Monday, September 7, 2015

State Charter Schools Unconstitutional

Late Friday surprise: Supreme Court says charter schools initiative is unconstitutional
By Joel Connelly on September 4, 2015 7:15 PM

The Washington State Supreme Court, in a late Friday surprise, delivered a ruling that the state’s voter-passed, billionaire-backed charter school initiative is unconstitutional.
The high court’s 6-3 ruling found that the independently organized schools do not pass muster as common public schools and therefore cannot receive public funding. Bill and Melinda Gates: $3 million in support for 2012 charter schools initiative, just ruled unconstitutional by the state Supreme Court.
 
“We hold that provisions of Initiative 1240 that designate and treat charter schools as common schools violate article IX, Section 2 of our state Constitution and are void,” Chief Justice Barbara Madsen wrote in the majority opinion.

“This includes the Act’s funding provision, which attempts to tap into and shift a portion of moneys allocated for common schools to the new charter schools authorized by the Act. Because the provisions designating and funding charter schools as common schools are integral to the Act, such void provisions are not severable …” In short, I-1240 goes down, although supporters said last night they would weigh legal options.
 
The ruling was greeted with surprise.  The state has nine charter schools set to operate this fall in Seattle, Spokane, Tacoma, Kent and Highline. “We need to understand what this means for the children who would start at the three impacted schools in Seattle,” Mayor Ed Murray said via Facebook upon learning of the ruling. John Zilavy, a Seattle parent, lamented on his Facebook page that the court’s ruling puts in “serious jeopardy” an educational took that “seems to be working.” “Our experience so far with the new Summit Sierra Charter School in the International District is that it has really found a way to make both teaching and learning more effective for a diverse group of students,” Zilavy wrote.
 
I-1240 passed by a 1 percent margin in 2012, after charter schools had previously been rejected three times by Washington voters.  Ninety-eight percent of its $10 million-plus war chest came from just 21 individuals.  Bill Gates put up $3 million, Wal-Mart heiress Alice Walton gave $1.7 million, Vulcan Inc. (Paul Allen’s development company) was good for $1.6 million, and liberal entrepreneur Nick Hanauer donated $1 million. The father of Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos gave $500,000.
 
The state’s influential teachers’ unions opposed I-1240, as did low-income groups, arguing that charter schools would skim money and take talented students from the public school system.  The court challenge to the initiative was brought by the League of Women Voters, the Washington Education Association, El Centro de la Raza, and the Washington Association of School Administrators.
 
In another telling passage from Madsen’s opinion, the court stated:  “Under the Act (I-1240), charter schools are devoid of local control from their inception to their daily operations.”
“The Supreme Court has affirmed what we’ve said all along — charter schools steal money from our existing classrooms and voters have no say in how these charter schools spend taxpayer funds,” said Kim Mead, president of the Washington Education Association.
 
The Supreme Court’s majority opinion made clear that the financial props have been knocked out from under the charter schools.  I-1240 “relies on common school funds as its funding choice,” Madsen wrote.  “Without those funds, the Act cannot function as intended.”
 
The state’s Charter School Commission reacted with anger to the court’s Friday surprise, noting that the case has been before the Supremes since last October.  “It is unprecedented that the Court issued a decision in this way, at 4:05 the Friday before the Labor Day weekend,” it said in a statement.
 
“We are most concerned about the almost 1,000 students and families attending charter schools and making sure they understand what this ruling means regarding their public school education options,” said the commission.
 
In a dissenting opinion, Justice Mary Fairhurst noted that as an alternative, “the state can constitutionally support charter schools through the general fund.”
 
The intensity of opinion, on what charter schools give and what they take away, was evident Friday night. Republican state Sen. Steve Litzow, who chairs the State Senate’s K-12 education committee, said:  “Public charter schools provide high-quality opportunity, especially for at-risk children, to succeed in the classroom.  In a state that fails one in four students, disproportionately from low-income and minority families, we cannot afford to do away with one of the most important tools for closing the opportunity gap.”
But Don Barbieri of Spokane, retired CEO at West Coast Hotels and a Washington State University regent, argued that public schools lack resources and teachers are underpaid.
 
“I went to a private school (Gonzaga Prep), yet our public schools are not paying livable wages and our citizens need to demand (that) no one is placed in poverty with a teaching vocation and all our kids should ask that we have their backs when they commit to hard work and dream,” he said.
 
http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/2015/09/04/late-friday-surprise-supreme-court-says-charter-schools-initiative-is-unconstitutional/

No comments:

Post a Comment