The National Wilderness Preservation System
is made up of four federal agencies: USDA Forest Service, USDI National Park
Service, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. It is
implemented through the National Heritage Area Program,
In
order to understand the rational behind what has taken place at the Bundy
Ranch in Clark County, Nevada, it is vital to understand some of the mindset
behind it. The United Nations now has a great deal of control over what happens
in United States’ land, largely but not only federal ownership and/or control.
What we are seeing is an international body now governing over many parts
of the U.S.
It then becomes a question of whether international treaties
and other agreements, especially UN Agenda 21 in this case, trump the United
States Constitution.
By the recently deceased researcher, author,
and expert on UN Agenda 21, Henry Lamb, an article was written in 2003 dealing
with the very issue people are taking note of today. It is entitled “Why the
Government is Grabbing our Land” (excerpt):
By 1976, the United Nations was ready to articulate
a general policy on land use. This policy is stated in the final report of
the first U.N. Conference on Human Settlements (HABITAT I), held in Vancouver,
British Columbia in 1976.
The preamble to the section on
Land, says: “Land…cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by
individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market.
Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation
and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice;
if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation
of development schemes. The provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions
for the people can only be achieved if land is used in the interests of society
as a whole. Public control of land use is therefore indispensable….”
In 1994 the map below was presented by
Michael Coffman to the U.S. Senate, which stopped the ratification of the
biodiversity treaty. Despite such efforts we find that it is being implemented
through various government agencies, executive orders, trade associations,
etc. Generally, it is funded by our tax dollars, or central bank cartel
funds, or those of foundations formed by corporations and tycoons which in
our history have become borrowers of the worlds’ major banking
institutions.
A program for National Heritage sites is
just one example of how this plan has still continued. Its efforts to control
land have increased at an alarming speed. As more people wake up to the reality
of what is taking place, we are naturally going to push back, as seen at the
Bundy Ranch. Then again, the efforts to implement this agenda will only become
bolder. That will create a very tense situation to say the least.
From another stalwart activist for sovereign
Americans’ foundationally agreed natural rights of life, liberty, and
property, Tom DeWeese, in a 2012 article:
I mentioned H.R. 4099, a bill now before Congress
to “Authorize a National Heritage Area Program, and for other purposes…”
The bill describes the need for Heritage Areas this way: “Certain areas of
the United States tell nationally significant stories; they illustrate
significant aspects of our heritage; possess exceptional natural, cultural,
scenic, and historic resources; and represent the diversity of our national
character.”
Section 4© of the Wilderness Act prohibits
the use of motor vehicles, motorized equipment, motorboats, landing of aircraft,
and all other forms of mechanical transport. Section 4© of the Wilderness
Act provides two narrow exceptions that allow motorized or mechanized
uses in wilderness for administrative purposes: 1) in emergencies involving
the health and safety of persons within the area; and 2) when a motorized or
mechanized action is necessary as the minimum requirement for proper protection
and administration of the area as wilderness.
Section 2© of the Wilderness Act defines
Wilderness, in part, “as an area where the earth and community of life are
untrammeled by man…” Remaining untrammeled is a key quality that differentiates
designated Wilderness from other undeveloped lands. To be untrammeled
means that natural processes in Wilderness are left free to function without
intentional human interference and manipulation. Protecting Wilderness
as untrammeled landscape is a key statutory intent of the Wilderness Act.
The Act further defines wilderness “as an
area to be “protected and managed so as to preserve its natural conditions
and which (1) generally appears to have been affected primarily by the
forces of nature, with the imprint of man’s work substantially unnoticeable…”
The Act envisioned the Wilderness system to be governed by natural
processes, retaining its “primeval character and influence…” The hands-off
approach directed by the Act provides that management decisions and activities
must strive to minimize the level of human interference in the Wilderness
ecosystem.
Despite the statutory intent that Wilderness
be self-willed or self-shaping landscape, a variety of intentional human
manipulations do take place in Wilderness, many of them unrelated to protecting
Wilderness character. Examples of common manipulations include fish
stocking, fire management, wildlife transplants, endangered species management,
management of game populations, predator control, and invasive weeds
and insect infestations.
One may readily see how this ties into Agenda
21, from the UN Agenda 21 publication.
Objectives
10.5. The broad objective is to facilitate
allocation of land to the uses that provide the greatest sustainable benefits
and to promote the transition to a sustainable and integrated management
of land resources. In doing so, environmental, social and economic issues
should be taken into consideration. Protected areas, private property
rights, the rights of indigenous people and their communities and other
local communities and the economic role of women in agriculture and rural
development, among other issues, should be taken into account. In more specific
terms, the objectives are as follows:
(a) To review and develop policies to support
the best possible use of land and the sustainable management of land
resources, by not later than 1996;
(b) To improve and strengthen planning, management
and evaluation systems for land and land resources, by not later than 2000;
© To strengthen institutions and coordinating
mechanisms for land and land resources, by not later than 1998;
(d) To create mechanisms to facilitate
the active involvement and participation of all concerned, particularly
communities and people at the local level, in decision-making on land use
and management, by not later than 1996.
Today, we have at least two generations
that have been indoctrinated well beyond four years (that is key to Agenda 21
implementation) and trained to be good “global citizens” — that it is
their duty to be good stewards to the earth, as global power-hoarders define
what that is to mean.
As time passes and the collectivist indoctrinated
youth grow up, they are to become managers of these wilderness areas. Then,
they must make sure the people who are still stuck in their old ways of thinking
will see the new ways for them, or be made to comply. As of yet, they have no
reliable way of knowing that in today’s world, this repackaged socialism is
just a vehicle for the ever increasing tyrannies of a new style of totalitarian
control, aided by technology generating the ability to monitor virtually
everything about our lives — a system of which Lenin could have only have
dreamed. And if these plans are allowed to fully come to fruition, there will
be no more free ranchers, farmers, or citizens.
No comments:
Post a Comment