Wednesday, March 18, 2015

Common Core Still Alive in SC

The Walking Core: Standards Won’t Die In SC, Posted on March 16, 2015 Written by dailycallernewsfoundation.org
Offi­cially, Com­mon Core is dead in South Car­olina, wiped out Wednes­day by a vote of the state board of education. How­ever, lead­ers of the state’s anti-Common Core move­ment are any­thing but happy, say­ing the state is being tricked by a bait-and-switch tac­tic that replaces the stan­dards with some­thing nearly identical.
Sheri Few, the head of South Car­olina Par­ents Involved in Edu­ca­tion and a top cam­paigner against Com­mon Core in the state, says that while the new South Car­olina Col­lege and Career-Ready stan­dards have a dif­fer­ent name, that’s about all that’s dif­fer­ent about them.
“The state board of edu­ca­tion has totally ignored the par­ents and tax­pay­ers of this state,” Few told The Daily Caller News Foundation. She pointed to an analy­sis done by the state’s Edu­ca­tion Over­sight Com­mit­tee that com­pared how sim­i­lar the new SC Col­lege and Career-Ready stan­dards are to Com­mon Core. Accord­ing to that analy­sis, 92 per­cent of South Carolina’s new math stan­dards are aligned with Com­mon Core, along with 89 per­cent of the Eng­lish standards.
The list of major changes is rel­a­tively short for both sub­jects. In Eng­lish, stu­dents are now expected to learn cur­sive, and an appen­dix list­ing sam­ple texts for each grade has been elim­i­nated (some com­plained cer­tain texts were inap­pro­pri­ate). In math, mul­ti­pli­ca­tion tables have been added and high school stan­dards are dif­fer­en­ti­ated by sub­ject rather than grade level. Other than that, changes are mostly in word­ing rather than content.
Accord­ing to Few, that means most of the glar­ing prob­lems she sees with Com­mon Core remain. The stan­dards are far too demand­ing of those in early grades, she said, while abruptly slow­ing down for those in high school.
John­nelle Raines, another Com­mon Core foe in the state who taught first grade for 29 years, said that sev­eral fac­tors likely influ­enced the state’s fail­ure to make a more dra­matic break. She said mem­bers of the redesign com­mit­tee kept the old stan­dards on hand to work with rather than start­ing from scratch, and argued that the teach­ers cho­sen for the com­mit­tee were partly selected based on how open they were to the exist­ing system.
“I don’t want to use the word rigged, but I don’t think it was done as fair as it could be,” Raines told TheD­CNF. She also said that teach­ers may sim­ply have desired to make switch­ing to new stan­dards rel­a­tively pain­less rather than hav­ing to spend years work­ing on a more ambi­tious overhaul.
Few, mean­while, put blame on newly elected Repub­li­can schools super­in­ten­dent Molly Spear­man, who was elected last year on an anti-Common Core platform. “She knows as well as I do that she was never opposed to Com­mon Core,” Few said. “She said it to get elected.” Another fac­tor in play? The Obama administration.
Related Posts

No comments:

Post a Comment