Friday, May 25, 2018

Banishment Rights


The “Nanny State” continues to usurp family sovereignty and undermine the family structure. Property owners should not be subject to legal expenses to deal with their own family members.

When everybody behaves, families have always taken care of their own. The family is the basic economic unit in free societies. This usually works for families until one family member becomes disruptive, weird or abusive. The parents who own the house should be free to banish the offender. This sad event usually involves drugs, alcohol and sociopathic bad behavior. Forcing offenders to take personal responsibility to support themselves and confront their own reality is beneficial to their recovery.

Government just makes things worse by misplacing responsibility and undermining personal responsibility. We now have weird kids turning into school shooters. Weird kids usually banish themselves by locking themselves in their bedrooms. In college, they hide in a “safe space”. Our free will lead us into problems if we have self-defeating attitudes and make bad decisions. Those who tolerate this are “enablers”.

Tolerance must be earned and is reciprocal. Tolerance for bad behavior is suicidal and leads to anarchy. It is achieved through manipulation. Effective resistance to manipulation is necessary and requires good listening skills.  It’s an art that requires time, patients and moderation. The bar set by the parents needs to be gauged to the ability of the child to reach it.  Parents just need to be assertive and supportive at the same time. Emotional maturity is rare and so are listening skills, but those who have these are fortunate.

It is difficult to deal with people who do not know themselves and are not reflective of their own behavior. Transactional analysis describes self-defeating behaviors.

Responsibility involves proximity. We are first responsible for ourselves. Next we are responsible to help our spouses and children. We are left with the consequences of our attitudes and actions.

The article below illustrates the fact that kids are like a box of chocolates, you never know what you’re going to get.

Parents forced to take 30-year-old “Deadbeat” son to court to evict him, by Daphine Moon, 5/24/18

‘Failure to launch syndrome’ a new condition named after the 2006 movie starring Matthew McConaughey where his parents try everything to get their adult son to ‘leave the nest’. Including paying a ‘professional’, played by Sarah Jessica Parker, to help coax their son out of the home.

In New York, one couple is currently living a real-life version of the movie and have issued at least five eviction notices to their adult son, at one point offered him money to leave, before resorting to taking legal action. It seems to be a growing issue with Millennials where they are staying home with their parents for longer than expected. Some blame economic strains but most say that the entitlement of the millennials is the real cause.

According to NY Post, an upstate couple got so fed up with their unemployed 30-year-old son’s refusal to leave the nest that they finally sued to evict him — and won.

Mark and Christina Rotondo were forced to the extreme-parenting measure after giving their layabout millennial boy Michael cash for moving expenses, pleading with him to get on with his life and finally sending written legal notices demanding he grow up and move out.

After listening to Micheal’s response on Fox News we are inclined to say entitlement seems to play a major roll in his reasoning. Take a look.

When asked if he considered spending as much time looking for a new place to live as fighting the eviction, Rotondo replied that he wasn’t ready to leave home.

Asked how he interacted with his parents under the same roof, Rotondo said there were no incidents, but that he did not talk to his parents. When asked if he lived in the basement, Rotondo replied in a bedroom.

In court, Rotondo noted that his parents did not support him by providing food or doing his laundry. But he insisted that they were providing for him with housing, in arguing why he should be granted another six months to find a new place to live.

Exasperated, the judge at one point mentioned Airbnb in pointing out how easy it was to find a place to stay on short notice.

After court, Rotondo said he had a business to support himself. But when asked about his business, Rotondo replied: “My business is my business.”

When all was said and done, the judge asked the parents’ lawyer to come up with an eviction order that Greenwood would sign. No specified deadline was stated in court, but the lawyer mentioned that it would include a reasonable time for Rotondo to vacate.


Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader


No comments:

Post a Comment