Thursday, January 22, 2026

Poor Quality Kitchen Appliances 1-22-26

Yes, poor quality overseas appliances are a persistent concern in 2026, with major brands accusing rivals of undervaluing imports to avoid tariffs, leading to cheaper but potentially lower-quality goods flooding the US market, especially as new tariffs expected in 2026 raise prices on many essentials, incentivizing cheaper imports and regulatory challenges. While some brands focus on high-tech, energy-saving, or US-made options, the broader market sees a push-pull between cost-cutting imports and demands for quality, with some foreign manufacturers potentially exploiting loopholes.  

Key Factors & Trends for 2026:

Tariff Avoidance Tactics: Some foreign manufacturers are accused of misdeclaring appliance values at customs, allowing them to bypass significant US tariffs, making their products artificially cheap, notes a New York Post article and report from the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission.

Price Increases: Higher tariffs expected in early 2026 are driving up prices for essential home goods, pushing consumers towards potentially cheaper, lower-quality alternatives or prompting earlier purchases.

Regulatory Focus: Governments are responding with mandatory quality compliance for certain products, aiming to curb unsafe imports, although enforcement remains a challenge.

Market Segmentation: The market includes premium US-made brands (like Sub-Zero), major international players (LG, Samsung), and budget-focused imports, creating varied quality levels.

Consumer Behavior: Consumers are balancing costs, with value-conscious buyers seeking deals, while others prioritize energy savings, smart features, and durability, creating demand for both ends of the quality spectrum, notes NielsenIQ. 

In essence: Yes, the landscape includes cheap, potentially low-quality imports, but also high-tech options, with ongoing trade issues and cost pressures shaping the market for consumers in 2026. 

In 2026, concerns regarding the quality of overseas kitchen appliances persist, driven by manufacturing shortcuts, counterfeit parts, and safety issues. While major brands still dominate the market, several factors contribute to the influx of lower-quality goods in the U.S. 

Reported Quality and Safety Issues

Recalls for Safety Hazards: Large-scale recalls continue in 2026 for imported appliances. For example, nearly one million Frigidaire-branded minifridges were recalled in early 2026 due to electrical components that can short-circuit and ignite, posing fire and burn risks.

Heavy Metal Contamination: The FDA issued warnings in late 2025 and 2026 regarding imported cookware (specifically aluminum and brass products from India and Pakistan) that may leach significant levels of lead into food.

Declining Durability: Many modern appliances, including smart electric and induction ranges, are reported to fail 30% to 40% faster than older models. This is often attributed to complex electronics, such as secondary relay boards and touchscreens, which are more fragile than traditional mechanical components.

Generic Components: To cut costs, some manufacturers use downgraded internal components hidden behind high-end exteriors. "Franken-ranges" and refrigerators often use identical generic parts across both budget and premium models. 

Economic and Trade Factors

Tariff Evasion: U.S. manufacturers like Whirlpool have alleged that some foreign competitors (including Samsung and LG) have undervalued their products at customs to avoid high tariffs, potentially allowing lower-cost, lower-quality units to enter the market more competitively.

Supply Chain Reliance: Even appliances labeled "Made in America" often rely on imported electronic components from China or Taiwan, making them susceptible to the same quality control issues as fully imported goods.

Rising Costs: Significant tariffs (up to 50% on some major appliances) have led to price increases in 2026, which sometimes results in consumers choosing cheaper, lower-quality alternatives to save money. 

Buying Advice for 2026

Verify Reliability: High-end brand names no longer guarantee quality. Use independent data like Consumer Reports or Yale Appliance, which ranks brands like Speed Queen, Bosch, and Miele as highly reliable in 2026.

Check for Recalls: Before purchasing, check the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) for recent appliance recalls.

Beware of "Exclusive" Models: Some big-box retailers sell exclusive model numbers that may use cheaper internal parts than those sold at specialized dealers. 

https://www.google.com/search?q=are+poor+quality+kitchen+appliances+being+manufactured+overseas+and+sold+into+the+us+2026

Comments

The US needs to reshore all kitchen appliance manufacturing to improve the quality and longevity of these items.

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

Older GE Products Superior 1-22-26

Older GE microwave/oven combos can last longer due to simpler, more durable metal construction and repairability, but modern units offer better efficiency, features, and digital reliability, with lifespans depending heavily on usage, maintenance, and specific model quality, making a definitive "yes" or "no" impossible; however, 30-year-old units, if still working, often showcase superior build but may lack features and pose repair challenges as parts become scarce.  

Why Older Units Might Last Longer:

Built to Last: 30-year-old appliances were often made with heavier-duty metal components, not just plastic, designed for longevity and repair.

Simpler Design: Fewer complex electronics meant fewer things to break, and parts were often standardized and easier to source. 

Why Newer Units Might Be Better (Despite Potential Shorter Lifespans):

Efficiency & Features: Modern microwaves are more energy-efficient and offer advanced features like convection, smart controls, and preset cooking.

Safety: Newer units meet current safety standards, whereas older ones, while generally safe if maintained, might have aging components. 

Key Factors for Lifespan:

Usage: Heavy daily use shortens life, regardless of age.

Maintenance: Regular cleaning and proper use (e.g., using microwave-safe containers) extend life.

Model Quality: A high-end older unit will likely outlast a budget new one, and vice-versa. 

The Verdict for a 30-Year-Old Unit:
If your 30-year-old GE combo is running well in 2026, it's a testament to its robust build. However, be aware that finding replacement parts for such old models becomes increasingly difficult, and performance might decline (e.g., slower heating from a weakening magnetron). 

In summary, while your old unit might outlast a cheap new one, a well-maintained, quality new unit offers modern benefits, but your vintage GE is a durable classic if it's still serving you well!. 

Yes, data from 2025 and 2026 indicates that 30-year-old GE microwave and oven combinations often outlast modern units due to simpler mechanical designs and more durable construction. While modern units offer advanced features and higher energy efficiency, they are statistically more likely to require repair or replacement within the first 5–10 years. 

Durability and Lifespan Comparison

30-Year-Old Units (1990s): These appliances were primarily mechanical, using durable components like metal thermostats and replaceable defrost timers. Ovens from this era had an average lifespan of approximately 23.6 years.

Modern Units (2026): Current models rely heavily on electronic control boards and complex software. Modern ovens have a significantly reduced average lifespan of about 14.3 years (a 39% decrease from the 1990s).

Microwave Longevity: Regardless of the era, microwaves generally have shorter lifespans than ovens, typically failing every 5–10 years. In combination units, a failed microwave often necessitates replacing the entire dual-unit because they are wired together. 

Why Older Units Last Longer

Simpler Design: Older models have fewer points of failure. Modern units contain numerous sensors and electronic boards that are sensitive to moisture and power surges.

Repairability: 1990s appliances were designed to be serviced, with components that could be rebuilt. Modern repairs often involve replacing expensive, non-serviceable circuit boards, with costs sometimes exceeding half the price of a new unit.

Material Quality: Older units frequently used heavier-duty metal parts compared to the lighter plastics and flimsier materials found in contemporary "mass-market" appliances. 

Advantages of New 2026 Models

Despite lower durability, upgrading to a 2026 model provides:

Energy Efficiency: New units must meet strict Department of Energy standards, using significantly less electricity than 1990s models.

Safety Features: Modern microwaves include enhanced insulation, reinforced grounding, and better surge protection.

Advanced Cooking: Features like convection, precise sensor cooking, and smart home integration are standard in 2026. 

https://www.google.com/search?q=are+30+year+old+ge+microwave+and+oven+combinations+lasting+longer+than+new+units+2026

Comments

In the 1990s, US Appliance Companies began to Off-Shore US Manufacturing to low wage, low regulation countries. The result was poor quality and shortened lifespans for these products. Stock Prices shifted to “Profits” and away from “Reliability” of products.

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

New Combo Costs 1-22-26

In 2026, new microwave and oven combination units typically cost between $1,000 and over $6,000, with many quality, feature-rich models falling in the $2,500 to $5,000 range, plus installation fees. Budget-friendly options start around $2,000, while high-end smart models with advanced tech can push the price much higher, making them a significant investment compared to separate units, say Consumer Reports and Angi 

https://www.google.com/search?q=how+much+does+a+new+microwave+and+oven+combination+unit+cost+in+2026

Comments

We just paid $400 to have our 30 year old GE Microwave Oven Combination rebuilt and restored.

“Energy Efficiency” is an Obama Era scam.

Electronic Starters will last for a few months and then will quit. They are not worth the cost of replacing them.

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

Sub Zero Refrigerators 1-22-26

Yes, Sub-Zero refrigerators generally last significantly longer than standard models, often 20 years or more compared to the 10-15 year lifespan of typical refrigerators, thanks to their premium materials, robust construction, dual cooling, and rigorous testing, though proper maintenance is crucial for achieving that longevity.  

Why Sub-Zero Refrigerators Last Longer:

Superior Components: They use high-quality, commercial-grade parts, including compressors, designed for durability.

Dual Refrigeration: Separate systems for fridge and freezer prevent air mixing, maintaining ideal humidity and preventing freezer burn.

Advanced Technology: Features like NASA-inspired air purification systems and precise temperature control (within 1 degree) keep food fresher longer, reducing waste and wear.

Intense Testing: Sub-Zero subjects its products to over 500 performance tests and designs them to last at least 20 years.

Premium Build: Expect stainless steel interiors, robust insulation, and vacuum door seals for better performance and longevity. 

Key to Longevity:

Maintenance is Key: Regular tasks, like cleaning the condenser every few months, are essential to maintain peak performance and reach their long lifespan. 

In essence, while the upfront cost is higher, Sub-Zero's extended lifespan and reduced need for replacement or frequent repairs can offer long-term value. 

Yes, Sub-Zero refrigerators generally last significantly longer than other brands. In 2026, they remain the industry leader for longevity, typically lasting 20 years or more. This is approximately double the lifespan of standard residential refrigerators, which average between 10 and 15 years. 

Lifespan Comparison by Brand (2026 Estimates)

Refrigerator Brand      Est Lifespan

Sub Zero                     20-25 years

Bosch                         14-19 years

GE KitchenAid            12-17 years

Why Sub-Zero Refrigerators Last Longer

Dual Refrigeration System: Unlike standard fridges that use one compressor for both sections, Sub-Zero uses separate compressors and evaporators for the refrigerator and freezer. This reduces the workload on each individual component and prevents air exchange between compartments.

Industrial-Grade Materials: They are constructed with premium-grade stainless steel, reinforced hinges tested 300,000 times, and commercial-grade cooling components.

Rigorous Testing: Every major component undergoes extreme stress tests, including dramatic temperature swings and power surges, before leaving the factory.

Serviceability: Sub-Zero units are designed to be rebuilt rather than replaced. Critical parts like compressors and control boards are easily replaceable by factory-certified technicians, which can extend a unit's life by another 10–20 years.

Advanced Seals: Vacuum-sealed doors lock in cold air more effectively than standard gaskets, reducing the frequency of cooling cycles and mechanical wear. 

Factors for Maintaining Maximum Lifespan

To reach the 20-year mark, Sub-Zero recommends the following maintenance:

Clean Condenser Coils: Dust and debris should be removed every 6 to 12 months to prevent compressor strain.

Replace Water/Air Filters: Follow the unit's prompts to ensure the air purification and water systems function optimally.

Monitor Door Seals: Promptly replace worn gaskets to maintain a tight vacuum seal. 

https://www.google.com/search?q=do+sub+zero+refrigerators+last+longer+than+other+refrigerators+2026

Comments

We bought a Sub Zero 650 model for $3000 over 25 years ago when regular refrigerators lasted 10 years.

We perform routine maintenance ourselves. Sub Zero Service is excellent. If anything broke, they sent a replacement with no charge. The Sub Zero model 650 now costs $12,000 in 2026. The Lifespan of the Sub Zero is understated.

We also had Kitchen Fronts of Georgia reface all “built-ins” through the house in light cherry and they built the the Sub Zero surround and door.

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

Wednesday, January 21, 2026

Greenland Defense Update 1-21-26

As of January 2026, the U.S. military presence in Greenland at Pituffik Space Base is around 150-200 personnel, primarily supporting missile warning and space surveillance, though some reports from early 2026, possibly sensationalized or reflecting proposed increases, suggest numbers could be growing or shifting, with some sources claiming a large buildup to 10,000 troops and others a reduction, but the core is a small U.S. contingent alongside Danish and other NATO forces.  

Key Details:

Current Numbers: Most reliable sources indicate about 150-200 U.S. troops are stationed at Pituffik Space Base. Base Name: The former Thule Air Base was renamed Pituffik Space Base in 2023.

Mission: The base is critical for missile warning, defense, and space surveillance for the U.S. and NATO.

International Cooperation: The U.S. presence is supported by Canadian, Danish, and other NATO forces, with recent European troop deployments emphasizing solidarity.

Context: Recent news in early 2026 highlights increased strategic interest and potential expansion, with some outlets reporting large buildups or reductions, but the actual operational force remains small. 

As of January 2026, the United States maintains a permanent presence of approximately 150 to 200 military personnel in Greenland.

These troops are primarily stationed at Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule Air Base), the only active U.S. military installation on the island. 

Key Details of U.S. Presence (2026)

Stationed Forces: Approximately 150–200 active-duty personnel from the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Space Force are permanently based at Pituffik.

Mission: The base serves as a critical node for the Integrated Tactical Warning and Attack Assessment (ITW/AA) system, supporting missile warning, missile defense, and space surveillance missions for the U.S. and NATO.

Total Personnel: While active-duty troops number around 200, the base hosts a total of roughly 650 people, including Canadian, Danish, and Greenlandic military personnel and civilian contractors.

Strategic Command: In June 2025, responsibility for Greenland was officially shifted from U.S. European Command (EUCOM) to U.S. Northern Command (NORTHCOM) to bolster homeland defense. 

Context for 2026

The U.S. presence is currently a subject of intense geopolitical debate. While reports in early 2026 indicate the U.S. has considered a massive increase to 10,000 troops to counter Russian and Chinese influence in the Arctic, the permanent stationed force remains at historical lows (down from thousands during the Cold War). Additionally, in January 2026, several European NATO allies (including France, Germany, and the UK) began deploying small contingents to Greenland for a joint exercise called "Operation Arctic Endurance" as a show of solidarity for Danish sovereignty. 

https://www.google.com/search?q=how+many+us+troops+are+based+in+greenland+2026

Comments

Trump believes that Greenland needs an additional 10,000 troops to deter China and Russia from interfering with trade routes and preventing China and Russia from controlling Greenland. His 10% tariffs would pay the US for increasing troop presence. 

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

Iran Protest Update 1-21-26

Based on reports from January 18, 2026, the nationwide protests in Iran against the Islamic Republic, which began in late December 2025, appear to have been largely suppressed by a brutal crackdown that has left thousands dead. 

While active, widespread street demonstrations have subsided, an "uneasy calm" has returned, with reports indicating the following as of January 18, 2026: 

Suppression: Iranian officials have indicated that the demonstrations have been controlled after a crackdown that rights groups say resulted in over 3,000 to 5,000 deaths.

Continued Tension: Despite the crackdown, some reports suggest ongoing strikes and localized defiance in Tehran.

Digital Blackout: A severe internet blackout has been in place for over a week, severely limiting communication and information flow.

Government Stance: Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei claimed on Saturday, January 17, 2026, that the protests have been "extinguished" and accused protesters of being "seditionists" backed by foreign entities.

International Reaction: Iranians in the diaspora, including in Japan, continue to hold rallies in support of the uprising. 

While some reports suggest the regime has temporarily quelled the uprising through mass arrests and violence, the situation remains fluid. 

As of January 18, 2026, citizen protests in Iran are continuing, although reports indicate a heavy military presence and a brutal government crackdown have suppressed the scale of public demonstrations in some areas. 

Current status of the uprising:

Active Resistance: Despite a "100% alert" state and tens of thousands of security forces locking down Tehran, rebellious youth reportedly engaged in hit-and-run clashes across the capital and other major cities overnight. Strikes were also reported in Tehran as recently as Friday.

Digital Blackout: A near-total internet and international phone blackout remains in effect, now entering its second week. Monitoring groups like NetBlocks report that a brief easing of restrictions on Saturday was quickly reversed.

Casualties and Arrests: Rights groups estimate that over 3,000 people have been killed since the uprising began in late December 2025. Iranian officials have acknowledged "thousands" of arrests, while some unofficial reports claim the death toll may be as high as 5,000.

Government Stance: Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei claimed on Saturday that the "sedition" had been extinguished, but simultaneously called on authorities to "break the back" of protesters.

Economic Drivers: The protests were initially ignited by the collapse of the Iranian rial and soaring inflation, but have since morphed into a widespread movement calling for the end of the Islamic Republic. 

For those following the situation, global human rights organizations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch provide ongoing monitoring of the crackdown.

https://www.google.com/search?q=are+iran+citizen+protests+continuing+today+on+1-18-26

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

Gaza Update 1-21-26

Yes, a significant ceasefire in Gaza did start on October 10, 2025, following a US-brokered peace plan, involving a halt to fighting, hostage/detainee exchanges, and withdrawal of Israeli forces to a "yellow truce line". However, reporting from late 2025 and early 2026 indicates it faced numerous alleged violations by Israel, with continued military operations despite the agreement, leading to ongoing conflict and humanitarian concerns, with a second phase of the deal announced in January 2026.  

Key Details of the October 10, 2025 Ceasefire:

Start: October 10, 2025, at 12:00 local time.

Agreement: A US-brokered plan involving a pause in hostilities, release of hostages held by Hamas for Palestinian prisoners, and Israeli forces pulling back.

Implementation:The first phase focused on these immediate steps, with Israel's cabinet formally approving it. 

Subsequent Developments (Late 2025/Early 2026):

Violations: Media outlets reported near-daily Israeli attacks and violations of the ceasefire, leading to continued Palestinian casualties.

Humanitarian Situation: Aid delivery remained below expected levels despite the ceasefire.

Phase Two: The US announced the start of a second phase of the ceasefire in January 2026, indicating ongoing efforts to manage the situation. 

In essence, the ceasefire began on that date, but its effectiveness was challenged by persistent violence and non-compliance from October 2025 into early 2026. 

Yes, a major ceasefire in Gaza officially went into effect at 12:00 p.m. local time on October 10, 2025. This truce was the first phase of a broader peace plan brokered by U.S. President Donald Trump. 

Key Details of the October 10 Ceasefire:

Terms: The initial phase included a halt to all military operations, a partial withdrawal of Israeli forces to designated lines, and a 72-hour window for the release of hostages held by Hamas in exchange for nearly 2,000 Palestinian prisoners.

Immediate Impact: Following the start of the ceasefire, tens of thousands of displaced Palestinians began returning to northern Gaza and Gaza City.

Stability: Although the ceasefire was described as "fragile" and faced hundreds of reported violations—including renewed Israeli strikes in late October—the U.S. and mediators continued to treat the agreement as formally in effect through the end of 2025.

Progression: On January 14, 2026, the U.S. announced the commencement of "Phase Two," which focuses on the demilitarization, governance, and reconstruction of Gaza. 

Other 2025 Ceasefires:

The October 10 agreement followed a previous, shorter-lived ceasefire that took place earlier in the year from January 19 to March 18, 2025, which collapsed after both sides accused the other of violations. 

https://www.google.com/search?q=did+the+ceasefire+in+gaza+start+october+10+2025

Comments

Hamas has failed to return the body of the last hostage and is refusing to disarm. Hamas has used ceasefires to rearm.

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

Ukraine Update 1-21-26

Yes, as of early 2026, Ukraine is largely holding its own defensively, preventing major Russian breakthroughs despite intense pressure, but faces significant challenges with depleted resources, especially artillery shells, while Russia continues grinding offensive operations and long-range strikes, aiming to wear Ukraine down for a potential collapse or capitulation, though analysts doubt a decisive Russian victory is near. Ukraine is innovating with drone warfare and maintaining resilience, but the war of attrition favors Russia's larger manpower and economic base, with no clear end in sight.  

Key Situation in Early 2026:

Defensive Stance: Ukrainian forces are effectively slowing Russian advances, particularly in northern Kharkiv and other sectors, forcing Russia to rely on costly, incremental gains.

Russian Strategy: Russia is employing heavy drone and glide bomb strikes on infrastructure, attempting to exhaust Ukraine's defenses and populace, while simultaneously conducting limited ground assaults.

Ukrainian Resilience: Ukraine shows remarkable societal and military resilience, adapting with technology like interceptor drones to counter Russian aerial attacks.

Resource Disparity: Ukraine suffers from critical shortages, especially artillery ammunition, a significant disadvantage against Russia's larger military-industrial complex.

Cognitive Warfare: Russia is actively spreading narratives of inevitable victory to pressure the West and Ukraine into accepting unfavorable peace terms, notes Institute for the Study of War (ISW)

Outlook:

Stalemate Possible: Many analysts suggest a decisive battlefield victory for either side is unlikely, with a "frozen conflict" or prolonged war of attrition being the most probable outcome, according to Russia Matters and Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

Continued Fighting: Russia seems determined to continue its push, with stated goals expanding beyond current frontlines, while Ukraine seeks to hold on for potential shifts in Western support, notes ISW and Stimson Center. 

As of January 2026, the war in Ukraine is characterized by operational parity, with front lines remaining largely at a standstill despite nearly four years of full-scale conflict. While Russia maintains a slow, high-cost offensive, Ukrainian forces have successfully held their ground in several key sectors, though they face severe challenges from infrastructure damage and diplomatic shifts. 

1. Battlefield Status: Strategic Stalemate

Holding the Line: Ukrainian forces continue to control sizable portions of the Donetsk, Zaporizhzhya, and Kherson regions. In early January 2026, Ukrainian troops successfully held a bridgehead on the east bank of the Oskil River near Kupyansk, blocking Russian attempts to advance.

Asymmetric Warfare: Ukraine has transitioned to a strategy of strategic defense and asymmetric strikes. This includes long-range drone and missile attacks on Russian military and oil infrastructure, such as ammunition depots in the Kostroma Oblast and fuel trains in occupied Crimea.

Territorial Control: Russia currently occupies approximately one-fifth (about 19-20%) of Ukrainian territory. Analysts suggest it is unlikely Russia will capture the remainder of the Donetsk region before 2027 or 2028. 

2. Current Vulnerabilities

Energy Crisis: Continuous Russian strikes on energy infrastructure have left thousands of Ukrainians without power during freezing winter temperatures in January 2026.

Personnel & Fatigue: Ukraine faces mounting war fatigue and issues with draft evasion, even as its lines remain resilient.

Technology Race: Both sides are locked in a rapid innovation cycle. Ukraine recently developed interceptor drones to counter Russian Shahed strike drones that had been adapted to target aircraft. 

3. Diplomatic Landscape in 2026

The "Trump Factor": Following the return of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency, pressure has increased on Kyiv to negotiate. The Kremlin has publicly aligned with Trump’s characterization that Ukraine is stalling peace deals, while European allies like Poland have disputed this, accusing Russia of escalating attacks despite peace talk rhetoric.

Slim Peace Prospects: Despite intensified talks in Paris and the U.S., experts believe a definitive end to the war in 2026 is unlikely because neither side is willing to make necessary territorial or security concessions.

Western Support: While European partners have announced new aid for Ukraine's military and energy grid, there are growing concerns that U.S. policy shifts may leave Europe alone in securing Ukraine's long-term defense. 

https://www.google.com/search?q=is+ukraine+holding+its+own+against+russia+in+2026

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

Tuesday, January 20, 2026

US Economy 1-20-26

The U.S. nominal GDP per capita for 2025 is projected to be around $89,000 to $90,000, with specific estimates from sources like Statista at $89,599 and Worldometer/IMF around $89,105, reflecting growth from the previous year, driven by economic activity and a stable population.  

Key Projections:

Statista: $89,599 (as of Jan 2026 data).

Worldometer/IMF: Approximately $89,105 (based on April 2025 IMF data) or $89,599 (from Worldometer using IMF data).

World Economics: Projects $85,951 for 2025. 

Context:

This figure represents the total economic output per person, calculated at current market prices.

These are forecasts, with figures varying slightly depending on the forecasting body and update time. 

As of January 2026, the United States’ nominal GDP per capita for 2025 is estimated and reported by major financial institutions as follows: 

International Monetary Fund (IMF): The October 2025 World Economic Outlook reports a nominal GDP per capita of $89,599.

Federal Reserve Bank (FRED): Current dollar (nominal) GDP per capita reached $90,774 in the third quarter (Q3) of 2025.

World Economics: Recent projections for the full year of 2025 are approximately $89,105. 

2025 Economic Context 

Nominal GDP Total: The total nominal GDP of the United States for 2025 is estimated at approximately $30.62 trillion.

Growth Rate: The real GDP growth rate for 2025 was approximately 3.0%.

Global Ranking: By nominal GDP per capita, the U.S. ranked as the 9th richest country globally in 2025. 

https://www.google.com/search?q=us+nominal+per+capita+gdp+2025

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

US Household Income 1-20-26

While an official 2026 U.S. median household income isn't out yet, estimates place it around the low to mid-$80,000s, building on the 2024 figure of $83,730, with projections for 2025 showing slight growth, but official 2026 Census data will be the definitive number, likely showing increases due to inflation.  

Key Figures & Projections

2024 (Official): $83,730 (U.S. Census Bureau).

2025/2026 Estimates: Some sources project growth, with one suggesting a median around $81,604 for a general profile, while others focus on upper-middle-class ranges, indicating increasing figures.

Family Income (2025/2026): The median income for a 4-person family was estimated at $119,584 for late 2025/early 2026 for federal program purposes. 

What to Expect for 2026

Slight Increase: Expect the 2026 figure to be higher than 2024 due to ongoing inflation and economic adjustments.

Official Release: The official 2026 data will likely be released by the Census Bureau in late 2026 or early 2027. 

Factors Influencing the Number

Inflation: Higher costs of living will push median incomes upward in nominal dollar terms.

Wage Growth: Modest wage increases for many groups contribute to the rising median. 

As of January 2026, the most recent official data from the U.S. Census Bureau (released in late 2025) reports that the median household income in the United States is $83,730. 

This figure represents a statistically significant increase (roughly 4%) from previous years, reflecting the first major rise in inflation-adjusted "real" median income since 2019. 

Key 2026 Household Income Statistics

Median Household Income: $83,730 (latest official 2025/2026 release).

Average Household Income: Approximately $121,000.

Median for 4-Person Families: Estimated at $119,584 for the fiscal period spanning October 1, 2025, to September 30, 2026.

Upper-Middle Class Threshold: Households in this category typically start earning between $104,000 and $117,000 annually in 2026. 

Income Distribution Overview (2026)

Income Bracket   Approx Ave Median

Bottom 20%        $18,460

Middle 20%         $94,390

Top 10%             $99,971

Top 5%               $560,000

The U.S. Census Bureau and FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data) remain the primary sources for verified national income data. For more localized data, you can use the Census Bureau's Interactive Income Map to check specific state or county medians. 

https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+the+us+household+median+income+2026

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

Federal Grant Defunding 1-20-26

Starting February 1, 2026, President Trump has threatened to cut off "any payments" to sanctuary cities and states, though the specific types of federal grants aren't detailed, it would generally target funding tied to immigration cooperation, potentially including broad federal aid for states and localities that don't comply with federal immigration enforcement, potentially affecting public safety, social service, or infrastructure funds, but legal challenges are expected as past attempts to withhold all funding were deemed illegal.  

Key Details of the Threat

Timing: February 1, 2026.

Reason: To penalize jurisdictions that adopt "sanctuary" policies, which limit local law enforcement's cooperation with federal immigration agents (ICE).

Scope: President Trump stated he would stop "any payments," suggesting a broad range of funding, but without specifying which federal grants. 

Potential Impacts & Challenges

Types of Funds: While not specified, this could involve federal funds for law enforcement, public health, education, or infrastructure, depending on the administration's actions.

Legality: Previous attempts to withhold broad federal funding have faced legal challenges, with courts ruling such actions potentially illegal, so this move is expected to face significant legal battles from states and cities. 

In essence, the threat is a broad withdrawal of federal funds, but the exact grants and legal outcomes remain uncertain as of early 2026. 

Starting February 1, 2026, the Trump administration intends to halt all federal payments to "sanctuary" cities and the states that house them. While the administration has not provided an exhaustive list of every specific grant, official announcements and previous actions identify several high-priority programs and broad funding categories targeted for suspension. 

Targeted Federal Programs and Categories

The administration has specifically identified or signaled cuts to the following programs and sectors: 

Health and Human Services (HHS) Programs: The Department of Health and Human Services has already announced it will withhold funds for several major programs in five Democratic-led states:

Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF): Subsidies for low-income families' childcare.

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF): Direct financial assistance and support services.

Social Services Block Grant (SSBG): Funding for a variety of social services, including elder care and child welfare.

Law Enforcement and Public Safety:

Justice Department Grants: Historically, this includes the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) program, though courts have frequently protected these funds in the past.

DHS/FEMA Funding: Grants for emergency management and disaster preparedness.

Broad Infrastructure and Services: Threats have been directed at billions of dollars allocated for:

Transportation: Department of Transportation (DOT) funding for state and local projects.

Education: Federal aid for local school districts.

Human Services: Funding for child support and general human services. 

Legal and Practical Status

The legality of these cuts is currently a major point of contention:

Unconstitutionality Claims: State attorneys general and legal experts argue the administration cannot unilaterally withhold funds appropriated by Congress to coerce local immigration policy.

Ongoing Injunctions: As of January 2026, federal judges have already blocked earlier attempts by the administration to withhold funding from over 30 jurisdictions, including Los Angeles, Chicago, and Boston.

Broad vs. Specific: Legal experts note the administration may be shifting strategy to target grants with "loose rules" where executive discretion is higher to bypass some court protections. 

President Trump stated the upcoming cuts will be "significant" but did not elaborate on the full list of impacted accounts beyond his initial executive orders. Local leaders in states like California, New York, and Illinois have already prepared to challenge the February 1 deadline in court. 

https://www.google.com/search?q=what+federal+grants+will+sanctuary+states+and+cities+lose+in+february+2026

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

Ending Sanctuary Status 1-20-26

While there's no specific Executive Order (EO) dated February 1, 2026, regarding sanctuary cities, President Trump has historically pursued cutting federal funding to jurisdictions hindering immigration enforcement, with recent actions around late 2025/early 2026 focusing on identifying sanctuary jurisdictions and reviewing federal funding eligibility for them under EOs like EO 14287 (Protecting American Communities from Criminal Aliens), leading to ongoing legal challenges and debates over constitutionality, as courts have previously blocked similar efforts.  

Key Context & Actions:

Trump's Stance: President Trump has consistently targeted "sanctuary" cities and states that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities, aiming to withhold federal funds.

Recent EOs (Late 2025/Early 2026): Executive Orders, such as EO 14287, directed the Attorney General and DHS to list jurisdictions obstructing federal law and to review federal funding eligibility, potentially leading to cuts for non-compliant areas.

Legal Challenges: These actions have faced significant legal opposition, with federal judges ruling against the administration, stating such funding cuts overreach presidential authority and infringe on Congress's power over spending.

Ongoing Process: The administration continues to identify and challenge these jurisdictions, while courts remain involved in determining the legality of these funding restrictions. 

In Summary: Expect continued efforts from the Trump administration to restrict funding for sanctuary jurisdictions, building on earlier policies and recent EOs, but anticipate legal battles as courts scrutinize the executive branch's authority to implement such broad funding cuts. 

President Trump has announced a plan to cut federal funding to sanctuary states and cities starting February 1, 2026. This initiative faces immediate legal challenges, as similar past attempts by the administration to withhold federal funds were blocked by federal courts. 

The White House Plan

President Trump, in a recent speech and social media posts, stated that "no more payments will be made by the federal government to states for their corrupt criminal protection centers known as sanctuary cities" effective February 1.

The administration argues that sanctuary policies, which limit local law enforcement cooperation with federal immigration authorities, are detrimental to public safety. The types of funding affected could be significant, potentially impacting money for healthcare, education, and transportation, but specific details of which funds will be cut have not been elaborated. 

Legal Challenges

The planned cuts are expected to face strong legal opposition, with officials in affected jurisdictions like California, New York, and Chicago vowing to litigate. 

Prior Rulings: Two previous efforts by the Trump administration to cut off some funding for sanctuary jurisdictions were shut down by courts, with federal judges ruling the actions unconstitutional and "coercive".

Current Status: A federal judge in August 2025 had already blocked the administration from withholding funding from over 30 jurisdictions in a case that is still pending and under appeal.

Future Outlook: Legal experts suggest the administration may be targeting different types of grant funds this time in an attempt to make the new effort more legally defensible, but many officials remain confident the move will again be blocked by the courts. 

https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=7cf98fb56e6d2ae8&q=sanctuary+state+and+city+federal+funding+cuts+eo+feb+1+2026

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

Monday, January 19, 2026

Panama Canel Update 1-19-26

Yes, the Panama Canal is fully operational and functioning in 2026, having recovered from past drought issues and managing ongoing infrastructure projects, with plans for future water management to ensure long-term stability despite climate challenges. While traffic levels fluctuate due to trade patterns and climate, the waterway remains a critical global trade route, actively implementing modernization and water security measures.  

Key Points for 2026:

Operational Recovery: After severe drought restrictions in 2023-2024, the canal saw a strong rebound in traffic by mid-2025 and continues to operate with normal capacity, though adjusted for demand.

Infrastructure Investments: The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) is moving forward with major projects, including tenders for new energy and port infrastructure planned for 2026, as part of a long-term strategy.

Water Management Focus: New projects, like the Rio Indio Dam, are underway to secure supplemental water for the canal, with construction beginning in 2027, to counter future drought risks.

Trade Dynamics: Traffic is expected to remain strong but below peak capacity, influenced by shifting trade flows and the impact of new tariffs, with the canal aiming for sustainability and increased cargo volumes in the coming years. 

In short, the canal is functioning, adapting, and investing in its future to remain a vital artery for world trade. 

 The Panama Canal is fully operational in 2026 and has significantly recovered from the severe drought-driven restrictions of late 2023 and 2024. 

Current Operational Status

Capacity: As of early 2026, the canal is operating at full water capacity, maintaining a standard 50-foot draft through the 2026 dry season.

Transits: While daily transits are approximately 33–36 vessels, this is near the canal's normal functional capacity.

Reservation System: A new long-term slot allocation program (LoTSA 2.0) is in effect for 2026, allowing shipping lines to reserve transit dates up to a year in advance. 

Key Developments in 2026

Infrastructure Investment: The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) is beginning a massive $8.5 billion decade-long investment plan in 2026 aimed at water security.

New Projects: Tenders for a new energy corridor are projected for the second quarter of 2026, and contracts for new port terminals are expected to be awarded by the end of the year.

Tourism: The 2025–2026 cruise season is currently underway, with major lines like Holland America and Norwegian operating full transits.

Defense: In January 2026, Panama and the United States launched joint military exercises to bolster the defense of the waterway. 

Future Challenges

Water Security: While current levels are stable, a $1.6 billion project for a new dam on the Rio India is planned (construction set for 2027) to prevent future drought disruptions.

Geopolitics: Ongoing discussions regarding international influence (specifically Chinese investment in nearby ports) and U.S. policy continue to be monitored for their long-term impact on canal neutrality. 

https://www.google.com/search?q=is+the+panama+canal+functioning+in+2026

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

Brazil Economy 1-19-26

For Brazil in 2026, forecasts suggest moderating growth (around 1.5-2.5%), slightly higher unemployment (6.5-7.3%) than late 2025, and inflation easing towards 3.7-4% (near central bank targets), with nominal GDP per capita around $10,200-$10,700, reflecting a cooling job market and easing prices after recent efforts.  

Here's a breakdown of the key indicators for Brazil in 2026:

GDP Growth: Expected to slow, with estimates around 1.5% to 2.5%.

Unemployment Rate: Projected to rise slightly from late 2025 lows, ranging from 6.5% to 7.3% as the market cools.

Inflation Rate: Forecasts aim for lower figures, around 3.7% to 4.0%, moving closer to the central bank's target.

Nominal GDP Per Capita: Estimated around $10,200 to $10,700 (USD). 

Key Trends for 2026:

Cooling Economy: A deceleration from previous years is expected, helping to ease price pressures.

Monetary Easing: Lower inflation could pave the way for further interest rate cuts.

Job Market Shift: After strong gains, the labor market is anticipated to become more selective, say Valor International

In 2026, the Brazilian economy is characterized by moderating inflation and steady but modest growth. Economic performance is influenced by tight monetary policy aimed at reaching inflation targets and potential pre-election fiscal pressures in the fourth quarter of 2026. 

Key economic indicators for Brazil in 2026 include:

Inflation: Average consumer price inflation is forecast at approximately 3.1% to 3.7%. The government's estimate as of late 2025 was 3.5%, reflecting a gradual decline toward the central bank's target.

Unemployment Rate: The unemployment rate is projected to be around 7.3%. This follows record lows seen in late 2025, where the rate reached 5.2% in November 2025.

Nominal GDP: Brazil's total nominal GDP is expected to be approximately $2.19 trillion to $2.29 trillion USD.

GDP per Capita (Nominal): Nominal GDP per capita is forecast to be approximately $10,215 to $10,710 USD.

GDP Growth: Real GDP growth for 2026 is projected to be between 1.6% and 1.9%. 

For more detailed economic data and historical trends, you can explore the IMF Brazil DataMapper or Trading Economics Brazil Forecasts

https://www.google.com/search?q=brazil+economy+unemployment+inflation+nominal+per+capita+gdp+2026

Comments

Brazil is a member of the BRICS trading group and buys oil from Russia. The founding members of BRICS includes Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

Russia Economy 1-19-26

For 2026, Russia's economy shows projected modest GDP growth (around 1-2.7%), with inflation cooling (forecasts around 2-4.5%), a low unemployment rate (around 3.1%), and nominal GDP per capita estimates varying but hovering around $14,000-$17,000, driven by state spending, but facing risks from sanctions and cooling domestic demand as authorities curb growth to manage prices.  

Key Economic Indicators for Russia (2026 Projections):

GDP Growth: Forecasts suggest slow growth, possibly around 1% to 2.7%, as military spending's boost moderates, according to sources like The Guardian and Georank.org.

Inflation: Expected to decrease significantly from recent peaks, with projections ranging from 2-2.5% (Bank of Russia view) to 4.5% (IMF end-of-period), as the Central Bank tightens policy.

Unemployment: Projected to remain very low, potentially around 3.1%, due to demographic factors and labor demand, notes IMF DataMapper.

Nominal GDP Per Capita: Estimates vary, with the IMF suggesting around $17,290, while Statista and Georank.org place it closer to $14,000-$15,000. 

Economic Context:

Stagnation & Control: The economy is experiencing a slowdown after rapid growth fueled by state spending, with officials now focusing on cooling inflation, potentially at the cost of slower real wage growth.

Policy Tightening: The Bank of Russia is cautiously cutting rates but remains wary of stimulating demand too much, keeping credit conditions tight. 

In 2026, Russia's economy is characterized by a "cooling trend" as the surge in military spending that drove growth in previous years begins to taper off. Key projections for the year include: 

Economic Indicators (2026 Projections)

Unemployment Rate: Projected at 3.1% by the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The Bank of Russia provides a lower estimate of 2.4%, noting that the labor market remains exceptionally tight due to military-related labor shortages.

Inflation Rate: The annual average is expected to be approximately 5.2%, with "end-of-period" inflation potentially dropping to 4.5%. The Central Bank of Russia maintains a target of bringing inflation down to 4.0% by mid-to-late 2026.

Nominal GDP: Forecasted to reach approximately $2.51 trillion (current prices).

GDP Per Capita (Nominal): Projected to be approximately $17,290. 

Growth Outlook

Real GDP Growth: Forecasters anticipate a sharp slowdown compared to the 2023–2024 period. Estimates range from 0.9% to 1.1% (World Bank and IMF) up to 1.5% (FocusEconomics).

Key Risks: Persistent high interest rates (designed to fight inflation), declining oil and gas revenues, and the "exhaustion" of the war-related spending boost are cited as major headwinds for 2026. 

https://www.google.com/search?q=russia+economy+unemployment+inflation+nominal+per+capita+gdp+2026

Specific 2026 median household income data for Russia isn't readily available yet, but projections and recent trends suggest it will likely be around $8,000 - $11,000 USD per capita annually, with household figures being higher, influenced by rising GDP per capita forecasts and recent average income increases, despite ongoing inflation, as per sources like Trading Economics and CEIC Data. 

https://www.google.com/search?q=russia+median+household+income+2026

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader