By Lora Ries, Director of Heritage’s Border Security and Immigration Center at The Heritage Foundation.
Rising from the Ashes: Principles and Policies for a New American Immigration System
America’s immigration system used to be broken due to lack of enforcement and overly complicated statutory provisions. Now it is a pile of ashes. As it has done with so many other American institutions, the radical Left has intentionally deconstructed our borders and immigration structures in the hope of building a new version of America. The Left’s vision of unlimited “new lawful pathways” as its “reimagined” immigration system is nothing more than an open border welfare state that diminishes jobs, wages, and economic opportunities for citizens. No country can sustain or survive it. From these ashes. however, comes a great opportunity to redesign a new, simpler, fairer, and more manageable immigration system that prioritizes America first and lawful immigrants second.
The radical Left has
intentionally deconstructed our borders and immigration structures in the hope
of building a new version of America.
What the Left envisions is nothing more than an open border welfare state that diminishes jobs, wages, and economic opportunities for citizens. It is time to design a new, simpler, fairer, and more manageable immigration system that prioritizes America first and legal immigrants second. “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”—Barack Obama, October 30, 2008
Introduction
Before the Biden–Harris Administration, Americans had long lived with a dysfunctional immigration system. Immigrating legally to the U.S. was too complicated, too slow, and too expensive. These factors, along with many foreigners’ knowledge that they would not qualify for admission under our immigration requirements, encouraged millions to bypass our legal immigration process and cross the border illegally, stay past the expiration date of their temporary visas, file fraudulent immigration benefit applications, and remain here for years without consequence. Other promising immigrants went to Canada, Israel, or elsewhere to avoid the U.S. immigration hassle.
Over the decades, the illegal alien population and the immigration benefit application and immigration court case backlogs continued to increase. All the while, the American public continued to differentiate between legal and illegal immigration, supporting the former while opposing—yet accepting some levels of—the latter. When faced with the question of what to do with the millions of illegal aliens already living here, Americans at the same time opposed amnesties while repeating the claim that 11 million illegal aliens could not be deported. The result: just a couple of hundred thousand deportations each year while the remaining, growing population continued to reside here unlawfully and gain greater footholds in the U.S.
Enter the Biden–Harris Administration and with it a fundamental transformation of our immigration system. By changing legal terms; twisting and warping statutory requirements; waiving, ignoring, or refusing to enforce laws; and unconstitutionally creating immigration benefits not authorized by Congress, the Biden–Harris Administration has intentionally erased the line between legal and illegal immigration. We can no longer recognize our immigration “system” because we no longer operate by the rule of law.
What remains cannot and should not be merely reformed. Rather, the Biden–Harris intended deconstruction should be swept aside and replaced with a new, simpler, lawful, orderly, and manageable immigration system that prioritizes Americans first, lawful immigrants second and illegal aliens not at all.
This paper introduces principles and policies for such a new American immigration system in the areas of legal immigration, working in the U.S., illegal immigration, and U.S. citizenship. It also is the first in a series of Heritage Foundation papers that will examine several of these issues in depth.
Before the Biden Administration
For decades, presidential Administrations have said that the American immigration system is “broken,” as millions of foreigners have been permitted to enter or remain in the U.S. illegally and continue to reside here without negative legal consequences. For those who respect the United States’ rule of law and seek to come to America through scores of temporary or permanent legal channels, the process can take several years and, in some scenarios, decades. As an example, in 2019, the State Department was issuing family immigrant (permanent) visas to Mexican unmarried sons and daughters of U.S. citizens whose family visa petitions were filed earlier than August 1997—a 22-year wait.
U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Consular Affairs, Visa Bulletin, Vol. X, No. 36 (December 2019), https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Bulletins/visabulletin_december2019.pdf (accessed August 28, 2024).
Act (INA) 8 U.S. Code Chapter 12—Immigration and Nationality, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/chapter-12 (accessed August 30, 2024). See also Immigration and Nationality Act [Act of June 27, 1952; Chapter 477 of the 82nd Congress; 66 STAT. 163; 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.] [As Amended Through P.L. 117–360, Enacted January 5, 2023], https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/COMPS-1376/pdf/COMPS-1376.pdf (accessed August 29, 2024) is followed by excessive exceptions and waivers, creating work for immigration attorneys whom applicants hire to help them navigate the confusing statutes and administrative regulations that have proliferated explosively over the decades. In addition, the federal government charges fees for certain lawful permanent immigration benefit applications while waiving and exempting millions of fees for other benefit applications, particularly asylum applications.
In short, it is a slow, frustrating, and expensive hassle to immigrate to the U.S. lawfully. As a result, when it is faster, easier, and cheaper to migrate to America illegally, then that is what some human beings will do—and have done for decades. Others will not come to the U.S. at all to start businesses or incubate new technologies. Instead, they immigrate to other countries that have more functional immigration systems.
For a snapshot of what our immigration system has generated over these many years, consider the immigration benefit and enforcement statistics from 2019, the last year before governments restricted international travel in response to COVID-19, thereby skewing 2020 U.S. immigration data:
The
estimated number of illegal aliens residing in the U.S. ranged from 11 million
to more than 22 million.
Compare Steven A. Camarota and Karen Zeigler, “Estimating the Illegal Immigrant Population Using the Current Population Survey,” Center for Immigration Studies, March 29, 2022, https://cis.org/Report/Estimating-Illegal-Immigrant-Population-Using-Current-Population-Survey (accessed August 28, 2024), with Mohammad Fazel Zarandi, Jonathan S. Feinstein, and Edward H. Kaplan, “The Number of Undocumented Immigrants in the United States: Estimates Based on Demographic Modeling with Data from 1990 to 2016,” PLoS ONE, Vol. 13, No. 9 (2018), article no. 0201193, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201193&type=printable (accessed August 28, 2024).
Within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) encountered approximately 288,500 inadmissible aliens at the ports of entry and another 859,500 between the ports of entry for a total of more than 1.14 million enforcement actions.
CBP encountered three aliens between ports of entry who were on the Terrorist Screening Data Set (TSDS) Table, “U.S. Border Patrol TSDS Encounters Between Ports of Entry of Non-U.S. Citizens,” in U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, “CBP Enforcement Statistics,” last modified August 16, 2024, https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/cbp-enforcement-statistics (accessed August 28, 2024).
The U.S. Border Patrol apprehended more than 76,000 unaccompanied alien children. DHS’s U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had an average daily detention population (ADP) of more than 50,000 aliens, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Fiscal Year 2019 Enforcement and Removal Operations Report, p. 5, https://www.ice.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Document/2019/eroReportFY2019.pdf (accessed August 28, 2024) and ICE deported more than 267,000 aliens.
The
Department of Justice immigration courts had a backlog of approximately 1.2
million cases.
Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, “Immigration Court Backlog: Historical Backlog (from 1998),” data through July 2024, https://trac.syr.edu/phptools/immigration/backlog/ (accessed August 28, 2024).
The number of immigration benefit applications pending at DHS’s U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) exceeded 5.7 million.
These data do not reflect a well-functioning immigration system for American employers or family visa petitioners, for alien beneficiaries, for U.S. taxpayers, or for federal law enforcement or immigration benefit adjudicators. Before 2020, the U.S. immigration system needed significant reforms if America was to have a lawful, orderly, and manageable system. Yet, as bad as those 2019 statistics were, they pale in comparison to those generated in less than four years by the Biden–Harris Administration’s intentional outright deconstruction of America’s immigration system.
The Biden Administration
During a 2020 presidential primary campaign debate, Joe Biden telegraphed his Administration’s open border and illegal immigration policies, stating that he would “make sure…we immediately surge to the border all those people that are seeking asylum. They deserve to be heard. That’s who we are. We’re a nation that says if you want to flee and you’re fleeing oppression, you should come.”
Karl
Salzmann, “Flashback: Biden Tells Migrants to ‘Surge to the Border,’” The
Washington Free Beacon, May 10, 2023, https://freebeacon.com/biden-administration/flashback-biden-tells-migrants-to-surge-to-the-border/ (accessed August 28, 2024).
Biden then added that he would reverse an order that had been issued by President Donald Trump so that asylum would be available beyond persecution on account of the claimant’s race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group—its traditional definition.
Then, once Biden was sworn in as President, he wasted no time unleashing his open border agenda. On the first day of his Administration, Biden began to violate sections of the INA and halted effective immigration enforcement and anti-fraud measures. His orders included stopping construction of the border wall system, ending enrollments of aliens in the effective anti–asylum fraud “Remain in Mexico” program, ordering that no deportations would occur for the first 100 days of his Administration, and revoking President Trump’s executive order and presidential memorandum ordering the collection of citizenship information during the decennial Census and exclusion of illegal aliens from the Census apportionment of members of the U.S. House of Representatives.
Biden directed federal agencies to refer to legal and illegal aliens alike as “noncitizens,” thereby bastardizing legal, statutory language to erase the line between legal and illegal immigration.
Memorandum from Troy A. Miller, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, to Deputy Commissioner; Chief Operating Officer; All Executive Assistant Commissioners; Chief, U.S. Border Patrol; All Assistant Commissioners; Chief Counsel; Executive Director, Privacy and Diversity Office; Executive Director, Policy Directorate; Executive Director, Planning, Analysis and Requirements Evaluations; Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services; Executive Director, Intergovernmental Public Liaison; Director, Information and Incident Coordination Center; Director, Law Enforcement Officer/Agent Safety and Compliance; Director, Office of the Executive Secretariat; Executive Director, Office of Trade Relations; Chief of Staff; Deputy Chief of Staff; and Deputy Chief of Staff (Policy), “Subject: Updated Terminology for CBP Communications and Materials,” April 19, 2021, https://htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/files/c1-distribution-memo-updates-to-immigration-terminology-signed-and-dated-9854-1618974536.pdf (accessed August 28, 2024).
His political appointees implemented policies to instruct CBP agents to process most inadmissible aliens they encountered into the U.S. in violation of the immigration statute instead of returning them across the border. Adam Shaw, Bill Melugin, and Griff Jenkins, “Mayorkas Tells Border Patrol Agents That ‘Above 85%’ of Illegal Immigrants Released into US: Sources,” Fox News, January 8, 2024, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mayorkas-tells-border-patrol-agents-illegal-immigrants-released-into-us-sources (accessed August 28, 2024).
The Left and the media referred to all encountered illegal aliens as “asylum seekers” in an attempt to generate American empathy for the masses who were coming to the U.S. Meanwhile, the real consequence of this leftist propaganda was to encourage inadmissible aliens to file fraudulent asylum applications to buy themselves more time to remain in the U.S. and gain work authorization.
Adam Shaw, Bill Melugin, and Griff Jenkins, “Mayorkas Tells Border Patrol Agents That ‘Above 85%’ of Illegal Immigrants Released into US: Sources,” Fox News, January 8, 2024, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mayorkas-tells-border-patrol-agents-illegal-immigrants-released-into-us-sources (accessed August 28, 2024).
The Left and the media referred to all encountered illegal aliens as “asylum seekers” in an attempt to generate American empathy for the masses who were coming to the U.S. Meanwhile, the real consequence of this leftist propaganda was to encourage inadmissible aliens to file fraudulent asylum applications to buy themselves more time to remain in the U.S. and gain work authorization.
Using a 2021 policy memorandum, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas restricted ICE’s ability to execute most of its immigration enforcement functions, limiting investigations, arrests, detentions, prosecutions, and deportations to spies, terrorists, some aggravated felons, and aliens who illegally crossed the border after November 1, 2020.
Memorandum from Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, to Tae D. Johnson, Acting Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; Troy Miller, Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection; Ur Jaddou, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; Robert Silvers, Under Secretary, Office of Strategy, Policy, and Plans; Katherine Culliton-González, Officer for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties; and Lynn Parker Dupree, Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, “Subject: Guidelines for the Enforcement of Civil Immigration Law,” September 30, 2021, https://www.ice.gov/doclib/news/guidelines-civilimmigrationlaw.pdf (accessed August 28, 2024).
Yet,
as the data below will show, the Biden Administration has not operated even
according to these very limited enforcement priorities. Echoing Barack Obama’s
2008 campaign statement that “we are five days away from fundamentally
transforming the United States of America,” Mayorkas bragged in January 2022
that “we have fundamentally changed immigration enforcement. For the first time
ever, our policy explicitly states that a non-citizen’s unlawful presence in
the United States will not, by itself, be a basis for the initiation of an
enforcement action.” He called this “a profound shift away from the prior
administration’s indiscriminate enforcement.”
Adam Shaw, “Biden’s First Year: Mayorkas Says Admin Has ‘Fundamentally Changed’ Interior Immigration Enforcement,” Fox News, January 20, 2022, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bidens-first-year-mayorkas-admin-fundamentally-changed-interior-immigration-enforcement (accessed August 28, 2024). In reality, Mayorkas’s policies have been clear violations of federal law.
Violating Immigration Parole. In addition to opening the border and ignoring immigration enforcement statutes, Mayorkas has grossly violated immigration benefit statutes passed by Congress in the INA. The most blatant of these violations has been his use of immigration parole. The INA states that: The Secretary of Homeland Security] may…in his discretion parole into the United States temporarily…only on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit any alien applying for admission to the United States, but such parole of such alien shall not be regarded as an admission of the alien and when the purposes of such parole shall, in the opinion of the Secretary, have been served the alien shall forthwith return or be returned to the custody from which he was paroled and thereafter his case shall continue to be dealt with in the same manner as that of any other applicant for admission to the United States.
Congress
later added the following statutory language to prevent the abuse of parole to
bring refugees into the U.S. more quickly:
The Secretary may not parole into the United States an alien who is a refugee unless the Secretary determines that compelling reasons in the public interest with respect to that particular alien require that the alien be paroled into the United States rather than be admitted as a refugee under section 1157 of this title.
Congress intended that parole would be used very rarely in special circumstances when an alien does not have adequate time to use legal visa and refugee processes—for example, when coming to the U.S. for emergency surgery or to testify in a criminal case. Therefore, Congress logically did not provide work authorization for aliens who receive temporary parole.
Despite
this clear statutory text, Mayorkas has repeatedly used mass and categorical
parole to allow tens of thousands of inadmissible aliens to bypass our lawful
visa and refugee processes each month. He created parole programs for aliens
from Afghanistan, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti,
Honduras, Nicaragua, Ukraine, and Venezuela, as well as aliens who have
previously been deported.
U.S.
Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services,
“Humanitarian or Significant Public Benefit Parole for Individuals Outside the
United States,” last reviewed/updated August 19, 2024, https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/humanitarian_parole
(accessed August 28, 2024). and aliens who have resided in the U.S. illegally for at least 10 years and are married to U.S. citizens.
In addition, Mayorkas created a parole program under which any alien can use the CBP Mobile One application to make an appointment at a land or air port of entry where CBP will parole them into the U.S. News release, “DHS Scheduling System for Safe, Orderly and Humane Border Processing Goes Live on CBP One™ App,” U.S. Department of Homeland Security, January 12, 2023, https://www.dhs.gov/news/2023/01/12/dhs-scheduling-system-safe-orderly-and-humane-border-processing-goes-live-cbp-onetm (accessed August 28, 2024). In other words, instead of securing the border, the Biden–Harris Administration created a deceptive shell game by shifting the illegal flow to the ports while pointing at (briefly) falling numbers of aliens crossing the southern border between these ports of entry.
Secretary Mayorkas has also given his mass parolees renewable work authorization for two-year increments without congressional authorization. He propagandizes his bypass of the statutory visa and refugee processes as “expanding lawful pathways” and insists that parole is granted on a “case-by-case basis.” Federal judges, however, have found otherwise. For example, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rebuked DHS’s abuse of parole in its December 2021 decision regarding the Secretary’s termination of the Migrant Protection Protocols. The court held that “deciding to parole aliens en masse is the opposite of case-by-case decision-making” and added that “DHS’s pretended power to parole aliens while ignoring the limitations Congress imposed on the parole power is not nonenforcement; it’s misenforcement, suspension of the INA, or both.”
Rendering Asylum Meaningless. The Biden–Harris Administration has intentionally ruined America’s second most important immigration benefit after U.S. citizenship—asylum. Beyond telling aliens to surge our border and claim asylum, as Biden did during his 2020 primary debate with de facto support from the media, which refer to all illegal aliens as “asylum seekers,” Mayorkas has violated immigration statutes to facilitate asylum fraud both procedurally and substantively.
He has violated Congress’s establishment of jurisdiction over asylum applications by replacing immigration judges, ICE attorneys, and the adversarial process with USCIS asylum officers who process both initial claims and second-stage applications for border crossers. Without cross-examination by ICE attorneys and immigration judges, USCIS asylum officers are more likely to rubber-stamp and grant weak, questionable, and unverified asylum claims.
Substantively, the Administration supports claims of domestic violence, gang activity, general crime, and climate change as grounds for asylum. These claims do not meet the requirements of the law, which are based on persecution because of an alien’s race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group. The Left has taken the U.S. far afield from the refugee protection the U.S. committed to providing after World War II. Instead of providing protection from persecution based on a trait that a person cannot or should not have to change, the Left has watered down and abused asylum as just another way to bring more aliens into the U.S. and allow them to remain here.
Tibisay
Zea, “How the Asylum System Became the Main Avenue for Mass Migration to the
US,” The World, February 12, 2024, https://theworld.org/stories/2024/02/12/how-asylum-system-became-main-avenue-mass-migration-us (accessed August 28, 2024).
Nor is this purposeful destruction of asylum unique to America. Asylum is the preferred tool of globalists who would use mass migration into Western countries to dismantle Western democratic traditions, culture, and civilization.
Biden–Harris Administration Statistics. The results of the Biden–Harris Administration’s open border operations and lawlessness have been record-setting and devastating to America’s sovereignty, security, public safety, and economy. During the 3.5 years that Joe Biden has been in the White House:
CBP has encountered over 10.5 million inadmissible aliens at and between the ports of entry, the vast majority of whom the Administration has released into the U.S. CBP unofficially reports that more than 2 million other aliens are “known gotaways” who evaded the Border Patrol. Using these two numbers plus any “unknown gotaways,” we can estimate that the policies implemented by the
Biden–Harris
Administration have enabled approximately 10 million inadmissible aliens to
enter the U.S., causing the illegal alien population to increase from the
pre-Biden level of 11 million–22 million to the current level of 21 million–32
million.
Between the ports of entry, CBP encountered 16, 98, 172, and 106 aliens on the Terrorist Screening Data Set during fiscal year (FY) 2021, FY 2022, FY 2023, and FY 2024, respectively.
CBP encountered 147,975 unaccompanied alien children during FY 2021, 152,880 in FY 2022, 137,992 in FY 2023, and 110,672 in FY 2024, for a total of 534,980 during the Biden–Harris Administration. Table, “FY Comparison by Demographic,” in U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, “Nationwide Encounters,” last modified November 19, 2024, https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/nationwide-encounters (accessed November 26, 2024). Worse, the Department of Health and Human Services, which is responsible for placing unaccompanied children with sponsors, has lost contact with more than 300,000 children.
In
FY 2021, ICE’s average daily detention population was more than 19,000. Table, “Average Daily Population of Noncitizens Maintained
in Detention Facilities,” in U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Department
of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Budget Overview,
Fiscal Year 2024 Congressional Justification, p. ICE-3, https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2023-03/U.S%20IMMIGRATION%20AND%20CUSTOMS%20ENFORCEMENT_Remediated.pdf (accessed August 29, 2024).
even though ICE was funded to maintain 34,000 detention beds. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ICE Annual Report Fiscal Year 2021, March 11, 2022, p. 11, https://www.ice.gov/doclib/eoy/iceAnnualReportFY2021.pdf (accessed August 29, 2024). ICE deported just over 59,000 aliens, less than half of whom were deported on or after February 18, 2021, following the Biden–Harris Administration’s policy memorandum limiting ICE’s enforcement actions.
In
FY 2022, ICE’s ADP was slightly more than 22,600. Table,
“Average Daily Population of Noncitizens Maintained in Detention Facilities,”
in U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Department of Homeland Security, U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement Budget Overview, Fiscal Year 2024
Congressional Justification, p. ICE-3 and ICE deported over 72,000 aliens.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Budget Overview, Fiscal Year 2024 Congressional Justification, p. ICE-O&S-211.
In FY 2023, the ADP was over 28,000, and deportations numbered more than 142,000. Figure 14, “FY 2018–FY 2023 Average Daily Population by Arresting Agency,” in U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Fiscal Year 2023 ICE Annual Report, December 29, 2023, p. 21, https://www.ice.gov/doclib/eoy/iceAnnualReportFY2023.pdf (accessed September 3, 2024), and Figure 20, “FY 2028–FY 2023 Overall ICE Removals by Fiscal Year,”
In FY 2024, the ADP was approximately 37,000 aliens, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, “ICE Detention Data, FY2024,” https://www.ice.gov/doclib/detention/FY24_detentionStats08292024.xlsx (accessed September 3, 2024) and ICE removed more than 248,000 aliens.
The number of cases in the Department of Justice immigration courts backlog has tripled from 1.2 million when Biden came into office to more than 3.7 million as of November 2024. Additionally, it is very expensive to immigrate lawfully to the U.S. This is partly because immigration law is nearly as complicated as the U.S. tax code. Each rule stated in the Immigration and Nationality
The number of immigration benefit applications pending at DHS’s U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has grown from over 6.3 million cases. Table, “Number of Service-wide Forms by Quarter, Form Status, and Processing Time, Fiscal Year 2021, Quarter 1,” U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/reports/Quarterly_All_Forms_FY2021Q1.pdf (accessed August 29, 2024) when Biden became President to over 9.2 million through June 2024.
Secretary Mayorkas claims he inherited a “broken asylum system” from the prior Administration. Nolan Rappaport, “Biden Administration Says US Asylum System Is Broken: Here’s How to Fix It,” The Hill, April 6, 2023, https://thehill.com/opinion/immigration/3937344-biden-administration-says-us-asylum-system-is-broken-heres-how-to-fix-it/ (accessed August 28, 2024). He has also repeated several past Administrations’ line that our immigration system is “broken” as he tries to justify “expanding lawful pathways” for millions of inadmissible aliens to come to the U.S. while simultaneously severely restricting immigration enforcement. News release, “DHS Announces Proposed Rule and Other Measures to Enhance Security, Streamline Asylum Processing,” U.S. Department of Homeland Security, May 9, 2024, https://www.dhs.gov/news/2024/05/09/dhs-announces-proposed-rule-and-other-measures-enhance-security-streamline-asylum (accessed August 28, 2024).
The truth, however, is that we no longer have an immigration “system.” The Biden–Harris Administration has dismantled each tool used to control the border and increase efficiency in the immigration system, thereby taking a dysfunctional system and burning it down to an unrecognizable pile of ashes made up—in part—of record terrorist threats, serious criminals, fentanyl poisonings, and child trafficking. These devastating results led the U.S. House of Representatives to impeach Secretary Mayorkas for his willful and systemic refusal to comply with and enforce the law and his breach of public trust. H. Res. 863, Impeaching Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, for High Crimes and Misdemeanors, 118th Cong., introduced November 13, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hres863/BILLS-118hres863rds.pdf (accessed August 28, 2024). He was the first sitting Cabinet member in American history to be impeached.
Facing reelection and very
negative polling on border security, Biden signed a June 2024 border
proclamation.
President
Joseph R. Biden Jr., Proclamation 10733, “Securing the Border,” June 3, 2024,
in Federal Register, Vol. 89, No. 111 (June 7, 2024), pp. 48487–48493, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-06-07/pdf/2024-12647.pdf (accessed August 28, 2024).
Rather than rescind his earlier open border orders, however, Biden signed a document that permits continued crisis levels of illegal immigration while allowing mass parole and unaccompanied child trafficking to continue. Per the choreographed plan with the radical Left, Biden subsequently announced an unlawful administrative amnesty for aliens who have lived illegally in the U.S. for at least 10 years and are married to U.S. citizens, as well as an easier process for illegal aliens who came to the U.S. as children to receive work visas, “Fact Sheet: President Biden Announces New Actions to Keep Families Together,” The White House, June 18, 2024, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/06/18/fact-sheet-president-biden-announces-new-actions-to-keep-families-together/ (accessed August 28, 2024). in direct violation of the INA.
Principles and Policies for a
New American Immigration System
America now faces an opportunity to sweep away Biden’s border and immigration ashes and redesign America’s immigration system. To achieve a lawful, orderly, and manageable system that benefits America first, legal immigrants second, and illegal aliens not at all, the new system should be simpler and faster than the dysfunctional, defrauded, confusing, and expensive pre-Biden immigration system. It also should include full and consistent enforcement.
In short, lawful applicants who are eligible for an immigration benefit should have it granted in a timely manner, and those who are not eligible should be denied expeditiously and then promptly depart the U.S. An alien who fails to depart the U.S. promptly should be removed with consequences such as fines, criminal convictions, the inability to return and the possibility of imprisonment if he or she tries to do so.
A lawful and efficient immigration system can succeed only if our borders are secure and immigration laws are consistently and thoroughly enforced. If it is no longer easier, faster, and cheaper to immigrate here illegally, future migrants will change their behavior based on calculations of higher risk and will be deterred from violating immigration laws.
Below are five principles that should be used in creating a new, effective American immigration system, as well as dozens of policies in the specific areas of legal immigration, working in the U.S., illegal immigration, and U.S. citizenship. A forthcoming series of Heritage Foundation papers will provide more in-depth examinations of several of these issues.
Principle 1: As the government
of a sovereign nation, our government must uphold the Constitution and rule of
law.
1. The U.S. Congress, not the
administrative state, should approve who may be lawfully admitted into the U.S.
and set the terms of their stay here.
2. Complying with the plain
language of the authorizing statute eliminates fraud and abuse.
3. Temporary means temporary.The
executive branch should return temporary and permanent visa eligibility to
congressional intent.
4. Congress, not the
administrative state, should determine whether temporary aliens may work in the
U.S.
5. Aliens who violate the
terms of their visas should have their visas revoked.Visas issued to students
and other aliens who violate local, state, or federal laws or engage in actions
that show support for designated terrorist groups should be cancelled immediately,
and such individuals should be deported promptly.
6. Transparent information on
immigration status is vital among federal and state agencies.The Social
Security Administration, Internal Revenue Service, and Department of Homeland
Security should share data on the immigration status of individuals as part of
their full enforcement of federal law, including against employers who knew or
should have known that they hired or employ aliens without work authorization. Federal
agencies should also share those data with state and local officials free of
charge.
7. Prosecutorial discretion in
the immigration removal context should be used very rarely.Congress should make
clear that prosecutorial discretion is the very rare exception, not the norm,
when enforcing immigration law.
8. Deportation is a critical
component of the enforcement needed to maintain a lawful and orderly
immigration system.Orders of removal should be executed in a timely manner.
9. U.S. citizenship is the
most important immigration benefit the U.S. provides.U.S. citizenship brings
exclusive rights and responsibilities. It should not be cheapened or defrauded
by allowing non-citizens to be treated as if they were U.S. citizens.
10. The U.S. government should
require that to be given U.S. citizenship, a child must have at least one
parent who is a U.S. citizen.The U.S. government should end its “birthright
citizenship” policy, which is not required by the U.S. Constitution and is not recognized
by the vast majority of other nations.
11. Proof of U.S. citizenship
should be required to register and to vote in federal, state, and local
elections.The Department of Homeland Security should cooperate with state and
local elections officials to verify the citizenship status of all registrants
and voters.
12. Since only U.S. citizens can vote legally, only the U.S. citizen population should be counted in determining congressional districts and presidential electoral votes. Only U.S. citizens should be used in the apportionment formula after every U.S. Census to determine all congressional, state, and local political redistricting and, in turn, the number of presidential electoral votes given to each state.To accomplish this, a citizenship question should be reinstated on the decennial U.S. Census.
Principle 2: Our immigration system exists to
serve the American people.
13. Immigration adjudicators and officials
work for the American people, not for aliens or advocacy groups.
14. Most immigrant (permanent) visas should be
for employment purposes, be merit-based, and not be used to diminish the wages
or employment opportunities of U.S. citizens.
15. Family-based immigration
(permanent) categories should be limited to the immediate nuclear family,
thereby ending chain migration.
16. The U.S. should not grant
lawful permanent residence based on a lottery system.
17. Applicants, not U.S.
taxpayers, should pay for adjudication of their applications and case backlog
reduction.
18. Just as they may legally
favor hiring veterans over other applicants, employers should be legally
allowed to favor hiring U.S. citizens over aliens with work authorization
documents.
19. Aside from government
persecution, victimization and other types of personal or economic problems
should not be the basis for an immigration benefit.
20. Assimilating immigrants into American political and civil society, language, history, and culture is critical for America to remain a united country.
Principle 3: Our country must
be secure to keep Americans safe.
21. Our borders and interior
must be secure, and public safety must be a top priority.
22. Both border security and
interior enforcement should be fully resourced for thorough enforcement.
23. Border agents should have
expulsion authority during national crises. Congress should provide border
agents with authority to expel illegal aliens across the border immediately
including (but not limited to) when a border or national crisis, not just a
health crisis, occurs.
24. Immigration detention is
necessary to protect public safety, prevent flight, and ensure removal if so
ordered by an immigration judge.
Backgrounder Border
Security
Rising from the Ashes:
Principles and Policies for a New American Immigration System
December 3, 2024 32 min read Download Report
Lora Ries, Director Border Security and Immigration Center
Summary
America’s immigration system used to be broken due to lack of enforcement and overly complicated statutory provisions. Now it is a pile of ashes. As it has done with so many other American institutions, the radical Left has intentionally deconstructed our borders and immigration structures in the hope of building a new version of America. The Left’s vision of unlimited “new lawful pathways” as its “reimagined” immigration system is nothing more than an open border welfare state that diminishes jobs, wages, and economic opportunities for citizens. No country can sustain or survive it. From these ashes. however, comes a great opportunity to redesign a new, simpler, fairer, and more manageable immigration system that prioritizes America first and lawful immigrants second.
Key Takeaways
The radical Left has
intentionally deconstructed our borders and immigration structures in the hope
of building a new version of America.
What the Left envisions is nothing more than an open border welfare state that diminishes jobs, wages, and economic opportunities for citizens. It is time to design a new, simpler, fairer, and more manageable immigration system that prioritizes America first and legal immigrants second.
“We are five days away from
fundamentally transforming the United States of America.” Barack Obama, October
30, 2008
Barack Obama, Remarks in Columbia, Missouri, October 30, 2028, https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-columbia-missouri-0 (accessed August 29, 2024).
Introduction
Before the Biden–Harris
Administration, Americans had long lived with a dysfunctional immigration
system. Immigrating legally to the U.S. was too complicated, too slow, and too
expensive. These factors, along with many foreigners’ knowledge that they would
not qualify for admission under our immigration requirements, encouraged
millions to bypass our legal immigration process and cross the border
illegally, stay past the expiration date of their temporary visas, file
fraudulent immigration benefit applications, and remain here for years without
consequence. Other promising immigrants went to Canada, Israel, or elsewhere to
avoid the U.S. immigration hassle.
Over the decades, the illegal
alien population and the immigration benefit application and immigration court
case backlogs continued to increase. All the while, the American public
continued to differentiate between legal and illegal immigration, supporting
the former while opposing—yet accepting some levels of—the latter. When faced
with the question of what to do with the millions of illegal aliens already
living here, Americans at the same time opposed amnesties while repeating the
claim that 11 million illegal aliens could not be deported. The result: just a
couple of hundred thousand deportations each year while the remaining, growing
population continued to reside here unlawfully and gain greater footholds in
the U.S.
Enter the Biden–Harris
Administration and with it a fundamental transformation of our immigration
system. By changing legal terms; twisting and warping statutory requirements;
waiving, ignoring, or refusing to enforce laws; and unconstitutionally creating
immigration benefits not authorized by Congress, the Biden–Harris
Administration has intentionally erased the line between legal and illegal
immigration. We can no longer recognize our immigration “system” because we no
longer operate by the rule of law.
What remains cannot and should
not be merely reformed. Rather, the Biden–Harris intended deconstruction should
be swept aside and replaced with a new, simpler, lawful, orderly, and
manageable immigration system that prioritizes Americans first, lawful immigrants
second, and illegal aliens not at all.
This paper introduces
principles and policies for such a new American immigration system in the areas
of legal immigration, working in the U.S., illegal immigration, and U.S.
citizenship. It also is the first in a series of Heritage Foundation papers that
will examine several of these issues in depth.
Before the Biden
Administration
For decades, presidential
Administrations have said that the American immigration system is “broken,” as
millions of foreigners have been permitted to enter or remain in the U.S.
illegally and continue to reside here without negative legal consequences.
For those who respect the
United States’ rule of law and seek to come to America through scores of
temporary or permanent legal channels, the process can take several years and,
in some scenarios, decades.
As
an example, in 2019, the State Department was issuing family immigrant
(permanent) visas to Mexican unmarried sons and daughters of U.S. citizens
whose family visa petitions were filed earlier than August 1997—a 22-year wait.
U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Consular Affairs, Visa Bulletin, Vol. X,
No. 36 (December 2019), https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Bulletins/visabulletin_december2019.pdf (accessed August 28, 2024).
Additionally, it is very
expensive to immigrate lawfully to the U.S. This is partly because immigration
law is nearly as complicated as the U.S. tax code. Each rule stated in the
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA)
8 U.S. Code Chapter 12—Immigration and Nationality, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/chapter-12 (accessed August 30, 2024). See also Immigration and Nationality Act [Act of June 27, 1952; Chapter 477 of the 82nd Congress; 66 STAT. 163; 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.] [As Amended Through P.L. 117–360, Enacted January 5, 2023], https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/COMPS-1376/pdf/COMPS-1376.pdf (accessed August 29, 2024) is followed by excessive exceptions and waivers, creating work for immigration attorneys whom applicants hire to help them navigate the confusing statutes and administrative regulations that have proliferated explosively over the decades. In addition, the federal government charges fees for certain lawful permanent immigration benefit applications while waiving and exempting millions of fees for other benefit applications, particularly asylum applications.
In 2019, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services determined that without changes in its fee waiver policy, it would forgo revenue of approximately $1.5 billion. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, “U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Fee Schedule and Changes to Certain Other Immigration Benefit Request Requirements,” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 220 (November 14, 2019), pp. 62280–62371, esp. p. 62298, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-11-14/pdf/2019-24366.pdf (accessed August 28, 2024). The Trump Administration proposed and finalized charging $50 for asylum applications, which previously had received complete fee waivers. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, “U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Fee Schedule and Changes to Certain Other Immigration Benefit Request Requirements,” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 220 (November 14, 2019), pp. 62280–62371, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-11-14/pdf/2019-24366.pdf (accessed August 28, 2024), and U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, “U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Fee Schedule and Changes to Certain Other Immigration Benefit Request Requirements,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 149 (August 3, 2020), pp. 46788–46929, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-08-03/pdf/2020-16389.pdf (accessed August 28, 2024). The Biden Administration returned to charging asylum applicants $0 to file their applications but imposed asylum program fees on unrelated applicants: $300 for small employers who file a petition for a temporary worker and $600 for large employers who file such worker petitions. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, “U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Fee Schedule and Changes to Certain Other Immigration Benefit Request Requirements,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 89, No. 21 (January 31, 2024), pp. 6194–6400, esp. pp. 6195–6196, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-01-31/pdf/2024-01427.pdf (accessed August 28, 2024).
In short, it is a slow, frustrating, and expensive hassle to immigrate to the U.S. lawfully. As a result, when it is faster, easier, and cheaper to migrate to America illegally, then that is what some human beings will do—and have done for decades. Others will not come to the U.S. at all to start businesses or incubate new technologies. Instead, they immigrate to other countries that have more functional immigration systems. For a snapshot of what our immigration system has generated over these many years, consider the immigration benefit and enforcement statistics from 2019, the last year before governments restricted international travel in response to COVID-19, thereby skewing 2020 U.S. immigration data:
The estimated number of
illegal aliens residing in the U.S. ranged from 11 million to more than 22
million.
Compare Steven A. Camarota and Karen Zeigler, “Estimating the Illegal Immigrant Population Using the Current Population Survey,” Center for Immigration Studies, March 29, 2022, https://cis.org/Report/Estimating-Illegal-Immigrant-Population-Using-Current-Population-Survey (accessed August 28, 2024), with Mohammad Fazel Zarandi, Jonathan S. Feinstein, and Edward H. Kaplan, “The Number of Undocumented Immigrants in the United States: Estimates Based on Demographic Modeling with Data from 1990 to 2016,” PLoS ONE, Vol. 13, No. 9 (2018), article no. 0201193, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201193&type=printable (accessed August 28, 2024).
Within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) encountered approximately 288,500 inadmissible aliens at the ports of entry and another 859,500 between the ports of entry for a total of more than 1.14 million enforcement actions.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, “CBP Enforcement Statistics FY 2019,” last modified May 24, 2024, https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/cbp-enforcement-statistics-fy2019 (accessed August 28, 2024). CBP encountered three aliens between ports of entry who were on the Terrorist Screening Data Set (TSDS). Table, “U.S. Border Patrol TSDS Encounters Between Ports of Entry of Non-U.S. Citizens,” in U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, “CBP Enforcement Statistics,” last modified August 16, 2024, https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/cbp-enforcement-statistics (accessed August 28, 2024).
The U.S. Border Patrol apprehended more than 76,000 unaccompanied alien children. Table, “Total Unaccompanied Alien Children (0–17 Years Old) Apprehensions by Month—FY2019,” U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Border Patrol, https://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files/assets/documents/2020-Jan/U.S.%20Border%20Patrol%20Total%20Monthly%20UAC%20Apprehensions%20by%20Sector%20%28FY%202010%20-%20FY%202019%29_0.pdf (accessed August 28, 2024).
DHS’s U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE) had an average daily detention population (ADP) of more
than 50,000 aliens,9
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Fiscal Year 2019 Enforcement and Removal Operations Report, p. 5, https://www.ice.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Document/2019/eroReportFY2019.pdf (accessed August 28, 2024) and ICE deported more than 267,000 aliens.
Figure
14, “FY 2017–FY 2019 ICE Removals by Arresting Agency,” in ibid., p. 19. The Department of
Justice immigration courts had a backlog of approximately 1.2 million cases. Transactional
Records Access Clearinghouse, “Immigration Court Backlog: Historical Backlog
(from 1998),” data through July 2024, https://trac.syr.edu/phptools/immigration/backlog/ (accessed August 28, 2024).
The number of immigration
benefit applications pending at DHS’s U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
(USCIS) exceeded 5.7 million. Table, “Number of Service-wide Forms
Fiscal Year to Date, by Quarter and Form Status, Fiscal Year 2020,” 1st
Quarter, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services, https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/data/Quarterly_All_Forms_FY2020Q1.pdf
(accessed August 28, 2024).
These data do not reflect a well-functioning immigration system for American employers or family visa petitioners, for alien beneficiaries, for U.S. taxpayers, or for federal law enforcement or immigration benefit adjudicators. Before 2020, the U.S. immigration system needed significant reforms if America was to have a lawful, orderly, and manageable system. Yet, as bad as those 2019 statistics were, they pale in comparison to those generated in less than four years by the Biden–Harris Administration’s intentional outright deconstruction of America’s immigration system.
The Biden Administration
During a 2020 presidential
primary campaign debate, Joe Biden telegraphed his Administration’s open border
and illegal immigration policies, stating that he would “make sure…we
immediately surge to the border all those people that are seeking asylum. They
deserve to be heard. That’s who we are. We’re a nation that says if you want to
flee and you’re fleeing oppression, you should come.”
Karl
Salzmann, “Flashback: Biden Tells Migrants to ‘Surge to the Border,’” The
Washington Free Beacon, May 10, 2023, https://freebeacon.com/biden-administration/flashback-biden-tells-migrants-to-surge-to-the-border/ (accessed August 28, 2024).
Biden then added that he
would reverse an order that had been issued by President Donald Trump so that
asylum would be available beyond persecution on account of the claimant’s race,
religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social
group—its traditional definition.
Ibid.
See also 8 U.S. Code § 1101(a)(42), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1101 (accessed August 28, 2024).
Then, once Biden was sworn in
as President, he wasted no time unleashing his open border agenda. On the first
day of his Administration, Biden began to violate sections of the INA and
halted effective immigration enforcement and anti-fraud measures. His orders
included stopping construction of the border wall system, ending enrollments of
aliens in the effective anti–asylum fraud “Remain in Mexico” program, ordering
that no deportations would occur for the first 100 days of his Administration,
and revoking President Trump’s executive order and presidential memorandum
ordering the collection of citizenship information during the decennial Census
and exclusion of illegal aliens from the Census apportionment of members of the
U.S. House of Representatives.
National Immigration Law Center, “Biden Administration Day One Immigration Actions,” January 2021, https://www.nilc.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Biden-Admin-Day-One-Actions-2021.pdf (accessed August 28, 2024); President Joseph R. Biden Jr., Executive Order 13986, “Ensuring a Lawful and Accurate Enumeration and Apportionment Pursuant to the Decennial Census,” January 20, 2021, in Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 14 (January 25, 2021), pp. 7015–7017, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-01-25/pdf/2021-01755.pdf (accessed August 28, 2024).
Biden
directed federal agencies to refer to legal and illegal aliens alike as
“noncitizens,” thereby bastardizing legal, statutory language to erase the line
between legal and illegal immigration.
Memorandum
from Troy A. Miller, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, to Deputy Commissioner; Chief Operating
Officer; All Executive Assistant Commissioners; Chief, U.S. Border Patrol; All
Assistant Commissioners; Chief Counsel; Executive Director, Privacy and
Diversity Office; Executive Director, Policy Directorate; Executive Director,
Planning, Analysis and Requirements Evaluations; Executive Director,
Laboratories and Scientific Services; Executive Director, Intergovernmental
Public Liaison; Director, Information and Incident Coordination Center;
Director, Law Enforcement Officer/Agent Safety and Compliance; Director, Office
of the Executive Secretariat; Executive Director, Office of Trade Relations;
Chief of Staff; Deputy Chief of Staff; and Deputy Chief of Staff (Policy),
“Subject: Updated Terminology for CBP Communications and Materials,” April 19,
2021, https://htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/files/c1-distribution-memo-updates-to-immigration-terminology-signed-and-dated-9854-1618974536.pdf (accessed August 28, 2024).
His political appointees
implemented policies to instruct CBP agents to process most inadmissible aliens
they encountered into the U.S. in violation of the immigration statute instead
of returning them across the border.
Adam Shaw, Bill Melugin, and Griff Jenkins, “Mayorkas Tells Border Patrol Agents That ‘Above 85%’ of Illegal Immigrants Released into US: Sources,” Fox News, January 8, 2024, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mayorkas-tells-border-patrol-agents-illegal-immigrants-released-into-us-sources (accessed August 28, 2024).
The Left and the media
referred to all encountered illegal aliens as “asylum seekers” in an attempt to
generate American empathy for the masses who were coming to the U.S. Meanwhile,
the real consequence of this leftist propaganda was to encourage inadmissible
aliens to file fraudulent asylum applications to buy themselves more time to
remain in the U.S. and gain work authorization.
Using a 2021 policy memorandum, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas restricted ICE’s ability to execute most of its immigration enforcement functions, limiting investigations, arrests, detentions, prosecutions, and deportations to spies, terrorists, some aggravated felons, and aliens who illegally crossed the border after November 1, 2020.
Memorandum from Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, to Tae D. Johnson, Acting Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; Troy Miller, Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection; Ur Jaddou, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; Robert Silvers, Under Secretary, Office of Strategy, Policy, and Plans; Katherine Culliton-González, Officer for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties; and Lynn Parker Dupree, Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, “Subject: Guidelines for the Enforcement of Civil Immigration Law,” September 30, 2021, https://www.ice.gov/doclib/news/guidelines-civilimmigrationlaw.pdf (accessed August 28, 2024).
Yet, as the data below will
show, the Biden Administration has not operated even according to these very
limited enforcement priorities. Echoing Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign statement
that “we are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States
of America,” Mayorkas bragged in January 2022 that “we have fundamentally
changed immigration enforcement. For the first time ever, our policy explicitly
states that a non-citizen’s unlawful presence in the United States will not, by
itself, be a basis for the initiation of an enforcement action.” He called this
“a profound shift away from the prior administration’s indiscriminate
enforcement.”
Adam Shaw, “Biden’s First Year: Mayorkas Says Admin Has ‘Fundamentally Changed’ Interior Immigration Enforcement,” Fox News, January 20, 2022, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bidens-first-year-mayorkas-admin-fundamentally-changed-interior-immigration-enforcement (accessed August 28, 2024). In reality, Mayorkas’s policies have been clear violations of federal law.
Violating Immigration Parole. In addition to opening the border and ignoring immigration enforcement statutes, Mayorkas has grossly violated immigration benefit statutes passed by Congress in the INA. The most blatant of these violations has been his use of immigration parole. The INA states that: The Secretary of Homeland Security may…in his discretion parole into the United States temporarily…only on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit any alien applying for admission to the United States, but such parole of such alien shall not be regarded as an admission of the alien and when the purposes of such parole shall, in the opinion of the [Secretary], have been served the alien shall forthwith return or be returned to the custody from which he was paroled and thereafter his case shall continue to be dealt with in the same manner as that of any other applicant for admission to the United States. 8 U.S. Code § 1182(d)(5)(A), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1182 (accessed August 28, 2024).
Congress later added the
following statutory language to prevent the abuse of parole to bring refugees
into the U.S. more quickly:
The Secretary may not parole
into the United States an alien who is a refugee unless the Secretary
determines that compelling reasons in the public interest with respect to that
particular alien require that the alien be paroled into the United States rather
than be admitted as a refugee under section 1157 of this title. 8 U.S. Code §
1182(d)(5)(B), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1182 (accessed August 28, 2024.
Congress intended that parole
would be used very rarely in special circumstances when an alien does not have
adequate time to use legal visa and refugee processes—for example, when coming
to the U.S. for emergency surgery or to testify in a criminal case. Therefore,
Congress logically did not provide work authorization for aliens who receive
temporary parole.
Despite this clear statutory
text, Mayorkas has repeatedly used mass and categorical parole to allow tens of
thousands of inadmissible aliens to bypass our lawful visa and refugee
processes each month. He created parole programs for aliens from Afghanistan,
Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Nicaragua,
Ukraine, and Venezuela, as well as aliens who have previously been deported.
U.S.
Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services,
“Humanitarian or Significant Public Benefit Parole for Individuals Outside the
United States,” last reviewed/updated August 19, 2024, https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/humanitarian_parole
(accessed
August 28, 2024)
and aliens
who have resided in the U.S. illegally for at least 10 years and are married to
U.S. citizens.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, “Implementation of Keeping Families Together,” Notice of Implementation of the Keeping Families Together Process,” Federal Register, Vol. 89, No. 161 (August 20, 2024), pp. 67459–67490, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-08-20/pdf/2024-18725.pdf (accessed August 28, 2024).
In addition, Mayorkas created
a parole program under which any alien can use the CBP Mobile One application
to make an appointment at a land or air port of entry where CBP will parole
them into the U.S. News release, “DHS Scheduling System for Safe, Orderly and
Humane Border Processing Goes Live on CBP One™ App,” U.S. Department of
Homeland Security, January 12, 2023, https://www.dhs.gov/news/2023/01/12/dhs-scheduling-system-safe-orderly-and-humane-border-processing-goes-live-cbp-onetm
(accessed August 28, 2024).
In
other words, instead of securing the border, the Biden–Harris Administration
created a deceptive shell game by shifting the illegal flow to the ports while
pointing at (briefly) falling numbers of aliens crossing the southern border
between these ports of entry.
Erin Dwinell, “Biden Administration Is Playing Deceitful Shell Game to Claim Fewer Illegal Border Crossings,” The Daily Signal, January 30, 2023, https://www.dailysignal.com/2023/01/30/administration-is-playing-deceitful-shell-game-to-claim-fewer-illegal-border-crossings/ (accessed August 28, 2024).
Secretary Mayorkas has also given his mass parolees renewable work authorization for two-year increments without congressional authorization. He propagandizes his bypass of the statutory visa and refugee processes as “expanding lawful pathways” and insists that parole is granted on a “case-by-case basis.” Federal judges, however, have found otherwise. For example, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rebuked DHS’s abuse of parole in its December 2021 decision regarding the Secretary’s termination of the Migrant Protection Protocols. The court held that “deciding to parole aliens en masse is the opposite of case-by-case decision-making” and added that “DHS’s pretended power to parole aliens while ignoring the limitations Congress imposed on the parole power…[is] not nonenforcement; it’s misenforcement, suspension of the INA, or both.”
Texas
v. Biden, No. 21–10806 (5th Cir. 2021) (emphasis in original).
Rendering Asylum Meaningless. The
Biden–Harris Administration has intentionally ruined America’s second most
important immigration benefit after U.S. citizenship—asylum. Beyond telling
aliens to surge our border and claim asylum, as Biden did during his 2020
primary debate with de facto support from the media, which refer to all illegal
aliens as “asylum seekers,” Mayorkas has violated immigration statutes to
facilitate asylum fraud both procedurally and substantively. He has violated
Congress’s establishment of jurisdiction over asylum applications by replacing
immigration judges, ICE attorneys, and the adversarial process with USCIS asylum
officers who process both initial claims and second-stage applications for
border crossers. Without cross-examination by ICE attorneys and immigration
judges, USCIS asylum officers are more likely to rubber-stamp and grant weak,
questionable, and unverified asylum claims.
USCIS asylum grants are significantly higher than application denials. As of June 2024, USCIS had denied or referred 2,444 asylum cases and granted 14,426 applications in FY 2024. Table, “Number of Form I-589, Application for Asylum and for Withholding of Removal by Case Completion Outcome, Office, Month (FY2024 Year to Date),” in U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, “Immigration and Citizenship Data: Asylum Division Monthly Statistics Report, Fiscal Year 2024,” June 2024, July 23, 2024, https://www.uscis.gov/tools/reports-and-studies/immigration-and-citizenship-data (accessed August 29 2024).
Substantively, the
Administration supports claims of domestic violence, gang activity, general
crime, and climate change as grounds for asylum. These claims do not meet the
requirements of the law, which are based on persecution because of an alien’s
race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular
social group. The Left has taken the U.S. far afield from the refugee
protection the U.S. committed to providing after World War II. Instead of
providing protection from persecution based on a trait that a person cannot or
should not have to change, the Left has watered down and abused asylum as just
another way to bring more aliens into the U.S. and allow them to remain here.
Tibisay
Zea, “How the Asylum System Became the Main Avenue for Mass Migration to the
US,” The World, February 12, 2024, https://theworld.org/stories/2024/02/12/how-asylum-system-became-main-avenue-mass-migration-us (accessed August 28, 2024).
Nor is this purposeful
destruction of asylum unique to America. Asylum is the preferred tool of
globalists who would use mass migration into Western countries to dismantle
Western democratic traditions, culture, and civilization.
See video of program, “Securing Sovereign Borders in an Age of Mass Migration,” The Heritage Foundation, February 14, 2024, https://www.heritage.org/immigration/event/securing-sovereign-borders-age-mass-migration.
Biden–Harris Administration
Statistics. The results of the Biden–Harris
Administration’s open border operations and lawlessness have been
record-setting and devastating to America’s sovereignty, security, public
safety, and economy. During the 3.5 years that Joe Biden has been in the White
House:
CBP has encountered over 10.5
million inadmissible aliens at and between the ports of entry, the vast
majority of whom the Administration has released into the U.S. CBP unofficially
reports that more than 2 million other aliens are “known gotaways” who evaded
the Border Patrol. Using these two numbers plus any “unknown gotaways,” we can
estimate that the policies implemented by the Biden–Harris Administration have
enabled approximately 10 million inadmissible aliens to enter the U.S., causing
the illegal alien population to increase from the pre-Biden level of 11
million–22 million to the current level of 21 million–32 million.
Between the ports of entry,
CBP encountered 16, 98, 172, and 106 aliens on the Terrorist Screening Data Set
during fiscal year (FY) 2021, FY 2022, FY 2023, and FY 2024, respectively. Table,
“U.S. Border Patrol TSDS Encounters Between Ports of Entry of Non-U.S.
Citizens,” in U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, “CBP Enforcement Statistics.” https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/cbp-enforcement-statistics (accessed
August 29, 2024).
CBP encountered 147,975
unaccompanied alien children during FY 2021, 152,880 in FY 2022, 137,992 in FY
2023, and 110,672 in FY 2024, for a total of 534,980 during the Biden–Harris
Administration.
Table, “FY Comparison by Demographic,” in U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, “Nationwide Encounters,” last modified November 19, 2024, https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/nationwide-encounters (accessed November 26, 2024).
Worse, the Department of Health and Human Services, which is responsible for placing unaccompanied children with sponsors, has lost contact with more than 300,000 children. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Inspector General, “Management Alert—ICE Cannot Monitor All Unaccompanied Migrant Children Released from DHS and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Custody,” Final Management Alert OIG-24-46, August 19, 2024, p. 1, https://www.oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/2024-08/OIG-24-46-Aug24.pdf (accessed November 26, 2024).
In FY 2021, ICE’s average
daily detention population was more than 19,000, Table, “Average Daily
Population of Noncitizens Maintained in Detention Facilities,” in U.S.
Department of Homeland Security, Department of Homeland Security, U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement Budget Overview, Fiscal Year 2024
Congressional Justification, p. ICE-3, https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2023-03/U.S%20IMMIGRATION%20AND%20CUSTOMS%20ENFORCEMENT_Remediated.pdf (accessed August 29, 2024). even
though ICE was funded to maintain 34,000 detention beds. U.S. Department of Homeland Security,
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ICE Annual Report Fiscal Year 2021,
March 11, 2022, p. 11, https://www.ice.gov/doclib/eoy/iceAnnualReportFY2021.pdf (accessed August 29, 2024).
ICE deported just over 59,000 aliens, less than half of whom were deported on or after February 18, 2021, following the Biden–Harris Administration’s policy memorandum limiting ICE’s enforcement actions.
In FY 2022, ICE’s ADP was
slightly more than 22,600, Table, “Average Daily Population of Noncitizens
Maintained in Detention Facilities,” in U.S. Department of Homeland Security,
Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Budget Overview, Fiscal Year 2024 Congressional Justification, p. ICE-3. and
ICE deported over 72,000 aliens.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Budget Overview, Fiscal Year 2024 Congressional Justification, p. ICE-O&S-211.
In FY 2023, the ADP was over
28,000, and deportations numbered more than 142,000.
Figure 14, “FY 2018–FY 2023 Average Daily Population by Arresting Agency,” in U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Fiscal Year 2023 ICE Annual Report, December 29, 2023, p. 21, https://www.ice.gov/doclib/eoy/iceAnnualReportFY2023.pdf (accessed September 3, 2024), and Figure 20, “FY 2028–FY 2023 Overall ICE Removals by Fiscal Year,” in ibid., p. 26.
In FY 2024, the ADP was
approximately 37,000 aliens,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, “ICE Detention Data, FY2024,” https://www.ice.gov/doclib/detention/FY24_detentionStats08292024.xlsx (accessed September 3, 2024). and ICE removed more than 248,000 aliens.
The number of cases in the
Department of Justice immigration courts backlog has tripled from 1.2 million
when Biden came into office to more than 3.7 million as of November 2024.
Transactional
Records Access Clearinghouse, “Immigration Court Backlog: Historical Backlog
(from 1998).”The number of
immigration benefit applications pending at DHS’s U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS) has grown from over 6.3 million cases
Table, “Number of Service-wide Forms by Quarter, Form Status, and Processing Time, Fiscal Year 2021, Quarter 1,” U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/reports/Quarterly_All_Forms_FY2021Q1.pdf (accessed August 29, 2024) when Biden became President to over 9.2 million through June 2024.
Table,
“Number of Service-wide Forms by Quarter, Form Status, and Processing Time,
April 1, 2024–June 30, 2024,” in U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services, “Immigration and Citizenship Data: All
USCIS Application and Petition Form Types (Fiscal Year 2024, Quarter 3),”
August 29, 2024, https://www.uscis.gov/tools/reports-and-studies/immigration-and-citizenship-data?page=2 (accessed November 26, 2024).
Secretary Mayorkas claims he inherited a “broken asylum system” from the prior Administration.
Nolan
Rappaport, “Biden Administration Says US Asylum System Is Broken: Here’s How to
Fix It,” The Hill, April 6, 2023, https://thehill.com/opinion/immigration/3937344-biden-administration-says-us-asylum-system-is-broken-heres-how-to-fix-it/ (accessed August 28, 2024).
He has also repeated several past Administrations’ line that our immigration system is “broken” as he tries to justify “expanding lawful pathways” for millions of inadmissible aliens to come to the U.S. while simultaneously severely restricting immigration enforcement.
News release, “DHS Announces Proposed Rule and Other Measures to Enhance Security, Streamline Asylum Processing,” U.S. Department of Homeland Security, May 9, 2024, https://www.dhs.gov/news/2024/05/09/dhs-announces-proposed-rule-and-other-measures-enhance-security-streamline-asylum (accessed August 28, 2024).
The truth, however, is that we no longer have an immigration “system.” The Biden–Harris Administration has dismantled each tool used to control the border and increase efficiency in the immigration system, thereby taking a dysfunctional system and burning it down to an unrecognizable pile of ashes made up—in part—of record terrorist threats, serious criminals, fentanyl poisonings, and child trafficking. These devastating results led the U.S. House of Representatives to impeach Secretary Mayorkas for his willful and systemic refusal to comply with and enforce the law and his breach of public trust.
H. Res. 863, Impeaching Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, for High Crimes and Misdemeanors, 118th Cong., introduced November 13, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hres863/BILLS-118hres863rds.pdf (accessed August 28, 2024). He was the first sitting Cabinet member in American history to be impeached.
News release, “Chairman Green on Mayorkas Impeachment: The Senate ‘Has a Responsibility to Conduct a Full Trial, Hear the Evidence, and Render a Verdict,” Committee on Homeland Security, U.S. House of Representatives, April 16, 2024, https://homeland.house.gov/2024/04/16/chairman-green-on-mayorkas-impeachment-the-senate-has-a-responsibility-to-conduct-a-full-trial-hear-the-evidence-and-render-a-verdict/ (accessed August 28, 2024).
Facing reelection and very
negative polling on border security, Biden signed a June 2024 border proclamation.
President
Joseph R. Biden Jr., Proclamation 10733, “Securing the Border,” June 3, 2024,
in Federal Register, Vol. 89, No. 111 (June 7, 2024), pp. 48487–48493, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-06-07/pdf/2024-12647.pdf
(accessed August 28, 2024). Rather than
rescind his earlier open border orders, however, Biden signed a document that
permits continued crisis levels of illegal immigration while allowing mass
parole and unaccompanied child trafficking to continue. Per the choreographed
plan with the radical Left, Biden subsequently announced an unlawful
administrative amnesty for aliens who have lived illegally in the U.S. for at
least 10 years and are married to U.S. citizens, as well as an easier process
for illegal aliens who came to the U.S. as children to receive work visas,
“Fact Sheet: President Biden Announces New Actions to Keep Families Together,” The White House, June 18, 2024, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/06/18/fact-sheet-president-biden-announces-new-actions-to-keep-families-together/ (accessed August 28, 2024) in direct violation of the INA.
Principles and Policies for a
New American Immigration System
America now faces an
opportunity to sweep away Biden’s border and immigration ashes and redesign
America’s immigration system. To achieve a lawful, orderly, and manageable
system that benefits America first, legal immigrants second, and illegal aliens
not at all, the new system should be simpler and faster than the dysfunctional,
defrauded, confusing, and expensive pre-Biden immigration system. It also
should include full and consistent enforcement.
In short, lawful applicants
who are eligible for an immigration benefit should have it granted in a timely
manner, and those who are not eligible should be denied expeditiously and then
promptly depart the U.S. An alien who fails to depart the U.S. promptly should
be removed with consequences such as fines, criminal convictions, the inability
to return and the possibility of imprisonment if he or she tries to do so.
A lawful and efficient
immigration system can succeed only if our borders are secure and immigration
laws are consistently and thoroughly enforced. If it is no longer easier,
faster, and cheaper to immigrate here illegally, future migrants will change their
behavior based on calculations of higher risk and will be deterred from
violating immigration laws.
Below are five principles that should be used in creating a new, effective American immigration system, as well as dozens of policies in the specific areas of legal immigration, working in the U.S., illegal immigration, and U.S. citizenship. A forthcoming series of Heritage Foundation papers will provide more in-depth examinations of several of these issues.
Principle 1: As the government
of a sovereign nation, our government must uphold the Constitution and rule of
law.
1. The U.S. Congress, not the
administrative state, should approve who may be lawfully admitted into the U.S.
and set the terms of their stay here.
2. Complying with the plain
language of the authorizing statute eliminates fraud and abuse.
3. Temporary means temporary.
The executive branch should return temporary and permanent visa eligibility to
congressional intent.
4. Congress, not the
administrative state, should determine whether temporary aliens may work in the
U.S.
5. Aliens who violate the
terms of their visas should have their visas revoked. Visas issued to students
and other aliens who violate local, state, or federal laws or engage in actions
that show support for designated terrorist groups should be cancelled
immediately, and such individuals should be deported promptly.
6. Transparent information on
immigration status is vital among federal and state agencies. The Social
Security Administration, Internal Revenue Service, and Department of Homeland
Security should share data on the immigration status of individuals as part of
their full enforcement of federal law, including against employers who knew or
should have known that they hired or employ aliens without work authorization. Federal
agencies should also share those data with state and local officials free of
charge.
7. Prosecutorial discretion in
the immigration removal context should be used very rarely. Congress should
make clear that prosecutorial discretion is the very rare exception, not the
norm, when enforcing immigration law.
8. Deportation is a critical
component of the enforcement needed to maintain a lawful and orderly
immigration system.Orders of removal should be executed in a timely manner.
9. U.S. citizenship is the
most important immigration benefit the U.S. provides. U.S. citizenship brings
exclusive rights and responsibilities. It should not be cheapened or defrauded
by allowing non-citizens to be treated as if they were U.S. citizens.
10. The U.S. government should
require that to be given U.S. citizenship, a child must have at least one
parent who is a U.S. citizen.
The U.S. government should end
its “birthright citizenship” policy, which is not required by the U.S.
Constitution and is not recognized by the vast majority of other nations.
11. Proof of U.S. citizenship
should be required to register and to vote in federal, state, and local
elections.
The Department of Homeland
Security should cooperate with state and local elections officials to verify
the citizenship status of all registrants and voters.
12. Since only U.S. citizens
can vote legally, only the U.S. citizen population should be counted in
determining congressional districts and presidential electoral votes. Only U.S.
citizens should be used in the apportionment formula after every U.S. Census to
determine all congressional, state, and local political redistricting and, in
turn, the number of presidential electoral votes given to each state.
To accomplish this, a citizenship question should be reinstated on the decennial U.S. Census.
Principle 2: Our immigration
system exists to serve the American people.
13. Immigration adjudicators
and officials work for the American people, not for aliens or advocacy groups.
14. Most immigrant (permanent)
visas should be for employment purposes, be merit-based, and not be used to
diminish the wages or employment opportunities of U.S. citizens.
15. Family-based immigration
(permanent) categories should be limited to the immediate nuclear family,
thereby ending chain migration.
16. The U.S. should not grant
lawful permanent residence based on a lottery system.
17. Applicants, not U.S.
taxpayers, should pay for adjudication of their applications and case backlog
reduction.
18. Just as they may legally
favor hiring veterans over other applicants, employers should be legally
allowed to favor hiring U.S. citizens over aliens with work authorization
documents.
19. Aside from government
persecution, victimization and other types of personal or economic problems
should not be the basis for an immigration benefit.
20. Assimilating immigrants into American political and civil society, language, history, and culture is critical for America to remain a united country.
Principle 3: Our country must
be secure to keep Americans safe.
21. Our borders and interior
must be secure, and public safety must be a top priority.
22. Both border security and
interior enforcement should be fully resourced for thorough enforcement.
23. Border agents should have
expulsion authority during national crises. Congress should provide border
agents with authority to expel illegal aliens across the border immediately
including (but not limited to) when a border or national crisis, not just a
health crisis, occurs.
24. Immigration detention is necessary to protect public safety, prevent flight, and ensure removal if so ordered by an immigration judge.
Principle 4: America’s
immigration system should be simple and sustainable.
25. As a sovereign nation, the
U.S. must have a lawful, orderly, and manageable immigration system—each year.
26. Immigration law should be
simple, and compliance with the law should be easy. The Immigration and
Nationality Act is needlessly complicated, causing many aliens to hire
immigration attorneys and spend significant amounts of money to navigate it,
and should be simplified. The excessive number of waivers and exemptions in immigration
law, policy, and operations creates needless confusion, legal work, and costs
and should be eliminated.
27. To be effective and efficient, our federal immigration
system should be integrated within the federal government and collaborative
with the states. Our fragmented immigration system across many departments
in the federal government causes needless confusion and delay. It should be
consolidated and should actively involve the assistance of state and local
governments and law enforcement.
28. Immigration data and costs
should be completely transparent to the American public.
Data on immigration status should be collected
by relevant federal, state, and local agencies; shared among relevant agencies,
including election officials; and reported to the American public.
29. Having an orderly and
manageable immigration system each year means pausing intake to address large
application backlogs.
When unreasonably large application backlogs occur, immigration officials should stop accepting additional immigration benefit applications, including employment authorization documents, until a well-managed level of pending applications is reached.
Principle 5: We must eliminate
incentives for foreign nationals and American organizations to break our laws.
30. Illegal immigration should
be prevented, not processed and funded. Congress and the executive branch
should prevent illegal immigration, not process it into the U.S. and then pay
for it on the back end, imposing avoidable costs on American taxpayers at the
federal, state, and local levels.
31. Our immigration system
should not exploit children, encourage illegal immigration, or facilitate
smuggling or trafficking.
32. Federal, state, and local
governments should not obstruct immigration enforcement or collude with or fund
non-governmental organizations (NGOs) or the private sector to further illegal
immigration, including human smuggling or trafficking, or harboring.
33. Legal immigration
applicants should not be adversely affected by illegal immigration or fraud. Applications
submitted by inadmissible aliens, including fraudulent applications, delay the
adjudication of lawful applications and increase costs for lawful applicants.
34. Persons fleeing a country to save their lives must seek
protection in the first safe country in which they arrive, not shop for a
country of preference.
35. Integrity must be restored to persecution protection. Congress should
clarify that persecution refers to government persecution and
eliminate the undefined and misused catch-all ground of “membership in a
particular social group.” Having both asylum and refugee statutory provisions in the
Immigration and Nationality Act is needlessly confusing when applicants must
prove the same eligibility elements. The law should be simplified to one
benefit type with an annual cap for thorough vetting and manageable
resettlement, including required advance notice to resettlement jurisdictions
and American assimilation.
36. Work authorization should be granted only once an
applicant’s underlying immigration benefit is granted, not when the benefit
application is merely filed or pending.
37. E-Verify should be implemented and enforced to the maximum
extent possible. Employers and federal, state, and local government officials
should use E-Verify. Enforcement of employment verification is critical, including
reverifying aliens with temporary employment authorization.
38. Foreign countries should
benefit from U.S. remittances only if they cooperate with the U.S. and their
nationals obey our laws.
The U.S. should not permit
aliens to send abroad any remittances gained by unauthorized employment. No
remittances should be sent to recalcitrant countries that refuse to accept the
return of their nationals who have removal orders.
39. Immigration judges need
authorities to dispense with meritless cases quickly. Congress should provide
immigration judges with summary dismissal and default judgment authority to
remove legally baseless claims quickly, which would effectively diminish the
case backlog and dissuade aliens and their attorneys from filing meritless claims.
40. Immigration due process
should be limited. Congress should limit administrative procedures for aliens,
including removal proceedings, to end excessive motions and the abuse of
administrative appeals that are used to prolong aliens’ presence in the U.S.
illegitimately. Aliens should be prohibited by law from filing any appeal of a final
order of removal in any federal court.
41. Remaining longer in the
U.S. unlawfully should not be grounds for an immigration benefit. Inadmissible
aliens should not receive immigration benefits based on their ability to avoid
deportation or gain U.S. ties while remaining longer in the U.S.
42. Inadmissible aliens should
be excluded from federal, state, local, and commercial benefits that facilitate
unlawful residence.
Inadmissible aliens should not
be eligible for any federal, state, or local government benefits, including
through their children, because the receipt of such benefits facilitates longer
unlawful residence in the U.S. and takes resources away from American citizens
and lawful immigrants. Inadmissible aliens should be excluded from commercial
benefits, such as bank accounts, that facilitate their unlawful residence.
43. Amnesty—even the prospect
of it—encourages more illegal immigration. Congress should oppose all forms of
amnesty and should not reward illegal behavior or violation of our immigration
laws.
Conclusion
America’s
immigration system used to be broken both because of a lack of enforcement and
because of its overly complicated statutory provisions. Now it is a pile of
ashes. As it has done with so many other American institutions, the radical
Left has intentionally deconstructed our borders and immigration structures in
the hope of building a new version of America. The Left’s vision of unlimited
“new lawful pathways” as its “reimagined” immigration system, however, is
nothing more than an open border welfare state that diminishes jobs, wages, and
economic opportunities for citizens. No country can sustain or survive such a
vision.
However, from the
ashes comes a great opportunity to redesign a new, simpler, fairer, and more
manageable immigration system that prioritizes America first and legal
immigrants second. The principles and policies laid out in this report can play
a crucial role in shaping just such a new immigration system.
Lora Ries is Director of the
Border Security and Immigration Center at The Heritage Foundation.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea
Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment