgiving, respectful,
and compassionate to our enemies. Has
she ever been?
She's gone over the top.
Think back to her incomprehensible 1993 call for the "politics of
meaning," which had no meaning whatsoever.
Part of what she was trying to do at Georgetown was appeal
to the liberal Foreign Service establishment.
But that's just a part of it. She
actually believes her own blabber.
She's gone European on us, embracing the "soft
power" pushed by a European continent that has never recovered its nerve
after two world wars. She seems to be advocating helplessness as a policy asset
-- a strategy for dealing with enemies best exemplified by cute gold retrievers
(like Dubs) who roll over to have their bellies rubbed when threatened by
danger.
Her ideas are not fit for an American president or even an
aspirant for our highest office. Her
ridiculous imputation of good faith and respect for the tortured anti-American
terrorist-enemies who behead infidels is naive to the point of idiocy.
You're in over your head, Hillary. Go home.
Channel Obama in the privacy of your own home.
Go to TheHillaryDaily.com for all of the latest news about
Hillary and the latest buzz on 2016 Candidates.
View my most recent videos in case you missed them!
Hillary Says We Should Empathize With Our Enemies - Dick
Morris TV: Lunch Alert!
Hillary's 1968 Problem - Dick Morris TV: History Video
The Republican Victory Saves Us From A Giveaway To Iran -
Dick Morris TV: Lunch Alert! http://list.dickmorris.com/t/661695/1875331/7156/18/
Source:Published on DickMorris.com on December 8, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment