Thursday, October 27, 2016

Time to Exit the UN

by Christian Org UK, Jul 1, 2016

Brexit was a stunning victory for liberty, independence and self-control, at least for the UK, and it may well be the first shot fired in a new revolution of freedom. Already a number of other European nations are talking about referendums on getting out of the EU. Good.

And while we are at it, it is time to pull out of other radical secular left globalist bodies that do far more harm than good. These transnational bodies are often a law unto themselves, with no accountability or responsibility to ordinary citizens.

The biggest and baddest example of this is of course the United Nations. The UN is well past its use-by date, and it is time for all concerned nations to pull out now. And if there is any doubt about this, all you have to do is look at what the UN has just recommended re the UK.

The UN’s Committee on the Rights of the Child has recently come out with a report containing 150 recommendations as to how the UK might be violating the U.N.’s charter on the Rights of the Child. It is utterly shocking. Indeed, the fact that atheist and secularist groups are singing the praises of the report should tell you all you need to know.

For example, let me offer you how the British Humanist Association has covered the UN report. It has a piece on this which begins:

The United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child has today published its major periodic review of the state of children’s rights in the UK, and has advocated for:
-the repeal of compulsory collective worship in UK schools
-a fully integrated education system in Northern Ireland
-full and comprehensive sex and relationships education in UK schools
-decriminalisation of abortion in Northern Ireland in all circumstances.

The British Humanist Association (BHA) has long campaigned for such changes, having secured similar recommendations in the civil society report that fed into the review. The BHA was on the working group that produced the education section of that report. Today it has welcomed the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child making the same recommendations.

It offers more detail of each of these four proposals, quoting from the UN. Here are the final two:

-On sex and relationships education: ‘Relationships and sexuality education is not mandatory in all schools, its contents and quality varies depending on the school, and LGBT children do not have access to accurate information on their sexuality. The Committee recommends that the State party ensure that meaningful sexual and reproductive health education is part of the mandatory school curriculum for all schools, including academies, special schools and youth detention centres, in all areas of the State party. Such education should provide age-appropriate information on: confidential sexual and reproductive health-care services; contraceptives; prevention of sexual abuse or exploitation, including sexual bullying; available support in cases of such abuse and exploitation; and sexuality, including that of LGBT children’.

-On abortion in Northern Ireland: ‘In Northern Ireland, abortion is illegal in all cases except where continuance of the pregnancy threatens the life of the mother, and is sanctioned with life imprisonment. The Committee recommends that the State party decriminalize abortion in Northern Ireland in all circumstances and review its legislation with a view to ensuring girls’ access to safe abortion and post-abortion care services. The views of the child should always be heard and respected in abortion decisions.’

All this is scary stuff indeed: more secular left Big Brother activism being foisted upon ordinary citizens, whether they like it or not. The Christian Institute in the UK especially expressed concern about the recommendations on children and Christian worship. It quickly released this statement:
Asking children to attend Christian assemblies undermines their human rights, according to a United Nations committee. A highly controversial new report by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child expresses ‘concern’ that pupils in the UK are legally required to take part in a daily act of collective worship, which is “wholly or mainly of a broadly Christian character”. Conservative MP David Burrowes described the criticism as “ludicrous” and said the Government can “respectfully put those kind of reports in the bin where they belong”.

Worship: The committee recommended that the Government “repeal legal provisions for compulsory attendance at collective worship”. Its recommendations are not legally binding. Parents can already withdraw their children from collective worship but the committee wants children to be able to act independently of their parents. Speaking to The Telegraph, David Burrowes said: “The collective act of worship is not an indoctrination exercise. It is recognising and respecting the Christian heritage of the country and giving people an opportunity to reflect”.
Not indoctrination

“The UN should spend more time doing its main job of preventing war and genocide rather than poking its nose in other countries’ classrooms.” According to Article 43 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the committee is to consist of “eighteen experts of high moral standing and recognized competence” in the field of human rights. It currently includes representatives from Bahrain, Egypt and Russia. The report contained 150 recommendations on where Britain could be contravening the UN’s charter on the Rights of the Child, including the freedom of parents to reasonably chastise their children.

Yes Christians have every right to be greatly concerned about this social engineering agenda of the UN. It is about enforcing secular humanism and taking away the rights of Christian parents, shutting down free speech, and stifling religious liberty.

These are just a few reasons of many why it is time to dump the UN. If the UK can dump the EU, surely Australia and other nations can dump the UN. And not a moment too soon.

Shadow Government Exposed

Clinton’s FBI Files Literally Mention “The Shadow Government” at the State Dept. Wow.

Bill Clinton once reportedly told senior White House reporter Sarah McClendon, “Sarah, there’s a government inside the government, and I don’t control it.” Average citizens who talk about things like that, however, are typically referred to as “Conspiracy Theorists” as if its a pejorative term. Then again, how much of a conspiracy is it when the FBI’s own documents confirm the existence of something referred to as “The Shadow Government”?

Check out page 56 from the FBI’s files on the Clinton investigation which is making the rounds on Reddit: At:

A powerful group of high-ranking state officials referred to as “The Shadow Government”. Really?

So Skull and Bones John Kerry is sitting over there in a group literally nicknamed “The Shadow Government” which decides what information will be released to the public and what will be censored in regard to fellow high-ranking elitist Hillary Clinton?

It’s almost a laughable cliché… except there it is in black and white. And still there are people in this country who claim there’s no such thing as a cover up and it’s all a conspiracy.
Please. Give us a break. (H/T: Lily Dane)

See Also: Video: John Kerry Admits They’re Making “Order Out of Chaos” to Create “World Order” Delivered by The Daily Sheeple We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).

Contributed by Melissa Dykes of The Daily SheepleMelissa Dykes is a writer, researcher, and analyst for The Daily Sheeple and a co-creator of Truthstream Media with Aaron Dykes, a site that offers teleprompter-free, unscripted analysis of The Matrix we find ourselves living in. Melissa and Aaron also recently launched Revolution of the Method and Informed Dissent. Wake the flock up!

Italy Shuts Down Mosques

Italy Shuts Down Illegal Mosques, Muslim Population Loses its Mind! By Tim Brown 10/26/16

The fact that the anti-christ religion of Muhammad, Islam, is allowed to be practiced in Western countries is a testimony to the weakness of the Christianity that prevails in those lands. That fact that it is practiced at all, is a testimony to the depravity of man. At least for Italy, they have chosen to take a stand against it. The Italian government has shut down all the illegal mosques in Italy, and the Muslims there are freaking out.

The Daily Mail reports:

An imam led the group in chants of ‘Allah Akbar’ which means ‘God is great,’ as they kneeled to the ground facing the Colosseum. The protest was organized by a Bangladeshi group, Dhuumcatu, which has complained that smaller or more informal mosques in Rome have been branded illegal by authorities for building violations.

At least 1.6 million Muslims live in the country but there are only a handful of mosques officially registered with the Italian government. Most worship takes place in houses and Islamic cultural centres.

But, Italy’s Interior Minister Angelino Alfano said in August that ‘mini mosques in garages’ should not be allowed as it makes them difficult to monitor, possibly raising the risk of radicalisation. The Dhuumcatu Association, said police had closed three improvised mosques in Rome in last few months.

Sikdir Bulbul, 41, is an Italian citizen who has lived in Rome for 16 years. He said the mosque he helped establish in 2012 was shut down in September. He added: ‘Friday prayer is very important to us so today we have come to the Colosseum. Otherwise where else can we pray?’

The Colosseum has great significance in the largely Catholic country. It is generally regarded by Christians as a site of the martyrdom of believers during the Roman Empire’s persecution of the religion.

A cross now stands outside the building inscribed with the words: ‘The amphitheater, one consecrated to triumphs, entertainments, and the impious worship of pagan gods, is now dedicated to the sufferings of the martyrs purified from impious superstitions’.

For these people to line up and pray outside an edifice that was used to murder Christians for sport is enough to infuriate even the most timid believer. Still, look at them.

These people are not the friends of God. They are not the friends of Italy, and they are most certainly not the friends of the free world. In fact, the time is going to come that these people will be doing the same things that those in the Middle East are doing to Christians today. They will be demanding they leave the country, pay the jizya or die, and we all know the Islamists can come up with some of the most horrible and inhumane ways to murder people.

Remember, there is no peace in Islam. There is only submission to Allah. The Koran teaches as much for the infidel.

Americans should learn this too. Being tolerant of this demonic ideology is just as dangerous as being tolerant of Communism. Both are out to destroy Christianity and freedom. It cannot and should not exist in the world, let alone in the West.

Good for Italy for taking the stand and not backing down in the face of the enemy.

Hillary Rallies Unattended

Hillary HUMILIATED By This 1 Difference In Her Rallies Compared To Trump’s

Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has struggled throughout her campaign to build excitement, in stark contrast to the experience of GOP nominee Donald Trump.

Clinton and Trump have both held campaign rallies, but there has been a major difference in the two, attendance. Trump’s rallies have been far better attended than Clinton’s despite the fact that Clinton holds far fewer,  which you might think would encourage people to show up since you never know when she’ll come out of hibernation to do another one.

The Gateway Pundit reported that, through Aug. 25, Clinton did just 11 campaign events whereas Trump did 29,  nearly three times as many. For Clinton’s 11 events, an estimated 10,000 people showed up in total.

For Trump events, an estimated 168,000 attended. During this time period, Trump has held almost three times the number of events with approximately 16 times the turnout as Clinton has.

As the leaked Democrat National Committee emails proved, Clinton’s campaign actually had to pay people to support her online and send interns to beef up protests. People are taking notice of Clinton’s absence from the trail with the hashtag #WheresHillary gaining steam on Twitter. To give even more perspective, The Gateway Pundit report that Trump averaged a turnout of 5,800 people per campaign event while Clinton manages less than 1,000.Quantcast

Even more stark was the fact that the Clinton machine grossly outspent Trump and yet he was garnering more enthusiasm and the polls have gotten closer and closer as the days go by.

Clinton has spent a whopping $257 million on her campaign to date. In contrast, to date Trump has spent just $87 million. Not only is Trump garnering more enthusiasm, he’s proven that he has the stamina to do the job, whereas Clinton’s health issues have raised major questions about whether she’s even physically capable of holding the office.

Clinton refuses to hold news conferences, with more than 260 days elapsing since her last one. She has had to take frequent breaks and, instead of engaging with the public as her rival does, Clinton hides behind campaign statements and canned responses.

The picture is clear — the question is whether it translates into votes this November.

Share this post on Facebook and Twitter to show the huge difference in enthusiasm between Trump and Clinton supporters as well as Trump’s much more vigorous campaign schedule.

Do you think Trump's support will carry him to the White House?

Hillary Demands Preapproved Debate Questions

“She Was in Full Meltdown”: Hillary Unleashed on Donna Brazile for Unapproved Debate Question 10/19/16

Hindsight is making more and more clear that Hillary’s outrageously rigged campaign is dependent – heavily dependent – on control over the media.

Nearly every question she has been asked during the past 18 months has been approved and agreed upon ahead of time. Hillary’s responses have been heavily scripted and rehearsed.

It even emerged that Donna Brazile, who is a CNN contributor and who was appointed interim chair of the DNC after Debbie Wasserman Schultz was forced out, shared questions that were meant to be spontaneous with the Clinton campaign in advance.

But in this alleged behind-the-scenes account, Donna Brazile becomes the brunt of Hillary Clinton’s anger after host Matt Lauer sprung an unapproved question about the email scandal on her.

As analyst Bill Still points out in the video, Hillary’s famously furious temper was unleashed after she lost control of the narrative. She can hardly be trusted with the difficult and consequential decision made in the Oval Office:

Check out what Hillary was claimed to have shouted at her staff just after leaving the stage of the forum, as she used and abused her presstitute media relations and her lapdog advisors shaping her entire ascent to power.

According to State of the Nation, who in turn received an anonymous email from who they believe to be an insider at NBC:

Behind the scenes, NBC technicians and cameramen at the Wednesday night, Commander-in-Chief Forum (Sept 7) report that Hillary Clinton was so angry and incensed that she had been  ‘blind-sided’ by one question she was not prepared for and had not approved in advance.

“When her time in front of the cameras ended, Clinton shook the hand Lauer extended to her and smiled once more for the wide camera shot and then Hillary proceeded to pick up a full glass of water and threw it at the face of her assistant and the screaming started. She was in a full meltdown and no one on her staff dared speak with her – she went kind of manic and didn’t have any control over herself at that point. How these people work with this woman is amazing to me.

[Hillary was] screaming at her staff, “you f – – – ing idiots, you were supposed to have this thing set up for me and you’ve screwed it up!   If that f – – – ing bastard wins we all hang from nooses!   Lauer’s finished…and if I lose it’s all on you ass – – – – s for screwing this up.”

Since Hillary does not allow any staff to have cell phones when she is in their presence, no footage is available, but Hillary will never let this rest.  She has made it clear that she wants Matt Lauer to be “persona non grata – for putting her on the spot.”

Interim DNC chairman Donna Brazile, the first black woman to hold the position, was singled out by Hillary during the rant.   She screamed at Donna, “I’m so sick of your face.   You stare at the wall like a brain dead buffalo, while letting that f – – – ing Lauer get away with this.   What are you good for, really?   Get the f – – – to work  janitoring this mess – do I make myself clear?” 

A female NBC executive said that Donna Brazile looked at Mrs. Clinton and never flinched, which seemed to enrage Hillary all the more.  The executive continued, “It was the most awful and terrible…and racist display – such a profane meltdown I have ever witnessed from anyone,  and I will never forget it.

Hillary reportedly shouted at Donna Brazile about the media ‘failure’ of allowing real questions to be asked. “You stare at the wall like a brain dead buffalo, while letting that f – – – ing Lauer get away with this. What are you good for, really?   Get the f – – – to work  janitoring this mess – do I make myself clear?””

This statement makes sense in no other context but one – Donna Brazile’s entire role – unofficially – in the campaign centers around coordinating media coverage, and disciplining anyone pretending to be a real journalist in this show election, while handing out treats to good lapdogs. Brazile as a liaison between CNN and the Democratic Party, is functioning like a majority whip in Congress – only no one is supposed to do this.

The source also claimed that Hillary got on the phone with Comcast executives demanding that Matt Lauer be punished and censored, once again supporting the theme of total media control.

One thing is certain, Lauer WAS heavily criticized after the debate in the mainstream media – including by NBC executives – for not challenging Trump’s claims more closely.

According to Real Time Politics: Matt Lauer totally bombed at the NBC Commander-In-Chief Town Hall Wednesday night, and he has received a ton of criticism from fans and critics alike over his clearly biased performance. Now, one report says that his bosses agree with the criticism… several high-ranking sources at NBC News “said they hear the criticism and agree with at least some of it.”

Lauer has been widely criticized for not challenging a number of Donald Trump‘s statements, including his fully debunked claim that he opposed the Iraq War. USA Today quotes several major papers who trashed Lauer, while noting the NY Times criticism that Lauer focused too much time on the emails:

“Lauer devoted about a third of his time with Mrs. Clinton to questions about her use of a private email server, then seemed to rush through subsequent queries…” Being this much in bed with the corporate media is a clear problem, but that’s how thoroughly corrupt the election has become. Even after lobbying softballs, Matt Lauer supposedly presented a problem for posing ONE real question… WTF?

While this dramatic story is not confirmed, and wasn’t caught on video (supposedly all staffers are barred from carrying phones), it is does mesh with plenty of other disturbing and confirmed document leaks showing the Hillary campaign engages regularly in “planting media stories,” and the heavy-handed pro-Hillary coverage is already plain to see for anyone paying attention to the election coverage.

As Zero Hedge reported, Guccifer 2.0 dug out documents that prove the media collusion: The first revelation comes from a January 2015 strategy document written by Hillary’s press secretary, Nick Merrill, about how the campaign should approach reporting on Hillary’s decision to run for president.  The memo identifies “Maggie Haberman” of Politico as someone who had a “very good relationship” with the campaign and who had “teed up stories” for Hillary in the past.

America can never be America with the media operating as a P.R. firm for the worst of the worst in Washington, and yet it goes on and gets worse with each passing day.

With the increasingly important role of suppressing dissent on the web (through algorithms that down-rank flagged political content), this terrible form of censorship is engulfing blogs and websites as well, and those offering sharp criticism often find that their audience and influence have diminished.

What does the future hold for sites like this one? Will we continue to be able to raise questions about Hillary’s emails?

If Matt Lauer is skewered for the slightest sign of backbone, what happens to the rest of us?

Read more: This article has been contributed by SHTF Plan. Visit for alternative news, commentary and preparedness info.

Beat Hillary Ads

A Dog that Barks at Lies -- One Minute Ad , An Urgent Message from Scott Wheeler author, producer, former investigative journalist and GOP Trust Executive Director
We announced that we were launching "Operation Hillary Scam" this week to expose Clinton corruption before the election, but we actually have been running it secretly for a while now.

We call it "Operation Hillary Scam" after the 1970's "Abscam" where several Democrat politicians were caught taking bribes by the FBI.

This time it we who have caught Hillary Clinton taking bribes from communist China and elsewhere. The operation is working. Good news today in the daily tracking polls shows Trump tied in Florida and leading in Ohio, two very critical swing states where we have been running targeted ads to move voters.

We must increase the pressure from now to Election Day. We will be working around the clock to secure television and digital advertising to get the "Hillary Scam" message out.

You can see some of the ads below that actually deal directly with her corruption, lies, and where the illegal money has come from.

We need you now to help us win this election-- we cannot allow someone as corrupt as Clinton anywhere near the White House ever again.

We have LESS THAN TWO WEEKS LEFT--we really need your help securing the air time and igniting the fuse for this important operation. We must make this thing explode over the next 12 days--and with your help, it will work.

No Abortion Restrictions

Abortion Lobbyist Admits He Lied About Rarity of Late Term Abortions , Robert George | 10/26/16

Alright Secretary Clinton, just tell us yourself when the child in the womb should be granted the same protection against deliberate homicide that you claim for yourself and other human beings whom you deem worthy of legal protection? Should the unborn child be protected from abortion at 4 months? 5? 7? Tell us.

Do you think abortion should be prohibited in the 8th month? The 9th? Or do you believe, as I suspect you believe, that it should be permitted up to birth (and even …during birth)? Tell us which abortions you would prohibit—if any.

Oh, and Secretary Clinton, you and your flacks say that very late-term abortions don’t exist, or are only done when “medically necessary.” Those claims are false. I challenge you to defend them—especially against the statements of late-term abortionists themselves who have acknowledged performing late-term elective abortions. Famously, top abortion industry lobbyist Ron Fitzsimmons admitted to lying about the frequency of partial-birth abortions in order to deceive the public. Do you claim he was lying about his lying?

Friends, Secretary Clinton and her media enablers (and the phony “fact checkers”) are trying to pull off a massive deception here. Don’t fall for it. Under pressure, they will retreat to the claim that late-term abortions are “rare,” and then defend that claim by saying that they are a “small percentage of the total number of abortions performed annually.” Do you spot the trick? Let’s say the total number is 1 million. 1.2 percent would be 12,000. Think about that. 12,000 fully viable babies who could be delivered and permitted to survive are instead deliberately killed. That is not a small number (although it is a small *percentage* of a hideously large number).

Some of these abortions are eugenic killings—the baby is killed because he or she is disabled or, as the abortionists prefer to say “defective.” Rarely if ever are they necessary for the preservation of maternal health, since the baby’s viability means that the pregnancy can be terminated by causing the delivery and birth of the living child. (Of course, “health” can be defined in an absurdly broad way, as the Supreme Court did in 1973 in Doe v. Bolton, such that the baby’s life—her very existence—is itself defined as the threat to the mother’s “emotional” or “psychological” well-being. A moment’s thought about where the logic of that leads will make you shudder.)

The truth is that Hillary Clinton supports abortion tout court—including late-term abortions. (Donald Trump did too until he got political ambitions; but she, not he, is the one lying about this issue today.) She should not be allowed to hide the fact that she supports them—just as Barack Obama does and almost all other nationally prominent Democrats do. They dance to the tune of the abortion lobby. It is a disgrace.