Sunday, October 6, 2019

Dunwoody Government Abuse


The City of Dunwoody began in 2009 with the full implementation of UN Agenda 21. In 2008 and 2010 the Georgia legislature passed laws establishing Regional Commissions to introduce unelected governance. The Georgia Legislature approved the Dunwoody City Charter with a “City Manager” form of government.  The City Council does vote on the budget using “group think” and gives the City Manager anything he wants and voters have no say.

By 2010, the Georgia Mayor and Council Handbook included UN Agenda 21 implementation ordinances and land use plans along with the propaganda that “smart growth” would replace 200 years of history that allowed individual cities’ sovereignty over their own ordinances. UN Agenda 21 required high density public transit development, but that expensive pipedream has failed in Atlanta Metro.

Private property rights were trashed from 2009 to 2016. Cities and their cronies were given authority to zone private property any way they liked. Easements were already excessive and bike lanes were required despite the fact that there were and are still no bikers using them. Property owners no longer had the property rights they had when the bought their properties. 

The Dunwoody City Charter was expanded by the Georgia Legislature to remove all limits to the city’s ability to tax and borrow, despite the fact that cities were going bankrupt over failed economic development schemes and failure to maintain critical infrastructure like water and sewer systems.

The abuse continued with police impounding cars of car owners who were late in paying their car insurance bills. Municipal Court became a profit center as fees and fines rose and proliferated. The fine for not paying your car insurance on time is $1300.

Homeowners now pay fees for inspections when they replace anything. Stream buffers render back yards useless and obstruct deck maintenance. Everything requires permits with hefty fines for non-compliance. Traffic gridlock is assured due to high density building, welfare migrant immigration and failure to plan for expansion.

Public school expansion and replacement costs doubled because of unnecessary State laws dictating that schools be built to accommodate 900 students and all are financed through Bond sales with interest doubling the cost. Neighborhood k-12 schools have been replaced by k-4, 5-6 and 7-8 middle schools making gridlock worse.

The maintenance of our crumbled 35 year-old roads we voted to be repaired in 2009 have not been completed, but we have spent $millions on bribes to attract more employment and development to achieve total traffic gridlock and settlement of lawsuits against sloppy law enforcement, useless expensive studies, very expensive, unnecessary road and intersection designs and other non-essentials since 2009.

Now we see the Dunwoody City Council debating protection for our invisible bikers and $1000 fines for harried car drivers if they violate these rules. Our current bike-lanes are 2 to 3 feet wide and would need to be expanded for these invisible bikers in order to squander more $millions. The bike lanes were installed to get federal funding for street expansion for commercial vehicles. Dunwoody, like the rest of Atlanta was built with narrow 2-lane roads and no sidewalks. 

There are few walkers on Dunwoody sidewalks. All the walkers confine themselves to the subdivision streets and few use the sidewalks that have been installed on the main roads. There are virtually no bikers using the bike lanes.

See the latest unnecessary, abusive police-state, revenue gouging ordinance proposed below.

Dunwoody ordinance seeks to protect cyclists, pedestrians, other ‘vulnerable road users’, Posted by Dyana Bagby, 9/10/19, Dunwoody Reporter.
 
The Dunwoody City Council is considering a new ordinance that would prevent motor vehicle drivers from getting too close to or threatening pedestrians, bicyclists, scooter riders and other “vulnerable road users” as part of a goal to make city roads safer.

The ordinance would impose stiff penalties against violators, including fines, jail time or having their license suspended. The penalties could be removed if the driver agreed to take a driver education class.

The Dunwoody council was scheduled to take up the ordinance at its Sept. 9 meeting in the first of two presentations, but the council agreed to defer discussion to allow the city’s legal department more time to go over its language.

“This is an important public safety issue and we want to get it right,” Councilmember Tom Lambert said at the meeting. Lambert is the sponsor of the proposed ordinance. There was no other discussion by councilmembers at the meeting.

The current draft of the ordinance would require, among other things that motorists move over into an empty lane if possible when passing someone on a bike, scooter or moped. If another lane is not empty, then car and small truck drivers would be required to pass vulnerable road users with at least 3 feet of space between them.

For larger trucks or commercial vehicles, the safe space to pass a vulnerable road user is at least 6 feet, according to the draft ordinance.

The ordinance bans motor vehicles from driving too closely to “vulnerable road users” to intimidate or threaten them, or tossing objects at them. The draft ordinance also requires motorists to yield to vulnerable road users who are approaching an intersection or close to an intersection.

The ordinance’s definition of “vulnerable road users” includes highway construction workers, emergency service providers and utility workers whose job can put them close to busy roads. People using skateboards, roller skates, wheelchairs and horse-drawn carriages would also be classified as “vulnerable road users.”

The ordinance might not apply in incidents where the “vulnerable road user” was violating traffic laws.
Lambert said he felt compelled to propose the ordinance after learning in January about a middle-school student being nearly struck by a car while she was in a crosswalk at North Peachtree and Tilly Mill roads. In another January incident, a jogger was struck by a car as she ran in a crosswalk and sustained serious injuries, he said.

The drivers were not paying attention to the road while the pedestrians were following the law, Lambert said. The proposed ordinance could help raise more awareness among motorists about sharing the road, he added. Deterrents such as fines, mandatory court dates and even a stint in jail, are also intended to change driver behavior to be more aware of their surroundings.

“We are striving to become a more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly city and have initiated a lot of priorities like sidewalks [and] crosswalks,” Lambert said. “Infrastructure is great, but you only get one piece of the puzzle.

“The idea not to be punitive, but to educate drivers,” he added. “We’re crafting the ordinance in way the driver can have penalties reduced or removed if they complete a driver education class.”

No other cities in Georgia currently have such an ordinance, Lambert said. He said he worked with Police Chief Billy Grogan and the city attorney to come up with Dunwoody’s ordinance by researching similar ones in Houston and Washington state. Nine states in the country have “vulnerable road user” laws, Lambert said.

Lambert said he hopes to have the proposed ordinance back before the City Council later this month. “I’m excited for us to blaze this trail … and set an example for other municipalities,” he said.

Dunwoody resident Cheryl Summers spoke out against the ordinance during public comment, saying “vulnerable road users” can use sidewalks and other pathways to stay off roads.

“I don’t see the need for this,” she said. “I don’t know of any driver or operator of a vehicle who would deliberately try to run down a pedestrian or one of these others vulnerable road users. I think this is a little ridiculous and redundant to what we already have.”


Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

No comments:

Post a Comment