Now that
progressives have cultivated a sufficient amount of dysfunction within families
in America, there are – quite conveniently – an increasing number of teenagers
who experience ambivalence around their emerging sexuality and/or gender
identity issues. Given the encouragement of liberal authority figures, the
press, and other media, more are manifesting this earlier in life than in years
past, instead of remaining “closeted” until adulthood, or never revealing their
proclivities to the world.
On April 17,
the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) conducted its “Day of
Silence,” wherein participating public high school and middle school students
remained silent throughout an entire school day to “raise awareness about the
silencing effect of anti-LGBT bullying, harassment and discrimination.”
Full disclosure
(though not for my sake or anything): GLSEN was founded by homosexual activist,
former Obama administration “Safe Schools Czar,” and probable pedophile Kevin Jennings.
Given the
turbulent nature of adolescence and the fact that these dysfunctional teens are
in the minority, many experience ridicule, harassment, and other forms of
derision commonly known as “bullying.”
This is also
quite convenient with regard to the political left’s radical agenda, I might
add, in the sense that it has allowed them to “justify” massive campaigns
ostensibly focused upon – are you ready? – saving children… in this case, from the “bigotry” of their
straight peers.… or more
accurately, exploiting these emerging “protected class” citizens for their own
political ends.
With the left, of course it is never
about the supposed beneficiaries of their largesse, as Penny Nance pointed out,
writing for Breitbart last
week. “Gay activists are going around you to get to your children, and schools
are complicit,” Nance wrote, pointing out that GLSEN operatives have systematically infiltrated schools and begun
harassing and bullying students who hold traditional or religious beliefs
regarding sexuality and marriage. Did she say “bullying?” Indeed she
did…
Recently,
Amanda Simpson, Executive Director of U.S. Army Office of Energy Initiatives and the first transgender Obama
administration appointee, called for a ban on “conversion therapy,” with which
she says the LGBT community is being “targeted,” whatever that means.
Now,
considering that the American Psychological Association is lousy with leftists
and sexual deviants, it is somewhat difficult to find an objective definition
for “conversion therapy.” Most of the industry designations (crafted by those
in academia, which is also lousy with leftists and sexual deviants) include
such terms as “pseudo-scientific,” “controversial,” and “dangerous.”
Loosely-defined,
“conversion” or “reparative” therapy refers to a collection of counseling and
psychiatric protocols which address changes in an individual’s sexual
attraction or sexual identity. Some, but not all of the practitioners operate
within Christian circles. Almost
always, there is existing ambivalence within the individual as to their
identification as a homosexual prior to seeking such treatment, which they
voluntarily seek out, as opposed to the “forced deprogramming” scenario
being suggested by the gay lobby.
“We used to
call things like this brainwashing, or reprogramming,” Simpson states in an
official White House video, which calls conversion therapy “harmful.” She said
that society ought to be gravitating away from “the way things are, to the way
things should be.”
And there you
have it, yet again: that leftist imperative for implementing their perverted
vision of what society should look like. America is now being schooled in “the
way things should be” by a transsexual, and that “way” is a wholly subjective
determination made by those on the left, who consider themselves the ultimate
arbiters not just of right and wrong, but of reality itself.
And what
criteria do they employ in order to arrive at these conclusions? Why, what
appeals to them emotionally,
what makes them comfortable…
That’s good enough for leftists. And since they are leftists, they have no reservations around misrepresenting
what conversion therapy actually is.
Like many of us,
I’ve heard the stories of homosexuals who claim to have known at age five that
they were attracted to the same sex. I can’t prove that they’re lying, nor do I
have much reason to believe they are. I’ve also heard the testimony of those
who were stone cold convinced at eighteen that they were homosexual, yet who at
twenty-five or thirty determined that they were miserable, depressed, confused,
hated the lifestyle, and were no longer sure which way they leaned in terms of
sexual attraction. Many of these accounts end with the individuals seeking out
reparative therapy, later emerging and claiming to be happy heterosexuals.
I wouldn’t want to see homosexuals
whisked away in the night in black vans and forcibly “deprogrammed,” if that is
even possible. By the same token, banning therapies aimed at addressing the
sexual confusion some homosexuals find themselves facing is an equally
draconian (not to mention totalitarian) measure.
Yet when it’s
an intellectually-enlightened member of the LGBT community like Amanda Simpson
advancing such measures, apparently that’s all well and good.
As an aside,
I’ve been inclined to wonder what solidarity a transgender person might have
with homosexuals, unless it had to do with an agenda – particularly after
having discourse with transgender individuals who did not share solidarity with
homosexuals, wanted nothing to do with the LGBT community – and were
subsequently slandered and disparaged publicly by both.
There are
millions of people of varied political stripes who have bought into the
insidious lie proffered by the left that homosexuals just want to be “allowed
to love.” Perhaps many of them do, but it bears mentioning that progressives
employed the identical tactic in the early 1970s during the abortion debate.
Abortion was going to be ever-so-rare; the pro-aborts argued that they were
just trying to save women from deadly back-alley or coat hanger abortions, and
give them an alternative to bearing unwanted babies conceived in rape or
incest.
We have seen
how that turned out, with abortion becoming a cottage industry,
“partial-birth-abortion,” and the scientific-industrial complex lobbying for
the right to discarded baby parts. In Britain, scientists have advocated for
the legal definition of abortion being widened to include live-born babies that
the parents or the state determine are too difficult to accommodate.
If we allow it,
this situation will turn out similarly. Last week, TruthRevolt.org referenced a piece by a Canadian columnist that detailed the chilling downside
of that country’s “legalization” of same-sex marriage.
For one thing,
in order to accommodate the new parameters of the institution of marriage, the
legal convention of “natural parent” was replaced by that of “legal parent,”
which essentially translated into the rights of all parents being usurped by the government. Clever, eh?
Then, sexual
orientations legally protected under the new same-sex marriage law gave rise to
inordinately influential “Human Rights Commissions” that have the power to sue
individuals and businesses (which often results in the bankrupting of
defendants), monitor and regulate communications, enter residences, seize
property, all on the say-so of one
offended homosexual. These commissions can also recommend prosecution
for “hate speech,” and they have an enviable 100% conviction rate over 30
years.
Homosexual
activists and sympathetic operatives spy on churches and religious groups,
their ears pricked up for anything they might find remotely discriminatory (by their definition, as we’re already
experiencing here in America), so that they can mince over to the nearest Human
Rights Commission office and file a complaint. Just what America needs, eh?
Well, I have a
wake-up call for the firebreathing, militant homosexuals out there: You don’t get to stigmatize the rest of us –
who outnumber you fifty-to-one, by the way – because you have a distorted
vision of what society ought to look like, and are so emotionally immature that
you think you ought to have your way, “just because.”
If all of this
perversion and constitutional nullification takes place in America within my
lifetime, I will probably be in prison in fairly short order, because I’m
certainly not going to shut up. I know – as well as do many other Americans –
that whether they’re misguided middle class professionals, or
fornicating-on-Pride-Parade-floats militants, this relatively tiny group of
people is merely being used by radicals to consolidate their power.
Integral to
this consolidation of power is eradicating traditional concepts of morality, so
that they may shift individuals’ allegiance from God to the State. And that,
Dear Reader, is evil.
http://eaglerising.com/17545/radical-anti-god-marxists-are-using-the-gay-lobby-to-remake-america/
Comments
Comments
It’s time to stop “protecting”
groups. Freedom of association is under attack. Social Engineering has ruined
the U.S. Military.
Muslims will be the next group to
seek “special treatment” under US Law. After that, It won’t be out of the
question to see the Bestiality Movement rise up to demand the right to marry
their animals. All will want to be able
to file law suits against anyone who doesn’t cow-tow to their wishes. Be very
careful who you elect to city councils, county commissions and state
legislatures and don’t forget to vet the judges.
Groups who will not assimilate
cannot be given the keys to the asylum. There are folks you shouldn’t hire;
they are disruptive and damage morale. You should be free to employ and do
business with whoever you please without fear of law suits. We are a
“Meritocracy” and need to repeal laws that seek to destroy us.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party
Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment