A few weeks before Syed Farook went
on his ritual killing spree in San Bernardino, he got into an argument about
Islam with one of the co-workers he later murdered.
The co-worker said that Islam wasn’t
peaceful. Farook said it was. Like most Islamic theological arguments, this was
one was settled with bombs and bullets.
The motive is officially still
unknown. Obama said it might be terrorism or a workplace thing. His laughably
corrupt Attorney General, Loretta Lynch said, “We don’t know if this was
workplace rage or something larger or a combination of both.”
The kind of workplace rage that
leads a couple to assemble a small army’s worth of firepower, some bombs and
tactical gear, destroy their cell phones and carry out a massacre all within 20
minutes.
This story is brought to you by the
same people who insisted that the assault on the Benghazi compound conducted
with heavy firepower was really a spontaneous movie review.
Farook’s father said, “He was very
religious. He would go to work, come back, go to pray, come back.” Neighbors
say that he “grew a beard and started to wear religious clothing. The long
shirt that’s like a dress and the cap on his head.”
Neighbors noticed something was
wrong, but they were afraid to “profile” him. That might be Islamophobic. And
it’s better to let Americans die than be thought a bigot. That’s the policy in
Washington D.C. and over in the Redlands in California.
So his motive remains a mystery
wrapped in an enigma and tucked inside an IED. We could speculate, but that
would be Islamophobic. All we can do is shoot back once the latest perpetrators
of workplace violence have killed enough people that killing them no longer
seems disproportionate.
Syed Farook sought his soulmate in
“a girl who has the same outlook, wear hijab, but live the life to the
fullest.” And in a cult of death, living life to the fullest means taking the
lives of others.
Farook, as his dating profile said,
came from a “religios but modern family of 4”. And you can tell they were
modern because they used guns, not swords.
When the Redlands Tea Party Patriots
objected to the resettling of Syrian Muslim migrants in their community, CAIR
accused them of “paranoia and phobia is rooted in a combination of ignorance
and bigotry.”
But “paranoia and phobia” are the
modern condition that the free world has found itself living in. Islamic
terrorism can strike anytime and anywhere from a Paris concert hall to a San
Bernardino County facility where disabled children were being helped. It’s
ignorance to ignore that and bigotry to defend it.
“What will be done to ensure the
safety of our community? Our biggest concern is the safety of our family, our
children and our grandchildren,” Victoria Hargrave of Redlands Townhall had
asked.
It was a good question. As the
country watched police charge towards a home in the Redlands, it has become an
even better question.
Everything possible was done to deny
Nidal Hassan’s terrorist motivations in the Fort Hood Massacre. His attack was
deemed workplace violence. Even his own attempts to explain that he supported
the terrorists were shut down so that he was reduced to smuggling messages to
get his story out.
And despite multiple statements by
Hassan that he was a terrorist, the official story is still workplace violence.
Right after the shooting, it was some strain of airborne PTSD that had somehow
transmitted itself from American veterans to the Muslim employee who had never
seen combat until he began killing them. There are always excuses.
The Times Square bomber had
financial issues. The Tsarnaev terrorists were poorly adjusted. Once the media
digs into Farouk’s life, it will no doubt find that he had financial issues,
was poorly adjusted and may have even been suffering from some mysterious form
of airborne PTSD.
Obama and the media would like to
make this story about “gun violence”. But guns don’t shoot themselves. There is
a hand that pulls the trigger and a mind whose foul purposes that hand serves.
Gun violence is not a mechanical
problem. It is not a hardware problem of guns going off at random. It is not a
biological problem of fingers randomly twitching on triggers. It is a problem
of the mind. Behind each massacre, there is a mind. And it is that mind, its
ideas and its beliefs, that kills.
San Bernardino is home to what is
described as a “growing Muslim population” and that growth comes with
terrifying growing pains.
This latest attack appears to be one
of them. It’s a matter of simple math that as the population most likely to
commit terrorist acts increases, so do the acts themselves.
Two months ago, Marilyn Snyder of
the Redlands Tea Party Patriots wrote of “the runners and spectators of the
Boston Marathon who never imagined that refugee jihadists were stealthily
plotting their demise — just because they were not Muslims.”
Most people in San Bernardino County
did not expect that anyone was plotting to kill them. They did not think that
one evening the events from far-off France would suddenly be taking place where
they lived. And yet that is the new reality. Islamic terrorism can strike anywhere
and everywhere.
“While it is impossible to prevent
death delivered by madmen who kill because of religious extremism, it is
possible to put in place federal policies that limit the influx of Muslim
extremists through the wide-open refugee doors of the Obama administration,”
Marilyn wrote. That remains true.
Sayeed Farouk, like Nidal Hassan,
did not suddenly fly over here from Syria. But that only makes it more vital
that we prevent the next attack and the next massacre by closing the doors and
keeping our country safe.
We cannot bring back the dead, the
victims of the long horrifying roll of Islamic terror that stretches back for
thousands of years, but we can protect the living.
The left approaches this as a
mechanical problem, but it’s an ideological problem. It’s a conflict between
two sets of ideas and two sets of worldviews. It is a war between those who
believe that men must be ruled by the dead will of
Mohammed and his brutal successors
and those of us who believe in the freedom of our founding documents and the
right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
It is not a war that we will win
through appeasement or disarmament. And we can begin to fight back by protecting
ourselves and our country.
“We Redlanders and all Americans
need to stand up with “common sense and judgment” with an emphatic “No!” to
Syrian refugee resettlement. It’s time to bar the doors against jihadi
infiltration,” Marilyn wrote.
From Redland to Paris, it’s time
that we did the right thing, for our towns, our cities and our country.
http://politichicks.com/2015/12/daniel-greenfield-protecting-ourselves-from-the-next-peaceful-massacre/
No comments:
Post a Comment