Social workers
drag boy from plane, get dragged into court, Swedish officials accused of destroying family over
homeschooling, by Bob Unruh, 6/4/16, WND
For half of his life,
14-year-old Domenic Johansson has been in the custody of social services
agencies in his home country of Sweden after agents forcibly removed him from a
jet on which he and his parents were preparing to leave for his mother’s home
country of India, because he was homeschooled.
For much of that time, he’s
been denied permission to see or talk to his parents. Social services agencies
even have denied him contact with extended relatives, and he was refused
permission to attend the funeral of his grandmother.
Now, ADF International is asking the European Court of Human Rights to
intervene, restore the boy to his parents and allow them to try to repair the
damage that has been inflicted from years of state custody.
WND
first reported on the case in 2009 when the boy was 7. At that time, his parents, Christer and Annie
Johansson, went public with their case after social services officials ordered
police to halt their plane’s takeoff so they could snatch Domenic.
The Gotland couple had
been homeschooling Domenic, described as “a bright and happy 7-year-old,” as
they prepared to move to India. They “made all the right moves, informing the
school of their plans.”
But police invaded the
international air carrier, took Domenic and placed him in social services
custody, where he remains despite years in Swedish courts.
ADF International
explained Tuesday why it filed a request to the ECHR to intervene.
“The boy, who is their
only son, has not been allowed to see his parents in five years and five
months. The Swedish district court acknowledged in 2012 that Domenic’s parents
took good care of him, but noted that they schooled him at home. This practice,
which is rare but legal in Sweden, forms the background and possibly the reason
for the draconian punishment the family continues to suffer,” the organization
said.
Lorcán Price, ADF
International legal counsel, said the Swedish authorities have clearly violated
the Johanssons’ right to family life.”
“This right is a
fundamental right expressly guaranteed by the European Convention on Human
Rights,” Price said. “Separating a young child from his parents without even
allowing them access to each other is an extreme and unnecessary interference
with this right.”
When authorities
snatched Domenic, they had no warrant. Nor did they ever charge the Johanssons
with a crime.
“At first, Christer and
Annie were allowed to visit their then seven-year-old son two hours a week;
however, the government soon cut off all visitations. The child was not only
prevented from seeing his parents but also his extended family. When his
grandmother died, the officials denied the boy permission to attend her
funeral,” ADF International said.
In 2009, a court
initially ruled that the government “was within its rights” to seize Domenic.
Officials claimed he need a filling in his teeth and he hadn’t had a
vaccination. But the officials,
according to ADF International, “also repeated the demonstrably false charges
that homeschoolers do not perform well academically and are not well
socialized.”
In November 2015, the
Swedish Supreme Court refused to correct the case.
“Every child deserves to
be raised by his or her mother and father. The European Convention on Human
Rights requires the cutting of that bond to be the nuclear last resort. In this
case, it seems to be the government’s first resort, and so we are inviting the
European Court of Human Rights to intervene,” said Robert Clarke, director of
European advocacy for ADF International.
“International law holds
that children should grow up in an environment where their family ties are
maintained, allowing them to enjoy the love, support, and nurture of their
natural parents. We urge the European Court of Human Rights to accept the case
and quickly have the Swedish authorities return the Johanssons’ son to their
care.”
When
that 2015 decision was released, prominent family attorney Ruby Harrold-Claesson of the Nordic
Committee on Human Rights said the decision “really isn’t surprising, because
the system has to protect its power over every individual, and its prestige
when they commit the basest of crimes.”
Michael Donnelly of the
international Home School Legal Defense Association noted then: “This is more
of the same cold, callous indifference we’ve seen in the past from the Swedish
Supreme Court. This court had multiple opportunities to correct a gross
injustice, and each time they have turned away.”
He said the Swedish
state “has destroyed this family and, sadly, even if the court agreed to hear
the case and overturn the decision – the harm has had been done is virtually
irreparable.”
Commenting earlier on
the case, Roger Kiska, senior counsel for ADF, said the case reveals the
“hardness” of European condemnation of homeschooling, which once was
exemplified by Adolf Hitler, who was among the first to ban homeschooling and
require student to be under government indoctrination during their formative
years.
“Domenic should have
been returned long ago but for the bureaucratic hardness of the Swedish Child
Protection system,” he said. “The behavior of the Swedish officials in this
case has been reprehensible.”
Swedish officials have
declined numerous requests to respond to WND questions.
http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/social-workers-drag-boy-from-plane-get-dragged-into-court/
No comments:
Post a Comment