District
Judge Richard Leon struck down a part of Washington DC’s gun carry law as
unconstitutional on Tuesday.
In a 46-page ruling, in which he ordered a preliminary
injunction, Leon put a halt on how DC police have only approved permits for
people to carry their guns concealed who had a “good reason to fear injury” or
those who are employed in jobs that are considered to be high risk.
Leon
wrote that law-abiding responsible citizens should be able “to carry arms in
public for the purpose of self-defense” and that right “does indeed lie at the
core of the Second
Amendment.”
“The
enshrinement of constitutional rights necessarily takes certain policy choices
off the table,” Leon wrote, quoting the
5-to-4 Heller Supreme Court decision from 2008 which established a constitutional
right to keep firearms inside one’s home.
“Because
the right to bear arms includes the right to carry firearms for self-defense
both in and outside the home, I find that the District’s ‘good reason’
requirement likely places an unconstitutional burden on this right,” he wrote.
Judge
Leon then called the violations of the constitutionally protected rights of
citizens that was imposed by DC in 2014 “understandable, but overly zealous.”
“The
District’s understandable, but overzealous, desire to restrict the right to
carry in public a firearm for self-defense to the smallest possible number of
law-abiding, responsible citizens is exactly the type of policy choice the
Justices had in mind,” he wrote.
Frankly, I don’t
know what is understandable about issuing permission (permits) in order for one
to exercise a God-given right to keep and bear arms. It seems clear to me that
if rights do come from
God, as our founding fathers expressed in the Declaration of Independence, that no government has a right to infringe on those
rights, and among those rights is the right to keep and bear arms.
Interestingly
enough, a pro-gun, pro-sodomite group known as Pink Pistols joined with Matthew
Grace in suing DC.
“This is not a
want,” Gwendolyn S. Patton, head of Pink Pistols International, said.
“This is a need. This is a right that we have and we are going to exercise it.
We wish to exercise it legally and therefore we’re going to challenge this idea
that you have a right to tell us what is a sufficient cause for us to carry a
gun.”
While I agree
with Patton that this is not an issue of want, but of rights, she went on to
say that sodomites face “an awful lot of instances where we get targeted by
people who don’t like us, don’t like what we do, don’t like what we stand for,
don’t like our politics.”
Not to get
sidetracked, but Patton added, “They don’t think we have the right to go about
our lives in a normal fashion and decide to harm us, to attack us, to hurt us,
and, in many cases, to kill us. This is unacceptable to us so we advocate the
use of the Second Amendment to protect ourselves from such things.”
Personally, we
know of many faked crimes against professed sodomites they actually engaged in
themselves. The problem with the argumentation is that these people’s alleged
lifestyle is unlawful. Not only does God condemn it as an abominable crime, but so did our
founding fathers. To mix rights with criminal
activity is wrong; and while Patton is right about the ability to defend one’s
self, she is not correct when it comes to engaging the behavior of sodomy,
which she promotes.
DC is a “may
issue” city, but of course, that sort of thinking is diametrically opposed to
the Constitution’s protections in the Second Amendment.
“The District of
Columbia cannot parcel out constitutional rights to a select few of its
choosing,” plaintiffs’ attorney David Thompson said Tuesday. “That’s not how the Constitution works in this
country.”
As for Mayor
Muriel E. Bowser, her spokesperson, Christina Harper said, “We believe our
gun laws are constitutional and should be upheld.”
The Washington
Free Beacon reports
that the city will request a stay on the ruling in addition to filing an
appeal, according to D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine.
http://eaglerising.com/33753/judge-stops-washington-d-c-s-assault-on-gun-rights/
No comments:
Post a Comment