The Fake Birth Certificate

'FAKE' OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE WAS 'INSIDE JOB', Investigator: Evidence shows government officials involved, by Bob Unruh, 12/25/16

The chief investigator for Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s probe of the validity of the image Barack Obama released as his birth certificate says evidence suggests the involvement of the Hawaiian government in the alleged fabrication.

WND reported last week that Arpaio and his chief investigator on the Obama birth certificate issue, Mike Zullo, held a news conference to reveal evidence they say shows the document was fabricated on a computer.

They conclude it is not a copy of any original Hawaiian document, and while their investigation did not address whether Obama is a “natural-born citizen” as the Constitution requires for presidents, or the political implications of such a forgery, they said it certainly raises many questions going forward.

Zullo showed how the digital images on the document released by Obama in a White House news conference allegedly were copied from another document. Zullo said the alleged fraud apparently involved the Hawaiian government.

His comments came in an interview on the Hagmann Report, where he was joined by pastor, author, radio host and former law-enforcement officer Carl Gallups of the  

PPSIMMONS blog, who was deputized by the sheriff for the investigation.

Zullo explained the investigation found that some of the images on the Obama document image apparently were copied from an original birth certificate that belongs to a woman named Johanna Ah’nee.

But Ah’nee said she obtained a copy of her birth certificate and kept it locked in her own files until after the Obama image was released. At about that time, she revealed it to WND senior writer Jerry Corsi, who was reporting on the dispute.

Zullo told how the investigation launched by Arpaio at the request of constituents took him to Hawaii. If Ah’nee’s copy of birth certificate had not been circulated, posted online or otherwise made available, he concludes that only the Hawaiian government, which had the document image, could have used it to copy elements onto Obama’s. “These things start to grow hair and you start to work with it,” Zullo explained. The evidence “pointed to an inside job,” he said.

Gallups said in the interview that now is the time for the questions to be expanded. “They manufactured a document,” he said. “That’s astounding, because now you have to ask why. Why would people produce a forgery, a fraud, for the president of the United States and defraud the American people. The answers are not good,” he said.

The interview:

And Gallups’ summary of the investigation results: WND reported last week after the announcement that investigators are working to transfer the evidence to members of Congress to determine if any crimes have been committed.

The atmosphere in Washington will be different under a President Donald Trump, who will be inaugurated Jan. 20, since he publicly questioned Obama’s birth certificate in 2011. During this election season, he stated he now believes Obama was born in Hawaii.

At a news conference last Thursday, Arpaio, the only law enforcement officer to formally investigate the allegations of fraud, presented evidence that the image of the birth document posted by the White House was fraudulent.

One thing seems certain: The evidence will have to go elsewhere for action to be taken, since Arpaio, known as “America’s toughest sheriff” and innovator of such jail amenities as pink underwear and surplus Army tents in the desert heat for jail inmates, is leaving office Jan. 1 after more than two decades serving Phoenix-area residents, who had asked him for the birth certificate investigation.

His replacement already has stated, CBS News reported, that he “will cut off Arpaio’s investigation into Obama’s birth certificate.”

Zullo told WND the evidence could be used in support of a Presidential Transparency Act, which would give secretaries of state across the nation the authority to investigate candidates with suspect qualifications.

“This is what we have learned. Every secretary of state is powerless to investigate a candidate,” he told WND. “They have to take everything on face value.”

That means a candidate whose qualifications are questioned cannot be reviewed by state secretaries of state, who run the elections

Zullo told WND that could be a very easy fix for the controversy that developed around Obama’s document.

The issue is that the U.S. Constitution requires the president to be a “natural-born citizen” but does not define the term. Scholarly works cited by the Founders defined it as a citizen at birth, born in the country to two citizens of the country, or merely the offspring of two citizens of the country.

The birth certificate Obama displayed on the White House website as “proof positive” of his eligibility states he was born in Hawaii to an American mother and a Kenyan father.

Some immediately pointed out alleged anomalies, questioning its validity, while others argued it also could prove his ineligibility because his father was not a citizen. Some of the lawsuits over the issue argued Obama was a dual citizen at birth through his father, contending the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born citizens.

Get an autographed copy of the now historic, No. 1 bestselling book that forced Barack Obama to release his challenged “birth certificate” in 2011 and get the whole story about his contested constitutional eligibility.

Eventually, just as the No. 1 bestseller “Where’s The Birth Certificate?” was combining with a challenge at that time from Trump to force Obama’s hand, Obama held a White House news conference to release a copy of his birth certificate.

Now the only official law enforcement investigation ever done into the Obama birth certificate has concluded it is “not authentic.” See a video prepared by the investigators and released at a news conference on Thursday:

Jerome Corsi, Ph.D., WND senior staff writer and author of “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” was credited by sheriff’s officials with contributing to the investigation.

Corsi said Zullo and Arpaio “have done the United States a heroic service demonstrating by forensic analysis that the long form birth certificate produced in a White House news conference on April 27, 2011, as Barack Obama’s authentic birth certificate is a forgery.”

“The nine points of forgery between the Johanna Ah’nee birth certificate and Obama’s [long-form birth certificate] prove convincingly that the Ah’nee birth certificate was the source document from which the Obama LFBC was created.”

Corsi said Arpaio’s five-year effort “vindicates the extensive research WND conducted over years to bring this issue to the attention of the American public.”

The sheriff’s video said there were nine images on the Obama birth certificate that appear to be identical to, and copied from, another birth certificate issued in Hawaii just days after his birth. That certificate belongs to Johanna Ah’nee.

The copied items include the word “Honolulu,” “Oahu” twice, three different Xs and two time stamps. The identical nature of the Xs raised serious questions since they would have been applied to original documents by moving a typewriter carriage and roller at the time.

Explained the investigator on the video: Doesn’t it just make sense that Alvin Onaka’s stamp and the April 25th date stamp were lifted from someplace also? Ask yourself this question. If anyone presented you with a document in your life that was this suspect would you readily accept it or would you begin an intense vetting, be it a house title, a car title, a piece of currency, anything? Would you accept something this suspect if presented to you in your life? If you answered no, then ask yourself a second question, don’t the American people have a right to vet the documents that they are presented by public officials.

One of the experts who assisted in the investigation was Reed Hayes, a court-qualified handwriting and document examiner, who runs a business in Hawaii. He is on the board of the Scientific Association of Forensic Examiners and has been in business nearly 40 years.

Forlabs, an Italian company that specializes in extracting information from multimedia files, also produced the results. “We had two experts from two countries in separate disciplines of forensics that came to one conclusion: Barack Obama’s long form birth certificate it not authentic,” the report said.

During the news conference, Zullo quoted from the investigation by Hayes: “The (nail in the coffin) that proves that Certificate of Live Birth is inauthentic is the exact lineup of numerous entries on both [certificates].” He said the experts likened the evidence to being as reliable as a fingerprint.

During his investigation, Zullo said he encountered unusual opposition from officials who would normally be expected to cooperate with investigators, such as hospital officials, state officials, and others in Hawaii. He said that just increased his suspicions.

Arpaio said he, like Zullo, at the outset was ready to verify the document as valid and drop the issue. “Five years ago I said one thing, show us the microfiche, the birth certificate and we’ll all go home,” he said. But he couldn’t because of the evidence.

He confirmed plans to turn the results over to the federal government and Congress. “Maybe some members of Congress will hold some hearings, open to the public regarding this matter. … If they can hold hearings … on underinflated footballs, why can’t you hold one on this?” he said. “Look at our evidence, just look at it.”

He said at the news conference that he was withholding some “sensitive” information so that the next step could be taken. But he called it a “fake, fake birth certificate.”

The evidence

The sheriff’s office concluded: “It is the opinion of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office that the birth certificate on your right, belonging to Johanna Ah’nee, was in fact used as a source document in the digital creation of Barack Obama’s long form birth certificate.” The video notes nine points of “forgery.”

“What are the odds that two stamps in two separate boxes stamped by hand … days apart would have the exact same angle?” the investigators ask.

Get commemorative “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” postcards. And who knows what President Trump may do to get to the bottom of this controversy once and for all.

“It should be pointed out these stamps were looked at by two separate document examiners in two forensic disciplines on two continents,” the video explains.

WND reported when the news conference was announced how the issue had badgered Obama from before his first inauguration until well into his second term. Now, apparently, it’s raining on his legacy.

WND reported Obama explained he decided to release it because the Internet “chatter” was becoming a “distraction.”

At the time, the Washington Times described Obama as “visibly frustrated” and noted that a recent CBS News-New York Times poll showed 45 percent of registered Republican voters believe Obama was not born in the U.S.

But while the issue became known in liberal and left-leaning circles as the biggest “conspiracy” theory of all time, some document experts questioned the validity of the birth certificate Obama released. The question was posed, unsuccessfully, to the U.S. Supreme Court many times.

In 2012, Arpaio held a news conference that concluded there was probable cause to believe the document Obama released as an official government document is a computer-generated forgery.

Arapaio, known for his strict enforcement of immigration laws, commissioned the investigative team after local citizens presented him with a petition expressing concern that Obama might not be eligible for Arizona’s presidential ballot.

The sheriff even deputized preacher, pastor, author, radio host and former law enforcement officer Carl Gallups of the PPSIMMONS blog in his pursuit of the truth.

“This investigation and its forensic conclusions in my opinion will vindicate a lot of people. That vindication includes the sheriff and his investigator of course but also president-elect Donald Trump. It also vindicates millions of Americans who dared to ask questions about this nefarious birth certificate and have been lampooned and marginalized by certain members of the press and other operatives for doing so. The investigation also vindicates those in the press who did have the guts to speak to this and to spend time investigating it, like WND,” Gallups said.

“I have a feeling that this matter is not over. Not by a long shot. I cannot imagine that authorized federal authorities will now not step in and investigate this matter to its conclusion.”

Investigators at that time they believed forgers committed two crimes. First, they said it appeared the White House fraudulently created a forgery that it characterized as an officially produced governmental birth record. Second, the White House fraudulently presented to the residents of Maricopa County and to the American public at large a forgery represented as “proof positive” of President Obama’s authentic 1961 Hawaii long-form birth certificate.

The investigators also said they had developed credible evidence that Obama’s Selective Service card was a forgery, based on an examination of the postal date stamp on the document. Also, records of Immigration and Naturalization Service cards filled out by passengers arriving on international flights originating outside the United States in the month of August 1961, examined at the National Archives in Washington, D.C., were missing records for the week of President Obama’s birth. Arpaio said then a “continuing investigation” was needed, and his investigators set to work.

‘Preposterous notion’

WND reported in 2015 when the issue was raised in a CNN interview in which anchor Jake Tapper excoriated Arpaio for questioning Obama’s document.

On CNN’s “The Lead,” Tapper said, “You’ve trafficked in this rather preposterous notion that Obama was not born in the United States and that he may have forged his birth certificate that he released.”

He continued, “Why would you risk your credibility on issues you care about – like illegal immigration, like law enforcement – by getting involved in this nonsense?”

“What do you mean ‘risk’?” Arpaio asked. “I’m the chief law enforcement officer elected by the people. I have a right to investigate and speak out. I’m not talking about where he came from. I don’t care where he came from. We’re working on a fraudulent, forged government document. That’s what we are doing.”

Tapper interjected, “You’re maintaining that the birth certificate that the president of the United States revealed and released to the public, you’re maintaining that that is fraudulent?”

Obama’s birth certificate: It’s still in the news after all these years. Now get the No. 1 bestselling book that forced the release of the document being challenged anew as fraudulent in an official law enforcement report.

 “That’s right,” Arpaio responded.

The CNN host asked, “Is there anyone, any credible law enforcement person outside of you and your organization and your contractors, who has any agreement with you on this?”

“No, they haven’t looked at it,” Arpaio said. “What, are you kidding? I’m probably the only law enforcement official who has looked into it. Nobody looks into it. They shy away from it.”

Once again, a flustered Tapper interrupted: “Because the president was born in Hawaii.”

“I don’t care where he was born,” Arpaio replied. “I’m talking about a fraudulent government document, a birth certificate. That’s all I’m concerned with. That’s a violation of the law.”

Listen to “Aaron Klein Radio” clip of Joe Arpaio discussing Obama’s birth certificate:

Zullo has noted that Hayes, a document examiner who has served as expert witness for Seattle law firm Perkins Coie – the firm that flew an attorney to Honolulu to personally deliver two paper copies of the birth certificate to the White House – has concluded in a signed affidavit that the document posted on the White House website is “entirely fabricated.”

Also, at the time Obama was born, only a short time after Hawaii was admitted as a state, there were a number of ways a Hawaiian birth certificate could have been obtained without the person having been born in Hawaii.

Americans skeptical

Six years into Obama’s administration, WND reported a poll revealed nearly one-quarter of American adults didn’t even believe he’s a U.S. citizen, let alone a “natural-born citizen,” and another 17 percent were unsure.

Rasmussen Reports found 41 percent of Republicans believed Obama is not an American citizen, a belief shared by 21 percent of those who are unaffiliated and 11 percent of Democrats.

“Just over 20 percent of Republicans and unaffiliated adults also are not sure, but only 7 percent of those in the president’s party share that doubt,” the polling organization said in a report titled “Have We Got A Conspiracy for You – 9/11? JFK? Obama’s Citizenship?”

Overall, 23 percent said the theory that Obama is not an American citizen is true, and another 17 percent said they weren’t sure. Sixty percent reject the theory as false.

Ironically, in recent months it’s been, Obama, his wife Michelle, Secretary of State John Kerry and even his former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, who have raised the issue over and over.

It was during an appearance in Nairobi, Secretary of State John Kerry said he thanked the Kenyan president for giving America “a president of the United States” – a comment alluding to the contested issue of where Obama was born.

Kerry told Kenya’s foreign minister he had a conversation with Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta concerning the Olympic Games in Rio and President Obama’s birthplace:

I had the pleasure of beginning that meeting [with Kenyatta], as I want to begin this press conference this afternoon, by congratulating Kenya on something no nation’s athletes have ever before accomplished, and that is to win both the men’s and the women’s marathon races at the Olympic Games. Absolutely extraordinary. When I mentioned that to President Kenyatta, he promptly said to me, “Well, we also had a hand in helping you win a silver because the person who won came from Kenya.” (Laughter.)

“And I said, “Actually, Mr. President, you did better than a silver and a gold. You gave us a president of the United States.” (Laughter.) So you can see we had a very friendly and positive beginning to the conversation.

Watch the video of Kerry’s remarks: Obama himself raised the question at the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, during an address in which he urged Americans to elect Clinton.

“You know, there’s been a lot of talk in this campaign about what America’s lost – people who tell us that our way of life is being undermined by pernicious changes and dark forces beyond our control,” Obama said. “They tell voters there’s a ‘real America’ out there that must be restored. This isn’t an idea that started with Donald Trump. It’s been peddled by politicians for a long time – probably from the start of our Republic.

“And it’s got me thinking about the story I told you 12 years ago tonight, about my Kansas grandparents and the things they taught me when I was growing up. They came from the heartland; their ancestors began settling there about 200 years ago. I don’t know if they had their birth certificates, but they were there.”

The mention of “birth certificates,” which prompted laughter and cheers from the crowd, was a deviation from the president’s prepared remarks, and comes just two nights after his wife, first lady Michelle Obama, brought up the issue of her husband’s citizenship and faith during her speech to the DNC.

At that time, Michelle Obama said one of her jobs in the White House was to teach her daughters “to ignore those who question their father’s citizenship or faith.”

She was referencing the challenges to her husband’s constitutional qualification for office as a “natural born citizen.”

Hillary Clinton “went birther” during a campaign appearance in Charlotte, North Carolina when she tweeted, “Someone who has never forgotten where he came from. And Donald, if you’re out there tweeting: It’s Hawaii.” –Hillary on @POTUS

http://www.wnd.com/2016/12/fake-obama-birth-certificate-was-inside-job/

Enviro-Nazi Riots Ahead

Suggested Ordinance Below:

Obama just renewed his ban on ocean shelf drilling, knowing that Trump would reverse it.  When Trump does this, the Enviro-Nazi cavalry will be saddled and ready to hit the streets and highways joining the BLM thugs, the Soros Temps, the transgender cross-dressers, the sanctuary city rioters, the capitol one barbarians and the mortified campus snowflake gangs. 

It would be wise for every city that doesn’t want their roads and highways choked with traffic-blocking, window-breaking, looting rioters to make a few changes.

All cities and counties who want to avoid the next 8 years of Alinsky-style protests should first require a permit, next restrict the entire protest to a central spot in a city park with lots of parking.  Rioters would be instructed to drive to these areas and park their buses or cars in the designated parking next to their reserved riot venue.

Police services will be provided to ensure that counter-protesters are not allowed and that protesters have their say.  All of this should happen during daylight hours and be over at a designated time.  All rioters will be required to be residents of the cities that provide these venues. Fires will be restricted to designated barbecue pits. 

Rioters will be expected to clean up after themselves. Rioters who do not follow these instructions will be arrested, fined $100 and jailed. They will also be subject to other charges if appropriate.

That will keep traffic flowing and allow commerce to flourish unmolested. This ordinance should serve to lower insurance costs for property and automobiles.

Police Chiefs who value their sanity should present this article to their city councils and county commissions for adoption and publication.

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

Discord in Mexifornia

Good News: The Victimhood Coalition May Devour Itself Before the Rest of Us, by Benny Huang, 12/24/16

The University of California’s “Students of Color Conference” ended in disarray earlier this month with various racial, ethnic, and religious groups vying for the “Biggest Victim” prize. Though it was intended to foster thoughtful discussion about issues that affect minorities, the conference devolved into a “safe space gone wrong” according to The Daily Bruin’s Jacqueline Alvarez.

Rather than hating white people, the various groups turned on each other. “The conference eventually turned into a kind of ‘oppression Olympics,’ where students argued over which minority group was oppressed the most rather than finding solidarity and understanding amongst each other,” wrote Alvarez.

One point of contention was the conference’s theme: “Fighting anti-Blackness.” The whole conference was geared toward America’s premiere victim group, blacks, which displeased some members of other groups. When one student asked why other groups’ issues weren’t being discussed a black student replied that blacks were the most oppressed which elicited a negative response from a Muslim student who said that her people were being bombed in the Middle East.

I don’t know about you but I find this whole story very entertaining. It’s a nice change to see the victimhood pathology eating away at the grand coalition of the oppressed rather than at our nation as a whole.

Modern progressivism is an identity politics stew consisting of divergent groups that don’t always agree. What binds them together is a visceral hatred of Western civilization which they associate with white people, Christianity, capitalism, individual rights, and “the patriarchy” (men). They’ve shown great progress in vanquishing all of these things.

The Left has an obsession with tearing down the status quo, a task it has been engaged in for more than two hundred years. Armed with rhetorical sledge hammers they go about smashing everything they see. Smash monogamy! Smash the patriarchy! Smash capitalism! Smash this! Smash that! Smashing is what they do best and for that the Left deserves to be called a demolition crew.

Leftists won’t admit this of course. In their own minds they are building a better, more egalitarian future. But in order to usher in that future they must first demolish Western civilization and sweep away the wretched rubble. This task has become their fixation. So focused are they on undermining the current order that they’ve almost lost sight of their supposed long term goal of building an earthly paradise in its place.

In all likelihood, they never will get around to the construction phase of their strategy because the demolition phase will never be complete. Consider for a moment their obsession with racism. Leftists perceive it everywhere and concoct phony examples of it where it doesn’t exist. Here’s a good example: Just before the election, a black church in Mississippi was torched and spray-painted with the words “Vote Trump.” Police have since arrested a man named Andrew McClinton for the heinous act. Who is this scoundrel? A klansman, perhaps? Nope. McClinton is a black member of the church. This man actually burnt down his own spiritual home just to make a point about the imaginary racists who live in his head.

In order to sustain our hysteria about racism the Left needs to provide teachable moments from time to time. The Mississippi church burning was one such moment. The lessons they wanted us to learn from it were that white supremacism still reigns supreme and that we must continue smashing it with all due ferocity. Therefore, demolition is still called for—and always will be. There’s never a good time to declare victory in the war on racism.

Unfortunately for them, a movement so tightly bound up with destruction runs the risk of devouring itself from within. Until recently I was of the opinion that this Left-on-Left cannibalization would likely happen after they had destroyed Western civilization as we know it.

I imagined it going down something like the French Revolution when Jacobins sent each other to the guillotine once they had murdered the monarchy, raped the nuns, and desecrated the churches. But could I be wrong? I have no doubt that this coalition of victims is going to self-destruct; it’s only a question of whether it will occur before or after their scorched earth campaign against the rest of us has concluded.

We conservatives should take every opportunity to point out that the Left’s many strange bedfellows don’t have much in common. Sometimes we do illuminate the absurdity of a movement that counts both Muslims and homosexuals as members. Don’t “gays” know that most Muslims hate them? Many don’t. But we haven’t done a good enough job explaining to Muslims that homosexuals hate them too. We might want to mention that after the social justice warriors complete their incremental criminalization of Christianity they’ll have all the right precedents in place to do the same to Islam.

“No fair!” shout the Leftists. “That’s the politics of divisiveness!” Yes, I suppose it is. But they started it.

Conservatives want people in this country to unite behind a common national identity—as Americans—whereas  liberals want to split the population into many different groups based on sex, sexuality, class, race, and religion before bundling the majority of those splinter groups into a coalition that will act as a battering ram against the dreaded System. They really don’t like it when we try to dilute the glue that binds their various constituency groups together.

Self-professed communist Van Jones complained of this tactic this past February, criticizing the Trump campaign for daring to say that the current administration puts illegal aliens above blacks—which they do, of course. Said Jones: “Somebody raised the DREAMers, the young Latinos who everyone loves, [Trump] puts them down. He says they’re not American…He pivots directly to blacks. This guy is going to try to sow dissension not just in the Republican ranks within America itself, he’s going to try to split the Obama coalition.”

Yes, I do believe that Trump was trying to split the Obama coalition but that’s okay because it richly deserves to be split. Black people’s interests are not the same as Hispanics’ interests and on the issue of illegal immigration blacks’ interests are in fact diametrically opposed to what Hispanic advocacy groups demand. Our unsecured borders have worked out great for dishonest employers but not for blacks who have found themselves competing for entry-level jobs with people who will work for less.

Trump was not, however, trying to drive a wedge between blacks and Latinos but rather between blacks and illegal aliens. There’s a difference. Perhaps it’s time for blacks to ask themselves where their true interests lie. What exactly do they gain from illegal immigration? Nothing, as far as I can see.

There are other reason why blacks should not rejoice in the booming Hispanic population, many of whom came here illegally. Look to Los Angeles for a good example, the city that hosted the aforementioned Students of Color Conference. Certain neighborhoods in LA which were once black enclaves have become predominantly Hispanic with serious consequences for the black residents who remain there. The neighborhood of Watts, which was the city’s black enclave for much of the 20^th Century, was only one third black in the 2010 census—and 65% Latino.

In an attempt to drive out blacks, gangs of brown supremacists have targeted them with racist attacks. In 2013 a black man was stopped by a gang of Hispanics who, according to the LA Times, “pulled up and called him a ‘n***er,’ saying black people were barred from the neighborhood.” They then proceeded to pull a gun on him and beat him with pipes. But if you ask blacks to get as upset about this as they do about police shootings that’s “sowing dissension.” So be it.

Van Jones doesn’t like people messing with the “Obama coalition” because his goal is to unite black and brown against white. Am I guilty of wanting black and white to unite to against brown? No. I want Americans of all colors to come together against illegal alien invaders—not all of whom are Hispanic. This is our country. It belongs to a multiracial group of people called Americans and we decide who may enter our house.

The coalition of the oppressed is in fact very fragile. Don’t hesitate to do everything in your power to aggravate its inherent schisms. Their goal is to destroy Western civilization so don’t feel bad about wanting to destroy their contrived sense of solidarity.

http://constitution.com/good-news-victimhood-coalition-may-devour-rest-us/

Obama as Complainer-in-Chief

Rush Limbaugh Predicts Obama Will Stir Up The Left Every Time Trump Acts, 12/24/16

 

Media giant Rush Limbaugh revealed his prediction for President Barack Obama’s plan for political involvement after stepping down as president, and it wasn’t what conservatives wanted to hear.

 

According to a story in the Conservative Tribune: On Tuesday, Limbaugh predicted that Obama would serve as a rallying point for Democrats nationwide, criticizing President-elect Donald Trump’s every move. He raises an important point — the media has been (and always will be) on Obama’s side.

 

“Obama is going to call (NBC’s) Chuck Todd, take his pick, (CNN’s) John King, Wolf Blitzer and they will not be able to wait,”  Limbaugh said on Tuesday. “They’ll give Obama as much time as he wants to rip into Trump and to ‘warn’ the American people.” “He’s going to try to create all kinds of unrest and disunity and so forth,” he added.

 

From a partisan standpoint, he almost has to. With the fall of the Democrat nominee for president Hillary Clinton, there are not a lot of Democrat figureheads left to choose from.

http://conservativetribune.com/rush-reveals-exactly-what-obama/

Trump To Dos

17 AGENDA ITEMS FOR TRUMP'S FIRST 100 DAYS, Exclusive: Joseph Farah offers president-elect bold plan to start New Year, by Joseph Farah, 12/21/16, WND

What are the first things Donald Trump should do upon taking the office of the presidency Jan. 20? Everyone has their ideas. Here is my top-17 list for the first 100 days:

1.    Obamacare needs to be scrapped, dismantled, destroyed and replaced with a system that uses market forces to make health insurance more affordable and available, one without mandates on consumers they don’t need or want. The “experts” will tell you how complicated that is. These are the same “experts” who insisted you could keep your own doctor and your own policy under Obamacare. They are the same “experts” who created a wacky Rube Goldberg-like system designed to fail, designed to drive up the cost of premiums, designed to empower government over consumers.

2.    The border needs to sealed – no ifs, ands or buts. It’s time for Trump to make good on his most important promise – the one that got him elected.

3.    A review of all globalist trade deals needs to take place quickly, and the stake needs to be put in the hearts of all of them that are not serving the best interests of the American people.

4.    Taxes – both personal and corporate – need to be slashed.

5.    The Internal Revenue Service needs to be scrapped in favor of a much simpler system not subject to political abuse and one that reduces time-consuming and expensive paperwork to comply.

6.    The U.S. military needs to get back to the business of defending the nation and away from acting as the government’s incubator for social experiments involving sex and gender.

7.    The late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia needs to be replaced by an equivalent jurist in temperament, intellect and constitutional integrity.

8.    Trump should name a commission to investigate glaring shortcomings in our electoral system – from taxpayer campaign financing to the lingering questions still surrounding the constitutional eligibility proofs for president and vice president. With a new forensic investigation of Barack Obama’s so-called “birth certificate” showing it to be a fraudulent document apparently manufactured at his behest, the nation should never be subjected to this kind of embarrassment again.

9.    To avoid a looming economic calamity, Trump should have a plan drawn up by his fiscal team to deal with the staggering $20 trillion debt he was left holding the bag with by Obama.

10. Trump should ask Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, to draw up a plan to reduce regulation on American consumers and businesses to put people back to work.

11. Of course, overturn all of Obama’s unconstitutional executive orders and presidential directives.

12. Announce that the Trump family will spend their own money on vacations.

13. Appoint a commission to recommend cuts in waste, fraud, abuse and corruption in Washington that leads to legislation providing real protections and incentives for whistleblowers, employees and supervisors who save money and disclose wrongdoing inside the swamp.

14. Evaluate every piece of legislation that hits the Oval Office on the basis of the constitutional test.

15. Carefully evaluate every judicial appointment by the same standard Trump has promised to apply to the Supreme Court nominations.

16. Shake up the White House press corps by overturning the misguided rules of the past that have helped turn the nation’s media into a partisan joke. Invoke drug tests on all reporters, producers and media crews who enter the White House. Institute a lottery system to determine where correspondents are seated for press conferences. Acknowledge the new stature of the digital media by treating them with as much respect as the old guard media establishment.

17. Start cutting the size and scope of the federal government, encouraging Cabinet secretaries to reduce spending and interference in matters more properly handled by state governments with an eye toward the elimination of the Department of Education and other agencies.

That would be a good start to the New Year. Don’t you think?

http://www.wnd.com/2016/12/17-agenda-items-for-trumps-first-100-days/