[ED: Readers
should note that a paper presented at a scientific conference is a citable
reference for publication purposes. That applies to Dr Lucija
Tomljenovic’s paper discussed in this article.]
An
extraordinary new paper published by a courageous doctor and investigative
medical researcher has dug the dirt on 30 years of secret official transcripts
of meetings of UK government vaccine committees and the supposedly independent
medical “experts” sitting on them with their drug industry connections.
If you want to
get an idea of who is responsible for your child’s condition resulting from a
vaccine adverse reaction then this is the paper to read. What you have to ask
yourself is if the people on these committees are honest and honourable and
acting in the best interests of British children, how is it this has been going
on for at least 30 years?
This is what
everyone has always known but could never prove before now. Pass this
information on to others so they can see what goes on in Government health
committees behind locked doors.
We quote here
from the author’s summary and the paper:
Deliberately
concealing information from parents for the sole purpose of getting them to
comply with an “official” vaccination schedule could be considered as a form of
ethical violation or misconduct. Official documents obtained from the UK
Department of Health (DH) and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation
(JCVI) reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in such
practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of protecting
the national vaccination program.
The 45 page
paper with detailed evidence can be downloaded here: The vaccination policy and the Code of Practice of the
Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI): are they at odds? Lucija Tomljenovic, Neural Dynamics
Research Group, Dept. of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of
British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. It was presented at and forms part
of the proceedings of The 2011 BSEM Scientific Conference now published online
here: The Health Hazards of Disease
Prevention BSEM
Scientific Conference, March 2011. [ED: BSEM HAVE REORGANISED THEIR
WEBSITE AND THIS PAGE NO LONGER EXISTS THERE – Note Added 8 May 2014]
There are other papers also found at that link which you
will find an excellent read.
The author, Dr
Lucija Tomljenovic writes: Here I present the documentation which appears to
show that the JCVI made continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe
adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and
health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they
deemed were necessary for “herd immunity”, a concept which with regards to
vaccination, and contrary to prevalent beliefs, does not rest on solid
scientific evidence as will be explained. As a result of such vaccination
policy promoted by the JCVI and the DH, many children have been vaccinated
without their parents being disclosed the critical information about
demonstrated risks of serious adverse reactions, one that the JCVI appeared to
have been fully aware of. It would also appear that, by withholding this
information, the JCVI/DH neglected the right of individuals to make an informed
consent concerning vaccination. By doing so, the JCVI/DH may have violated not
only International Guidelines for Medical Ethics (i.e., Helsinki Declaration and the International Code of Medical
Ethics) [2] but also, their own Code of Practice.
[ED: THE UK
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPEARS TO HAVE CHANGED ALL THE LINKS TO THEIR DOCUMENTS
BY ARCHIVING THEM WITH THE UK NATIONAL ARCHIVE – IF READERS WOULD LIKE TO
ATTEMPT TO FIND THE CORRECT LINKS ON THE UK NATIONAL ARCHIVE AND POST THEM IN A
COMMENT HERE THAT WOULD BE WELCOME – Note Added 9 May 2014]
Dr Lucija
Tomljenovic continues:
The transcripts
of the JCVI meetings also show that some of the Committee members had extensive
ties to pharmaceutical companies and that the JCVI frequently co-operated with
vaccine manufacturers on strategies aimed at boosting vaccine uptake. Some of
the meetings at which such controversial items were discussed were not intended
to be publicly available, as the transcripts were only released later, through
the Freedom of Information Act (FOI). These particular meetings are denoted in
the transcripts as “commercial in confidence”, and reveal a clear and
disturbing lack of transparency, as some of the information was removed from
the text (i.e., the names of the participants) prior to transcript release
under the FOI section at the JCVI website (for example, JCVI CSM/DH (Committee
on the Safety of Medicines/Department of Health) Joint Committee on Adverse
Reactions Minutes 1986-1992).
In summary, the
transcripts of the JCVI/DH meetings from the period from 1983 to 2010 appear to
show that:
1) Instead of
reacting appropriately by re-examining existing vaccination policies when
safety concerns over specific vaccines were identified by their own
investigations, the JCVI either a) took no action, b) skewed or selectively
removed unfavourable safety data from public reports and c) made intensive
efforts to reassure both the public and the authorities in the safety of
respective vaccines;
2)
Significantly restricted contraindication to vaccination criteria in order to
increase vaccination rates despite outstanding and unresolved safety issues;
3) On multiple
occasions requested from vaccine manufacturers to make specific amendments to
their data sheets, when these were in conflict with JCVI’s official advices on
immunisations;
4) Persistently
relied on methodologically dubious studies, while dismissing independent
research, to promote vaccine policies;
5) Persistently
and categorically downplayed safety concerns while over-inflating vaccine
benefits;
6) Promoted and
elaborated a plan for introducing new vaccines of questionable efficacy and
safety into the routine pediatric schedule, on the assumption that the licenses
would eventually be granted;
7) Actively
discouraged research on vaccine safety issues;
8) Deliberately
took advantage of parents’ trust and lack of relevant knowledge on vaccinations
in order to promote a scientifically unsupported immunisation program which
could put certain children at risk of severe long-term neurological damage;
Read the paper
here for the full evidence to back up these conclusions in its 45 pages.
An excellent piece of investigative research:
And don’t
forget to read more from the proceedings of The 2011 BSEM Scientific Conference
now published online here:
BSEM Scientific
Conference, March 2011. [ED: BSEM HAVE REORGANISED THEIR WEBSITE AND THIS
PAGE NO LONGER EXISTS THERE – Note Added 8 May 2014]
Comments
I missed this
report about UK vaccinations in 2012, but we’ve had some misgivings about
vaccinations in the US in recent years and this report could have contributed
to the concern. The US is certainly capable of launching their own cover-up.
Norb Leahy,
Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment