Something is seriously wrong with
the President of the United States. After his press conference in Turkey, I sat
dumbfounded and shocked by his attitude toward the Paris terrorist attacks and
by what he didn’t say about
retaliation against ISIS. As I sat watching the television, I could not
believe what I heard. First, his attitude was so cavalier and casual about the
attacks; he actually called them a “set-back”. A “SET-BACK”? This, in the face
of the worst attack on a major European city since 9/11? But then I remembered;
when James Foley was beheaded by ISIS, Obama took less than five minutes to
give a statement before rushing off to his golf game. He has also remained
rather nonchalant when masses of other innocents have become the victims of
ISIS. There is no passion or outrage in his statements; they are more
matter-of-fact and dismissive as though this type of thing was just the “new
normal”.
After trying to digest his doubling
down on sticking to his “strategy” in defeating ISIS, I started to do a little
digging into exactly why he would react this way. The definition of insanity is
doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result, so is he
crazy? I considered that option, then realized that no, he means to do exactly
what he is doing. But why? My theory is that all roads lead back to Iran.
Consider the fact that Obama has
always been lukewarm in going after ISIS. He adamantly refuses to send troops
to annihilate them even when advised to do so by his own military advisors. He
makes half-hearted efforts to make it look
like we are doing something when he sends planes to drop a few bombs or to take
out a few ISIS soldiers just to make it look good on the evening news. You
can’t tell me that our military, if given free reign couldn’t target strategic
points and wipe out ISIS oil fields, field operations and headquarters if they
were allowed too. And there lies the question. Why are they not allowed to?
While listening to news reports, I
heard Walid Phares, a Middle East expert and professor at the National Defense
University sum it up pretty well. When asked “why can’t we take them out?” he
replied:
“Actually we can and actually we
should, but the president has a different strategy. He’s getting a lot of
pressure by the Iranians. Otherwise he should have long time ago allied
himself, partnered with Arab moderate forces such as Saudi Arabia, Jordan,
Egypt, UAE, they are fighting terrorism very much and very well in Yemen, in
Sinai, in Libya, elsewhere, but the reason that he’s not going to these
moderate Arab forces and asking them on the ground to be boots on the ground is
because the Iranians are pressuring him because the Syrian Regime is pressuring
him. They don’t want those areas, those Sunni areas to be liberated by Sunni
moderates because they won’t have access to them. That’s the bottom line of
it.”
Obama has decided that he is going
to play on Iran’s team and turn his back on all of our Arab allies that are
fighting against terror groups. He is willing to let ISIS run free because it
is what the Iranians really want. ISIS creates chaos and Iran benefits from the
chaos because they do not want the Sunni areas to be liberated by the Sunni
moderates. Obama is in bed with the Iranians and also the Syrian regime which
is also Iran’s puppet.
Dig a little deeper and you can see
why Obama pushed the Iranian nuclear deal so hard. He couldn’t wait to lift the
sanctions against them and was going to do so against the will of Congress and
the American people no matter what. The billions of dollars released to them
will only further fund terrorist groups and attacks. But it doesn’t matter
because his loyalty is with Iran. Why would he make sure that Iran could have a
nuclear weapon in ten years? Everyone knew and still knows that is a huge
mistake.
In digging further, Obama may be
teaming up with Russia as well as Iran, yet we know that Russia is propping up
Bashar-al-Assad in Syria against our allies on the ground. If we team up with
Russia, then we will be hampered in going after ISIS. Is your head spinning
yet?
The last thing that really shocked
me was a quick fact in an article in the Washington
Free Beacon which quotes Mark Toner, State
Department spokesman, as saying on Monday at a press briefing that
“U.S. officials have also urged their Russian counterparts to talk with
Assad’s government about no longer purchasing oil from the Islamic State.”
Is this why the U.S. has not bombed
the ISIS oil fields? If we really wanted to destroy ISIS, we would go right to
the source of their funding: the oil fields. If Assad and Russia really wanted
to destroy ISIS, the U.S. would tell Assad to stop buying their oil; we would
join together and take the oil fields out and crush ISIS. That is not what Iran
wants however so we end up doing their bidding and siding with two of our worst
nightmares.
Maybe I’m the crazy one, but it is
the only thing that makes sense to me and it is the only reason I can justify
the incredible actions of this President. There is no other explanation for why
he is refusing to wipe out an enemy that he knows is coming or is already in our
midst.
We as Americans better be prepared
for dangerous times ahead, and I am praying that the next fourteen months of
Obama don’t end in even more of a disaster for us and our allies.
http://politichicks.com/2015/11/is-obama-irans-puppet/
No comments:
Post a Comment