The Globalist Cabal

There are elected officials and corporate CEOs in the US and UK who were placed in their positions based on their support for the global movement decades ago.  These are the individuals who supported the creation of the EU and the removal of voters’ rights. In the UK, the members of parliament would be wise to vote to agree with the Brexit vote and their corporate cronies should support Brexit. If they do not, British voters will fight to replace them in the next election. It’s a simple test to see if they will honor the will of the voters.

The same infiltration occurred in the US, where elected officials have supported globalism and these politicians and corporate CEOs also have the opportunity to support the will of the people and support Trump’s goal to return to the rule of law in the US.

Rule of Law

In the US, restoring enforcement of current immigration law will mark the beginning of restoring the rule of law in the on January 21, 2017. Politicians who refuse to enforce existing laws and refuse to remove their sanctuary city practices risk federal aid removal from their State and be would prosecuted. They will also not be allowed to interfere with federal teams who move in to enforce these laws and the will be prosecuted if they do.

In the UK, restoring sovereignty to the UK is the task at hand. This requires bi-lateral trade agreements with UK trading partner nations and the restoration of UK law to replace EU laws. The UK can continue expatriate employment, but would need to establish both expatriate and visitor visa systems with monitoring of these cards at transportation facilities. It should be simple for the UK to reverse all laws that affect UK voters by simply reinstalling the UK laws that were in place before the EU was formed. These laws should go into place as soon as they are gathered together and codified.  In the meantime, UK officials should be able to begin to develop bi-lateral trade agreements with their trading partners. When these have been completed, they should be able to quit the EU on a date of their choosing. There should be no EU rules that obstruct the EU Exit process.

If European countries want to reduce their terrorism risk, they would restrict reentry of their residents returning from countries where terrorists operate. They would not be able to book passage back to their European host country. These countries should keep track of their refugees and have plans to return them to their home countries.  Finally, European countries should ban Sharia law and let Muslims who do not want to assimilate return to their home countries and revoke their European citizenship as necessary. What would be left would be Muslims who want to live under whatever their European country laws prescribe.

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader