By Jamie Glazov’s video series. Tonight I would like to talk to you
about the greatest threat to national security. The weather.
As you might have heard, Global
Warming is, according to the raving madmen running what’s left of the
Democratic Party into the ground like a flaming comet, the greatest threat to
national security. Pay no attention to Paris. Never
mind what happened in California. The real threat is your thermometer.
But tonight I want to break from the
deep thoughts of such respected minds as Bernie Sanders and Barack Obama to
talk about the true greatest threat to national security.
The jet plane.
Sometimes terrorists fly jet planes
into buildings. Sometimes they arrive on them at airports, step out, smile and
apply for political asylum. That was how the ringleader of the
original World Trade Center attack did it. He was a refugee.
These days the media has spent a lot
of time talking about how we’ve been betraying the values of the Statue of
Liberty by wanting to make sure that our country isn’t invaded by Islamic
terrorists.
The funny thing about that is that a
refugee Islamic terrorist actually headed up a plot to blow up the Statue of
Liberty. The man known as the Blind Sheikh, whose followers were linked not
only to the World Trade Center bombing, but to a variety of other
Jihadi-about-town terrorist activities, had a whole long list of New York City
landmarks he wanted to blow up. And like every tourist, they included the
Statue of Liberty.
But that seems only fitting because
if there are two things Islamic terrorists really hate, it’s unveiled women and
liberty. The greatest threat to national security, to our freedom and our
future, isn’t the weather. It’s migration. In ancient times wars began when nomadic
groups migrated into someone else’s territory. Today it’s our territory that is
being migrated into.
A quarter of Afghans told Gallup
that they want to leave, Afghanistan is a country of 30 million, and more than
100,000 are expected to try to go to Europe this year. Some simply found out
that Germany was open and they began walking. That’s how these things begin,
but it’s not how they end.
Some Syrians have actually made it
over to our southern border. And I know the official story is that all the Syrian
migrants are just widows and orphans hobbling on their missing legs to escape
ISIS. And the moment they reach America, they kiss the ground and begin
singing, “I’m a Yankee Doodle Dandy.”
But in the real world, polls show
that 1 in 5 Syrians supports ISIS and a third like the local Al Qaeda
franchise.
A 2007 poll showed 77% supported
financing Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood terror group operating in Israel, and
about the same one were all for aiding the so-called Iraqi fighters who later
morphed into ISIS. Even the polling of Syrian refugees
shows 13% support ISIS. 19% of them view America as the greatest threat. 37% of
them oppose US airstrikes on ISIS. These are the “poor victims” we’re
taking in. And boy are we ever being taken in.
Even if that first 13% is as bad as
it gets, that still means that Obama’s first hot batch of 10,000 Syrian
refugees will contain 1,300 ISIS supporters. What can 1,300 ISIS supporters do to
America? Just wait and find out.
The United States already resettles
more people than anyone else. Not a single Muslim country participates in the
resettlement programs. Not one.
Turkey and Jordan have refugee camps
but they aren’t giving any of them citizenship. And the Syrians themselves,
when they were flooded with Iraqi refugees, treated them like garbage and used
them as sex slaves.
The United States does more than
anyone else and we are being taken advantage of. Let’s look at some of the
numbers. There are an estimated 60 million
people displaced or on the move. And as we’ve seen with Afghanistan, a whole
lot of people can begin moving once the opportunity presents itself.
640 million people surveyed want to
move somewhere else. 150 million of them would like to come to America. 42
million would like to move to Canada. That’s more than the entire population of
Canada. 26 million would like to move to Australia. But Australia only has 23
million people. 26 million would like to move to
Germany, and these days they can. That poll was from 2012. The numbers
would be even worse now.
The U.N. refugee agency says more
than 218,000 migrants crossed the Mediterranean in October —more than in all of
2014. It estimates that more than 600,000 people crossed the Mediterranean this
year.
Those are disturbing figures. Don’t
take it from me. The spokesman for the United Nations High Commissioner for
Refugees called some of them, “beyond anything that could have been expected
even a few months ago.” With chain migration, that’s only the beginning.
Germany froze family reunification
for two years, because of estimates that each migrant would bring along as many
as 8 family members. Which means you have to multiply
each migrant crossing the border by 8.
Now you can see why even Sweden is
beginning for mercy. Sweden is set to bring in 180,000
asylum seekers this year. This is a country where the young male population is
at around 600,000.
But the real demographic bankruptcy
is in the birth rate. In Sweden, a quarter of the children are already born to
immigrant mothers. A lot of them are Somali Muslims. Somalia’s birth rate is
three times higher than Sweden’s. Germany’s birth rate is at 1.3.
Syria’s birth rate is more than twice that. Afghanistan’s birth rate is four
times that. European countries skew old. Muslim
countries skew young. So, for example, the median age of Germany’s population
is 46. The median age of its Muslim population is 34.
Once all the migrants, who are in
the majority young men, are accounted for, the median age will be even lower.
You hear a lot of worries about some European countries on the migration route
ending up with more migrant men of fighting age than exist in the native
population. That’s effectively an invasion.
But when you’re talking about
countries with low birth rates, it’s not that hard to achieve a scenario where
the young male migrants displace the young male population of the country.
It’s why Mohammed is the most
popular name in the UK or in Oslo. Oslo is less than 10 percent Muslim, but
it’s Muslim where it counts, among the youngest generation.
In the UK, 1 in 3 Muslims is under
15. Among children up to 4 years old, Muslims are at 9 percent. That’s double
their proportion in the overall population.
The future of the UK is in that
child population. And that population is already 9 percent Muslim. We like to
think that it doesn’t apply to us, but it does. The Muslim population in the US
has increased 67% since 9/11. The US has a higher birth rate, but most of the
same numbers apply to us.
We’re not immune to math. We’re not
immune to geometric progression. The Muslim population in the US is
younger, their birth rate is higher and the potential for national
transformation is huge. Warfare, invasion, takes a younger population.
The Muslim world has a large
disposable young male population. A chunk of that population is making its way
to Europe even as we speak. It seems like a big chunk to us, but by their
standards, it’s hardly noticeable. It’s that disposable young male population
which doesn’t bother to get jobs, which parties and does drugs, then suddenly
finds religion and redemption by killing a whole bunch of non-Muslims.
It’s not just Europe’s story. It’s
our story too. Think about the Tsarnaev brothers
who went from drug dealers to Jihadists.
This is the national security threat
that we are up against. It’s not as glamorous as Global Warming. There are no
telethons and Al Gore won’t stand in front of a giant spreadsheet until the
polar bears come here. But it’s real and it’s here now.
The real national security threat
comes from the oldest form of war. Migration. Entire civilizations were wiped out
by migration. If we don’t shut the doors, we might become just another footnote
in someone else’s ancient history.”
http://politichicks.com/2015/12/daniel-greenfield-two-talks-on-muslim/
No comments:
Post a Comment