Saturday, November 1, 2014

Mafia Extortion in Sicily


Dealing with the mafia: Stop that racket, Oct 27th 2014, 14:33 by B.R.
THE protection racket was one of the first businesses the Sicilian mafia entered into. Mafiosi have shaken down firms, large and small, on the island for over 150 years. In the 1990s it is thought that 90% of business owners paid a “pizzo”—slang for beak, as in “wet your beak”—to keep hoodlums from their doors. The custom is so entrenched that many people assume it to be intractable.
Some brave figureheads have attempted to rally businessmen to take a principled stand against the crime syndicates. Yet when such heroes arrive, they can end up fighting an unwinnable war on two fronts. They must not only be wary of mafiosi with guns, but also the wrath of other merchants, for whom paying up has simply become a habit built up over decades. 
A new paper by Guido Palazzo of the University of Lausanne and Antonino Vaccaro of IESE Business School, to be published in the Academy of Management Journal next year, opens with the tale of one such man who found himself pincered. Libro Grassi was a clothing-factory owner who publicly refused to pay protection money in the late 1990s. He was eventually gunned down for his principles, but not before being ostracised by his peers, who accused him of tarnishing the image of Sicily.
Mr Palazzo argues that societies dominated by organised crime are remarkably resistant to change. “Many Sicilians consider paying protection money to the mafia perfectly legitimate,” he writes. “Libero Grassi found no support among his peers because his decision to challenge the practice publicly was perceived as inappropriate in his social context.” Yet, as the paper goes on to explore, in the past few years there has been a remarkably successful campaign against the pizzo. It has succeeded, say the authors, precisely because it did not have such a figurehead to drive it.
In 2004 a group of seven students who were hoping to open a open a small business in Palermo, the Sicilian capital, got frustrated with the mafia’s meddling. One night, they anonymously plastered the walls of the town with hundreds of posters which read, simply: “A society that pays the Pizzo is a society without dignity.” Although the protagonists were naturally keen not to identify themselves, they captured the island’s imagination. So, as a next step, they launched a campaign called “Addiopizzo”, or “Goodbye pizzo”. Rather than try to convince resistant business owners to change their behaviour, they persuaded 3,500 ordinary citizens to sign a declaration saying they would buy goods from shops which did not pay the mafia. Thus emboldened, they presented the list to a local newspaper.
Once they had proven that there was a commercial benefit in refusing to pay a pizzo, the students moved on to the shop owners themselves. In secret, one-on-one meetings they encouraged individual merchants to sign up to Addiopizzo. Those that agreed were given a banner that could be placed in shop windows telling customers that they were refusing to pay protection money. Importantly, the list was only disclosed, and the banners distributed, once they had mustered a hundred signatories.
The results have been remarkable. Addiopizzo has been the most successful campaign against racketeering in the island’s history, says Mr Palazzo. Some 20% of shops now declare that they don’t pay the mafia. Additionally, reports to the police of attempted coercion rose from 178 in 2004 to 260 in 2011.
The key to the success of Addiopizzo, says Mr Palazzo, is that values were changed from the bottom upwards. If thousands of ordinary customers signal their intention to change their behaviour, there is little pressure the mafia can bring to bear on them. By linking the change in mindset to “dignity”, a deep-rooted Sicilian value, Mr Palazzo says they also cleverly reclaimed the idea that standing up to the mafia was socially appropriate. And by signing up shops quietly, and then releasing the list as a fait accompli, mafia bosses, used to dealing with top-down protests, found themselves submerged by a movement rising from beneath their feet. By the time they recognised the threat, it was too late.
Mr Palazzo says that other business movements can learn much from Addiopizzo. Most important is the power of producing a positive message. The Sicily campaign worked because the consumers demonstrated that it was in the shop owners’ commercial interest to resist organised crime. This lesson can be applied to other areas, such as global warming or promoting socially responsible consumption, says the professor. In such cases, he thinks, the emphasis is too often on the apocalyptic consequences of the status quo, rather than giving positive reasons to change. As the mafia may be learning, changing values, rather than peddling fear, can make for better results.
Comments
In the U.S., we call them politicians.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

Guns & Bibles


"Marshall Rawson was just suspended from Shorter University for exercising his right to refuse an unwarranted search of his car while on the university campus. For refusing, it was assumed that he was in possession of a firearm on campus. He is a member of Young American's for Liberty and several other youth activist groups focused on Conservative Christian values.
 
Shorter University is supposed to be a Christian college, but based on the slanderous rumors that were spread around its campus accusing Marshall as if he were a racist white supremacist, (though some of his biggest supporters in this are Americans of African descent,) I personally find it hard to believe that the dean of the school, Mr. Corey Humphries hasn't played the race card a little too hard this time.
 
Marshall Rawson has been an excellent student, but caught the attention of Humphries on Constitution Day, when he and other members of Young Americans for Liberty held a silent, peaceful demonstration on campus sporting empty holsters and carrying signs advocating campus carry and the Second Amendment. Mr. Humphries called a halt to the event for his own personal beliefs against the 2nd Amendment. Mr. Humphries then proceeded to place the group, Young Americans for Liberty on probation, and meetings had to be moved off campus.
 
The information involving this case has been well documented; including an audio recording of the students last meeting with the Dean, at which time he was questioned about matters completely unrelated to academics, to include political affiliations and who he would vote for in the upcoming elections; the police were called to search his car; the police however refused to conduct an illegal search and instead informed a then outraged Humphries that all he could legally do was ask Marshall to leave.
 
Humphries then suspended Marshall without the possibility of an appeals process until the Spring of 2016. For more information, please contact attorney Alex Johnson at 770-670-6216.
 
Jesse Sargent, Vice-Chairman, Empower the Youth / Leadership Now”
Comments
 
Trust the Founders. They wrote the U.S. Constitution based on wise principles. They coupled the rights to privacy and self-defense with freedom of religion. If Christians are divided on these principles, they will enable evil men to dismantle our republic. This has happened and continues to accelerate.
 
Christian schools need to base their policy decisions on the U.S. Constitution (as written). Shorter violated our right to privacy to attack our right to self-defense. Searches require warrants issued by judges based on probable cause.  Our right to self-defense is a deterrent to aggression. When it is taken away, crime flourishes.
 
The other schism we need to resolve is help for the poor. It is required and must be done on a person to person basis. Mother Theresa of Calcutta is a good recent example of what to do to fulfill this requirement.
 
Charity by government is corrupted and becomes bribery, socialism and slavery.
 
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party
 
 

No Sneezeola


WHO Urges Sneeze protection while CDC Retreats
U.S. agency removes warning of airborne Ebola transmission
NEW YORK – While the Centers for Disease Control has removed from its website a warning that Ebola can be spread through sneezing, the World Health Organization has just issued new guidelines for health workers that specify protective equipment should be worn to protect the mouth, nose and eyes from contaminated droplets and fluids.
The WHO guidelines are based on a review of care of Ebola patients, the U.N. agency said.
Meanwhile, Friday, the CDC website removed a “Fact Sheet” posted Thursday that stirred controversy by admitting after weeks of apparent denial that Ebola can be spread by coughing and sneezing.
The WHO said the Guidelines Development Group it convened included participation of a wide range of experts from international organizations, including the CDC, Doctors without Borders and the Infection Control Africa Network.
“These guidelines hold an important role in clarifying effective personal protective equipment options that protect the safety of healthcare workers and patients from Ebola virus disease transmission,” says Edward Kelley, WHO director for service delivery and safety.
“Paramount to the guidelines’ effectiveness is the inclusion of mandatory training on the putting on, taking off and decontaminating of PPE, followed by mentoring for all users before engaging in any clinical care.”
The guidance posted by the CDC Thursday, captured by NaturalNews.com, said “droplets of the virus can travel short distances, less than 3 feet [one meter] from person to person.”
It further disclosed that a person “might also get infected by touching a surface or object that has germs on it and then touching their nose or mouth.”
Mike Adams, writing at NaturalNews.com, commented that the fact sheet meant “the CDC is now admitting it lied all along” by denying the Ebola virus could be spread by “indirect transmission routes,” including sneezing and coughing. The CDC, he said, had insisted Ebola can only be spread by “direct contact” with the body or bodily fluids of an Ebola-infected person.
The same CDC fact sheet also acknowledged Ebola can contaminate objects, saying “a person might also get infected by touching a surface or object that has germs on it and then touching their mouth or nose.”
Dr. Rossi Hassard, a professor of epidemiology at Mercy College, was quoted by the New York Post saying droplets of the Ebola virus could remain active on surfaces such as a table or doorknob.
The removal of the fact sheet was merely the most recent in a series of public reversals.
On Tuesday, the CDC issued guidance for health care workers specifying new procedures for Emergency Medical Services when handling Ebola patients in ambulance transfers that admitted “lessons had been learned from the recent experience caring for patients with Ebola in U.S. healthcare settings.”
 
On Oct. 20, reacting to the two nurses who contracted Ebola in Texas after treating patient Thomas Eric Duncan, the CDC “tightened guidance” for U.S. health care workers, specifying no skin should be exposed and all workers be properly trained and supervised by a monitor as they put on and remove personal protective equipment.
Then, on Thursday, as a result of the developing controversy of nurse Kaci Hickox’s refusal to comply with state-imposed quarantine requirements after retuning to the U.S. from West Africa, the CDC issued new guidance for “active monitoring” of persons with potential exposure to Ebola, including daily phone calls to state health authorities to report their temperatures and possibly even state-imposed travel restrictions
The apparent “learning on the fly” cast suspicion on continued reassurances by CDC Director Dr. Thomas Frieden that the CDC had all necessary procedures in place, and Ebola would be contained in the United States if health care officials and workers followed CDC recommendations precisely.
Then, when nurses Nina Pham and Amber Vinson contracted Ebola after treating Duncon, the CDC appeared to blame the nurses, suggesting they became infected because they didn’t follow CDC “safety protocols” for treating Ebola patients.
The assertion that CDC protocols were sufficient was undermined when the CDC issued new guidelines specifying health care workers treating Ebola patients must have every inch of their bodies covered by protective equipment and that trained supervisors were needed to monitor workers as they put on and took off the equipment.
Still today, the CDC continues to hold the line that there is no risk Ebola can be airborne transmitted.
Yet, as reported by WND, the U.S. Army has published a widely used medical management handbook, now in its seventh edition, that warns viral hemorrhagic fever, the category of viruses that includes Ebola, can be an airborne threat in certain circumstances.

Source:http://www.wnd.com/2014/10/who-urges-sneeze-protection-while-cdc-retreats/
 
 
Comments
 
I don’t know who to believe.  WHO is the World Health Organization.  They’re all UN global Communists and this kind of stunt plays into their game.  The CDC are also global Communists, but they are more often wrong and bungling. I tend to believe WHO, that sneezing is part of how this is passed along, but I am baffled at them telling the truth.  Maybe they do that from time to time just to throw us off. I think this is an elaborate stunt to give some credibility to WHO.
 
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
 

Obama will Stop Deportation


Obama Planning to Stop Deportation for Millions of Illegals

Length of Time in U.S., Family Ties to Others in Country Are Expected Criteria

(WSJ) – The White House is considering two central requirements in deciding which of the nation’s 11 million illegal immigrants would gain protections through an expected executive action: a minimum length of time in the U.S., and a person’s family ties to others in the country, said people familiar with the administration’s thinking.

Those requirements, depending on how broadly they are drawn, could offer protection to between one million and four million people in the country illegally.

The deliberations follow President Barack Obama ’s promise to act to change the immigration system, after legislation overhauling immigration law died in Congress.

Republicans have protested that Mr. Obama would overstep his authority by acting alone. Several Democratic candidates in tight races also have complained, and last month the president canceled plans to announce the changes before the election.

Mr. Obama, who has been criticized by immigrant-rights advocates for the delay, wants to grant new protections—such as safe harbor from deportation and work permits—to many people who are in the U.S. illegally but have significant ties to the country, said three people familiar with White House thinking.

Such protections would be temporary since the president lacks authority to give people permanent legal status.

One person said officials are leaning toward granting protections to people in the country illegally for 10 years and who meet other criteria, though that could be broadened to include more recent arrivals.

Parents of U.S. citizens are likely to qualify, people familiar with discussions said, as long as they meet other criteria. But it is unclear whether the policy would include parents of so-called Dreamers—people brought to the U.S. illegally as children, and who were given a temporary legal status in 2012.

Also unclear is whether other family ties, such as being married to a U.S. citizen, would qualify somebody for new protections. Illegal immigrants cannot win legal status by marriage unless they return to their home country for a period of years.

The answers to those questions will determine whether up to four million people or as few as just over one million gain protections, according to estimates prepared by the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute, which the White House has consulted.

White House spokeswoman Katherine Vargas said the president hasn’t made a decision or even received recommendations from his cabinet secretaries. “It is premature to speculate about the specific details,” she said. Still, a mid-December announcement of the change is expected by many immigration experts.

Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R., Fla.), who tried to move immigration legislation through the House this year, said executive action would amplify distrust among Republicans in Mr. Obama and make legislating harder. “The right’s going to fly off the rails,” he said. “How do you trust someone who says he does not have the legal authority to do something and then does it anyway?” Mr. Obama previously said that his ability to change immigration law on his own was limited.

White House officials also are considering allowing more young people into the 2012 “Dreamer’’ program that grants temporary legal status and work permits to those who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children, according to two people familiar with discussions. Some 580,000 people were enrolled in the program as of June.

No matter how the White House draws the criteria, the number gaining new protections is certain to be less than the eight million or so who would have benefited from legislation that the Senate passed last year, but that died amid GOP opposition in the House.

Any package along these lines is sure to be attacked by Republicans and possibly some Democrats as presidential overreach. Administration officials say they are working to make sure that whatever they do is legally and politically defensible.

One person people familiar with the process said the White House is trying to craft a plan that survives Mr. Obama’s presidency and isn’t so unpopular that a future Republican president could easily reverse it. “It has to be politically sustainable,” this person said.

One of the most politically sensitive questions is whether to include parents of young people in the Dreamer program, known formally as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. These people are among the most politically active in the immigration debate and are demanding that their parents not be left out.

The president “must be inclusive, and he must be broad, to protect as many people as possible,” said Cristina Jimenez, managing director of the group United We Dream. “Any package of administrative reform must include our parents.”

Republicans have said that broad executive action would kill any chance for immigration legislation next year. Democrats reply that chances already are low that the two parties could come to agreement on a bill. Immigration activists are pressing Mr. Obama to take the most sweeping action possible.

The White House also is expected to change criteria used in deciding who is a priority for deportation. It may, for instance, say a traffic violation doesn’t make someone a priority, though other convictions do. The legal rationale is that the administration lacks the capacity to deport all illegal immigrants and has discretion to set priorities.

Other changes are expected to benefit businesses that use large numbers of legal immigrants, such as technology companies. One change under consideration would “recapture” unused visas from previous years in order to make more visas available to such companies, according to one person familiar with the deliberations. This person said that a second change that companies have requested—changing the way visas are counted so that a family unit counts as only one spot toward the limit—is less likely.

This person said the administration is also considering a change that would make it easier for foreign students to stay in the U.S. after graduation while they await employment-based visas.

White House officials are inclined to wait to announce the new policy until after a must-pass spending bill has cleared Congress, to avoid tangling that legislation with any GOP effort to roll back the immigration policy.

Further, the Louisiana Senate race may not be decided until a Dec. 6 runoff, and White House officials want to avoid injecting immigration into any re-election fight by Sen.Mary Landrieu , a Democrat.

It also is possible that the Georgia Senate race will remain unsolved until an early January runoff, but a senior administration official said there is no thought to pushing the announcement into next year. Mr. Obama has repeatedly vowed to act by year’s end.


http://online.wsj.com/articles/obama-may-cut-deportations-1414626089


10/30/14

Night of the Living BRT

Just when you thought it was dead
 
Cobb  Commission Chairman Tim Lee plans to ask voters in the 2016 presidential primary  to approve a property tax increase that would help fund a $500 million bus  system down Cobb Parkway, according to an email from the county’
s transportation  director to a federal transportation official obtained by The Atlanta  Journal-Constitution.
 
The county has to come up with $250 million to qualify for a federal grant that would pay for the other half of the bus rapid transit system, which would operate like a  train on a dedicated lane to be built along much of the Cobb Parkway  thoroughfare. It would cut a path through some of the most
congested areas in  metro Atlanta, from Kennesaw State, past the Big Chicken, down through the  Cumberland area and past the new Atlanta Braves stadium.
 
Cobb transportation director Faye DiMassimo wrote to Keith Melton, community planner in the U.S. Department  of Transportation’s Atlanta office, on July 9 to assure him that the county  would be moving ahead with BRT planning
in 2015. The email was sent just weeks after it became clear that a majority of county commissioners would not support 
 
Lee’s plan to use $72.5 million in individual projects that would be funded by the Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax (SPLOST) renewal as part of the county’s grant match. “Cobb will continue station development and operating plan development through 2015,” the email says.  “Previously, Cobb had planned to secure local funding through its SPLOST.
“Alternatively, Cobb County intends to seek necessary local match funding sources through a bond referendum  in the March 2016 (primary) … with a (grant) application submission for 2016  funding consideration.”
 
In an interview, Lee said he is considering the referendum in 2016 because it is the next election after Tuesday. But when asked if the ballot initiative would happen, Lee responded:  “It’s way too early to even talk about it.” DiMassimo said that Lee was aware of her email before she sent it. The email also says that the BRT project would be “submitted” for federal grant consideration by Sen. Johnny Isakson in October. Isakson said in an interview that he is not sponsoring the project, and that his role was to set up a meeting between Lee, DiMassimo and U.S. Secretary of Transportation Anthony Fox. Isakson said Lee and DiMassimo flew to Washington for that meeting.
 
“First of all, we don’t do earmarks anymore, so we can’t make submissions,” Isakson said. “I think the county is looking to do BRT with matching funds from the federal government in 2016 or 2017. Obviously, I’m supportive
of matching funds coming to Georgia  anytime I can.”
But “there’s any number of steps that have to happen” first, he said. The biggest step is identifying a way to pay the county’s share.
 
A continued push In preparing the list of projects to be funded by the SPLOST this summer, Lee pushed for $100 million in matching funds for the grant. When it became clear that the four district commissioners would not support that plan, the chairman removed it and lobbied for adding $72.5 million worth of individual projects on the SPLOST list that would count toward the county’s match. Critics derided that move as an attempt to sneak BRT past voters, who stiff-armed the project as part of a 2012 regional sales tax
initiative.
 
On July 22, as commissioners  considered approving the list of projects to be funded by the SPLOST renewal, Lee sought to assure them that BRT was not part of this year’s vote.
“I just want to be clear about something: the bus rapid transit project … is not going to be part of the SPLOST for consideration in November,” Lee said at the meeting. “The project, in its entirety, has been removed.”
 
Not entirely. References to the BRT were removed from the list of projects the county has to publish for the referendum,  but a $60 million project bridging Windy Hill Road over Cobb Parkway is on the  SPLOST project list and would reduce
the overall cost of BRT by 12 percent. That, in turn, would reduce the amount of cash the county has to borrow to
proceed with BRT. DiMassimo said in an interview this week that the bridge is needed regardless of BRT, but acknowledged that it could impact the county’s effort to
build it. “It has been identified as a necessary stand-alone project for nearly 10 years,” she said of the Windy Hill Road bridge.
Commissioner Lisa Cupid, who pushed in that July meeting to make sure BRT was not a part of the SPLOST vote,  said she is frustrated that the transit line is again being linked to the SPLOST vote. She argued at the July meeting for BRT’s removal because the county “has not been as transparent as we could and should be” regarding whether transit was on or off the SPLOST ballot. “I was under the impression that, at the end of the day, BRT-related projects had been removed,” Cupid said in an interview this week. “I thought we took those projects out … to reduce the level of concern from the public that BRT was being hidden. So this is new information to me.”
 
The county has been repeatedly criticized over transparency issues during the past year — from Lee hiring an off-the-books attorney to negotiate with the Braves without the county attorney’s knowledge, to the county claiming that the public investment in the stadium would be limited to $300 million when it will borrow nearly $400 million for the project.
Commissioner Bob Ott said Friday that one of the reasons he voted against placing SPLOST on ballots is because he thinks some will be used to accomplish BRT.
 
“I had my doubts during the entire discussion that night as to what was really going on,” Ott said. “There were just too many ways to get to where the BRT proponents want to go. There seems to be a continued push to bring BRT into Cobb County.”
 
If approved by voters, the  SPLOST renewal would raise a minimum of $750 million over six years, with the  biggest beneficiary being the county’s transportation department, which depends  on the sales tax revenue for 98 percent
of its budget. The penny tax renewal would keep the county’s sales tax at six percent — four percent for the state; one percent for the schools; and one percent for municipal governments.
 
2016 SPLOST funding:
$287.4 million for transportation projects
$184.9 million combined for projects identified  by six cities
$77.5 million for Parks and Recreation
$38.8 million for county-wide projects
$37.1 million for police
$30 million for information services
$23.3 million for new police training center
$23.2 million for libraries
$17.8 million for facilities
$14 million for county radio system
$13.5 million for fire department
$2.2 million for senior services
Source: Cobb County. For a full project list, go to the 2016 SPLOST page at cobbcounty.org
 
30 years of close Cobb County  SPLOST votes
1981: Failed. Yes 48 percent; No  52 percent
1985: Passed. Yes 63 percent; No  37 percent
1989: Failed. Yes 49.6 percent;  No 49.9 percent
1990: Passed. Yes 52 percent; No  42 percent
1994: Passed. Yes 56 percent; No  44 percent
1998: Failed. Yes 41 percent; No  59 percent
2000: Failed. Yes 47 percent; No  53 percent
2005: Passed. Yes 49.7 percent;  No 49.5 percent
2011: Passed. Yes 49.9 percent; No 49.7 percent
Source: Cobb Board of Election
 
Source: The Atlanta Journal-Constitution by Dan Klepal_ (http://www.myajc.com/staff/dan-klepal/)
 
Comments
Vote NO on the Cobb SPLOST to slow down this government spending spree.  Cobb needs an independent poll of Cobb voters to see how many citizens support BRT or any expansion of tax subsidized public transit. Public transit can be replaced by private transit to get it off the books and end the corruption.  All current public transit should be self-supporting, not tax subsidized.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

Protect Your Property Rights


Become very familiar with the new laws your cities and counties have enacted.  These new laws were created as part of UN Agenda 21 implementation. Agenda 21 determines that private property ownership is unsustainable.  The new laws herald the beginning of the end of private property ownership and must be stopped and reversed.

Study your Land Use Plans, Zoning Codes, Easements, Sidewalks, Watershed and Underground Lines, EPA Wetlands, Eminent Domain, Property Tax Abuse, Conservation Easements, Water Rights, Endangered Species, Sales Tax

Land Use Plans

Your city and county have been directed by State law to produce Land Use Plans.  These requirements come from UN Agenda 21 implementation initiatives by way of grants with strings attached, also seen as federal bribes to get States and local governments in line to approve plans that limit your property rights and add fees and fines. These Plans limit what you can do with your land. In the past, growing cities grew outward.  Farmland was sold to make subdivisions.   This tends not to be the case with most Land Use Plans. The new Plans give government control over your property and diminish your property rights. They are cookie-cutter plans that are all the same and have been implemented nation-wide.

Zoning Codes

Under Agenda 21, Zoning Codes are excessive.  Past codes simply prevented a land owner from putting a pig farm next to your home.  These new zoning codes are tied to the Land Use Plans and may freeze zoning or limit development dictating the size of lots.  Past codes were more flexible than the new ones.

Easements

When you bought your property, you should have received a Plat, that’s a drawing of your lot.  The Plan may include an easement line if your property abuts a main road.  These easements are excessive in DeKalb County.  Some are 40 or 50 feet from the centerline of the main road.  If you have a Plat with an easement, you should get the official copy of your Plat from DeKalb County Recorder of Deeds Office.  If a dispute arises, the county’s copy is the official copy the judge will rely on.   If your easement seems excessive, you should see what can be done to get it reduced. 

Also get a Plat of your subdivision to see if easements vary while abutting the same road.  Your easement was “granted” by the builder, who is long gone and it was a permanent gift to the government.  

Easements belong to the government, but you still pay the taxes on their property as if it was really your own.  If your government wants to widen the road, they can “take” the easement and remove your trees and your fence and pay you nothing for your easement.  It’s when the government goes beyond your easement that they may own you some money for taking your property. The 40 to 50 foot easements are not needed and in most cases could be reduced to 20 to 25 feet to accommodate the addition of lanes and sidewalks.

If any homes on the “easement-bearing road have the side of their home facing the easement, look at those plats.  If their easement is shorter, that’s the easement you want.  It makes no sense to have easements vary from the same road. 

Changing your easement may require a change in State Law, because cities and counties will want to view your builder’s land gift as permanent.

Remember, if government screws up, allows overbuilding and creates its own congestion, they will want you to pay for the fix.  So, they won’t cut your easement in half just because you asked them to.

Sidewalks

You may be the victim or beneficiary of a new government installed sidewalk because the government doesn’t want us to drive anymore; they want us to walk or take public transportation. 

Be aware, that these sidewalks, although costly, are often not installed to last.  Your government might say that from now on, sidewalk repair is at your expense and they can force you to repair it.  Happy now ?

Watershed & Underground Lines

You should get a copy of your subdivision Plat showing all underground pipes and cables.  This includes your sewer pipes, water distribution lines, gas lines, and watershed that includes your storm sewer pipes, creeks and lakes. This will help you to know where not to dig and help you understand your critical infrastructure.  All you can see now are the manhole covers. 

A Plat will help you fill out the picture. You may notice that your storm sewer empties out into a creek that empties out into a lake that empties back into a storm sewer pipe.  You may also notice that the sewer main line goes under the road or through your property.  You should also know where these lines are that are on your property.

You may be horrified to learn that your city or county doesn’t have these Plats, or that they are out of date or inaccurate.  Again, you should check to see what State Law requires.

The sewer line coming out of your house and going to the street is yours to repair.  The old sewer lines last about 40 years and they fail because of tree roots. They cost about $4000 to replace.  Your water line is usually pulled apart by the heavy equipment your contractors used to replace your sewer line.  That costs about $1000 to replace.

Gas line breaks are always handled by the gas company. But the gas lines inside your home should be handled by a contractor.

Other interesting things like wells and buried fuel tanks may be lurking under your lot.  Check county records to see if they appear on their Plat or Description.  A mere 100 years ago, your subdivision was a farm.

EPA Wetlands

If your lot contains a “wetland” you can’t build anything on the wet part. In the old days, you just hauled in dirt and made it “not a wetland”.

Eminent Domain

Yes, government can seize your land, but until recently it only did so when they had to put in or widen a road or highway.  Now they can do it to build a city hall.  Also, if they condemn you property or you don’t pay you property tax on time, they can seize it.  They love to do this. 

Property Tax Abuse

Counties have appraisers who go around and revalue property to calculate property taxes.  Some are good and some are not.  If your property is overvalued, you can appeal.  In past years, they would ignore you. However, Georgia passed the following bill:

House Bill 197 allows the State Revenue Commissioner to appoint an Appraisal Review Board in the event there is evidence that calls into question the methods used to determine a county tax digest. If such a review board is formed, it shall be composed of three members all appointed by the Commissioner including one employee of the Department of Revenue and two county appraisers. The Review Board shall issue a written report of its findings which may be grounds for the withholding of certain local assistance grants.

A 7% property tax increase in Fulton County and 100% increases in lake front property tax in Hall County have caused voter anger.

Conservation Easement

Warning to Farmers:  Don’t sign a Conservation Easement.  If someone from the county offers you one in exchange for a break on you property tax, order them off your property. These agreements give government the right to come back later and tell you that you can’t raise cattle or plant crops or sell produce or do whatever you were doing.  Your land becomes worthless

Water Rights

Water rights are linked to property rights.  If land owners lose their water rights their property becomes worthless. If government fails to keep up with water supply needs or starts messing with your water, don’t ignore it.  Farming in several counties in California ceased when government diverted water to save the snail darter and water was restricted in Atlanta because of the Florida mollusks. 

Endangered Species

Like Wetlands and Water Rights the Endangered Species Act may adversely affect your property value.

Sales Taxes

In Georgia, your State Sales Tax is 4%.  You County Sales Tax will be 2% or 3%.  Your SPLOST tax will be 0 to 1%. Your total Sales Taxes will be 6% to 8%. 

SPLOSTs

Government is trying to get a 1% Sales Tax SPLOST in Cobb County for projects that are normally handled by property taxes and general fund revenue.  This is a stealth property tax.  SPLOSTs have been successful for public schools so far, but voters are weary and may start to vote no.

MARTA Tax SPLOST

Fulton County, DeKalb County and the City of Atlanta all carry a 1% MARTA tax to subsidize public transit.  Efforts to expand this to Gwinnett County and Cobb County have failed, but Clayton County will add this to their ballot.

Investment Property Value Killers

Commercial property owners have lost fortunes after the EPA designates all or part of their land as a “wetland”. Other federal agencies like the Bureau of Land Management, Interior Department and Army Corp of Engineers have closed farms and fisheries costing owners millions in losses.

Farm Property Value Killers

The federal government has taken to seizing your water and land use rights using Land Use Plans, Conservation Easements, Banned Livestock Orders, or simply taking your land because the government wants it.

Government bans on Russian Hogs in Michigan and attempted to discourage raising free range chickens in Georgia suggest that States could go after farmers and order them to destroy their herds. Politically connected competitors may be promoting these schemes.

Government water shut offs have caused farms in California and entire towns in Western States to close. 

Private land next to government land is in danger of losing livestock due to “wildlife preserve replenishment” of predatory wild animals.  It is a crime to kill some of these animals. Farms close and owners lose fortunes.

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader