And Obama will give it to them unless we force Congress to
impeach him.
UNFCCC Draft Agreement, page 18 of 51:
“The provision and mobilization of
financial resources by developed country Parties and other developed
Parties included in Annex II shall
represent a progression beyond their previous efforts, and financial resources
shall be scaled up from a floor of US$100 billion per year from 2020, including
a clear burden-sharing formula among them, and in line with needs and
priorities identified by developing country Parties in the context of
contributing to the achievement of the objective (Article 2/XX) of this
Agreement.”
New World Order: U.N. Secretly Planning Court to ‘Judge’ U.S.
For Climate Change, 11/1/15, Infowars
(Infowars) – The
official draft text of the climate treaty for the soon-to-start UN Climate
Summit in Paris proposes to establish a global Supreme Court that would rule on
issues such as “climate justice,” “climate finance,” “technology transfers,”
and “climate debt.”
Tucked away on page 19
of the 34-page document is the call for establishing an International Tribunal
of Climate Justice. The text, which is still heavily bracketed with
text that hasn’t been completely resolved and agreed upon, reads:
An International Tribunal
of Climate Justice as A compliance mechanism is hereby established to address
cases of non-compliance of the commitments of developed country Parties on
mitigation, adaptation, [provision of] finance, technology development and
transfer and, capacity-building, and transparency of action and support,
including through the development of an indicative list of consequences, taking
into account the cause, type, degree and frequency of non-compliance.
Courting Climate
Tyranny
With all of the
world’s politically correct politicians and all of the world’s “progressive”
journalistas and Big Media commentariat daily hyperventilating over the
ever-growing list of alleged threats and catastrophes caused by global warming,
it might be expected that there would be some mention of this planned
environmental judicial system for the planet. However, since the text was
released on October 20, there has been a virtual blackout in the major media
regarding this revolutionary development. The only mentions one is likely to
find with search engines are alarms being sounded by critics, the climate
realists who reject the apocalyptic predictions (and discredited pseudo-science
– see: here, here, and here) of the multi-billion dollar global
warming lobby.
The censoring of any
coverage of the planned UN Climate Tribunal by the major media is not
surprising; they have been completely over the top in their promotion of
anthropogenic (manmade) global warming (AGW) hysteria and would not want to
jeopardize the globalist agenda by drawing attention to the dangers of
establishing a planetary judicial authority.
This follows a
distinctive pattern: We have seen a similar media censorship of the regional
and global tribunals that la and WTO treaties. It was only years later, when
these courts began assaulting U.S. sovereignty by over-ruling U.S. laws and
U.S. court decisions, that the subversive nature of these judicial bodies
became apparent. Then the erstwhile supporters of these treaties (such as
Senator John Kerry, now Obama’s Secretary of State and a promoter of the
climate treaty) claimed that they had no way of knowing that these
international courts would eventually subvert U.S. sovereignty. These claims of
invincible ignorance don’t wash, of course, because this magazine, among other
critics, warned repeatedly that this is precisely what would happen.
The same pattern is
screamingly evident in the case of the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)
and Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) agreements to merge
the United States, respectively, with Pacific Rim countries and the European
Union. The so-called mainstream media have seen fit to censor any criticism of
(and virtually any mention of) the dangerous tribunals (here and here)
that would be established by these treaties.
As we reported,
in February of this year, the International Tribunal of Climate Justice comes
to us courtesy of the Marxist regime of Bolivia’s President Evo Morales, a
close comrade of Cuba’s Fidel Castro and an ardent admirer of Communist China’s
founder/mass-murderer Mao Tse-tung. “In April 2010,” we reported, “Comrade
Morales convened the ‘World People’s Conference on Climate Change and the
Rights of Mother Earth’ in Cochabamba, Bolivia, which drew thousands of true
believer Red-Green activists from across the planet. The outcome of that
confab, the ‘Cochabamba Statement,’ calls for ‘the equitable allocation [of]
atmospheric space between developed countries and developing countries during
the period 1750 to 2050 based on the principles of equity and historical
responsibility, and the needs of developing countries in order to achieve their
economic and social development and poverty.’”
Like
the Cochabamba Statement, the UN’s draft text states (repeatedly) that the
new global “decarbonization” program will be carried out “in accordance with
common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities.” Which
is, simply, the UN’s way of channeling Karl Marx’s famous dictum, “From each
according to his ability, to each according to his needs,” into global policy
for effecting the confiscation and transfer of gigantic portions of the
planet’s wealth.
We noted at the time
that the negotiating text said it “establishes the International Climate
Justice Tribunal in order to oversee, control and sanction the fulfillment of
and compliance with obligations of Annex I and Annex II Parties under this
agreement and Convention.” We reported further that it called for establishing
a Compliance Committee and a Compliance Mechanism to “enforce” compliance. Its
stated: “In order to ensure compliance for developed countries and facilitate
developing countries in their implementation,” a Compliance Committee will be
created. And, the text informs us, “The Compliance Committee shall have two
branches, namely an enforcement branch and a facilitative branch.”
The enforcement branch
would be aimed at the developed countries (especially the U.S. and EU), and the
facilitative branch would function as a mechanism to transfer the wealth from
the middle classes of the developed countries to the globalists and their
ruling class comrades in the developing countries. The new text released on
October 20 contains almost identical enforcement and compliance language (page
20) as the earlier version of the document.
During the United
Nations Rio+20 Conference on Sustainable Development in 2012, Morales told
delegates that capitalism “is a new colonialism,” and he urged them to “put an
end to the capitalist system.” The assembly responded with enthusiastic
applause and cheers. That should surprise no one; the General Assembly of the
UN is dominated by countries whose ruling regimes are members of the Socialist
International, the radical Marxist organization of communist and socialist
parties. Moreover, as we’ve reported extensively, leaders of the Socialist
International occupy many of the top posts in UN agencies and have been in
charge of the UN’s socialist green agenda for decades
(see here, here, and here).
Bolivian President Evo
Morales is the head of the country’s Movement for Socialism Party (MAS,
Movimiento Al Socialismo), which, along with other former members of the
Socialist International, broke away to form the even more radical international
Progressive Alliance. MAS is also a member party of the Sao Paulo Forum, the
Castroite organization whose annual conferences are a platform for Marxist
regimes and terrorists. While members of the Progressive Alliance and the
Socialist International may spar over differences in Marxist doctrine, they are
united in their common goal of destroying free enterprise and property rights.
And they see the UN green agenda as one of the most powerful tools imaginable
for the “complete transformation” of the world.
One of the
organizations that has been in the forefront of blowing the whistle on this UN
deception is the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), which, among
other things, publishes Marc Morano’s always-informative Climate
Depot website.
In an October 23
posting, CFACT’s Craig Rucker reported: “Over 130 developing nations led
by South Africa and instigated by China and India are insisting that they will
not sign a climate agreement in Paris unless it contains massive redistribution
of wealth from developed to poor nations. Now they want the power to haul the
U.S. and its allies before a UN Star Chamber to enforce compliance.”
“If the climate
tribunal becomes the focus of public scrutiny, watch for the negotiators to
pull a switch behind closed doors and try and accomplish the same thing by
re-branding it an enforcement ‘mechanism’” Rucker wrote. “Whatever they call
it, countries who sign onto this agreement will be voting to expand the reach
of the UN climate bureaucracy, cede national sovereignty, and create a one-way
street along which billions will be redistributed from developed to poor
nations,” notes Rucker. “Developed nations would be expected to slash their
emissions while the ‘poor’ countries expand theirs. China, which holds a
trillion dollars in U.S. debt, would be counted among the poor. China and India
are delighted. They would like nothing better than a world where the West cedes
the competitive advantages their free-market economies created. They hope for a
future where Asia does the manufacturing and the United States and Europe do
the importing — until their wealth runs out, anyway.”
http://www.infowars.com/stealth-agenda-new-un-tribunal-to-judge-us-for-climate-debt/
Comments” The US needs
to quit the UN before it’s too late.
Norb
Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment