How did campaign contributions get tangled up with free speech ? Is it because you guys want campaign contributions tangled up with earmarks, bribery, extortion, kickbacks, graft and corruption ? This is worse than their misinterpretation of “Life”, “Born”, and congress shall establish no religion. These lawyers are raveled up in their own underwear. Your lawyers write 2500 page unintelligible bills. Some lawyers become judges and haplessly release child molesters.
What would the Supreme Court say about restricting campaign contributions to registered voters in the candidates’ city, county, district or state ? Would they overturn that law, because it limits free speech ? Voters are disenfranchised. There is no way you can get re-elected without millions of dollars of special interest money, so the game never changes. That’s why the Tea Party movement took root and why so many voters stopped supporting their parties and declared themselves as independents.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment