Guest comment: Hannity interview explains why
refugee flow so dangerous to us, by Ann Corcoran 7/30/16
Editor: From time
to time I post guest columns from readers. Although a few days late, this
is a very welcome piece. I heard the interview live driving through South
Dakota the other day and thought—you must all hear this! Thanks to reader
Julia for being on the same wavelength and sending me her comments. (Emphasis
is mine)
Rich Higgins and
Raheem Kassam Warn Against the Inflow of Refugees. Sean
Hannity questioned Rich
Higgins and Raheem
Kassam on his radio
show about “why
President Obama is insisting 10,000 ‘refugees’ from the Middle East [be]
brought immediately to America, and why Democratic nominee Hilary[sic] Clinton
advocates increasing numbers by ‘500 per cent'” in light of the non-stop
killing, raping, and groping by refugees and migrants in France, Germany, and
Belgium and when Obama’s advisers say that terrorists may infiltrate the
refugee population.
Higgins is a
former official with the Department of Defense’s Combating Terrorism Technical
Support Office & Irregular Warfare Support Program. Kassam is
Editor-in-Chief at the Breitbart London bureau.
Behind bars in
France, Marxist, Carlos-the-Jackel married his French lawyer in a Muslim
ceremony. As to Hannity’s question, Higgins answered, “I think that they’re so
keen to have them coming in here because their Muslim Brotherhood advisers are
telling them that is best for the West.”
Kassam added that “powerful liberal open
borders activists such as George Soros” were responsible as well. His message
to them: “it’s very hard to fight for social justice if you’re dead.”
“‘And the most galling element of it,’ Kassam continued, ‘is that we
have the BBC, and the New York Times, and Sky News (editor note – Rupert
Murdoch), and all of these other guys who are basically saying: ‘well, a
backpack killed these people, a machete killed them.’ No. These are Syrian
migrants who have faked being refugees. Some of them have been turned down in
terms of asylum status, and they happen to have bomb making knowledge and
explosives at the same time?”
Higgins emphasized that the “outcome of this
enemy isn’t just the killing, it is the political [expansion] of the shariah
law, of Islamic law, in the west and we see our media compliant with Islamic
law already – they won’t tell us the truth about it.” Higgins continued his warning: “[and] to build on [Kassam’s] comments on
the Socialist-Islamist nexus, in 2003, Carlos
the Jackal, the Terrorist, in his book Revolutionary Islam said that
only a coalition of Marxists and Islamists can destroy the United States and
what we see happening right now is that de facto alliance – both in the
tactical sense – in the neighborhoods where these NGOs are working with these
refugee groups – they’re not actually refugees, they’re immigrants or Muhajirun
is the more appropriate technical term for them and this is all part of the
Hijra . . Hijra is a term from
Islam this is a Hijra – it is an act of moving here
– they call it the process of settlement – they are not coming to immigrate and
to actually become Americans or to subscribe to the Constitution – they’re
coming here as a process of settlement.”
When
the Obama administration says ISIS is on the run because it may have lost some
“occupied territory” or lost “some leaders to drone strikes”, read what “Carlos
the Jackal” surmised below and realize that ISIS is adaptive and “the only destination to which it
is on the run is the next step in its strategy or the next attack and we have
to stop falling into the ‘lone wolf’ trap, the insistence that if [ISIS]
leaders aren’t texting instructions to [its] operatives, an attack somehow has
less strategic importance or is not directly connected to its plan.”
“Carlos
the Jackal” a/k/a Ilich
Ramírez Sánchez, is “a Venezuelan now serving a life sentence for murder in
France,” He “saw that only
revolutionary Islam could recruit the large numbers of killers and martyrs
necessary to destroy the United States.”
“Carlos had also concluded that the United States could not be
destroyed by any military rival. What was needed was a campaign of terror and
that terrorism is ‘the cleanest and most efficient form of warfare.’ By killing civilians, he argued, the
terrorist saps the morale of the enemy and forces its leadership to submit to
the demands of the revolution or surrender.”
“Carlos] dwelled on the necessity for all Muslim men to grow beards and
all Muslim women to wear the “revolutionary” head-cover (the hijab) invented in
Lebanon in the 1970s. He said that
beards and the hijab can be used as tools of terror, to dishearten the
Americans by reminding them that “their enemy Islam” is in their midst.”
See. See
also.
Editor: So the
question we (who understand this) have is this: They are telling us that they are coming for
us, so why don’t more people believe them?
No comments:
Post a Comment