A public
interest law firm is threatening to bring lawsuits against more than 100
counties across the United States that appear to have more registered voters
than living residents.
The
Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF), a law firm dedicated to election
integrity based in Indiana, recently sent statutory notice letters to election officials in 141 counties
putting them on notice of their discoveries. The group says if action is not
taken to correct the questionable voter rolls, they will bring lawsuits against
every single county on the list.
“Corrupted
voter rolls provide the perfect environment for voter fraud,” said J. Christian
Adams, president and general counsel of PILF. “Close elections tainted by voter
fraud turned control of the United States Senate in 2009. Too much is at stake
in 2016 to allow that to happen again.”
The
statutory notice letters argue the counties are violating the National Voter
Registration Act (NVRA) and urge them to correct the issue, claiming their
voter rolls contain a substantially high amount of ineligible voters. The group
used federally produced data to come to their conclusions.
“Voter
rolls across America have been discovered that contain substantial numbers of
ineligible voters, resulting in the possible disenfranchisement of legally
eligible voters via ballot dilution that threatens to subvert the nation’s
electoral process,” a sample letter sent
to the counties reads.
“Based on our comparison of publicly available
information published by the U.S. Census Bureau and the federal Election
Assistance Commission, your county is failing to comply with Section 8 of the
NVRA,” it continues. “Federal law requires election officials to conduct a
reasonable effort to maintain voter registration lists free of dead voters,
ineligible voters and voters who have moved away.”“In short, your county has significantly more voters on the registration rolls than it has eligible live voters and is thus not reasonably maintaining the rolls.”
According to PILF, the 141 counties targeted for their suspicious voter rolls span across 21 states and include: Michigan (24 counties), Kentucky (18), Illinois (17), Indiana (11), Alabama (10), Colorado (10), Texas (9), Nebraska (7), New Mexico (5), South Dakota (5), Kansas (4), Mississippi (4), Louisiana (3), West Virginia (3), Georgia (2), Iowa (2), Montana (2), and North Carolina (2), as well as Arizona, Missouri, and New York (1 each).
Data provided by the group also shows that some counties have voter registration rates that exceed 150 percent.
Franklin County, located in Illinois, contains the highest voter registration rate of any county on the list at 190 percent. Franklin is followed by Pulaski County, also located in Illinois. Pulaski boasts a 176 percent voter registration rate, according to the group.
Adams said former Attorney General Eric Holder and current AG Loretta Lynch refused to enforce the law because they don’t have a problem with corrupted voter rolls.
“Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch have deliberately refused to enforce this law because they have no problem with corrupted voter rolls,” Christian Adams told the Washington Free Beacon in an email statement. “They don’t like the law, so they don’t enforce it. It’s a pattern that has come to characterize this Justice Department.”
http://freebeacon.com/issues/election-group-141-u-s-counties-have-more-registered-voters-than-people/
Read more at http://minutemennews.com/2015/08/voter-fraud-alert-look-how-many-u-s-counties-have-more-voters-than-people/
|
COUNTY
|
STATE
|
REGISTRATION RATE
|
|
Lowndes County
|
Alabama
|
127%
|
|
Perry County
|
Alabama
|
113%
|
|
Greene County
|
Alabama
|
112%
|
|
Macon County
|
Alabama
|
112%
|
|
Wilcox County
|
Alabama
|
110%
|
|
Marengo County
|
Alabama
|
104%
|
|
Hale County
|
Alabama
|
104%
|
|
Washington County
|
Alabama
|
103%
|
|
Conecuh County
|
Alabama
|
102%
|
|
Choctaw County
|
Alabama
|
102%
|
|
Apache County
|
Arizona
|
101%
|
|
Mineral County
|
Colorado
|
133%
|
|
Hinsdale County
|
Colorado
|
116%
|
|
San Juan County
|
Colorado
|
115%
|
|
Ouray County
|
Colorado
|
112%
|
|
Pitkin County
|
Colorado
|
105%
|
|
Summit County
|
Colorado
|
105%
|
|
Dolores County
|
Colorado
|
104%
|
|
San Miguel County
|
Colorado
|
103%
|
|
Cheyenne County
|
Colorado
|
101%
|
|
Boulder County
|
Colorado
|
101%
|
|
Mcintosh County
|
Georgia
|
142%
|
|
Marion County
|
Georgia
|
129%
|
|
Franklin County
|
Illinois
|
190%
|
|
Pulaski County
|
Illinois
|
176%
|
|
Washington County
|
Illinois
|
150%
|
|
Henderson County
|
Illinois
|
148%
|
|
Union County
|
Illinois
|
138%
|
|
Rock Island County
|
Illinois
|
133%
|
|
Alexander County
|
Illinois
|
130%
|
|
Massac County
|
Illinois
|
125%
|
|
Hardin County
|
Illinois
|
119%
|
|
Mercer County
|
Illinois
|
109%
|
|
Crawford County
|
Illinois
|
109%
|
|
Wabash County
|
Illinois
|
105%
|
|
White County
|
Illinois
|
104%
|
|
Jersey County
|
Illinois
|
104%
|
|
Jefferson County
|
Illinois
|
102%
|
|
Sangamon County
|
Illinois
|
101%
|
|
Scott County
|
Illinois
|
101%
|
|
Crawford County
|
Indiana
|
112%
|
|
Scott County
|
Indiana
|
107%
|
|
Franklin County
|
Indiana
|
106%
|
|
Brown County
|
Indiana
|
104%
|
|
Tipton County
|
Indiana
|
104%
|
|
Union County
|
Indiana
|
103%
|
|
Orange County
|
Indiana
|
103%
|
|
Dearborn County
|
Indiana
|
102%
|
|
Newton County
|
Indiana
|
102%
|
|
Warrick County
|
Indiana
|
101%
|
|
Clark County
|
Indiana
|
101%
|
|
Fremont County
|
Iowa
|
104%
|
|
Lyon County
|
Iowa
|
101%
|
|
Gove County
|
Kansas
|
116%
|
|
Cherokee County
|
Kansas
|
105%
|
|
Bourbon County
|
Kansas
|
102%
|
|
Rawlins County
|
Kansas
|
101%
|
|
Breathitt County
|
Kentucky
|
110%
|
|
Fulton County
|
Kentucky
|
106%
|
|
Menifee County
|
Kentucky
|
105%
|
|
Magoffin County
|
Kentucky
|
103%
|
|
Wolfe County
|
Kentucky
|
103%
|
|
Trimble County
|
Kentucky
|
103%
|
|
Monroe County
|
Kentucky
|
103%
|
|
Carlisle County
|
Kentucky
|
102%
|
|
Mercer County
|
Kentucky
|
102%
|
|
Floyd County
|
Kentucky
|
102%
|
|
Powell County
|
Kentucky
|
102%
|
|
Owsley County
|
Kentucky
|
102%
|
|
Anderson County
|
Kentucky
|
102%
|
|
Cumberland County
|
Kentucky
|
102%
|
|
Leslie County
|
Kentucky
|
101%
|
|
Caldwell County
|
Kentucky
|
101%
|
|
Hancock County
|
Kentucky
|
101%
|
|
Livingston County
|
Kentucky
|
101%
|
|
Tensas Parish
|
Louisiana
|
109%
|
|
St. Helena Parish
|
Louisiana
|
104%
|
|
Cameron Parish
|
Louisiana
|
102%
|
|
Leelanau County
|
Michigan
|
109%
|
|
Roscommon County
|
Michigan
|
107%
|
|
Charlevoix County
|
Michigan
|
107%
|
|
Otsego County
|
Michigan
|
107%
|
|
Ontonagon County
|
Michigan
|
107%
|
|
Antrim County
|
Michigan
|
107%
|
|
Dickinson County
|
Michigan
|
106%
|
|
Emmet County
|
Michigan
|
106%
|
|
Genesee County
|
Michigan
|
105%
|
|
Iosco County
|
Michigan
|
105%
|
|
Kalkaska County
|
Michigan
|
105%
|
|
Berrien County
|
Michigan
|
105%
|
|
Keweenaw County
|
Michigan
|
104%
|
|
Benzie County
|
Michigan
|
104%
|
|
Mackinac County
|
Michigan
|
104%
|
|
Gladwin County
|
Michigan
|
104%
|
|
Alcona County
|
Michigan
|
103%
|
|
Gogebic County
|
Michigan
|
103%
|
|
Cheboygan County
|
Michigan
|
102%
|
|
Menominee County
|
Michigan
|
102%
|
|
Montmorency County
|
Michigan
|
101%
|
|
Saginaw County
|
Michigan
|
101%
|
|
Midland County
|
Michigan
|
101%
|
|
Wayne County
|
Michigan
|
101%
|
|
Walthall County
|
Mississippi
|
109%
|
|
Issaquena County
|
Mississippi
|
107%
|
|
Lincoln County
|
Mississippi
|
103%
|
|
Amite County
|
Mississippi
|
101%
|
|
Ray County
|
Missouri
|
101%
|
|
Petroleum County
|
Montana
|
108%
|
|
Carter County
|
Montana
|
103%
|
|
Loup County
|
Nebraska
|
110%
|
|
Wheeler County
|
Nebraska
|
107%
|
|
Kimball County
|
Nebraska
|
106%
|
|
Thurston County
|
Nebraska
|
102%
|
|
Hooker County
|
Nebraska
|
101%
|
|
Keya Paha County
|
Nebraska
|
101%
|
|
Thomas County
|
Nebraska
|
101%
|
|
Harding County
|
New Mexico
|
133%
|
|
Mora County
|
New Mexico
|
110%
|
|
Catron County
|
New Mexico
|
103%
|
|
Los Alamos County
|
New Mexico
|
102%
|
|
De Baca County
|
New Mexico
|
102%
|
|
Hamilton County
|
New York
|
122%
|
|
Clay County
|
North Carolina
|
103%
|
|
Yancey County
|
North Carolina
|
101%
|
|
Hanson County
|
South Dakota
|
163%
|
|
Campbell County
|
South Dakota
|
105%
|
|
Union County
|
South Dakota
|
105%
|
|
Potter County
|
South Dakota
|
102%
|
|
Harding County
|
South Dakota
|
101%
|
|
Brooks County
|
Texas
|
123%
|
|
Kenedy County
|
Texas
|
116%
|
|
Terrell County
|
Texas
|
111%
|
|
McMullen County
|
Texas
|
109%
|
|
Irion County
|
Texas
|
107%
|
|
Jim Hogg County
|
Texas
|
105%
|
|
Culberson County
|
Texas
|
104%
|
|
Presidio County
|
Texas
|
102%
|
|
Polk County
|
Texas
|
101%
|
|
Mingo County
|
West Virginia
|
108%
|
|
Lincoln County
|
West Virginia
|
107%
|
|
McDowell County
|
West Virginia
|
103%
|
Comments
This answers the question about how Obama could
have won in 2008 and 2012.
Getting the dead to vote has been part of the
Democrat playbook for some time. When I was 3 years old, we moved to Texas where
my uncle John was the Secretary of Agriculture and he introduced us to Lyndon
Johnson. I remember uncle John strolled into our back yard one evening and my
dad asked: “John, how did Lyndon do in the election?” John answered: “Everybody who ever lived in
those counties voted for Lyndon last night.”
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment