The United Nations and
its mostly autocratic member regimes have big plans for your life, your
children, your country, and your world. And those plans are not limited to the
coercive “climate” agreement recently concluded in Paris.
While the
establishment media in the United States was hyping ISIS, football, and of
course “global warming,” virtually every national government/dictatorship on
the planet met at the 70th annual General Assembly at UN headquarters in New
York to adopt a draconian 15-year master plan for the planet. Top globalists
such as former NATO chief Javier Solana, a socialist, are celebrating the plan,
which the summit unanimously “approved,” as the next “Great Leap Forward” —
yes, the old campaign slogan of the Chinese Communist Party.
The master plan is
comprised of 17 “Post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals” (SDGs) with 169
specific “targets” to be foisted on all of humanity — literally all of it, as
the plan itself states explicitly. “As we embark on this collective journey, we
pledge that no one will be left behind,” reads the UN manifesto, entitled Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development. But if you love liberty, self-government, free markets,
or the U.S. Constitution, you will almost certainly be wishing that the UN
would leave you behind.
Officially dubbed
“Agenda 2030,” the UN plot, as its full title suggests, is aimed at
“transforming” the world. The program is a follow-up to the last 15-year UN
plan, the defunct “Millennium Development Goals,” or MDGs. It also dovetails
nicely with the deeply controversial UN Agenda 21, even including much of the
same rhetoric and agenda. But the combined Agenda 2030 goals for achieving what
is euphemistically called “sustainable development” represent previous UN plans
on steroids — deeper, more radical, more draconian, and more expensive.
“This Agenda is a plan
of action for people, planet and prosperity,” reads the preamble. “All
countries and all stakeholders, acting in collaborative partnership, will
implement this plan.” Ironically, the preamble even claims the UN goals will
“free the human race from the tyranny of poverty” and “heal” the planet — or,
as the planet is also referred to in the document, “Mother Earth.”
Not-so-subtly purporting to usurp the role of God, the UN even claimed that the
“future of humanity and of our planet lies in our hands.”
Speaking on September
25 at the opening ceremony of the confab that adopted Agenda 2030,
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon hinted at just how far-reaching the plot really
is. “The new agenda is a promise by leaders to all people everywhere,” he
explained, presumably conflating “leaders” with mass-murdering gangsters such
as Kim Jong-un, Raul Castro, Robert Mugabe, and other despots who hold great
sway with most of the regimes comprising the United Nations. “It is a universal,
integrated and transformative vision for a better world.” “We need action from
everyone, everywhere,” Ban said, pointing to the “guide” offered by the 17
SDGs. “They are a to-do list for people and planet, and a blueprint for
success.” “We must use the goals to transform the world,” Ban continued.
“Institutions will have to become fit for a grand new purpose.”
The Agenda 2030
agreement makes the audacity of the scheme clear, too. “This is an Agenda of
unprecedented scope and significance,” boasts the document. “Never before
have world leaders pledged common action and endeavor across such a broad and
universal policy agenda,” the agreement continues. “What we are announcing
today — an Agenda for global action for the next fifteen years — is a charter for
people and planet in the twenty-first century.”
The
Agenda
Perhaps the single
most striking feature of Agenda 2030 is the practically undisguised roadmap to
global socialism and corporatism/fascism, as countless analysts have pointed
out. To begin with, consider the agenda’s Goal 10, which calls on the UN,
national governments, and every person on Earth to “reduce inequality within
and among countries.” To do that, the agreement continues, will “only be
possible if wealth is shared and income inequality is addressed.”
As the UN document
also makes clear, national socialism to “combat inequality” domestically is not
enough — international socialism is needed to battle inequality even “among”
countries. “By 2030, ensure that all men and women, in particular the poor and
the vulnerable, have equal rights to economic resources,” the document demands.
In simpler terms,
Western taxpayers should prepare to be fleeced so that their wealth can be
redistributed internationally as their own economies are cut down to size by
Big Government. Of course, as has been the case for generations, most of the
wealth extracted from the productive sector will be redistributed to the UN and
Third World regimes — not the victims of those regimes, impoverished largely
through domestic socialist/totalitarian policies imposed by the same corrupt
regimes to be propped up with more Western aid under Agenda 2030.
Wealth redistribution
alone, however, will not be enough. Governments must also seize control of the
means of production — either directly or through fascist-style mandates. “We
commit to making fundamental changes in the way that our societies produce and
consume goods and services,” the document states. It also says that
“governments, international organizations, the business sector and other
non-state actors and individuals must contribute to changing unsustainable
consumption and production patterns … to move towards more sustainable patterns
of consumption and production.”
In plain English, the
Agenda 2030 document is claiming that today’s “consumption and production”
patterns are unsustainable, so we’ll need to get by with less. How much less?
It would be hard to find a more clear and concise assessment than that offered
by the late Maurice Strong, the recently deceased Canadian billionaire
and longtime UN environmental guru who led the 1992 Earth Summit, in a
pre-Earth Summit document: “It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption
patterns of the affluent middle-class … involving high meat intake, consumption
of large amounts of frozen and ‘convenience’ foods, ownership of motor
vehicles, numerous electrical appliances, home and workplace air-conditioning
... expensive suburban housing … are not sustainable.”
In truth, such
“lifestyles and consumption patterns” are sustainable,
so long as the freedom that makes prosperity possible is not destroyed in the
name of achieving “sustainability.” The UN and the environmental lobby claim
that we must get by with less because there are now too many people on the
planet consuming too many resources. But this rationale for accepting UN-imposed scarcity is
patently false.
Of course, the
promoters of Agenda 2030 would claim that rather than impoverish us, the global
regime they envision would take good care of us — through universal health
coverage, for instance. One of the targets for Goal 3, ensuring “healthy lives”
and “well-being,” is: “Achieve universal health coverage,” including “vaccines
for all.” Universal access to “mental health,” along with “sexual and
reproductive health-care services” — code words for abortion and contraception
— are also included. All governments are expected to integrate such services into
their “national strategies and programmes,” the agreement demands.
It is worth noting
that mass-murdering Soviet dictator Vladimir Lenin made clear that controlled
healthcare is the “keystone” of socialism. The United Nations obviously agrees.
And though he may not call it “socialism,” Obama undoubtedly also views
government control of healthcare as key. Indeed, enactment of ObamaCare could
be viewed as a “great leap forward” by the United States toward implementation
of a key component of Agenda 2030, before Agenda 2030 was even “approved.”
But as important as
targeting healthcare is to the globalist schemers, any plan for building
international socialism would be lacking without also targeting the next
generation with global-socialist propaganda. And so an entire goal of Agenda
2030 is devoted to ensuring that all children, everywhere, are transformed into
what the UN calls “agents of change,” ready to push forward the plan for the
new global order. “Children and young women and men are critical agents of
change and will find in the new Goals a platform to channel their infinite
capacities for activism into the creation of a better world,” the agreement
explains.
The sort of activists
that the UN hopes to make your children into is also explicitly defined in the
agreement. “By 2030, ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills
needed to promote sustainable development, including, among others, through
education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles, human rights,
gender equality, promotion of a culture of peace and non-violence, global
citizenship and appreciation of cultural diversity and of culture’s
contribution to sustainable development,” the global plan for 2030 states.
Considering what the UN means by “sustainable development” — population
control, central planning, global governance, and more — the agenda for your
children takes on an even more sinister tone.
“Sustainable” children
for global citizenship in the new order will be accomplished via what the UN
misleadingly refers to as “education.” In the UN document the word “education”
alone is mentioned more than 20 times. And throughout the agreement, the UN
openly advocates the use of schools to indoctrinate all of humanity into a new
set of values, attitudes, and beliefs in preparation for the new “green” and
“sustainable” world order. The UN’s education agenda also puts sex “education”
front and center. “By 2030, ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive
health-care services [abortion and contraception], including for family
planning, information and education,” the document explains.
How much will Agenda
2030 cost? Various figures have been thrown around by UN bureaucrats regarding
the monetary costs of the plan, generally ranging between $3 trillion and $5
trillion per year.
Yes, trillions. In the “From Billions to Trillions” report
released by the World Bank in July 2015, the globalist outfit, a key player in
Agenda 2030, conceded: “To meet the investment needs of the Sustainable
Development Goals, the global community needs to move the discussion from
‘Billions’ in ODA [Official Development Assistance] to ‘Trillions’ in
investments of all kinds: public and private, national and global, in both
capital and capacity.”
But the money needed
to implement Agenda 2030 and other UN schemes is only part of the cost. Other
parts include the loss of our national independence and freedom that the rise
of global governance and global socialism would surely entail. Revealingly,
empowering dictators to help in global governance is openly touted by Agenda
2030. The document states, “We recommit to broadening and strengthening the
voice and participation of developing countries [the regimes ruling those
countries] — including African countries, least developed countries,
land-locked developing countries, small-island developing States and
middle-income countries — in international economic decision-making,
norm-setting and global economic governance.”
Powerful
Promoters
When Agenda 2030 was
adopted at the 70th annual UN General Assembly confab in New York City on
September 25, the UN plot to re-engineer civilization was ushered in with a
“thunderous standing ovation,” the UN Department of Public Information
reported. Every one of the 193 UN member governments on the planet — from
murderous communist and Islamist dictatorships to those ruling what remains of
the “Free World” — vowed to help impose the UN’s controversial goals on their
subjects.
It all sounded so
wonderful to some of the world’s most brutal dictators that they could hardly
contain their glee. “This agenda promises a brave new world, a new world which
we have to consciously construct, a new world that calls for the creation of a
new global citizen,” gushed Marxist dictator Robert Mugabe, the genocidal mass-murderer
enslaving Zimbabwe who also serves as chairman of the African Union. “I want to
believe that we are up to this task that we have voluntarily and collectively
committed ourselves to. Our success, and in particular the promise of a new
world that awaits us, depends upon this commitment.” He also promised to
vigorously impose the UN Agenda 2030 on the starving and impoverished victims
his regime lords over with Agenda 2030-style policies. The communist Castro
regime vowed to work with socialist Venezuelan strongman Nicolas Maduro and
other tyrants to impose the UN goals on their victims, too — all with financing
from Western taxpayers.
The brutal tyrants
ruling Communist China, meanwhile, have also been enthusiastic cheerleaders for
the UN goals — goals that the regime boasted it played a “crucial role” in
developing. The Chinese autocracy, infamous for forced abortions, censorship,
religious and political persecution, the “one-child policy,” terrible
pollution, kangaroo courts, and of course, murdering more human beings than any
other entity in all of human history, used its vast, global propaganda machine
to celebrate Agenda 2030.
“China has made
important contributions to the global efforts in reaching a fair, inclusive and
sustainable post-2015 development agenda,” the regime’s deputy permanent
representative to the UN, Wang Min, was quoted as saying in a report by the
Communist Chinese news and espionage service Xinhua. “China is also very active
in putting forward Chinese proposals…. The agreement includes important
proposals by China and many other developing countries in numerous aspects.”
Among other
“commitments,” China promised to spend $2 billion in foreign countries to meet
the UN goals in “education” and “health,” with its funding increasing to $12
billion by 2030. While only contributing a small piece of the pie, the fact
that Beijing is so excited about the agenda is quite revealing. Echoing
Chairman Mao’s rhetoric, EU and NATO globalist Javier Solana said, “With a
sustained commitment from all countries, developed and developing alike, the
world can ensure that it celebrates another great leap forward in
2030.” (Emphasis added.) The last “Great Leap Forward,” presided over by
Chairman Mao Tse-tung between 1958 and 1963, resulted in the murder of an
estimated 45 million Chinese who were worked, starved, or beaten to death.
The Obama
administration, which apparently does not plan to present the UN scheme to the
U.S. Senate for ratification as required by the U.S. Constitution, also offered
a forceful defense of the UN agenda. Speaking to the UN General Assembly on
September 27, 2015, after purporting to commit the United States to the global
plot, Obama claimed the UN blueprint “is one of the smartest investments we can
make in our own future.”
Even the world’s
leading religious figure, Pope Francis, addressed UN member governments with a
plea to support the UN goals. “The adoption of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development ... is an important sign of hope,” he declared, before demanding a
UN “climate” regime as well.
Beyond governments and
religious figures, much of the private sector also enthusiastically backed the
new goals. Among the mega-corporations backing the scheme are the world’s top
three search engines: Google, Microsoft’s Bing, and Yahoo. It was not
immediately clear whether those corporations’ support for the UN agenda would
affect the supposed impartiality of search results, but critics of the UN plan
expressed alarm nonetheless.
For now, at least, the
world and the White House are all pretending that the SDGs are binding on
Americans, too. However, the U.S. Senate was not consulted, as the Constitution
requires for all treaties. And even if the Senate were to ratify it, the
federal government cannot grant itself new anti-constitutional powers merely by
approving a treaty.
Therefore, the
agreement has no force in the United States. But as UN Agenda 21 showed
clearly, that does not mean that the Obama administration, and possibly future
presidents, would not attempt to push it forward anyway. The American people,
therefore, must demand through their elected representatives that the UN power
grab be stopped.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/22267-un-agenda-2030-a-recipe-for-global-socialism
No comments:
Post a Comment