Once again there was a presidential debate and not one
candidate mentioned the great land grabs and government assault on property
rights. The only way we can bring these issues to the front is by barraging them
with these three questions at every stop:
Featured News Item
Three Questions to Change the Election By Tom DeWeese
Take Control of this Presidential Election!
How do we make the policies of Agenda 21 a major issue in
the upcoming election campaign? Let’s take it directly to the candidates, in
front of their own audiences!
I’ve prepared three main questions for all anti-Agenda 21-
property rights activists can ask anywhere the multitude of Presidential
candidates appear.
Each of these questions pertain to one of the three planks
of Agenda 21. The three planks are 1.Social Equity; 2. Economic Prosperity; 3.
Ecology (the assault on property rights). These are the infamous 3 E’s of
Agenda 21.
Ask these questions in a public forum and watch the candidates’
reaction. That will tell you if they really stand with you on the vital need
for limiting the power of government.
Most won’t have an answer. In fact most won’t even know what
you are talking about. They will try to evade or put some positive spin on it. But
you will know!! You will understand that
such candidates will never work to fix these problems. And so will the rest of
the audience. It is time for our movement to take aggressive action against
these slithering candidates. We need to descend on public forums.
Organize. Place our people strategically around the room.
And one by one begin to ask these questions. When they can’t answer, have
someone else ask it again, and again.
* Let them know they had better give these issues some
thought.
* Let them know that we are going to be there every time
they appear in public.
* And let them know we are going to force them to actually
talk about issues that mean something to real Americans.
A word of caution – do not take this action alone. Organize
with at least three friends. Have each choose one of these questions to ask the
candidates. If you have more people to join you, have others prepared to do a
follow up question if they fail to answer. As you get your moment in front of
the microphone, read the statement as I’ve provided below and then finish with
the question shown in bold:
Here are the statements and questions for you to read at
candidate appearances:
1. Property Rights Question
Private property rights are under assault in communities and
rural areas across the nation as local, state and federal governments move to
enforce new planning development programs, particularly under the labels of
Sustainable Developments or “Local Visioning.” If elected, what actions will
you take to protect the unrestricted right of use, enjoyment and disposal of
private property by its owners?
2. Regional Government Question
It’s a growing situation that local elected representative
government is being overshadowed by the establishment of non- elected boards,
councils, planning commissions and regional governments. These non-elected
organizations are, in effect, taking government further away from the people as
they deal in backrooms, unseen and unapproachable. Yet, while not elected by
the people, they are creating policy that affects private property, tax rates
and much more, especially through the taking of federal grant money, which
results in federal control over the use and outcome of that money. If elected,
what actions will you take to eliminate these massive grant programs and to
stop federal efforts to enforce creation of non-elected boards, councils and
regional government boards?
3. Social Justice Question
The term social justice is used more and more in today’s
official society. The actual meaning of social justice is redistribution of
wealth, much of which is imposed through the tool of political correctness.
Social Justice is used to create class warfare and divisions in our society. It
is now widely used in our public school curricula to replace actual academics
with behavior modification methods designed to change the attitudes, values and
beliefs of the children. The openly stated purpose of such programs as Outcome
based education and Common Core is to create new global citizens who reject
traditional American values of individual freedom, free enterprise and limited
government. Such curriculum is enforced through a centralized Federal
Department of Education, which has usurped local input. If elected, will you
take action to shut down the federal Department of Education and return
education policy to the states, making sure to end these orchestrated attacks
on the
attitudes, values and beliefs of the children?
Let’s start a revolution to force this election to finally
mean something! Spread the word and make
sure the candidates face these questions at every public event.
This is our chance to finally make Agenda 21 one of the
leading issues in the nation!
Ask the questions! These questions can also work on local,
state and Congressional candidates. Please pass this alert on to everyone you
know – your lists of fellow activists, family and friends.
Tom DeWeese is one of the nation’s leading advocates of
individual liberty, free enterprise, private property rights, personal privacy,
back-to-basics education and American sovereignty and independence. Subscribe
to his monthly report at: http://deweesereport.com?mc_cid=46c264f4b2&mc_eid=[UNIQID]
View this article on our web site
(https://deweesereport.com/2015/09/18/three-questions-to-change-the-election/?mc_cid=46c264f4b2&mc_eid=[UNIQID])
http://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fdeweesereport.com%2F2015%2F09%2F18%2Fthree-questions-to-change-the-election%2F&mc_cid=46c264f4b2&mc_eid=[UNIQID] Share (http://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fdeweesereport.com%2F2015%2F09%2F18%2Fthree-questions-to-change-the-election%2F&mc_cid=46c264f4b2&mc_eid=[UNIQID])
http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=:&mc_cid=46c264f4b2&mc_eid=[UNIQID]
https%3A%2F%2Fdeweesereport.com%2F2015%2F09%2F18%2Fthree-questions-to-change-the-election%2F
Tweet
(http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=:&mc_cid=46c264f4b2&mc_eid=[UNIQID]
https%3A%2F%2Fdeweesereport.com%2F2015%2F09%2F18%2Fthree-questions-to-change-the-election%2F)
http://us1.forward-to-friend1.com/forward?u=3af5d41d21ad9fce53c86ba9d&id=46c264f4b2&e=5f675b1de6 Forward
(http://us1.forward-to-friend1.com/forward?u=3af5d41d21ad9fce53c86ba9d&id=46c264f4b2&e=5f675b1de6)
Don't miss the September issue of the DeWeese Report!
Subscribe now (https://deweesereport.com/subscribe/deweese-report/?mc_cid=46c264f4b2&mc_eid=[UNIQID])
NewsWire Articles
The sky is falling – or not, by Kathleen Marquardt
“They believe that the earth’s climate has moved into a
cooling cycle, which means highly erratic weather for decades to come. And that, they say, has profound implications
– most of them bad – for world food production, economic stability and social
order. With the world’s population now
so high, the results of even minor year-to-year shifts in climate could be
catastrophic, they say.”
The only word that was changed from the above 1976 article
and scare tactic was from ‘cooling’ to ‘warming.’ Every other word in the article, other than
‘cooling’ is exactly the same as for Global Warming/climate change. In an educated electorate this would be
enough to have the masses calling for a complete shutdown of the IPPC, the UN
and the rest of the Global Warming hoax – including telling the Pope to go back
to being head of the Catholic Church and get off the carbon tax soap box.
The article:Climatologists Forecast Stormy Economic Future
(http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/05/04/flashback-1976-climatologists-blamed-california-drought-on-global-cooling/?mc_cid=46c264f4b2&mc_eid=[UNIQID])
“As a result Dr. Browning and other previously ignored
climatologist are getting a lot of attention.
Projections that they made years ago appear to be coming true. They believe that the earth’s climate has
moved into a cooling cycle which means [**
Read the full article (http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/05/04/flashback-1976-climatologists-blamed-california-drought-on-global-cooling/?mc_cid=46c264f4b2&mc_eid=5f675b1de6)
]
Hitler’s crazed thinking extolled by Yale professor
by Kathleen Marquardt
We’ve heard a lot about Common Core recently, but most that
which has been in grades K-12. Our
universities are far worse breeding grounds for the evils of destroying values,
attitudes and beliefs of our children – and they have been at it a lot longer.
Not only does this professor praise Hitler’s Malthusian
thinking but he attacks the US because we aren’t following in the jackbooted
footsteps of Nazi believers:
“By polluting the atmosphere with greenhouse gases, the
United States has done more than any other nation to bring about the next
ecological panic, yet it is the only country where climate science is still
resisted by certain political and business elites. These deniers tend to
present the empirical findings of scientists as a conspiracy and question the
validity of science — an intellectual stance that is uncomfortably close to
Hitler’s.”
In the article below, Robert Zubrin exposes some of the
really bad thinking/teaching going on at Yale.
Yale Professor Explains Hitler’s Malthusianism, Thinks
There’s Something to It
The fundamental question boils down to this: Are humans
destroyers or creators? If the idea is accepted that the world’s resources are
fixed, with only so much to go around, then each new life is unwelcome, each
unregulated act or thought is a menace, every person is fundamentally the enemy
of every other person, and each race or nation is enemy of every other race or
nation. The ultimate outcome of such a worldview can only be enforced
stagnation, tyranny, war, and genocide... [** Read the full article (http://www.nationalreview.com/article/423959/yale-professor-hitlers-malthusianism?PW2dh43R22QCjFFz.01& mc_cid=46c264f4b2&mc_eid=5f675b1de6)
]
No comments:
Post a Comment