The “no-go zones” in some Western nations, where law
enforcement has lost control because of the influence of Islamic law, are
coming to America.
That’s according to several Islam experts interviewed by WND
who believe the kind of Muslim enclaves that have developed in Europe due to a
lack of assimilation will eventually arise in the U.S. as the Muslim population
grows.
The contention that “no-go” zones exist is controversial, as
evidenced by the widespread ridicule that arose when an analyst said in a Fox
News interview shortly after the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attack in Paris that
the major English city of Birmingham was a “no-go” zone itself.
The analyst apologized, but only for exaggerating his point,
not for asserting “no-go” zones exist.
As WND reported, the government of France has identified 751 Zones Urbaines
Sensibles, or Sensitive Urban Zones,
that the state does not fully control, citing Middle East foreign policy expert
Daniel Pipes, director of the Middle East Forum.
The zones are enclaves where Muslim immigrants have chosen
not to assimilate, and law enforcement has lost some degree of control.
Republican Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal recently told Fox
News interviewer Neil Cavuto that the zones are inevitable in America if the
country doesn’t insist that immigrant Muslims assimilate.
He said Islamists are setting up their own culture within
the United States “to overturn our culture.”
“We need to recognize that threat,” he insisted.
He said there are neighborhoods that could be defined as a
no-go zone.
“You can call them whatever term you want, but absolutely
there are neighborhoods, we have communities of people that don’t want to
integrate or assimilate,” he said.
“But they’re coming as the Muslim population grows,” he
warned. “We already see areas such as Dearborn, Michigan: It isn’t a no-go zone
— police don’t fear to enter there and non-Muslims aren’t menaced for
non-adherence to Shariah norms — but police did the bidding of the Muslim
community a couple of years ago and arrested some Christian missionaries solely
for the crime of preaching to Muslims. A Shariah crime, not a crime according
to any U.S. law.”
David Yerushalmi of the American Freedom Law
Center, which has fought legal battles over
the Dearborn disputes, said there aren’t any no-go zones in American right now,
but Dearborn comes close.
There, evangelical Christians were attacked with rocks and
bottles by a Muslim crowd for talking about their faith on public property
during an annual Arab festival. When police arrived, they ordered the
Christians to leave or face arrest.
Several legal cases over the incident have been resolved in
favor of the Christians, but a major one, handled by AFLC, is still under way.
It has been granted the highly unusual step of a hearing before a full federal
appeals court, which previously denied the Christians’ claims.
Yerushalmi said there have been times when first responders
have declined to go into certain riot areas for a time because it “would incite
the crowd to more violence.”
He said there aren’t the numbers of Muslims in the U.S.
population at the moment to form such no-go-zones.
“However, you have demographics which are changing,” he
warned.
Islam analyst Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs not only believes the zones are coming, she’s already
prepared a strategy to fight them.
“There aren’t large-scale no-go zones here as there are in
Europe, but they are coming, because Islam by its very nature is against
assimilation into a kaffir (non-Muslim) society. It is supremacist at its core
– Islam must dominate and not be dominated,” she told WND.
“So while Muslims have assimilated here to a greater degree
than they have in Europe, there are growing Muslim areas in some cities
(Dearborn, Newark, etc.) and these will continue to grow. Then there are rural
Muslim camps where firearms training and other alarming things have been
reported,” she said.
She asserted the U.S. should end immigration from Muslim
countries.
Geller argued “there is no reliable way to tell a jihadist
or jihadi sympathizer from a ‘moderate.’”
She called on Muslim groups in the U.S. “to renounce the
aspects of Islam that contradict constitutional freedoms, or face sedition
charges if they try to advance those elements.”
Geller said that when the U.S. Muslim population “grows to
the levels we see in European countries, we will face exactly the same thing
that Europe is experiencing now.”
- Profiling of Muslims at airports and in hiring in professions in which national security and public safety could be compromised.
- Investigating foreign funding for mosques in the U.S.
- Watching for mosques where violence is advocated.
- Including an accurate depiction of Islam and its violent doctrines in school textbooks.
- Stopping foreign aid for countries using Shariah, or Islamic law.
- Denying citizenship to those who support Shariah.
Onetime
Muslim terrorist Walid Shoebat has posted a piece
online by Keith Davies explaining that no-go zones in the U.K. are areas where
even serious crimes are not reported, because they are handled by Shariah
rather than British law enforcement.
“Numerous murders and rapes are not reported in these no-go
zones because of local justice systems,” he wrote.
WND
reported last year that President Obama had
thanked Muslims for “building the very fabric of our nation” and claiming they
were in part responsible for “the core of our democracy.”
But his comments didn’t align with statements from some of
the Founders.
For example, in 1801, President Jefferson sent the Navy to
the Barbary Coast to stop Islamic pirates’ reign of terror on U.S. merchant
ships. Jefferson read the Quran to understand what was motivating the pirates,
and he learned that the Muslim holy book commanded the faithful to “plunder and
enslave” non-Muslims.
In 1814, after Tripoli broke its truce and began attacking
U.S. ships again, former President John Adams wrote Jefferson a letter advising
that Islam’s founder was “a military fanatic.” In another writing, he condemned
Islamic law as “contemptible.”
His son and future president, John Quincy Adams, went further,
arguing that the essence of Islam is “violence and lust: to exalt the brutal
over the spiritual part of human nature.” He suggested the Quran’s commands to
fight and conquer other lands “in the cause of Allah” were at odds with
democracy, peace and the Judeo-Christian ethic on which America was founded.
“The precept of the Koran is perpetual war against all who
deny that Muhammad is the prophet of God,” he added. “The vanquished may
purchase their lives by the payment of tribute; the victorious may be appeased
by a false and delusive promise of peace; and the faithful follower of the
prophet may submit to the imperious necessities of defeat: but the command to
propagate the Muslim creed by the sword is always obligatory, when it can be
made effective. The commands of the prophet may be performed alike by fraud or
by force.”
Amid
the controversy over the recent Islamic terrorism in Paris, Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo said she may sue Fox News for its
references to no-go zones in the city.
Pipes said that as far back as 2006 that France’s Sensitive
Urban Zones ranged from two zones in the medieval town of Carcassonne to 12 in
the heavily Muslim city of Marseilles. Most towns and cities have at least one,
he said.
Pipes
regularly has updated a 2006 post
citing references by politicians, civil leaders and journalists to “no-go
zones” in Britain, Germany and Sweden, as well as France.
Soeren Kern, senior fellow of the
Gatestone Institute, wrote
in 2011, “Islamic extremists are stepping
up the creation of ‘no-go’ areas in European cities.”
“Many of the ‘no-go’ zones function as microstates governed
by Islamic Shariah law,” he wrote. “Host-country authorities effectively have
lost control in these areas and in many instances are unable to provide even
basic public aid such as police, fire fighting and ambulance services.”
And Spencer noted that in 2002, the New York Times’ David
Ignatius wrote of France that “Arab gangs regularly vandalize synagogues here,
the North African suburbs have become no-go zones at night, and the French
continue to shrug their shoulders.”
Jindal also referenced the zones in a speech in London last
weekend.
He said in his prepared remarks that “in the West,
non-assimilationist Muslims establish enclaves and carry out as much of Shariah
law as they can without regard for the laws of the democratic countries which
provided them a new home.”
“It is startling to think that any country would allow, even
unofficially, for a so-called ‘no-go zone,’” Jindal said. “The idea that a free
country would allow for specific areas of its country to operate in an
autonomous way that is not free and is in direct opposition to its laws is hard
to fathom.”
The Council on American-Islamic Relations in Washington, a
“civil rights” group founded as a front by the Muslim Brotherhood, according to
the FBI, expressed disappointment in what it called “Muslim bashing.”
http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/islam-experts-no-go-zones-looming-for-america/
Comments
Muslim immigrants living on welfare programs
in the US should be deported back to their countries. The same goes for others
who will not assimilate.
All welfare programs need to be limited to US
citizens and then eliminated and replaced with a renewed free market system
with no minimum wage and a family funded, family-based social safety net.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment