Who won? by Joe A. Gilbertson 10/5/16
Governor
Mike Pence and Senator Tim Kaine debated tonight at Longwood University in
Farmville, Virgina. The moderator was CBS News correspondent Elaine Quijano.
We
scored this debate based not on issues but on how we believe this performance
will affect their poll numbers, including appearance and presentation.
Mike Pence +10 Pence established himself as the calm, cool
voice of reason, and he became the dominant player after the first few minutes.
The image I saw? He was center of attention, and was unflappable under the
attacks of Kaine. Since we have seen relatively little of Pence, and frankly we
thought him a bit stiff, it was surprising to see his flexibiliy and poise in
responding to Kaine.
Mike
seemed to realize he was constantly on camera, he shook his head "no"
and laughed at the appropriate times. This, we believe. had great effect
on the believability of Kaine's accusations. Pence was well versed in the
issues, better than Kaine, and took no losses there.
Much
of the audience, because of media coverage on this, were expecting Mike Pence
to avoid defending some of Trump's positions. In fact, Pence defended Trump
very ably in every case, and anyone listening got a very clear picture of how
Pence and Trump stand on the politically contentious issues.
We
awarded Pence 10 points for his posture, his dominance, gravitas, presentation,
his clear defense of Trump's positions, and his knowledge of the issues.
Tim Kaine +4 While Tim Kaine was aggressive and
occasionally eloquent, he lost audience points with his interruptions of Mike
Pence and his continual rehashing of nebulous issues and accusing Pence of not
defending Trump (which Pence was doing). At one point my impression was that
Kaine was putting on a Perez Hilton performance. After the debate, one NBC
commentator called him a "twit."
Kaine
seemed to forget that he was on camera (split screen) when Pence was speaking.
His posture and the opportunity to "mug" for the camera were lost
there. On the positive side, a wider American audience now knows him and has
had exposure to the Hillary agenda.
His
purpose was really not to increase his own popularity, but rather to attack Donald
Trump, which he did with alacrity. People will remember the tax return issue
and the "not defending Trump" memes even though in context they were
readily defended by Pence. For these reasons, Kaine gets a positive score.
Moderator -4 Elaine Quijano seemed to lose control
frequently with the candidates talking over each. Initially Kaine took
advantage of this, but Mike Pence quickly adapted to a debate with less
decorum. She seemed to have asked questions slightly in favor of Tim
Kaine, avoiding some serious issues with Clinton. She also seemed to talk over
Mike Pence much more often as he was making his final points than she did
Kaine. Pence frequently did not get a chance to respond after contentious
statements from Kaine.
My winner? Mike Pence, 10 to 4.
Do
I think this will move the needle toward Trump? It depends on the audience
size. The scheduling was good, in a prime hour and covered on most major
networks. It may not have reached 28 million people as did the presidential
debate, but even half of that could have an effect.
I
believe the issues were presented more clearly and fairly than have been
portrayed in the media recently. This could solidify people who were leaning
toward Trump. I do not believe Clinton will get the same benefit.
1 comment:
But of course Tim Kaine is a Real Twit! I follow him on Twitter; I'm a Real Twit too.
"Twit" was traditionally short for "nitwit," but watch for it to enter the dictionary soon as cyberslang for "person who uses Twitter.com."
Post a Comment