Daniel
Greenfield: Syrians are a Terror Threat, Here are the Numbers, by Daniel Greenfield, 12/3/15, Politichicks
Syria is a terror state. It didn’t become that way overnight because of the Arab Spring or the Iraq War.
Its people are not the victims of
American foreign policy, Islamic militancy or any of the other fashionable
excuses. They supported Islamic terrorism. Millions of them still do.
They are not the Jews fleeing a Nazi
Holocaust. They are the Nazis trying to relocate from a bombed out Berlin. These are the cold hard facts.
ISIS took over parts of Syria
because its government willingly allied with it to help its terrorists kill
Americans in Iraq. That support for Al Qaeda helped lead to the civil war
tearing the country apart. The Syrians were not helpless, apathetic pawns in
this fight. They supported Islamic terrorism.
A 2007 poll showed that 77% of
Syrians supported financing Islamic terrorists including Hamas and the Iraqi
fighters who evolved into ISIS. Less than 10% of Syrians opposed their
terrorism. Why did Syrians support Islamic terrorism? Because they hated
America.
Sixty-three percent wanted to refuse
medical and humanitarian assistance from the United States. An equal number
didn’t want any American help caring for Iraqi refugees in Syria.
The vast majority of Syrians turned
down any form of assistance from the United States because they hated us. They
still do. Just because they’re willing to accept it now, doesn’t mean they like
us. If we bring Syrian Muslims to America, we will be importing a population
that hates us.
The terrorism poll numbers are still
ugly. A poll this summer found that 1 in 5 Syrians supports ISIS. A third of
Syrians support the Al Nusra Front, which is affiliated with Al Qaeda. Since
Sunnis are 3/4rs of the population and Shiites and Christians aren’t likely to
support either group, this really means that Sunni Muslim support for both
terror groups is even higher than these numbers make it seem.
And even though Christians and
Yazidis are the ones who actually face ISIS genocide, Obama has chosen to take
in few Christians and Yazidis. Instead 98.6% of Obama’s Syrian refugees are
Sunni Muslims. This is also the population most likely to support ISIS and Al
Qaeda.
But these numbers are even worse
than they look. Syrian men are more likely to view ISIS positively than women.
This isn’t surprising as the Islamic State not only practices sex slavery, but
has some ruthless restrictions for women that exceed even those of Saudi
Arabia. (Al Qaeda’s Al Nusra Front, however, mostly closes the gender gap
getting equal support from Syrian men and women.) ISIS, however, gets its
highest level of support from young men. This is the Syrian refugee
demographic.
In the places where the Syrian
refugees come from, support for Al Qaeda groups climbs as high as 70% in Idlib,
66% in Quneitra, 66% in Raqqa, 47% in Derzor, 47% in Hasakeh, 41% in Daraa and
41% in Aleppo.
Seventy percent support for ISIS in
Raqqa has been dismissed as the result of fear. But if Syrians in the ISIS
capital were just afraid of the Islamic State, why would the Al Nusra Front,
which ISIS is fighting, get nearly as high a score from the people in Raqqa?
The answer is that their support for Al Qaeda is real.
Apologists will claim that these
numbers don’t apply to the Syrian refugees. It’s hard to say how true that is.
Only 13% of Syrian refugees will admit to supporting ISIS, though that number
still means that of Obama’s first 10,000 refugees, 1,300 will support ISIS. But
the poll doesn’t delve into their views of other Al Qaeda groups, such as the
Al Nusra Front, which usually gets more Sunni Muslim support. And there’s no
sign that they have learned to reject Islamic terrorism and their hatred for
America.
When Syrian refugees were asked to
list the greatest threat, 29 percent picked Iran, 22 percent picked Israel and
19 percent picked America. Only 10 percent viewed Islamic terrorism as a great
threat. By way of comparison, twice as many Iraqis see Islamic terrorism as a
threat than Syrians do and slightly more Palestinian Arabs view Islamic
terrorism as a threat than Syrians do. These are terrible numbers.
Thirty-seven percent of Syrian
refugees oppose US airstrikes on ISIS. 33% oppose the objective of destroying
ISIS. And these are the people whom our politicians would have us believe are
“fleeing an ISIS Holocaust.”
Seventy-three percent of Syrian
refugees view US foreign policy negatively. That’s a higher number than Iraqis.
It’s about equal to that of Palestinian Arabs. They don’t like us. They really
don’t like us.
Obama’s first shipment of Syrians
will include 1,300 ISIS supporters and most of the rest will hate this country.
But unless they’re stupid enough to announce that during their interviews, the
multi-layered vetting that Obama and other politicians boast about will be
useless.
It only took 2 Muslim refugees to
carry out the Boston Marathon massacre. It only took 19 Muslim terrorists to
carry out 9/11. If only 1 percent of those 1,300
Syrian ISIS supporters put their beliefs into practice, they can still kill
thousands of Americans.
And that’s a best case scenario.
Because it doesn’t account for how many thousands of them support Al Qaeda. It
doesn’t account for how many of them back other Islamic terrorist groups such
as Hamas that had widespread support in Syria.
While the media has shamelessly
attempted to exploit the Holocaust to rally support for Syrian migrants, the
majority of Syrians supported Hamas whose mandate is finishing Hitler’s work.
The Hamas charter describes a “struggle against the Jews” that culminates in
another Holocaust. Bringing Hamas supporters to America will lead to more
Muslim Supremacist violence against Jews in this country. But all of this can be avoided by
taking in genuine Syrian refugees.
While Obama insists on taking in
fake Syrian refugees, mainly Sunni Muslims from UN camps who support terrorism
and are not endangered in Jordan or Turkey, both Sunni countries, he is
neglecting the real refugees, Christians and Yazidis, who are stateless and
persecuted in the Muslim world. Instead of taking in fake refugees who hate us,
we should be taking in real refugees who need us.
Obama and Paul Ryan have claimed
that a “religious test” for refugees is wrong, but religious tests are how we
determine whether a refugee is really fleeing persecution or is just an
economic migrant.
The Sunni Muslims that Obama is
taking in do not face persecution. They are the majority. They are the
persecutors. It’s the Yazidis and the Christians who need our help. And these
real refugees, unlike the fake Sunni Muslim refugees, are not coming here to
kill us. They truly have nowhere else to go.
Syria is a disaster because its
rival Muslim religious groups are unable to get along with each other. Bringing
them to this country will only spread the violence from their land to ours.
Instead of taking in the religious majority that caused this mess through its
intolerance, we should take in their victims; the Christians and Yazidis who
are being slaughtered and enslaved by ISIS. During the entire Syrian Civil War,
Obama has only taken in 1 Syrian Yazidi and 53 Christians.
It’s time that we had a refugee
policy that protected the persecuted, instead of their Muslim persecutors. It’s
time that we listened to Syrian Christians in this country who oppose bringing
tens of thousands of Syrian Muslims to terrorize their neighborhoods the way
that they are already terrorizing Syrian Christians in Germany.
Syrian Muslims are a nation of
terrorist supporters. They destroyed their own country. Let’s not let them
destroy ours. It’s time that we kept our nation
safe by doing the right thing. Let’s take in the real Christian and Yazidi
refugees and let the fake Sunni Muslim refugees and terrorist supporters stay
in their own countries.
http://politichicks.com/2015/12/daniel-greenfield-syrians-are-a-terror-threat-here-are-the-numbers/
No comments:
Post a Comment