$1 trillion cost of longest US
war hastens retreat from military intervention by Geoff Dyer and Chloe Sorvino in
Washington.
The Afghanistan war, the longest overseas conflict in
American history, has cost the US taxpayer nearly $1 trillion and will require
spending several hundred billion dollars more after it officially ends this
month, according to Financial Times calculations and
independent researchers.
Around 80 per cent of that spending on the Afghanistan
conflict has taken place during the presidency of Barack Obama,
who sharply increased the US military presence in the
country after taking office in 2009.
The enormous bill for the 13-year conflict, which has
never been detailed by the government, will add to the pervasive skepticism
about the war in the US, where opinion polls show a majority of Americans
believe it was a bad idea.
With the Iraq war having already cost the US $1.7tn,
according to one study, the
bill from the Afghanistan conflict is an important factor in the broader
reluctance among the American public and the Obama administration to intervene
militarily in other parts of the world — including sending troops back to Iraq.
John Sopko, the government’s special inspector-general for
Afghanistan, whose organization monitors the more than $100bn that has been
spent on reconstruction projects in the country, said that “billions of
dollars” of those funds had been wasted or stolen on projects that often made
little sense for the conditions in Afghanistan. “We simply cannot lose this
amount of money again,” he said. “The American people will not put up with it.”
Adjusted for inflation, Mr Sopko said the amount the US
had spent on reconstruction in Afghanistan was more than the cost of the
Marshall Plan to rebuild Western Europe.
“Time and again, I
am running into people from USAID, State and the Pentagon who think they are in
Kansas [not Afghanistan],” he said. “My auditors tell me things [about spending
plans] and I say, ‘you have to be making this up, this is Alice in Wonderland’.”
The Nato military operation in Afghanistan, which started
shortly after the 9/11 attacks in 2001 and which has been spearheaded by the
US, will come to a melancholy close at the
end of December with the Taliban
insurgency still strong, although it does not hold any major cities.
Under current plans, about 10,000 US troops will remain
in the country until 2016, although the administration is under growing
pressure to extend their presence because of worries about a Taliban resurgence
once the US departs.
Since 2001, the government has appropriated $765bn for
the war in Afghanistan, the vast bulk for the defense department but also
including some spending at the state department.
The money to finance both the Iraq and Afghan wars was
borrowed and, according to Ryan Edwards at City University of New York, the US
has already paid interest of $260bn on that war debt. Under FT calculations
based on funds appropriated, $125bn of those interest costs have been allocated
to the Afghan conflict.
$620m Six
ways to waste it $500m in transport planes for Afghan forces, stored for three years, turned into $36,000 of scrap metal
$80m on north Afghan consulate, officials decide too vulnerable to attack
$34m on base with 64,000 sq ft operations centre in southwest Afghanistan, never used
$3m on eight patrol boats for Afghan police, still in Virginia storage after four years
$5.4m incinerators, installed incorrectly, never used
$3.6m on TV broadcast trucks for live sporting events, unused in Kabul storage
On top of that there are medical costs already incurred
for soldiers who have left the military. Linda Bilmes, a Harvard economist who
has done extensive research on the war costs, estimates that medical spending
on veterans from both Iraq and Afghanistan has so far reached $134bn. However,
she said it was impossible to assess how much of that spending was related only
to Afghanistan because a third of soldiers served in both conflicts and because
medical issues such as post-traumatic stress disorder were usually the
cumulative result of a series of events rather than one incident.
The Afghan conflict has led to other increases in public
spending that are significant but difficult to isolate. As well as the separate
war funding it has received since 2001, the Pentagon’s “base” budget, which
covers all its other costs, has also seen a dramatic increase, with the wars in
Afghanistan and Iraq one of the main factors.
Given the political pressures surrounding the wars,
military healthcare premiums paid by serving military members have been kept
low, prompting a surge in healthcare spending by the Pentagon, while salaries
have risen above inflation. Since 2001, the defense department’s base budget
has increased by $1.3tn more than its own pre-9/11 forecasts.
The future bill from the Afghan war is likely to run into
hundreds of billions of dollars more. The Pentagon has indicated it wants
funding of $120bn for 2016-19 for operations in Afghanistan, although the
eventual cost will depend on the future mission that the White House decides
on.
$892bn Future
costs $56.4bn in 2015 budget war funding request includes 10,000 troops in Afghanistan for two years at cost of $7bn a year
$836bn in estimated care for veterans of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in coming decades as soldiers reach 60s (Harvard)
As well as further interest payments, the health bills
will start to rise dramatically, especially once veterans from the war reach
their 60s and begin to use more medical services.
Prof Bilmes forecasts future medical and disability costs
for veterans from both Iraq and Afghanistan will reach $836bn over the coming
decades. The two wars have also added to the Pentagon’s fast-growing pension
bill: the military pension system has an unfunded
liability of $1.27tn, which is expected to rise to $2.72tn by 2034.
“The dirty secret about this war is that the Pentagon or
anyone else in the government cannot tell you how much it has actually cost
us,” says an administration official.
Source;http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/14be0e0c-8255-11e4-ace7-00144feabdc0.html#slide0
No comments:
Post a Comment