FEC: No
freedom of press for Internet publications, satellite TV and radio, streaming
movies and printed books, by Natalia Castro, 10/6/16
The Federal Election Commission
(FEC) has decided to remain a step behind the changing technological world,
likely so that they can still have a place in our government. After an FEC
meeting and vote it has been decided that the organization would continue its
censorship of Internet based websites, radio, streamed movies and even books. Effectively
allowing the organization to maintain control over a significant portion of
modern American media.
An
amendment submitted to the FEC on Sept. 29,
2016 by Commissioner Lee Goodman specifically aimed at modernizing exemptions
to FEC regulation in accordance with technological changes in the 21 century
was struck down by Democrats led by Ann Ravel, who called the attempt
“pitiful.”
Ravel won based on a split 3-3
decision, meaning the law would stand as is
without an expansion of the “press exemption” which currently states that “a
media entity’s costs for carrying news stories, commentary and editorials are
not considered ‘contributions’ or ‘expenditures.’”
With Goodman’s proposal online
blogs, documentaries, satellite radio and books would be free of FEC regulation
and suppression. As Goodman defends, this would clarify the law without
changing it. Why?
Because it would follow the framers’
intention within the First Amendment of the Constitution where freedom of press
is explicitly outlined. They did not mean the “press” as some elite cadre of
journalists, they meant the printing press, as explained by UCLA law professor
Eugene Volokh in his 2011 paper on the topic, “The
Freedom…of the Press, from 1791 to 1868 to Now: Freedom for the Press as
an Industry, or the Press as a Technology?”
“Through-out American history, the
dominant understanding of the Free Press Clause (and its state constitutional
analogs) has followed the press-as-technology model. This was likely the
original meaning of the First Amendment. It was pretty certainly the
understanding when the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified. It was the largely
unchallenged orthodoxy until about 1970,” Volokh writes.
Volokh continues, “Since 1970, a few
lower court decisions have adopted the press-as-industry model. But this has
been a distinctly minority view. Supreme Court majority opinions have continued
to provide equal treatment to speakers without regard to whether they are
members of the press as industry. And while several opinions have noted that
the question remains open, the bulk of the precedents point towards equal
treatment for all speakers — or at least to equal treatment for all who use
mass communications technologies, whether or not they are members of the press
as industry.”
The freedom of the press so often
interlocks with freedom of speech, but the press, which can be used by anyone,
obviously protects an individual right that cannot be abridged.
That is, whether the writer is
working in a blog, through a video published online for streaming, or writing
an e-novel, they deserve the protections of the First Amendment.
However, if this was upheld and
regulations were not applicable to these groups of people the FEC might not
have a reason to exist. The group would be unable to moderate the
“contributions” and “expenditures” of any members of media in order to submit
to the freedom of the press, forcing the FEC’s power to shrink significantly.
The current restrictions to freedom
of the press contemplated by the FEC keep freedoms locked in an archaic,
pre-constitutional time where today’s technology simply did not exist, and uses
that as a justification for censorship. With Ravel’s
debate remarks and Twitter attacks on the
Washington Examiner and the Daily Caller for daring to report on Goodman’s
amendment, it seems the “pitiful” right leaning media would be the first to be
moderated by these unelected bureaucrats.
Natalia
Castro is a contributing editor at Americans for Limited Government.
http://netrightdaily.com/2016/10/fec-no-freedom-press-internet-publications-satellite-tv-radio-streaming-movies-printed-books/
No comments:
Post a Comment