Sunday, April 26, 2015

'Innovation Act' Will Stifle Innovation

By Dana Rohrabacher, 04/24/2015 06:51 PM ET

 

For investors in technology start-ups, things are about to get much more complex and dangerous. Friends of inventors, family, angels, venture capitalists and private equity managers: Listen up.

 

The "Innovation Act," also known as H.R. 9, will reenter the House Judiciary Committee in the next two weeks, thanks to the efforts of Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-VA. Then it will speed back to the floor for passage.

 

President Obama, known to be tight with Google, has said he will sign it. Google and other mega-corporations will be pleased.

 

Touted as a triumph in the killing of "patent trolls," those voracious creatures whose influence has been vastly exaggerated by corporate image-makers, this bill actually will kill investment and innovation.

 

The American patent, so indispensable to technology start-ups, is about to be rendered useless when faced with an infringer of disproportionate size.

 

Start-ups asserting an infringement claim will be met with an onslaught of high-priced lawyers and legal fees.

 

They will find themselves with a limited capacity for discovery and pleadings, coupled with stays against the use of their technology. These actions will set in motion the likely outcome of bankruptcy.

 

Ill-informed Republican and Democratic members watching this wool-clad wolf move forward, and having passed it last year as H.R. 3309 (only to have it die mercifully in the Senate), will be unlikely to recognize the immediate danger it creates for the investment community. Indeed, in the name of burning trolls at the stake, the measure places all innovation in America on the pyre.

 

Technology start-ups, funded often by friends and family and later angels, venture capital and even private equity, have lessened their investment risk through the assurance that their fledgling enterprise has applied for or has been granted a patent.

 

Once marked as a triumphant accomplishment in the Silicon Valley landscape, this now threatens to become its undoing.

 

Complicated by the proposed Innovation Act's creation of "joinder liability," which forces investors to pay damages for actions of third parties over which they exert no control, this no longer represents security to the investor. It represents risk, big-time risk.

 

If you are an angel, a friend, a family member and have become part of a claim of infringement by a large corporation, you will find nothing but pain and grief.

 

At the end of your rainbow you will succumb to complex pleading rules, fee-shifting and — that ungainly phrase, again — joinder liability.

 

The American patent system once was hailed as a great equalizer, just as the six-shooter was to our pioneers. Its entire purpose was the ability to assert a claim of valid, unique technology when faced with a case of infringement.

 

Now, if H.R.9 becomes law, infringers merely have to lay in wait, earning income from the very technology they infringe and devising a strategy for when the small start-up dares to stand up and fight.

 

In perhaps its cruelest stroke, H.R. 9 gives corporate infringers the ability to reach into the grave of these departed start-ups and into the pockets of their investors, co-owners and stakeholders, placing unlimited liability on them for the legal fees of a major corporation.

 

Bankruptcy furnishes little escape from these liabilities. Involuntary joinder liability is a salient feature of the Innovation Act. This form of liability will cause the millions of dollars dubiously incurred by the mega-corporations using top-notch counsel to be shifted to small entities incapable of defending themselves.

 

Such once-innovative entities will be crushed by the weighty presence of major corporations. If they seek bankruptcy they will find the bills will shift to their investors and stakeholders.

 

Could it be that these are the fundamental intentions of this bill rather than the "tort reform" claimed by its proponents?

 

Rohrabacher is a Republican who represents California's 48th congressional district and is a member of the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee.

 


 

No comments:

Post a Comment