Thursday, July 28, 2016

The World According to Thumper

“If you can’t say anything nice, don’t say anything at all.” – Thumper - Walt Disney’s Bambi 1942.

This is the Democrat’s primary rule for everyone else to follow.  It was the beginning of “political correctness”.

Bambi also had an environmental message about guns and hunting.  People were seen through the eyes of the animals in the forest.  A good piece of propaganda for animal rights.

But now, alligators eat your kids, bears go through your trashcan, coyotes kill your pets and you can’t say anything about it, because of “political correctness”.

Bambi might have lost his mother in the forest fire, but he did have his friends in the forest.  During World War II, the US population knew well that their soldiers might not come home.  This message that we have others in our “family” to be with and to receive solace from.

In 1944, Smokey Bear said: “only you can prevent forest fires”.  But you cannot control lightening and it causes most forest fires.  It was government’s way to prevent a small percentage of forest fires and it became a big deal.  Most of these forest fires occurred on land claimed by the federal government. 

The fires continue, because government never takes care of anything that is has responsibility for.  But that never stops them from wanting more to be responsible for.  If those forests were owned by tree farmers, they would find a way to prevent forest fires.  They would remove the brush that makes these fires go out of control. They would harvest trees and thin the forest.  They would separate tree farms with “fire breaks”.  They would deploy fire retardant and develop better methods.

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

Liberals shouldn’t Lead

Liberals make excuses when things go badly.  Liberals don’t go back to find out what caused the problem.  Liberals certainly never fix the problems they created. Liberals say they “did their best” and shouldn’t be blamed. Liberals insist that “things aren’t that bad”.  They argue with whoever mentions any problems. 

Liberals are defensive.  So are criminals.  Criminals deny that they did anything wrong.  Liberals attack when they are asked questions.

Liberals are tricky.  Criminals are tricky and enjoy outsmarting the cops to prove how smart they are.  Liberals like everyone to know how smart they are.  Liberals are dishonest.

Liberals are power hungry.  Liberals like telling everyone else what to do.  Liberals like to pick out victims to help at everyone else’s expense.  They claim that is government’s job.  It is not. 

Liberals love working in government, because they have access to other people’s money to spend on their victims, so they can buy their allegiance and their vote.

Liberals are spendthrifts.  Electing a Liberal is like giving a credit card to a teenager.

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

Social Engineering Sovereign Suicide

The social engineering promoted by the US federal government, the UN, the Communist Party USA and the Democrat Party went into overdrive in the US when Obama took over in 2009. 

I noticed the addition of “Gays” to non-discrimination policies cities were adopting when I saw them in questionnaires sent in response to “request for quotes” as early as 2000.  I wondered where this was coming from because back then you could tell that “Gays” were lobbying for inclusion as a “protected group”, but they had not been added to the Civil Rights legislation.  They are still not included as a protected group in the current Civil Rights Act.  It’s a tough sell, because “Gays” are typically not impoverished; they are successful business owners.  It was clear that only a fraction of “Gays” were activists.

The addition of “transgender” experimenters to this lobby and a re-branding as LGBT were the most recent political moves made by this well-organized lobby. 

I found it interesting that the Communist Goals List 1963 included: Goal 26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy." It was part of a number of goals designed to weaken family influence.

Corporations began publishing “politically correct” positions on issues in 2000, but actually issued threats for voter noncompliance in 2015.  In 2016 we saw more evidence of corporations backing transgender bathroom usage and pastor protection from lawsuit bills and threatening to move their operations unless we voters complied.  These same corporations support globalism and UN Agenda 21.

I found it revealing that the Communist Goals List 1963 also included: Goal 37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

Pope Francis’ support of UN Agenda 21 based on the global warming hoax in 2015 was a shock to us after decades of conservative Popes since John Paul II, so we knew that the Liberals were getting their turn.

I confirmed my suspicions with Goal 27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a "religious crutch."

The media have long been identified with Liberal bias and we begin to notice this immediately after the 1950s. There had been a Liberal and a Conservative newspaper in most large cities until the 1960s.  Liberals used the McCarthy era to claim victimization for themselves
Again, this was no surprise according to Goal 20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions and Goal 21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
Congress has voted with the Democrats for some time.  Republicans know that their candidates campaign using Republican rhetoric but vote with the Democrats.

This is further explained by Goal 15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

Public Schools have failed in recent years as the federal government began to emphasize Liberal advocacy over actual learning.

Yep, it’s in Goal 17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

The US Constitution has been ignored since 1860. It prevented big money and big banks from taking over to rule the US according to their needs at the time.  Law schools have all but abandoned the Constitution and it needs to be restored by the Congress.

The proof is in Goal 29.  Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

UN Agenda 21 is the roadmap to the Communist takeover in the US.  If they fail to destroy the US, they will fail to establish their “new world order” for now.

This is obvious in Goal 11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

The rise of Donald Trump and the Brexit vote signal a reversal of these goals. If they are allowed by remain, we are toast. The UN overstepped its bounds with the refugee resettlement program. All of the Communist Goals have been achieved.

See all 45 Communist Goals at:

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

Trump 47.9% Clinton 38.5% in NH

SWING STATE SHOCK: Trump Takes Huge 9-Point Lead

A new poll showed Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump jumping ahead of Democrat rival Hillary Clinton in a highly contested swing state. Inside Sources partnered with the New Hampshire Journal and surveyed a random sample of 1,166 registered voters. The results showed Trump leading Clinton 47.9 percent to 38.5 percent in New Hampshire. The poll was conducted July 19-21 and had a margin of error of +/- 5.1 percent.

Not good news for the Clinton Camp. In fact, these results appeared to be a part of growing trend that has Democrats worried. So worried, in fact, that campaign manager Robby Mook sent an email to supporters to raise awareness (not to mention funds) regarding it, reported The Hill. “Poll after poll is showing that Trump has been eating away at our lead, and after his convention, he’s erased it entirely,” Mook said.

Mook surmised that some of Trump’s lead was the traditional bounce candidates get after their conventions — although that hasn’t happened for a Republican since 2000 — but “that doesn’t make these next few weeks any less critical.” Mook also asked supporters to donate at least $1 toward Clinton’s campaign. “With the polls leaning in the wrong direction, your contribution has never been more critical,” he wrote.

After lagging behind Clinton since May, Trump has picked up steam. The RealClearPolitics average of national polls showed Trump leading Clinton 45.6 percent to 44.7 percent.

Several other recent polls have shown the Republican nominee with a slight lead over Clinton. A CNN/ORC poll also released on Monday showed Trump with a 6-point lead.
Statistician and analyst Nate Silver also said Monday that if the general election happened today, Trump would be favored to win.

It’s not hard to see why Trump has been eating away at Clinton’s lead and appealing to more voters. The Democrat Party cannot stop reeling from one scandal before it finds itself embroiled in another. And from the looks of it, there could be more scandals in the near future.

Trump 47%, Clinton 40%

New Poll: PHILADELPHIA, Pennsylvania — A new USC Dornsife / Los Angeles Times Presidential Election Poll released by Joel B. Pollak, 7/27/16


USC Dornsife / Los Angeles Times Presidential Election Poll released Wednesday shows Republican nominee Donald Trump with 47% support among likely voters, and Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton with 40.4% — the largest lead for the Republican thus far in the 2016 presidential race.

Trump’s lead reflects a “bounce” following the Republican National Convention in Cleveland last week, but also continues a trend that began in the weeks before, with revelations by FBI director James Comey in early July that while she would not face criminal prosecution, Clinton had been “extremely reckless” with classified information during her tenure as Secretary of State.

Trump has led throughout most of the month, with the exception of a slight Clinton lead on July 20, which was the third day of the Republican convention and followed a 48-hour news cycle focusing on plagiarism in Melania Trump’s convention speech.

Clinton may enjoy a bounce after the Democratic National Convention wraps up in Philadelphia tomorrow. Reviews of First Lady Michelle Obama’s speech on Clinton’s behalf on the first night of the convention, for example, were stellar. At the same time, there is considerable unhappiness among supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), whose delegates staged a mass walkout from the convention on Tuesday evening in protest at a “rigged” election process within the party. If Clinton cannot unify her party’s base, she may not enjoy the bounce she expects.

The new USC/L.A. Times poll corroborates new polling data from Gallup that indicates that Trump and Clinton have exactly the same favorability among American voters for the first time. 37% of Americans view both candidates favorably, while 58% view them unfavorably.

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News. His new book, See No Evil: 19 Hard Truths the Left Can’t Handle, is available from Regnery through Amazon. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.

Email Leaks

Foreign Manipulation of American Elections? by Kevin D. Freeman, 7/27/16

The Democrat National Committee (DNC) is blaming Vladimir Putin and Russian cyber warriors for hacking their servers and releasing to Wikileaks all sorts of incriminating emails. They tell us “never mind the content” because it is all a foreign plot to help Donald Trump win the White House. This is so very rich in so many ways.

First, let’s start with the irony that the DNC being hacked keeps the reality of an email scandal front and center in front of American voters, overshadowing the Democrat convention. For months, we have been painfully aware that Secretary Clinton put sensitive and classified information at risk on her private server. She claims that the Secret Service was guarding it but that is really deceitful. Yes, the Secret Service may have guarded the physical location of her server as it was in the Clinton residence. But by no means were they responsible for cyber security of a private server. Period. It is simply not their job.

According to FBI Director Comey, Secretary Clinton placed American national security at risk intentionally or inadvertently and that should outrage all of us, whether or not he recommended indictment. According to Comey, there was classified information, some “Top Secret,” accessible from her unguarded server.

Now, we know what embarrassing things can be found in a hacked server. We know that the DNC, for example, conspired to rig the primary election in Clinton’s favor against Bernie Sanders. There is a great deal of other very troubling information as noted by Gateway Pundit. All of this really makes the Democrat Party “con” explained by Dinesh D’Souza frighteningly real. There is clearly a hidden truth at the DNC that they want to keep from the American people.

Hackers (or insider leakers) and Wikileaks had different ideas, exposing corruption. Now, we believe that if the RNC (Republican Party) were hacked and emails exposed, there likely would be a lot of corruption shown there as well. Sadly, that seems to be the nature of modern politics. For Secretary Clinton, we may never know if there were embarrassing information among the tens of thousands of deleted emails or the emails once deleted but recovered by the FBI. The FBI was not looking for embarrassing truths but rather national security risks.

What is so important here, though, happens to be the fact that neither Secretary Clinton nor the Democrat Party as a whole seems to have a handle on cyber security. Obviously, this is a complex and difficult task–guarding our nation in a digital age. But, should we trust someone who purposely circumvents the cyber security rules of our government? The reality is that our nation’s secrets are a lot more important than the embarrassing things uncovered about the DNC. Real lives and our future were put at risk.

Rather than apologizing profusely and taking steps to correct the obvious weakness, however, the DNC took the very unusual step of devising a theory that the hack was conducted by the Russians at the request of Putin to help elect Donald Trump. And that is the crux of what I’d like to cover here. The DNC has publicly shared that they believe foreigners will use cyber and other means to influence American elections. [Never mind that foreign donors secretly supported President Obama in 2008 and 2012 or have openly funded the Clinton Foundation for years.] What the DNC is claiming is that covert and insidious efforts are underway to control who becomes the next President of the United States.

Do we believe Putin is capable of doing this? Absolutely! Do we think he did it? Perhaps. But the reality is that there is a more certain path to controlling the election. As reported in the USA Today, one of the surest indicators of who will win the White House is the stock market. When stocks are rising, the incumbent party most often retains power. When stocks are falling, the incumbent party loses. Since 1928 (according to USA Today), there is only one instance that the incumbent party retained the White House with declining market. The year was 1956 and Eisenhower was able to overcome a 2.6% decline in the S&P 500. The 19.5% decline in 2008, however, was as sure a predictor as imaginable that then-Senator Obama and the Democrat Party would take control. In fact, until the September 11 cascading failure of Lehman Brothers triggered the collapse, McCain/Palin were leading Obama/Biden in the polls. Even Vice President Biden admits that the market collapse won the election for them.

Of course, the corollary is also true. Those who want the incumbent party to retain the White House might seek to keep the stock market inflated, at least through the election. Certainly sounds like a conspiracy theory. But is it any more conspiratorial than blaming email embarrassment on Russian hackers? Regardless of the motive, someone could try to rig stock prices to remain artificially high. Many analysts believe this has been happening with the culprit being the central banks in power.

So, a reasonable question that must be asked is whether or not the market’s consistent rise this election season is real or artificial? And, if someone wanted to elect the out-of-power party, could they manipulate share prices by cyber or other means?

For our part, we appreciate that the DNC is highlighting the dangers of cyber-economic manipulation to control our elections. We just think they should look a little more closely at how they gained the White House in 2008. And we should all wonder if there might be a puppet master at work right now.

Originally posted on Global Economic Warfare.

Bribing the Government

BREAKING: 1 Day After “Clinton Cash” Film Opens, CEO of Huge Company Steps Down

Almost immediately following the release of the film “Clinton Cash,” Hans Westberg, now-former CEO of Swedish telecommunications company Ericsson, was removed from leadership. If you watch the movie, you will see why. The book, “Clinton Cash,” from which the film was adapted, is a The New York Times bestseller by Government Accountability Institute President and Breitbart Senior Editor at Large Peter Schweizer.

That book showed that not only did Ericsson sell its equipment to nations that support terrorism according to Secretary Hillary Clinton’s State Department, but Ericsson’s transactions also became a topic of conversation between United States diplomats and the Swedish foreign minister.

In 2010, Ericsson received a letter from the Securities and Exchange Commission demanding a cessation of trade with nations that sponsor terrorism — specifically Iran.
 In 2011, the State Department, at the time under Secretary Clinton, created a list of goods and services that were impermissible to send to terror-sponsoring nations.

How does this tie into “Clinton Cash”? That’s the fun part. Ericsson, certainly just from the goodness of its heart, decided to pay former President Bill Clinton $750,000 for a single speech — a little out of the ordinary, as it had never once brought either of the Clintons in for a speech in the 10 years prior for any amount of money.

In an interview with Fox News Business, Peter Schwiezer pointed out that “Seven days after (Bill Clinton) got paid, Hillary Clinton’s State Department issued a statement that said we’re going to ask the company to police themselves.”

This company was placed under close scrutiny by the State Department, until Bill Clinton spoke … and got paid handsomely to do so. Then, suddenly, the federal government trusted Ericsson to fix its own problems.
You do the math.