Monday, March 21, 2016

Gold Dome Week 10

Week Ten Legislative Update, 3/20/16,

Testing Mandates Reduced
Space Bill Is Placed in Study Committee
Religious Liberty Legislation on Governor's Desk

As the final two days of the legislative session approaches, the House reconvened on Monday, March 14 for day 36 of the 2016 legislative session and an extremely busy week. We had a busy legislative agenda for the week, both on the House floor and in committee meetings to continue to vote on and review legislation. With only two legislative days left, many more House and Senate bills received final passage this week and are now on their way to Governor Deal’s desk for consideration.

This week, the House unanimously passed Senate Bill 364, the Quality Based Education Act, to revise annual performance evaluations for public school teachers and state mandated testing. SB 364 would revise evaluations so that student growth would account for 30 percent of a teacher’s evaluation, down from the current 50 percent. Additionally, professional growth would account for 20 percent, and the test component of teacher evaluations is lowered from 70 percent to 40 percent. The bill would also reduce the number of state mandated tests from 32 to 24 for students in grades K-12 by removing social studies and science milestone tests in grades 3, 4, 6, and 7. SB 364 would also ask local school systems to move all testing as close to the end of the school year as possible to ensure the students have received maximum exposure to the material prior to testing. SB 364 also adds formative testing in 1st and 2nd grades to measure progress and early learning to guarantee that all students are proficient in reading by 3rd grade and proficient in math by 5th grade. The bill is the result of multiple meetings with teachers, administrators, parents, and advocacy groups from across the state who gave input and opinions on what should be revised in the current evaluation and testing systems. This legislation will give our teachers more freedom to teach Georgia’s students and will take the burden off both students and teachers. Our teachers greatly influence the youth in our state, and as such, we want to provide them with the resources to have the best opportunity to succeed in the classroom so that our students have the best opportunity to succeed in the future.

Other bills that passed the House floor this week:

SB 206, by Sen. William T. Ligon, Jr. (R-Brunswick), revises provisions relating to the prohibition of a water supplier's option to disconnect water service to premises because of the indebtedness of a prior owner, occupant, or lessee. The bill provides a procedure to obtain information regarding moneys owed for water supplied to certain real property under certain circumstances.  SB 206 exempts any property from the refusal to supply water because of the indebtedness of the prior occupant. A new section is added to current law setting forth that any property owner or tenant, person executing a contract for the purchase or occupancy of property, attorney closing a real estate transaction, or lender considering the loan of funds to be secured by real property shall have the right to request a statement from the water supplier setting forth the amount of any outstanding water charges along with any late fees with interest.  Rep. Alex Atwood (R-St. Simons Island) spoke in support of the bill. He indicated that ACCG, GMA, the Georgia Realtors Association, and others are in support of this legislation. There was one amendment, but it was withdrawn.  SB 206 passed the House with a vote of 170-0.

SR 730, by Sen. William T. Ligon, Jr. (R-Brunswick), encourages the Coastal Regional Commission to create a comprehensive plan for and oversee the implementation of the Coastal Georgia Greenway and to create and file an annual report with the General Assembly detailing its progress.  It passed with a vote of 149-18.

SB 263, by Sen. Bruce Thompson (R-White), allows for the governing authority of each municipality and county in this state, as well as each board of education, which employs sworn police officer who are POST certified to adopt policies under which officers may retain their weapon or badge upon retirement or leaving employment as a result of a disability arising in the line of duty. It passed the House today with a vote of 123-46.

SR 558, by Sen. Jeff Mullis (R-Chickamauga), is a constitutional amendment to provide that the existing excise tax on fireworks shall be specifically dedicated to the provision of trauma care, fire services, and local public safety purposes. SB 350, the enabling legislation, allocates the revenues collected. SR 558 cleared the House with a vote of 169-2.

SR 876, by Sen. Steve Gooch (R-Dahlonega), was carried in the House by Rep. Kevin Tanner (R-Dawsonville). It seeks to establish a Joint High-Speed Broadband Communications Access for All Georgians Study Committee. No changes were made in the House Special Rules Committee where this Resolution had been assigned. This resolution passed 166-0.

Senate Places Space Bill Into Study Committee
After HB 734, the Georgia Space Flight Act, passed the House with overwhelming support of 164-8, the Senate Science & Technology committee decided to place the bill into a Senate study committee after spending approximately 90 minutes discussing the legislation.  The Senate’s primary focus was on the Federal Aviation Administration’s launch licensing process and applicable federal regulations  as well as county zoning issues should the launch site be approved by the FAA. 

Although, these issues are aspects to consider regarding the project; however, my legislation did not pertain to such matters.  The state has no influence over the federal regulatory process; therefore, I was rather dismayed that the Senate’s focus were on matters the state has no jurisdiction over.  The legislation’s focus was mainly on space flight operation liability shield, which is a policy that is very similar to other space friendly states like Texas and Florida.  This policy is a minimum standard to which the industry is looking for in order for the commercial space industry to consider Georgia as player in the industry. 

I will bring back this legislation next year, but the Senate will study the project and federal regulations in the interim.  Also, I will be in discussions with the chairman of the House Science & Technology Committee to create a Select Commercial Space Industry subcommittee to study the entire commercial space industry in Georgia as well as the Spaceport Camden project.  I will take what both the Senate and House will learn in the interim and apply any new findings to future legislative initiatives that may be needed in the future.   

"Free Exercise Protection Act" Passes General Assembly On March 16th, the General Assembly passed a compromise version of the religious free exercise legislation. The bill is a product of meticulous behind-­the-scenes work among legislators, senior attorneys, leaders in the metro-­Atlanta and statewide business communities, leaders from Georgia’s LGBT community and even  an  atheist lobbying  group from Washington, DC., committed to taking a balanced approach to protecting religious 501(c)3 nonprofits and citizens from unfair government action, the highly negotiated substitute integrated requests from each of these involved stakeholder groups, putting into statute a level of fair and candidly routine religious protections that Georgia citizens are right to expect. Achieving balance and fairness on this issue has been the single goal throughout the process, in spite of opponents’ claims of potential discrimination. I challenge Georgians to recognize that the scope of the legal attacks on our First Amendment free exercise rights are vastly broader.

An Overview of Free Exercise Protection Act, HB 757
HB 757 is a reaction to the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on same sex marriage, and many may reasonably believe it presents a public relations issue for the state and its business community in terms of holding and attracting economic development, but in drilling down into the bill, very little is actually changed by it in Georgia in terms of the present rights of citizens.

Protection of Ministers, Clerics, other Religious Practitioners, and Individuals of Faith in Regards to Compelling Their Participation in Same Sex Marriage Ceremonies

Religious practitioners shall not be required to perform marriages that violate their faith.

A refusal to perform marriages in contravention of a religious practitioner’s faith shall not give rise to a claim of discrimination or be grounds for the loss of tax exempt status.

No individual shall be compelled to attend or participate in a marriage ceremony which violates his or her faith or be subject to a claim for discrimination for failure to do so.

In reality, this is already the law on both federal and local levels as existing anti-discrimination laws generally have carve outs affecting religious organizations in areas of faith.

Protection of Businesses that Close on Saturday or Sunday

No business or industry shall be required by local ordinance or regulation to operate on a designated religious day of rest.

One might consider this a Chik-fil-A defense law. In Georgia, however, there exist no present local laws or regulations that require the opening of a business on a Saturday or Sunday.

Protection of Faith Based Organizations in Same Sex Marriage Ceremonies

No faith based organization shall be compelled to provide goods, services, or rent a location to conduct a marriage ceremony that violates its faith.

A refusal to provide such goods, services, or rent a location shall not give rise to a claim of discrimination or be grounds for denying such organization tax exempt status.

Generally, this is a codification of existing general law that already protects faith based organizations from participating in activities in opposition to their faith.

Protection of Faith Based Organizations in Regards to Employment Laws

No faith based organization shall be required to hire or retain an individual whose religious beliefs or practices run counter to beliefs of the faith based organization except as may be required by federal or Constitutional law.

A refusal to hire or retain such individual shall not give rise to a claim of discrimination or be grounds for denying such organization tax exemption status.

On first blush this provision of the bill may appear troubling to individuals concerned about discrimination in employment. However, the bill expressly recognizes federal anti-discrimination employment law. Under federal law and regulations, faith based organizations are already exempted in regards to employees in positions where ones faith is an integral part of his or her job. A minister, for instance, would fit under this existing federal exemption. Employees of such organizations in non-faith related positions, however, such as a secretary or a janitor, are protected under federal anti-discrimination law.

Strict Scrutiny Standard in Government Actions affecting Religious Liberty

The bill requires that Georgia courts shall insure that any infringement of religion by the government takes place only when there is a compelling governmental interest, and the government utilizes the least restrictive means of achieving that compelling governmental interest.

This provision is a codification in Georgia of the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act passed in the early 1990s in response to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that had applied a lower standard for considering Religious Freedom than other First Amendment protections such as Freedom of the Press or Speech. Numerous other states have also codified this standard in the past quarter century. The bill specifically recognizes that federal and state anti-discrimination laws are a compelling government interest.

Of concern to some is the fact that county or city local ordinances were not specifically recognized as well. However, the bill does not outlaw these local protections either, but merely leaves it to the courts to determine if such ordinances fit within the strict scrutiny standard. No local anti-discrimination ordinance or state law which has ever been examined under the strict scrutiny standard in other states has ever been struck down.

Furthermore, in terms of Georgia courts future considerations, the bill expressly states that in using the strict scrutiny standard, Georgia courts should follow existing Georgia Supreme Court precedent on this issue. The key case in Georgia is Jones v. Moultrie which held that one cannot use religious beliefs as a legal basis to infringe upon the rights legally held by others. Specifically, the court held, A person’s right to exercise religious freedom, which may be manifested by acts, ceases where it overlaps and transgresses the rights of others. This finding should support the upholding of local ordinances barring discrimination.

The bill specifically states that this strict scrutiny standard cannot be used as a basis for government officials to use their religious beliefs as grounds for refusing to perform their governmental duties. In other words, a government employee cannot pick and choose which laws to follow.

The bill specifically recognizes that maintaining safety and good order in penal institutions is a compelling state interest and that religious rights may be curtailed in such situations.

The bill specifically states that the strict scrutiny standard in regards to religious freedom applies to government action only and cannot be used as a basis for employee claims against private employers for alleged religious persecution.

Next week will be the final week of the 2016 legislative session. On Thursday, March 24 we will convene one final time this session for legislative day 40, or sine die, the last day we have to pass any legislation this year. While the end is near, there is still work to be done and many issues to be considered, and your input on these issues is very important to me. My colleagues and I will work long hours every day next week to ensure that we are doing what is best for Georgia and its citizens. If you are following legislation that you would like to see passed, or if you have any questions about the bills that the General Assembly has considered this session, please do not hesitate to reach out to me. Your input will help guide my decisions during this crucial time, and I appreciate all of your feedback.

You can reach me at my Capitol office at (404) 656-0177 or by email at jason.spencer@house.ga.gov. As always, thank you for allowing be to be your representative. 

GA State Representative Jason Spencer
28 Yachtsmen Court, Woodbine Georgia  31569
United States


No comments:

Post a Comment