Secretary of State of the United States traveled to the Muslim country of Jordan to assure its Foreign Minister that Jews would not be praying any more at the holiest site in Judaism. As Kerry put it, “It is Muslims who pray on the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif and non-Muslims who visit.”
Israel is often accused of apartheid
and segregation, but here was the Secretary of State championing both, as long
as it was Muslim segregation aimed at Jews.
The Temple Mount “Status Quo”
worriedly talked about by Kerry and the media as the answer to the recent
Muslim stabbing spree is no different than the Muslim ban on Jews entering the
Cave of the Patriarchs, where Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are buried, past the
seventh step. It rewards Muslim violence by upholding Muslim segregationist
racism.
There’s no word on whether
segregated drinking fountains will be put in for Muslims and non-Muslims. Jews
visiting the former site of their Temple have been attacked for drinking from
an “Islamic” water fountain.
Perhaps the status quo will also say
that, “It is Muslims who drink from water fountains on the Temple Mount and
non-Muslims who go thirsty.” And don’t even ask about the bathrooms. PLO leader
Abbas, whom Kerry also met with, shrieked that Jews “have no right to defile it
with their filthy feet”.
The status quo on the Temple Mount
and in the Middle East is the supremacism of Muslim bigotry. The Jews violated
this status quo in a very big way by seeking independence. The indigenous
Jewish people were no longer willing to be a conquered nation under the boot of
Muslim invaders, forced to live in ghettos, wear yellow badges, walk barefoot
or wait on the seventh step outside their holy places.
Every act of Muslim terrorism is
blamed on this primal Jewish violation of the “Status Quo”. Israel violated the
status quo by becoming the first non-Muslim country in the Middle East. If that
wasn’t bad enough, Jews violated the status quo even further by becoming the
first indigenous people to reclaim land lost in a war from its Muslim
conquerors. Then the members of a religion that had been defeated by Islam, its
holy places turned into mosques, had the temerity to go and pray at their own
holy places.
What could Muslims do in the face of
so many violations of the status quo by an inferior conquered race except
resort to maddened orgies of violence, setting off bombs and chopping up Rabbis
with cleavers?
It’s not only the Jews who get in
trouble for violating the Muslim status quo. When Coptic Christians turned out
to protest the Muslim Brotherhood regime in Egypt, the supporters of the
“moderate” terror group, which Kerry backs, responded by shouting “Death to the
Christians” and burning churches.
Jordan’s Foreign Minister warned
Kerry, “When you infuriate the emotions of one of our billion Muslims around
the world, things become rather thorny and rather difficult to manage.” The world’s one billion Muslims,
whose delicate emotions are always infuriated by something, enforce an Islamic
status quo in which no non-Muslim dares to violate the Muslim superiority
complex.
A Danish newspaper can’t print
cartoons that a few Imams don’t like or the billion Muslims will get angry.
Burger King can’t have ice cream that Muslims think resembles the name of their
god or a billion Muslims will get angry. America can’t defend itself against
Islamic terrorism or a billion Muslims will get angry. Jews in Israel and
Christians in Egypt can’t have their civil rights or a billion Muslims will get
angry. Some might say that the billion
Muslims are just looking for things to get angry at… but that would just make a
billion Muslims angry.
When buildings fall or buses blow
up, when people are stabbed, shot or exploded by the unofficial representatives
of the bilious billion, we go right past the crime to the anger that motivated
it. “Why do they hate us?” becomes the question and Muslim anger becomes the
pivot of national security policy.
Since Muslim anger causes violence, we
stop terrorism by tiptoeing around anything that might make them angry. Minor
things mostly like freedom of speech or freedom of religion. If you’re a Coptic
Christian who makes a YouTube video about Mohammed, you can be sent to prison
when some of the moderate Muslim Brotherhood/Al Qaeda locals murder four
Americans while shouting, “Allahu Akbar.”
After weeks of brutal Muslim
murders, Kerry has gotten Israel to reinforce a ban on Jews praying at the
holiest site in Judaism because it offends Muslims. Next up, maybe Jews will be
restricted to the seventh step of the Cave of the Patriarchs again. Because
that was the “Status Quo” under the Muslim conquest.
But the status quo won’t be restored
by merely banning Jews from praying at the Temple Mount. It won’t even be
restored by giving in to demands from Obama, Kerry and the outraged stabber
lobby to keep Jews out of those parts of Jerusalem that Muslims had ethnically
cleansed them from in 1948.
A Jewish Israel is a violation of
the Islamic status quo. But so are a Christian Spain and an independent Greece.
The Ottoman Empire at its peak nearly reached Vienna and extended into the
Ukraine. Muslims once held Sicily. The monstrous Mughals ruled over much of
India. Creative Muslim geography and revisionist history now claim that
Australia’s aborigines were originally Muslim and Turkey’s Islamist ruler, who
hopes to revive the Ottoman Empire, insists that Muslims originally discovered
America.These violations of the status quo must all be eliminated or a billion
Muslims will be very, very angry.
Pandering to Muslim bigotry only
earns more of the same. The Muslims butchering Jews in Jerusalem are not going
to be satisfied with any status quo short of the total Sharia subjugation of
the Jews with all the attendant ritual humiliations of ghettos, bare feet and
legal immunity for Muslim murderers of Jews.
Allowing Muslims to set the tone for
every negotiation by invoking one billion fuming faithful who will go on a
killing spree if a cartoon is published, a book is printed or a prayer is
prayed is a submission to a racist theocracy. Worse still, it treats the anger
of the bigoted murderers as if it had moral weight.
Our diplomatic Stockholm syndrome
traces back the root cause of Muslim violence not to the Muslim killers, but to
anyone who might be guilty of provoking them.
Obama’s people responded to the
murder of Americans in Benghazi with a Pakistani video apology and by treating
a YouTube video critical of Mohammed as the real crime. Hillary Clinton told
the father of a murdered SEAL, “We’re going to have that person arrested and
prosecuted that did the video.”
When Muslims butcher Jews in
Jerusalem, the blame settles not on the killers, but on their victims. Some
Jews had to be stabbed because other Jews (and their filthy feet) had prayed at
the holiest site in Judaism that the Muslim conquerors claimed for their own
because Mohammed once flew there on a magic horse with a woman’s head. Or at
least that was this week’s Muslim excuse for killing Jews. Muslims had been killing Jews for
over a thousand years. But there’s always some momentary excuse for how the
Jewish victims provoked their Muslim killers this time that utterly fails to
explain why this same cycle of Muslim anti-Semitic violence has been going on since
the beginning of Islam.
We are often lectured on how
oppressed Muslims are. One of the more popular Muslim victimization memes
claims that Muslims are “the new Jews”. So far the only thing they have done to
prove this claim is trying to kill all the Jews on the theory that when all the
Jews are dead, they can be the new Jews.
By accepting Muslim anger as moral
we have turned murderers into victims and victims into murderers. The extremes
of Muslim outrage are not proof of their suffering, their frustration and
desperation, as the media claims, but of their racism, their supremacism and
their dehumanization of non-Muslims.
Muslim terrorism is not a cry for
help. It’s a cry of hate. Muslims are not entitled to a
supremacist status quo that enshrines their conquests as sacred and forever
represses the rights and identities of the peoples under their rule. It is this
supremacist sense of entitlement that fuels Muslim terror from ISIS to Hamas.
Upholding such a status quo only
breeds further conflicts as Islam seeks to restore its status quo conquests
around the world. It’s their belief that they can restore a supremacist status
quo that is the cause of Muslim terrorism. Take away this expectation of a
status quo and Muslim terror goes away.
Obama has decided to uphold the
Muslim status quo. Muslim terrorism is met with backdoor support for a
Caliphate through political Islam. Muslim stabbings in Israel are met with
calls for upholding a Muslim supremacist status quo that bans Jews from praying
at the holiest site in their religion.
Our national security strategy, our
diplomacy and the premise of societies that are being transformed by Muslim
migration is don’t make the Muslims angry. This vision for the West is an
abusive relationship in which the free world plays the beaten wife whose dreams
and hopes have narrowed down to not “provoking” another violent tantrum from
the psychotic monster who has taken over her life.
“Don’t Make the Muslims Angry” has
become our highest law. The free world needs an intervention before we give up
our rights, our identities and our future to live in this abusive relationship
with Islam.
http://politichicks.com/2015/11/daniel-greenfield-violating-the-muslim-status-quo/
No comments:
Post a Comment