H-1B Employer Maps: Dependent,
Willful Violator, and Debarred, Thousands Prefer Alien Workers to Americans,
by Bryan Griffith, David North November 2016
The Center for Immigration Studies has produced two maps
using publicly available Department of Labor (DOL) data. The first map points
out the employer addresses that have identified their use of H-1B as above
average. The second map deals with a smaller group of employers who have been
identified by the Department as abusing the program.
The H-1B program allows employers to bring skilled
workers (usually with college degrees) to the United States on nonimmigrant
visas. The three-year visas can be renewed for another three years, and the
visas can be kept alive, virtually forever, if the employer has applied for a
permanent immigrant visa for the worker in question. There are some minimal and
ineffective labor market protections for these workers. Under all circumstances
they can bring their spouses and children (under H-4 visas) with them to the
United States – and under some circumstances these aliens can work legally;
there are no wage protections for the H-4s.
On the first map, there are over 2,000 employers
identified who, actively and publicly, prefer alien workers for at least some
jobs to U.S. ones. The formal name for this group of employers sounds like it
comes from the field of abnormal psychology: they are "H-1B
dependent." This is the definition of the term: an employer with 25 full-time workers or fewer, with
eight or more of them H-1Bs; with 26-50 workers, there are 13 or more H-1Bs;
and with 51 or more there are 15 percent or more H-1Bs. Most users of the H-1B
visa, in general, are not H-1B dependent.
The "H-1B
Dependent" employers are shown in the map above; a tap on the icon
presents their names, addresses, and phone numbers, all as drawn from the records
of the U.S. Department of Labor. We have provided the phone numbers from the
federal records so that local media can call the employers and ask them about
their, by definition, unusual hiring practices.
It should be noted
that the information behind the icons has been supplied by the employers and
neither DOL nor CIS has proofread every entry, so there are errors. For
example, the one icon in West Virginia belongs to the Harrison County Board of
Education; yes, the county sought H-1B teachers, but did not have enough to
warrant the H-1B dependent status. Either someone in the school system checked
the wrong box on one of the five applications filed for such workers or the DOL
made the erroneous data entry.
Under U.S. law an
employer gets into trouble, appropriately, for discriminating against
African-Americans in favor of whites, or Gentiles in preference to Jews, but it
is perfectly okay under the law for the same employer to hire alien workers
(through the H-1B program) in preference to resident ones. And if the employer
decides that what he really wants, as some do, are twenty-some-odd males from
one nation in Asia, that's okay. Many employers are attracted to these workers
because they can be paid at below-market wages, and they are docile and less likely to seek better jobs than their
American peers.
The second map
shows H-1B employers who are classed as debarred or willful violators. They
have, at some point in the past, violated the H-1B rules and have been denied
the use of H-1B workers for a period of time. As we pointed out in a report
about two years ago the Department is, unfortunately, extremely reluctant to
put erring employers in either
category.
Comments
This
article was published by the Center for Immigration Studies and includes
propaganda aimed at promoting the hiring of immigrants in the US. The article
didn’t include the names of these 2000 corporations and doesn’t mention the new
globalist, US government initiated hiring structures that have globalized
hiring.
The
traditional “brain drain” practices were formalized on US college campuses
after 1945. I was a natural extension of
the US practice of attracting the most productive immigrants at times when we
needed workers. I worked at Washington
University in St. Louis from 1971 to 1975 and was involved in the program. We had many visitors from foreign nations who
were interviewing US executives to understand our views on employment. I had
private sector experience and I was the one who answered these questions. While
in the private sector in 1967, my first engineering hire was a BSEE from India,
who received his degree in the US.
I’ve been
involved in hiring many engineers over the years. Most of them have been US
citizens, but many critical hires were immigrants I sponsored on H1b
visas. Most of my hires had high
GPAs. As a Consultant, I saw Firearms
Training Systems hire their entire engineering department from China. They earned their BSEE in China and MSEE in
the US. Yesterday I hired a design
engineer with an MSEE and a 3.5 GPA and a BSEE from India.
The H1b
program has been watered down by the globalists and needs to be tightened back
to only include the top engineering students and only when US applicants were
unqualified. STEM is a scam and includes
jobs I would consider to be technicians, not engineers.
The H2a
program for seasonal agricultural workers was mismanaged and needs to be
tightened up and expanded to support US agriculture until US citizen hires can
handle it.
The H2b
program for seasonal non-agricultural workers needs to be restored to include
only jobs that US citizens cannot do. US citizens can do this work. I hired a
‘stone grinder” from Mexico on an H2b visa in 1977 for Schwann Foods’ tortilla
bakery.
The L1b
program is too loose and needs to be eliminated.
The
“anchor baby” and lottery citizenship programs need to be eliminated and the
addition of relatives needs to be limited to spouses and children.
The US
government needs to end their practice of supplying refugee and immigrant workers
directly to companies and temp companies should comply with tighter rules to
lower US immigration. The US refugee
program needs to be repealed.
Norb
Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader.
No comments:
Post a Comment