What We Can Expect With a
Democrat-Marxist Controlled House of Representatives…. November 8, 2018 bySundance
CTH has received multiple
requests for a review of predictable consequences as a result of the midterm
election. Thankfully, and perhaps unfortunately, we have solid references
to base these predictions on – because there’s a solid frame of reference from
the 2006 midterm and the subsequent consequences we saw in 2007, 2008, 2009,
2010.
If we take the empirical
2006 example as the starting point and overlay the 2018 landscape to modernize
the predictive model, what results is a most likely scenario.
First, any intellectually
honest review must overlay the current political environment. In 2018 the
scale of unchecked lawless behavior is a significant influence toward the
differences we can expect from the last time Democrat/Marxists held
congressional power. The term “Democrat-socialism”, in essence a Marxist
approach, is now the dominant fuel within the professional DNC political
operations.
When the Democrats last
held power in 2006, their actionable objective was toward a far-left, Saul
Alinsky-type aggressive tone and influence; however, there was a need to couch
that intention as they positioned Senator Barack Obama for the 2008 presidential
election.
In 2006 the radicals,
needed to downplay their radicalism. In 2018 the severity and aggression
of the left, as assisted by the dropping of all media pretense, no longer needs
to hide the intention. When Democrat-Marxists take control in January of
2019 they no longer need to couch the extremism, the American electorate have
been prepped.
Secondly, it cannot be
overstated how violent and confrontational the House of Representatives will be
as soon as they are sworn in. They will work with an immediate purposeful
intention. All political violence will be approved to attain their
objectives. The recent behavior of Jim Acosta (CNN media), and ANTIFA
toward Tucker Carlson, is now, and will be going forward, the new normal.
There will be extreme
political violence.
In 2006 it was the SEIU
and AFSCME union foot-soldiers who smashed windows, advanced upon polling
places and engaged in the most severe examples of voter fraud and
intimidation. In 2018, with the help of uber-Alinsky DNC Chairman Tom
Perez, that corrupt sentiment is now institutionalized within
democrat-socialist political apparatus. ANTIFA is now the DNC grassroots
activist approach.
Failing to accept the
severity of this shift in the past decade is intellectually dishonest. As
Nancy Pelosi said of the Occupy Wall Street violent anarchists: “God bless
these people.” Indeed the OWS precursor to ANTIFA were laying the
groundwork for the new severity of power in Democrat leadership. Nothing
is out-of-bounds; no level of corrupt behavior will be avoided; everything will
happen openly and without any backlash from a compliant media apparatus; the
social fabric will be shredded.
The Democrat mantra:
“never let a crisis go to waste” is the modern version of the Fabian-Socialist:
“remould it closer to the heart’s desire“. Both approaches rely upon the destruction of acceptable
norms in order to advance the political objective.
Specifics: When Democrats last
took power in January 2007, Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer took control in the
final two years of George Bush second term. Immediately they set about a
process laying the groundwork for the 2008 presidential election of Barack
Obama. This was a priority objective.
One of the techniques was
the removal of the budget process. By eliminating the federal budget process in
2007 (fiscal year ’08) the Democrats paved the way for the next democrat
president to demand massive open-ended spending.
By the time the year of
the general election came around (2008), the lengthy budget process was
replaced with Omnibus spending bills (fiscal year 2009). Obviously when
Obama was successfully installed in November of 2008, the useful crisis was
financial. The subsequent TARP bailout, auto bailout, ARRA ($1 trillion
stimulus) and QE1 were all accomplished with massive omnibus spending packages.
[NOTE: These are important
references because from that moment forward, despite the GOP taking back
control in January 2011, the constraining budgetary process was forever
destroyed. There was never regular-order budgetary spending again.]
It is also critical to
emphasize the difference between Democrats taking control in the last two years
of Bush’s second term, and Democrats taking control in the last two years of
Trump’s first term.
Within this difference you will predictably see a shift in strategic operations
from the Marxists.
George W Bush was exiting,
and unlimited spending was used to empower the entry of Obama; however, now the
Marxists need to knee-cap President Trump by weaponizing the power of the purse
– the biggest weapon of the House of Representatives.
After a ten year UniParty
hiatus the Marxists will now go back to using budgets in the structural defunding
and dismantling of ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement), the Southern
Border Wall, and any program, initiative, policy or institution the Marxists
want to see removed. This is a strategy of the Democrat crisis-makers;
and they are exceptionally better at achieving their desired results than
Republicans.
When it comes to political
weaponization and political power constructs the Marxists have exceptional work
ethics; they will outwork anyone on the other side who opposes them. They
are far, far, better at political strategy and scheme than conservative
politicians. Part of the reason for their success is that crooks, cons
and swindlers are far more cunning than honorable, virtuous and moral
people. It is unfortunate, but true; and the same truth applies beyond
politics.
Two other thoughts on this
issue.
First, you might remember when this massive spending, and the government
takeover of healthcare, led to the Marxists losing the 2010 midterm election in
a massive defeat. But do you remember what the democrats did in the
lame-duck congress between November 2010 and January 2011?
Does the term “Porkulous”
ring a bell? While 63 democrat seats were lost in the November 2010 election
(and six democrat senate seats), those exiting Marxists, despite just having
suffered the worst defeat in almost 100 years, audaciously –and apologetically– voted in the
December 2010 lame-duck session, to fully fund President Obama’s next two years
in office. This was done by Speaker Nancy Pelosi specifically to block
the incoming GOP wave from upending the priorities of the Obama administration
in 2011. That was called the “Porkulous” spending bill; and the
democrat-Marxists didn’t give a snit about how it looked.
Now, do you think Speaker
Paul Ryan will do anything as bold to fund and secure the budgetary priorities
of President Donald Trump in this lame-duck?
Secondly, about the
overall unilateral commitment and cunning historically displayed by the
Marxists. They are so committed to the long-term view they are willing to
sacrifice anything for the biggest, most consequential, advances toward their
objectives. In 2010 the democrats killed their own “blue-dog” coalition
to advance their ideological goals.
Within the 63 House seats
the Marxists lost in that 2010 midterm election; they killed off the entire 40
member Bart Stupak coalition; the blue-dog caucus. Totally willing to
sacrifice 40 seats to attain a generational ideological objective (ObamaCare);
and they are about to step back into power a mere eight years later.
Stunning when you think about it.
In my opinion few reading
this have any idea just how bad these next two years are going to be. It’s not
your fault. We are the normal people who don’t spend every moment of our
day scheming, conniving, and developing plans to dismantle the lives of your
freedom loving community and rebuild it as a collective society. For
these Marxists who are about to take power that’s
all they do. Every moment of their existence they spend
thinking about how to gain power and dominate, 24/7/365 that’s all they do.
Lastly, future
predictions: Michael Bloomberg will be the Democrat/Marxist nominee for
2020. There will be a field of candidates; but the professional Democrat
machine will run the splitter strategy, and the back-room crowd who really
control the elements of power have already pre-selected their nominee, Michael
Bloomberg. Marxists always have the plan mapped out well in advance. (A
woman will be the VP nominee)
If you start now looking
at what actions the Marxists are taking, through the prism of their goal being
President Michael Bloomberg, lots of things will make a lot more sense.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody
GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment