Sunday, March 22, 2015

Fight Against Property Seizure

PLF defends Emerald Isle beach homeowners against a “taking” by town officials, Posted on March 20, 2015 Written by citizenreviewonline.org
Town of Emer­ald Isle, N.C.; March 19, 2015: This week, the nation’s lead­ing prop­erty rights defense orga­ni­za­tion stepped in to rep­re­sent an Emer­ald Isle cou­ple who are fight­ing the town’s uncon­sti­tu­tional impo­si­tion of a 20-foot-wide gov­ern­ment dri­ving lane across their pri­vately owned sandy beach property.
Donor-supported Pacific Legal Foun­da­tion (PLF) is a pub­lic inter­est legal orga­ni­za­tion that defends lim­ited gov­ern­ment and prop­erty rights in courts across the coun­try.  Because of the impor­tance of the Emer­ald Isle case, PLF now rep­re­sents beach­front home­own­ers Greg and Diane Nies, free of charge, in chal­leng­ing the Town government’s uncon­sti­tu­tional seizure of their prop­erty rights.  PLF, which is head­quar­tered in Sacra­mento and main­tains an Atlantic Cen­ter based in Florida, is rep­re­sent­ing the Nies along with Keith Anthony, Esq., and North Carolina’s Morn­ingstar Law Group.
Launch­ing its rep­re­sen­ta­tion this week, PLF filed the open­ing brief in the Nies’ case to the North Car­olina Court of Appeals.
Emer­ald Isle offi­cials cre­ated a gov­ern­ment road­way across pri­vate beach land — and didn’t pay the own­ers a dime in reimbursement
The Nies own a beach­front house, which they pur­chased in 2001, on a lot that includes all the sandy beach prop­erty from the mean high water mark, inland to the first line of dunes.  PLF and the Nies are chal­leng­ing the Town’s takeover of the Nies’ sandy beach prop­erty, for gov­ern­ment and pub­lic use, with­out any com­pen­sa­tion as required by the Constitution.
Specif­i­cally, through a 2010 ordi­nance the Town has given itself an exclu­sive, 20-foot-wide dri­ving lane across the Nies’ sandy beach prop­erty.  Town vehi­cles now cruise across the Nies’ land at all times of the day, leav­ing deep ruts that destroy veg­e­ta­tion, make it dif­fi­cult for the Nies to walk on the prop­erty, and endan­ger their grand­chil­dren and oth­ers who come to visit.
More­over, a 2013 Town ordi­nance cre­ates a toll road across the same area (and more) of the Nies’ land, allow­ing the pub­lic to drive across it, from Sep­tem­ber to May, for a fee to the Town.  Trucks and cars now tear through the Nies’ sandy land, “hot­dog­ging” and leav­ing trash.
“PLF’s mis­sion, nation­wide, is to defend con­sti­tu­tion­ally pro­tected prop­erty rights,” said PLF Prin­ci­pal Attor­ney J. David Breemer.  “We’ve come to the aid of Greg and Diane Nies because their rights are lit­er­ally being dri­ven over by Emer­ald Isle’s Town government.
“When gov­ern­ment takes pri­vate prop­erty for a pub­lic use, the Fifth Amend­ment says the own­ers must be com­pen­sated,” Breemer noted.  “Steal­ing isn’t allowed.  Emer­ald Isle offi­cials sug­gest this rule doesn’t apply to them when they’re tak­ing over pri­vate prop­erty at the beach.  But PLF has entered this case to let them know they’re wrong.  The Con­sti­tu­tion pro­hibits gov­ern­ment con­fis­ca­tion, no mat­ter where the pri­vate prop­erty is located.”
The Town’s “pub­lic trust” argu­ment is all wet
In try­ing to jus­tify fail­ing to pay the Nies for tak­ing over the use of their pri­vate beach prop­erty, the Town has come up with an inven­tive — and base­less — the­ory.  It claims that title to all pri­vately owned beach­front land between the dunes and the mean high water mark, includ­ing the Nies’ land, is sub­ject to an unwrit­ten “pub­lic trust” ease­ment that allows the Town to occupy that area with­out pay­ing the owners.
“The city’s argu­ment amounts to a license for a sweep­ing seizure of people’s pri­vate prop­erty along the coast,” said Breemer.  “It per­mits the gov­ern­ment to take over all pri­vate land sea­ward of the dunes right away.  As time goes on, it could con­tinue to grab more inland pri­vate prop­erty as ero­sion causes the dunes (and the alleged pub­lic trust ease­ment) to migrate land­ward.  It’s a for­mula for seiz­ing people’s back­yards first, and con­fis­cat­ing their beach houses later when they come to be on a dry sand area, and not giv­ing them a red cent in return.
“Beyond being a shock­ing exam­ple of gov­ern­ment dis­re­spect for people’s pri­vate prop­erty, the city’s argu­ments also hap­pen to be legally unsup­port­able,” stated Breemer.  “The pub­lic trust doc­trine has never been held to allow gov­ern­ment to pick a slice of pri­vate land for its exclu­sive use.  Rather, as defined by con­sis­tent case law, the doc­trine applies only to state-owned tide­lands that are sea­ward of the mean high water mark.  The city is try­ing to twist and stretch this doc­trine to cover pri­vate land to which it has never applied.
“We’re ask­ing the courts to give the gov­ern­ment of Emer­ald Isle a les­son in basic civics,” Breemer said.  “Emer­ald Isle offi­cials can’t evade the Fifth Amend­ment with fan­ci­ful dis­tor­tions of the pub­lic trust doc­trine.  As with any nor­mal emi­nent domain action, if the local gov­ern­ment wants to use the Nies’ pri­vate prop­erty for a Town or pub­lic road, the Nies must be paid.  In Amer­ica, gov­ern­ment can’t take our homes, our yards — or our pri­vately owned beach land — for free.”
State­ment by Greg Nies
Greg Nies and his wife, Diane, are both retired from careers in data man­age­ment.  They have two grown chil­dren and two grand­chil­dren.  Retir­ing to their Emer­ald Isle beach home was a dream for them — until the Town took away their prop­erty rights.
“We both worked hard all of our lives, start­ing as teenagers,” said Greg.  “We saved from our hard earned wages to buy this place, in 2001.  After long careers work­ing in offices all day, we wanted to retire to some­place that had good weather year-round and lots of oppor­tu­nity to walk on the beach in the fresh air.
“We felt it was our dream home,” he noted.  “We pay the mort­gage and taxes.  Yet it is now being taken away from us by the Town.
“Since the Town’s cre­ation of a gov­ern­ment thor­ough­fare across our land, it is no longer the beau­ti­ful beach we fell in love with,” he said.  “It has become a rut­ted mess devoted more to vehi­cles than peo­ple.  Trash trucks and other Town vehi­cles are dri­ving by all the time.  We worry about our grandchildren’s safety due to Town approval of dri­ving on our prop­erty.  It is nearly impos­si­ble for us to walk on our own  beach prop­erty due to the extreme ruts.  Diane has had hip prob­lems (sci­at­ica).  I have heart prob­lems that have become quite seri­ous now due to the stress of the Town tak­ing of our property.
“We under­stand the Town has the right to con­demn for pub­lic use, but they have to pay mar­ket value,” he con­tin­ued.  “We are grate­ful that Pacific Legal Foun­da­tion has joined us to fight for the basic prop­erty rights that we are being denied.  In fact, we’re fight­ing for everyone’s prop­erty rights, because if gov­ern­ment offi­cials can make up rea­sons to take ours away, it can hap­pen to other home­own­ers, wher­ever they live.”
The case is Nies v. Town of Emer­ald Isle.  More infor­ma­tion, includ­ing the open­ing brief on appeal, and a blog post by PLF Prin­ci­pal Attor­ney J. David Breemer, is avail­able at PLF’s web­site:  www.pacificlegal.org.
CONTACT:
J. David Breemer
Prin­ci­pal Attor­ney
Pacific Legal Foun­da­tion
jdb@pacificlegal.org
(916) 419‑7111
Related Posts
at

No comments:

Post a Comment