Abortion Lobbyist Admits He Lied About Rarity of Late
Term Abortions , Robert George | 10/26/16
Alright Secretary Clinton,
just tell us yourself when the child in the womb should be granted the same
protection against deliberate homicide that you claim for yourself and other
human beings whom you deem worthy of legal protection? Should the unborn child
be protected from abortion at 4 months? 5? 7? Tell us.
Do you think abortion
should be prohibited in the 8th month? The 9th? Or do you believe, as I suspect
you believe, that it should be permitted up to birth (and even …during birth)?
Tell us which abortions you would prohibit—if any.
Oh, and Secretary Clinton,
you and your flacks say that very late-term abortions don’t exist, or are only
done when “medically necessary.” Those claims are false. I challenge you to
defend them—especially against the statements of late-term abortionists themselves
who have acknowledged performing late-term elective abortions. Famously, top
abortion industry lobbyist Ron Fitzsimmons admitted to lying about
the frequency of partial-birth abortions in order to deceive the public. Do you
claim he was lying about his lying?
Friends, Secretary Clinton
and her media enablers (and the phony “fact checkers”) are trying to pull off a
massive deception here. Don’t fall for it. Under pressure, they will retreat to
the claim that late-term abortions are “rare,” and then defend that claim by
saying that they are a “small percentage of the total number of abortions
performed annually.” Do you spot the trick? Let’s say the total number is 1
million. 1.2 percent would be 12,000. Think about that. 12,000 fully viable
babies who could be delivered and permitted to survive are instead deliberately
killed. That is not a small number (although it is a small *percentage* of a
hideously large number).
Some of these abortions
are eugenic killings—the baby is killed because he or she is disabled or, as
the abortionists prefer to say “defective.” Rarely if ever are they necessary
for the preservation of maternal health, since the baby’s viability means that
the pregnancy can be terminated by causing the delivery and birth of the living
child. (Of course, “health” can be defined in an absurdly broad way, as the
Supreme Court did in 1973 in Doe v. Bolton, such that the baby’s life—her very
existence—is itself defined as the threat to the mother’s “emotional” or
“psychological” well-being. A moment’s thought about where the logic of that
leads will make you shudder.)
The truth is that Hillary
Clinton supports abortion tout court—including late-term abortions. (Donald
Trump did too until he got political ambitions; but she, not he, is the one
lying about this issue today.) She should not be allowed to hide the fact that
she supports them—just as Barack Obama does and almost all other nationally
prominent Democrats do. They dance to the tune of the abortion lobby. It is a
disgrace.
No comments:
Post a Comment