Monday, June 1, 2015

GA RINO Handwringing

The RINO stampede in Georgia began with the reelection of John Padgett for State GOP Chair. They will defend the establishment not matter the cost.  The only way to keep getting the annual $21 billion in federal bribes through 2016 is to “play ball”.  Obama runs a top-down organization and prefers that states also embrace a top-down style. We have that now in Georgia; nothing bottom-up about it. If Republicans take the Whitehouse in 2016, then 2017 should see spending cuts, including cuts in grants to states.
Georgia RINOs claim paranoia over the 2016 election. They believe they may fail to take the Whitehouse in 2016 and don’t want to take any risks by “breaking up the team”. They are also afraid they will lose seats in the Gold Dome. They know Georgia is filling up with minorities and immigrants and believe these new folks will automatically vote Democrat. Meanwhile, Georgia conservatives who are disgusted with the GOP may again stay home and not vote in 2016. Our RINOs need to understand that about 25% of Georgia GOP voters are Constitutional Conservatives, inclined to vote for Rand Paul or Ted Cruz.
I applaud their paranoia to increase Republican wins, but they need to start behaving better to the voters if they want to win over Democrats and independents.
I believe we need to ban UN Agenda 21, end regionalism, reduce federal spending, debt and regulations, stop the EPA and end Obamacare and Common Core and take our lumps.
In the end, I would remove all unconstitutional activities from the federal and give these to the states according to the US Constitution and the 10th Amendment.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

Elites Use Amnesty against the Middle Class

Elites Using Amnesty to Conspire Against the Middle Class, May 31, 2015
Controversial firebrand Ann Coulter’s new book, “Adios, America” argues that fettered immigration is destroying the country by driving down the salaries of the middle class while increasing their tax burden. And it’s the elites on both sides — right and left — who are making it happen. An excerpt:
(Ann Coulter) – This is “Goodbye,” America. Adios. Paalam Na. No further warning will be issued.
For 40 years, the people have tried to tell politicians they want less immigration, but the politicians won’t listen.
Every single elite group in America is aligned against the public — the 5 media, ethnic activists, big campaign donors, Wall Street, multimillionaire farmers and liberal “churches.”
They all want mass immigration from the Third World to continue. Both political parties connive to grant illegal aliens citizenship and bring in millions more legally, and the media hide the evidence.
Their game plan is: Never allow an honest debate on immigration.
Only in the case of immigration is the public systematically lied to from every major news outlet. They tell us, for example:
Polls show the public overwhelmingly supports “comprehensive immigration reform.”
No poll shows this. The Left uses polls to manipulate public opinion, rather than quantify it. Typical is a Brookings Institution Poll that asked respondents to chose between two ways to solve the illegal immigration problem: “Arrest and deport all those who are here illegally” or “provide an earned path to citizenship.” Absolutely no one has proposed that we deport all those here illegally — much less “arrest” them. But can’t I be against amnesty without voting for rounding up illegals at gunpoint? No! Look at the menu — no substitutions!
Immigrants are doing jobs Americans just won’t do.
Americans are perfectly happy to do all manner of jobs — they just won’t do them for $7 an hour. Unions used to care about that, but now they just want political power. Democrats want the votes; certain business interest want the cheap labor. So both parties have conspired against the middle class.
Amnesty will be fantastic for the economy.
Unless we’re talking about the Mexican economy, this is patently ridiculous. Adding another 30 million poor, unskilled, non-taxpaying, welfare-receiving people to America is good only for government workers and employers who refuse to mechanize their operations or pay Americans one dollar more.
Hispanics will never vote for Republicans unless they pass amnesty.
First of all, moron Republicans: If they can’t vote, they can’t vote against you. Second, Hispanics who are citizens don’t care about amnesty! They’re already in. They vote 8–2 for the Democrats because they like big government. In 2011, 73% of California Hispanics said they’d support a candidate who wanted to “secure the border first, stop illegal immigration, and then find a way to address the status of people already here illegally.” In a 2014 Univision poll, 58% chose “require border security first” over “pass immigration reform.”
The American electorate isn’t moving to the left — it’s shrinking. No minds have been changed. Democrats just brought in a new group of voters whose minds don’t need to be changed.
Back when Democrats still claimed to represent working Americans, they opposed illegal immigration. Since being taken over by the Far Left, all that matters to them is changing the electorate to one that doesn’t mind liberal insanity.
A nation’s immigration policies are at least as important as, say, going to war. But the media have decided that who gets to live in America is none of America’s business.
The public can’t be trusted with the truth. Go back to the kids’ table. The grown-ups are deciding this. Anyone who challenges the elite consensus on immigration will be swarmed with blitzkrieg attacks.
It can be difficult to discuss America’s immigration policies when it’s considered racist merely to say, “We liked America the way it was.”
The media convince people to believe lies by the simple process of repetition: Diversity is a strength! We’re a nation of immigrants! It’s a crisis to have people living in the shadows!
I don’t mean to be obtuse, but why is it a crisis that illegal aliens are “living in the shadows”? I forget. We need to bring in more people who will drive down the wages of our fellow Americans because — why again? It is not a crisis for Americans that other people have come into their country illegally and now find it uncomfortable to be living here breaking the law. It’s supposed to be uncomfortable to break the law. Perhaps illegal aliens should have considered that before coming. Americans are being asked to respond to the world’s oldest joke: A guy kills his parents, then throws himself on the court’s mercy as an orphan. How did all these illegal aliens get into “the shadows” in the first place? They weren’t kidnapped and dragged across the border. They came here. At most — and this is dubious — it’s a crisis for the illegal immigrants. But “living in the shadows” is evidently better than living in Guadalajara, otherwise, there’s an easy solution. Living in the shadows doesn’t seem to be much of a crisis even for them. Any amnesty is an inducement to illegal aliens. If you choose to argue it’s not, I refer you to history. This is not the first time Americans have been promised secure borders in return for amnesty. The 1986 Simpson-Mazzoli Act, also known as “The Charlie Brown and Lucy with Football Act,” was supposed to end illegal immigration forever: Give us amnesty one time, then: Never again. Illegal immigration sextupled. Contrary to everything you’ve heard, the only options are not: Amnesty or deporting 11 million people. There’s also the option of letting them stay in the shadows — or the same thing we’ve been doing for the last 30 years. Americans are under no moral obligation to grant amnesty to people who have broken our laws. “The moral thing to do” is usually defined as “following the law.” Historically, Democrats have found it fun and profitable to bully Republicans into taking suicidal positions. This latest push for amnesty is approximately the Republicans’ fifth mugging. As with all disastrous legislation, Republicans are being told, “We have got to do this yesterday!” Debate any urgent liberal demand long enough, and the problem usually just goes away. The fact that Democrats want 30 million new voters is not a good enough reason to ignore the law and screw over American workers, as well as legal immigrants already here. How about Republicans try this: We’re not giving you anything — not even half — because there’s no reason to do so.
http://nypost.com/2015/05/31/ann-coulter-elites-conspire-against-the-middle-class/
http://www.teaparty.org/coulter-amnesty-elites-conspire-middle-class-101252

Metro Atlanta Growth & Retrenchment

The AJC article Regional Divisions Hinder Growth, 5/31/15 page 1 is a nonsensical propaganda piece. Atlanta’s growth in the 1980s was compliments of the electronics manufacturing boom.  All of that was off-shored, moved to Texas or brought back to their home office states. 

ARC is irrelevant and failure to follow ARC’s wishes will help more than hurt. ARC is totally irrelevant to the rural counties in the 10 county region.  Regional governance is destroying California by usurping local control and cutting the voters out of the conversation. It is part of UN Agenda 21, designed to remove elective governance.

Agenda 21 requires that we completely abandon our infrastructure to save us from “global warming”, which does not exist. It claims that carbon is a pollutant that must be reduced, public transit, bikes and walking must be used, cars must be banned, our coal and oil must be outlawed and 5 times more expensive wind and solar must be used.

Georgia politicians have created the gridlock and deteriorating roads by using our road taxes for other purposes.

Atlanta grew outward like every other US metro area from the 1950s forward.  City dwellers moved to the suburbs to find good schools and the jobs moved with them. Land costs farther out were more affordable, so the subdivisions and office parks and Shopping Malls followed. There is nothing wrong with this model and we have $trillions invested in our current set-up and the smartest thing we can do is maintain it.  

We don’t have $trillions right now to waste on underutilized public transit, expensive commuter trains or unaffordable energy, education, healthcare or government.

If multinational corporations want to put their offices in Atlanta transit villages, that’s fine. It’s up to them.

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

Sunday, May 31, 2015

Atlanta Regional Commission

The Atlanta Regional Commission was created in 2008 by the Georgia Legislature.  Federal grants to states required that all states create unelected regional governance to implement UN Agenda 21.
Funding ARC includes the State of Georgia and federal grants totaling about $70 million a year.  Expenses include staff at about $20 million a year plus grants to CIDs, cities and counties about $50 million a year.  That’s where you got your bike lanes, multi-use paths, streetcars and other fluff. 
ARC is dedicated to the development of high density transit villages located by MARTA stations.
ARC is also interested in your water and what to do with old people. They’ve been grasping for straws to find a purpose since their T-SPLOST was defeated in 2012.
ARC pretends to rule over 10 counties they included in Region 3.  The real metro counties actually include Fulton, DeKalb and the City of Atlanta.  The other counties don’t have MARTA trains and most of these rural counties could do without ARC and so could the others.
ARC Chairman Kerry Armstrong is a developer.  ARC gives grants to developer projects aimed at packing high-rise office buildings and apartments next to MARTA and a Mall in a Community Improvement District (CID).
Multi-national companies are pressured to locate in these CIDs and support the rest of UN Agenda 21. Their goal is to eliminate cars and have everybody live, work, bike and walk, but not drive.  The problem is that the apartment rents are too high for most folks.
Local Elected Officials on the ARC Board include:
Buzz Ahrens
Clark Boddie
Eric Clarkson
Eric Dial
Tim Downing
John Eaves
Nancy Harris
Tim Lee
Mark Mathews
Lee May
Randy Mills
Ceasar C. Mitchell
Charlotte Nash
Charles Oddo
Richard A. Oden
Willie Oswalt
Harvey Persons
Robert Price
Kasim Reed
Tommy Smith
Jeff Turner
Jere Wood
Tom Worthan
If any of the above are your elected officials, you might ask them why they are involved in ARC and UN Agenda 21 implementation. You may get a load about economic development and millennials, but most of them are still living with their relatives. UN Agenda 21 has listed Atlanta as one of the “mega-cities” they want to use to house “the workforce”.
Many of us believe that the Georgia Legislature should repeal HB 1266 and HB 277, the Bills that created “regionalism” and unelected governance in Georgia.
http://www.atlantaregional.com/about-us/overview

UN Death Quotas

Elderly face NHS discrimination under new UN death targets by Sarah Knapton, Science Editor, 29 May 2015
Elderly people will be treated like second-class citizens and denied medical care under new targets which give priority to saving the lives of young people
The NHS could be led to discriminate against the over 70s to meet ‘highly unethical’ UN health targets which seek to reduce premature deaths in younger people, senior medics have warned.
Under the proposed Sustainable Development Goals, UN member states will be given targets to cut the number of deaths from diseases like cancer, stroke, diabetes and dementia by one third by 2030.
However because many are age-related illnesses people who succumb to those diseases from the age of 70 are not deemed to have died prematurely and so are not included in the target.
• Unsung army of elderly carers swells
•
Wave of home closures leaves elderly stuck in 'care warehouses'
In an open letter published in The Lancet, an international group of ageing specialists say the new guideline sends out the message that health provision for younger groups must be prioritized at the expense of older people.
Prof Peter Lloyd-Sherlock, professor of social policy and international development at the University of East Anglia, and lead author of the letter, said: “This premature mortality target is highly unethical, since it unjustifiably discriminates against older people.
“We already know that there is age discrimination in cancer care and surgery and these targets give that the stamp of approval.
“The targets are not quite set in stone yet, so we have a final opportunity to impress upon the UN the need to alter this explicitly ageist health target.
“If this doesn’t happen, people aged 70 and over will become second-class citizens as far as health policy is concerned.”
The letter warns that the UN target: “has the potential to undermine cherished, fundamental principles of universality and health as a right for all.”
“Put simply, it tells policy makers, particularly in poorer countries that older people do not matter,” the signatories warn.
• NHS 'defies the law' to deny pensioners vital operations, warns Royal College of Surgeons
• Elderly dying due to 'despicable age discrimination in NHS'
• Lives of elderly at mercy of postcode lottery in 'ageist' NHS, figures suggest
Others who have signed include ageing experts from The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Institute for Ageing and Health at Newcastle University as well as representatives of The Alzheimer’s Society, Age UK, and HelpAge International.
Baroness Sally Greengross, former director of Age Concern England who also signed the letter said: "If adopted, this UN target could lead to institutionalised discrimination against older people in health care, both here in the UK and globally.
“This target will inevitably reinforce the ageist bias that pervades many aspects of health care decision-making.”
The Sustainable Development Goals which are due to come into effect later this year, replace the Millenium Development Goals which ran up to 2015 and include ambitions for climate change, health care, development and policy.
If the target was met, around 42,000 lives would be saved each year for the under 70s. However if older people were included in the target an extra 130,000 lives would be saved.
Although the guidelines are not binding, health experts warn that the UN is likely to take a dim view of countries who fail to comply.
Last year the Royal College of Surgeons warned that elderly people are being denied life-saving operations because of age discrimination within the NHS.
Data released for the first time showed that across large areas of the country, almost no patients above the age of 75 are receiving surgery for breast cancer or routine operations such as gall bladder removal and knee replacements.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice), was also criticized for attempting to change its funding criteria to take into account "wider societal benefits" when deciding on whether to fund drugs.
Health experts branded the move ‘deeply suspect’ and said the elderly, may lose out because they do not contribute as much to society as younger people.
Tom Gentry, policy advisor at AgeUK said that people were living far longer than in the past, with even the average 70-year-old expected to live for at least another decade.
“We know that access to surgery is getting worse for older people, and yet we are talking about people who still have years left to live,” he said.
“We need to improve. We are fighting entrenched cultural attitudes about the value of older people and this target will not help that.”
In 2013, the Government introduced age discrimination laws which mean patients should not be denied procedures on grounds of age. Doctors are supposed to assess patients based on their fitness for an operation, and likely benefit from it.
A spokesman for the Department of health said: “It is wrong to deny people treatment just because of their age, which is why we made it illegal.
“Decisions on care should only ever be based on clinical need.”
Comments
It’s time to quit the UN and let it drift off to somewhere else.

Fly the US Flag

He Flew Our Flag to Honor Fallen Soldiers, What His School Required He Do to It Will Tick You Off
Our flag means many things to many people. For some it’s a sign they’ve left behind oppressive and totalitarian cultures to live in the land of the free. For others it represents a rich military heritage with the flag calling to attention those who died to protect what it stands for. And oddly enough for another group of people it stands as reason to be offended.
You’ve seen it all over the nation, people complaining about the American flag because they don’t like what it stands for. Looks like schools are now joining in to get the flag banned.
Kalisa Michaels writes: Peyton Robinson said he got the bad news from a school administrator Wednesday morning. The 18-year-old senior at York Comprehensive High School was told he wasn’t allowed to fly his American flag and POW-MIA flag in the bed of his pickup truck.”He said, ‘We’re having some issues. Some people were complaining about the flags in your truck,'” Robinson told WBTV-TV. He said the administrator said the flags could “possibly” be offensive, and told Robinson to take them down before coming back to the South Carolina school Thursday.
But apparently, Robinson didn’t have to lift a finger. He told WBTV that at some point Wednesday, a school official unscrewed the bolts securing the flags to his truck and laid them in the bed “when I wasn’t even there.”
By the end of the school day, officials announced that flags such as Robinson’s are safety concerns. Superintendent Vernon Prosser told WSOC-TV the fear is that they could block the view of other drivers and cause a wreck.
The senior — who has relatives who served in the military — was upset. “I was pretty mad,” he told WBTV. “I don’t see how it’s a problem. Nobody has ever complained about it before. ”I’d understand if it was the Confederate flag or something that might offend somebody,” he added. “I wouldn’t do that. But an American flag — that’s our country’s flag. I have every right to do it. I don’t see a safety issue. I mean, I understand it’s a big flag — it’s 4 by 6 — but nobody has ever complained about it being in their way or anything.”
So Robinson hit his Facebook page Wednesday and let everybody know what was happening — and fellow students quickly took up the cause, driving back to school that night with flags flying from their vehicles. “I’ll keep fighting,” Robinson told WSOC Wednesday night. “I’m not letting it go; I won’t go down without a fight.”
Students also vowed to fly flags Thursday morning at school in solidarity with Robinson — and more than 70 vehicles equipped with waving flags pulled into the school parking lot. A crowd stood on the roadside and cheered them on, and what appeared to be a group of veterans saluted at the school’s entrance as they rode in. Principal Christopher Black told WSOC on Thursday he would be asking all of those students to remove their flags. But just a couple of hours after the demonstration, there was a big change of heart.
“Due to the outstanding display of patriotism through peaceful demonstration, it is apparent to us that many are not happy about this policy,” the school said in a statement. “School officials have reviewed the standing policy regarding flags and have decided that an exception will be made for the American flag, as long as the size of the flag(s) does not create a driving hazard.”
The state Highway Patrol told WSOC the York students’ flags are legal.
Robinson’s dad told WSOC he’s proud of his son and that he encouraged him to keep flying the flag whatever the rules might say, even if it meant leaving school.
http://preservefreedom.org/he-flew-our-flag-to-honor-fallen-soldiers-what-his-school-required-he-do-to-it-will-tick-you-off/

Muslim Common Core

How the Muslim Brotherhood Uses Common Core to Brainwash Children
This is one crazy story, one I’m not at all surprised liberals are ignoring. Turns out there are very strong connections tying the Muslim Brotherhood to the nation’s Common Core public education curriculum.
It’s already been shown to be true the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated some of the top positions in Washington D.C. (see www.shoebat.com).
But now it looks like those connections extend deep into the public education system. I wish I could say this is a bit of a surprise, to know our school system is being taken over too, but based on the headlines these past few months it really isn’t.
Here’s what the Conservative Tribune writes on the matter.
While many have cried out against the Common Core as having a strong pro-Muslim bias, others have done some digging and traced the origins of the money financing the latest federal takeover of American education to the Middle East.
Common Core is part of the “One World Education” concept, which was put forward by the Connect All Schools program. This program is in turn funded by the Qatar Foundation International, the director of whom is the grandson of the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood.
The QFI partnered with the U.S. State Department and Department of Education in 2011 to implement the Connect All Schools program, joining U.S. classrooms with others around the world.
Of course, the story here in America is that the Common Core standards were created by the National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers, among other groups.
Many of these groups can be traced to an organization known as Pearson Education, which designs and creates educational products and services for its clients. Pearson Education’s largest financial stakeholder is the Libyan Investment Authority, originally founded by one of Moammar Gadhafi’s sons.
The Libyan Investment Authority in turn is made up of investors from Libya, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, as well as members of the Council on American-Islamic Relations and the Muslim Brotherhood, according to The Washington Times.
Add into that mix the progressive propaganda also prevalent throughout the Common Core curriculum, and one can clearly see that the educational standards are little more than an indoctrination scheme aimed at the impressionable children of America.
When one also considers the fact that the federal government is coercing and threatening states to adopt the Common Core standards or risk losing federal funds, it becomes obvious that parents must rise up and take back their local and state education systems from the feds and foreign influences.
Knowing this, is it any wonder the government is going after off-the-grid parents who want to teach their children an independent education? No, it’s not.
The government needs children under their thumb so they can continue to indoctrinate them. Brainwashed children will be passive observers to the rise of an Islamic Caliphate. They won’t dare put up resistance because they’ve been taught since day one this is the way things are.
Now you can see why there’s so much pro-Muslim material in our schools and why Christianity is constantly under attack.
It’s frightening, don’t you think? What do you think of this report….conspiracy or right on the mark?
http://survivaljoe.net/blog/fact-muslim-brotherhood-using-common-core-to-brainwash-children/