Sunday, May 22, 2016

Teamsters Pension Fund Broke

407,000 Workers Stunned As Pension Fund Proposes 60% Cuts, Treasury Says "Not Enough", Submitted by Tyler Durden, 5/21/16, Submitted by Michael Shedlock via MishTalk.com,

407,000 private sector workers are about to lose most of their pensions. I first wrote about this on April 21, in One of Nation’s Largest Pension Funds (Truckers) Will Reduce Benefits or Go Broke by 2025.

The Central States Pension Fund, which handles the retirement benefits for current and former Teamster union truck drivers across various states applied for reductions under that law.

Currently the plan pays out $3.46 in pension benefits for every $1 it receives from employers. That’s a drain of $2 billion annually.

The plan filed for 60% cuts in pensions. The Treasury Department has the final say. The verdict came in today: “cuts not deep enough”.


The Central States Pension Fund has no new plan to avoid insolvency, fund director Thomas Nyhan said this week. Without government funding, the fund will run out of money in 10 years, he said.

At that time, pension benefits for about 407,000 people could be reduced to “virtually nothing,” he told workers and retirees in a letter sent Friday.

In a last-ditch effort, the Central States Pension Plan sought government approval to partially reduce the pensions of 115,000 retirees and the future benefits for 155,000 current workers. The proposed cuts were steep, as much as 60% for some, but it wasn’t enough. Earlier this month, the Treasury Department rejected the plan because it found that it would not actually head off insolvency.

The fund could submit a new plan, but decided this week that there’s no other way to successfully save the fund and comply with the law. The cuts needed would be too severe.

Normally, when a multi-employer fund like Central States runs out of money, a government insurance fund called the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) kicks in so that retirees still receive some kind of benefit.

But that’s not a great solution in this case. For one thing, the amount is smaller than what pensioners would have received under the Central States reduction plan, and is based on the number of years a retiree worked. A retiree would receive a maximum $35.75 a month for each year worked, according to the fund’s website. (That amounts to $1,072.50 a month for retiree who worked 30 years.)

But there’s yet another problem. The PBGC itself is underfunded and isn’t expected to be able to cover all the retirees in the Central States Pension Fund.


About the Fund

Message from the Board of Trustees

Central States Pension Fund is one of the nation’s largest multiemployer Taft-Hartley defined benefit pension plans. With more than 400,000 participants across the country, Central States Pension Fund is jointly administered by an eight-member Board of Trustees consisting of four Labor Trustees and four Employer Trustees.

Established in 1955 to provide pension benefits to Teamsters in the trucking industry, today, Central States Pension Fund has more than 1,500 contributing employers representing 60,000 participants in a variety of industries, including car-haul, tank-haul, pipeline, warehouse, construction, clerical, food processing, dairy and trucking.
At year-end 2014, Central States Pension Fund had assets of $17.8 billion with a liability for promised benefits of $35 billion. The Fund pays out over $2.8 billion in pension benefits per year. To date, nearly $62 billion in retirement benefits have been paid by Central States Pension Fund to Teamster retirees and their families.


Comments

The Teamsters had always required “host corporations” to contribute to the Central States Pension Fund, but never bothered to control benefit levels to fit revenues. Unions always negotiate their way into oblivion.

Defined Benefit Pension Plans have been terminated by the vast majority of corporations that once sponsored them.  They remain in government, utilities and a handful of suicidal dinosaurs like Boeing and others.  We began terminating these plans in the 1980s and 1990s because they were destined to fail.  We allowed employees to transfer their pension fund balances to 401K Plans and some of us set up separate Age-Weighted Defined Contribution plans to subsidize older employees.  We knew that the PBGC couldn’t handle these defaults.  All “defined benefit plans” including Social Security were offered in the 1930s based on the supposition that beneficiaries would die at age 65. But now life expectancy is age 78 and beyond. 

If Social Security had been structured as a portable private investment account instead of a method to dump cash into a federal government “slush fund”, we would all have tripled our deposits and we would own them.  If we had contributed $500,000 over 40 years, we would have had $1.5 million.


Norb Leahy, Dunwoody Tea Party Leader
 

No comments:

Post a Comment