Why is North Carolina a swing state while South
Carolina is still RED? by Ann Corcoran 11/3/16
It is because the demographic change (remember
they are changing America by changing the people) is far advanced in North
Carolina while it is only beginning in South Carolina.
Trump and
Clinton are both in North Carolina today. Is it a swing state because of its
huge refugee/immigrant population? I think so! http://heavy.com/news/2016/11/north-carolina-poll-polls-2016-election-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-winning-losing-new-forecast-percent-men-women-independent-undecided/
Of course all
that will change for SC in a few years as Republicans like Senator Lindsey
Graham and Rep. Trey Gowdy are making little to no effort to hold the line in
terms of the UN/US State Department Refugee Admissions Program, and Graham
himself was one of the Senate ‘Gang of Eight’ that pushed through an amnesty
bill for illegal aliens a couple of years ago.
I don’t
understand how Rs like Graham don’t see that as the immigrant population grows
it will be attracted to the Democrat Party which promises to keep their welfare
goodies flowing and will ultimately lead to the downfall of the Republican
Party in states like his. But, it isn’t SC I want to tell you about. Trump and Clinton
going to North Carolina today!
I’ve wondered
how North Carolina, the land of Senator Jesse Helms, is now a toss-up state and
today as both Hillary and Trump head there, we see very clearly that it is a
traditional red state turning blue and both parties are fighting for it.
So, I did a
little numbers research. And, I am not saying that there are enough
refugee voters to swing the election, but the vast disparity between the states
is stunning. Also, NC has obviously thrown out the welcome mat to illegal
aliens. (Note in my previous
post that it is
clearly in the top ten for the placement of the ‘unaccompanied alien
children.’)
All of the
following data can be found at the Refugee Processing Center. And, I found a bit more at an ORR
annual report to Congress.
From 1983 to
2001, North Carolina resettled 16,640 refugees, while South Carolina only got
1,925. Then from FY
2003 to FY 2016 the states break down this way: NC (27,748) and SC (2,042).
Total refugee tally
for NC is roughly 44,388 to SC’s 3,967. (In between
those two documents, I was too lazy to look up 2002, but you get the idea). So, I am maintaining that it is the influx of
vastly more immigrants and refugees to North Carolina than South Carolina that
makes the difference—why NC is turning blue and SC isn’t (yet!). And, I should have mentioned all those
worker visas for NC, here.
We have a
pretty substantial archive on North Carolina and problems there with refugees, go
here to learn more. Don’t miss a stunning
murder case, contractors not taking care of the refugees, companies looking for
cheap labor and posts on how NC colleges lured Arab students, including 9/11
mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, to the state to boost their student
enrollment.
Then I found this stunning. From FY2003 to
FY2016, North Carolina received refugees from the following 56 countries. This list does not include illegal
alien-sending countries like Mexico and some from Central and South America.
Can you imagine the problems with languages in the medical system, the school
system and the criminal justice system! Where were they placed?
I started to
look at all the towns and cities and when I got to 35 I quit. Bottomline,
I bet there were at least 50-60 towns and cities in North Carolina that
received refugees. Maybe only a couple in some towns, but they were very
widely distributed and surely helped destroy community cohesiveness.
Eight of the
nine major resettlement contractors are operating (competing!) in North
Carolina. The only one missing is the International Rescue Committee. Go
here for office locations.
The wild card
for Trump and Clinton is whether the African American community there gets
it—that they are being out-competed in the job market by tens of thousands of
refugees pouring in to the state. And, if Hillary is elected there will never
be a slowdown.
No comments:
Post a Comment