Daniel Greenfield writing at his blog Sultan Knish carefully
explains what we already know. Islamic terrorism isn’t the end goal,
taking America over from within is the long range plan.
My personal theory is that every time one of the Islamic hot-heads pulls
off a terror attack in the West, the long term caliphate-planners cringe.
The latter think in generational terms (unlike western secularists), and
they use the Hijrah, the migration, to quietly build Muslim ‘communities’
around mosques, and then throw their kufi hats into the local political arena.
Greenfield: “Trump isn’t a threat to national security. Muslim immigration
is.” But, when the Islamic terrorists can’t be patient and control themselves,
then more Westerners wake up and that isn’t good for the shariah-planting
planners.
Here is a bit of what Greenfield said: ISIS does not plan to
defeat America with terror plots. But those plots will eventually accumulate
into an organized domestic terror organization. An Islamic State in America based around a
majority Muslim town or neighborhood with its own leader pledging allegiance to
the Caliph of the Islamic State.
An American Molenbeek; and there are already plenty of candidates for that
horrifying honor.
Any Muslim plans for
expanding into the West depend on Muslim immigration. Whether it’s ISIS or its Muslim
Brotherhood ancestor, or any of the other Islamist organizations and networks,
they all require manpower. Some of that manpower will be provided by high Muslim birth rates, but
it won’t be nearly enough, not for a country the size of America, without a
large annual flow of Muslim migrants.
We are told that halting Muslim immigration would only encourage Muslim
terrorism. But our open door to Muslim immigration certainly hasn’t stopped
terrorism. Instead it has increased it by providing reinforcements to the
terrorists. If
we can’t stop Muslim terrorism with the population we have now, how are we
going to manage it if the Islamic population continues doubling and even
tripling?
Much more logic here….Flashback to 2007! I can’t get this story out of my mind. In 2007,
only a month after Refugee Resettlement Watch launched, the Washington Times reported that Imam
Yahya Hendi (now the Muslim chaplain at Georgetown University) told a Saudi audience that the US would have 30 Muslim mayors by
2015.
Obviously he was overly optimistic. 2015 has now come and gone. There might
be a couple, does anyone know? And although he doesn’t mention migration, he
does say they aren’t converting enough people to Islam to get their numbers up
high enough, fast enough.
Now, I ask you, if you are a ‘moderate’ Muslim happily living under the US
Constitution, why does it matter what ‘religion’ a mayor is?
And, just imagine if we said we wanted 30 Catholic mayors by (date). Or,
God forbid, someone said we are aiming for 30 Jewish mayors by some date in the
near future, all hell would break loose in the media.
No hell broke loose for Hendi. Other than me, at RRW, I don’t think anyone paid a minute’s
attention to Hendi’s braggadocios prediction.
Here is what he said, reported by the Washington Times on August 6, 2007 (emphasis is mine): “I
think the future is bright, because of our wisdom in dealing with the reality,”
Mr. Hendi, a Palestinian by birth, said at a gathering of Saudi academics on a
visit to Saudi Arabia.
“There are serious
efforts being made among the second and third generation to become part of the
political establishment. The challenge we face is in the media
and from some Christian extremists who don’t want an Islamic presence in
America.”
Mr. Hendi said U.S.
Muslims were working on “nationalizing” Islam as part of the fabric of U.S.
society, including
cutting funding links to Muslim countries. [LOL, I doubt the funding from S.A. has been cut!—ed]
“Last year, we elected
the first Muslim to Congress, and I expect that by 2015, there will be three or
four, as well as at least 30 mayors,” he said, adding that the number of
Muslim lawyers in the United States has multiplied since September 11. Continue here (amazingly the link is still live,
maybe not for long).
Again, I ask you, if a mayor is a true believer in the US Constitution, and
not attempting to slip Sharia law into a community, what difference does it make which
‘religion’ the mayor practices?
No comments:
Post a Comment