The
president's proposal limits accounts to $3 million in accumulated savings,
enough to fund an annual retirement annuity of $205,000 a year. Under current
law, workers under 50 can place $5,500 in their IRAs each year in pre-tax
dollars. Those 50 and over can contribute $6,500 in 2013.
Contributions
to 401(k) plans are capped at $17,500. The money is taxed when it's taken out
during retirement. Obama's plan won't raise much revenue — just $9 billion over
10 years. It's simply more of the Obama fairness campaign. The White House made
this clear when it said last week that under current law "some wealthy
individuals" can amass "substantially more than is needed to fund
reasonable levels of retirement saving.
"Think
about that statement for a moment, for it reveals a corrupt mind-set. The
administration is saying that America has a government that believes it has the
moral authority to decide just what a "reasonable" level of
retirement savings is. That's an alarming statement. Of course the White House
and its allies will pitch the plan as a reasonable means to bring down
deficits. How, they will ask, can anyone object to having the rich
"contribute" a little more to the solution? But the political left is
never honest about the policies it sells to the public. Small tax hikes become
hefty ones. A bit of regulation grows into a grinding regulatory regime.
Limited
help for the poor produces a welfare state. Environmental laws, supposedly to
clean up our air and water, actually wrest control of the economy from the
private sector. Background checks and registration are the precursors for
firearm confiscation. ObamaCare is the forerunner of a single-payer system. Democrats
are always poking a camel's nose under the tent with the full intention of
pushing the beast all the way in as soon as possible. Given that, don't be
surprised if Obama's retirement account idea leads to even more revenue than
the $9 billion it's supposed to raise. If it becomes law, Democrats will take
the next step, putting a stranglehold on the trillions Americans now hold in
their retirement accounts. Already Obama's Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
chief Richard Cordray said the agency wants to "help" Americans
manage the $19.4 trillion they've put away for their retirements, and is
"exploring ... in terms of whether and what authority we have."Three
years ago on these pages former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and policy analyst
Peter Ferrara warned that "Washington is developing plans for your
retirement savings.""The idea," they said, "is for the
government to take your retirement savings in return for a promise to pay you
some monthly benefit in your retirement years.
"They
will tell you that you are 'investing' your money. ... But they will use your
money immediately to pay for their unprecedented trillion-dollar budget
deficits, leaving nothing to back up their political promises, just as they
have raided the Social Security trust funds."And then there's the Annual
Report of the White House Task Force on the Middle Class released in February
2010 that, according to Connie Hair of Human Events, posed the idea of seizing
"private 401(k) plans for government disbursement."Government envy of
retirement accounts isn't unique to the current White House.
The
Washington Post reported 20 years ago the Clinton administration was pondering
an "unprecedented effort by the federal government to deal with its budget
woes by turning to the more than $4 trillion in cash, stocks and other
investments held by pension funds."It's unlikely Obama will be able to tap
into Americans' retirements this year or next. But the Democrats will keep
trying. It's just too tempting.
Source:
Investor's Business Posted Daily: Posted 04/11/2013
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/041113-651601-washington-wants-to-change-way-americans-retire.htm#ixzz2QFGWcxxl
Comments:
We are quickly becoming the United Socialist States of
Amerika. If we lose control of our
assets, we lose our assets including savings for retirement and property. States are sovereign entities that can
reverse this trend, but States have been ineffective and uninvolved. This needs to change. States need to challenge every
unconstitutional move the federal government makes.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment