Obama amnesty
shot down – again! Supremes reject
administrative tactic for 2nd time, by Bob Unruh, 10/3/16
For the second time, and
without comment, the U.S. Supreme Court has rejected President Obama’s tactic
of granting amnesty to millions of illegal aliens through administrative
actions. The high court on Monday declined to revisit the dispute, as the White
House had wanted.
Fox
News reported the case might still
return to the Supreme Court at a later date but almost certainly not while
Obama is president.
The issue has been
percolating throughout Obama’s tenure in the White House. He repeatedly stated
he alone didn’t have the authority to change America’s immigration laws to
allow amnesty for millions of illegals and tried to pressure Congress to take
action.
When the lawmakers
refused to do what he wanted, he had administration officials re-interpret
existing law to allow as many as 5 million illegal aliens to remain in the
country.
But
his plan was shot down by a
federal judge in Texas, whose decision in a case brought by 26 states, led by
Texas, was upheld by an appeals court. The Supreme Court earlier this year
voted 4-4 on the case, leaving the lower court precedent standing.
Now the court has
declined to revisit the fight. The district judge’s ruling found the
Constitution doesn’t give the president that authority.
When he was speaker of
the House, Rep.
John Boehner listed 22 times when Obama
made statements that he is not allowed to do what he did.
For example, in October
2010, Obama said: “I am president, I am not king. I can’t do these things just
by myself. … I’ve got to have some partners to do it. … If Congress has laws on
the books that says that people who are here who are not documented have to be
deported, then I can exercise some flexibility in terms of where we deploy our
resources, to focus on people who are really causing problems as opposed to
families who are just trying to work and support themselves. But there’s a
limit to the discretion that I can show because I am obliged to execute the
law. … I can’t just make the laws up by myself.”
But in 2014, the
administration announced an immigration-law change that would “shield more than
four million people from deportation,” NBC News said.
Texas sued and was
joined by more than two dozen other states, citing the massive new demands for
public services such as school and health care that would be imposed by those
who previously had been subject to deportation.
“In seeking rehearing –
a [chance] to argue the same case over again – the Justice Department said the
move ‘is consistent with historical practice and reflects the need for prompt
and definitive resolution of this important case,'” NBC said.
The
4-4- tie was set up by the death earlier
this year of Justice Antonin Scalia. A tie at the high court means the lower
court ruling is left standing.
It was Obama’s Deferred
Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents program that was
derailed. It was set up to let certain categories of illegal aliens stay in
America
http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/obama-amnesty-shot-down-again/
No comments:
Post a Comment