While a specific Supreme Court hearing on Trump's actions toward sanctuary jurisdictions has not been scheduled for late 2025, it is highly likely that legal challenges will reach the court. Multiple lawsuits are already underway, and the Supreme Court's involvement is probable given the history of litigation surrounding this issue and the Trump administration's aggressive stance.
Legal background
- Trump's actions: Since taking office
in January 2025, President Trump has issued executive orders targeting
"sanctuary" jurisdictions that limit cooperation with federal
immigration enforcement. The administration has also threatened to cut
federal funding to these areas and launched new enforcement surges.
- Ongoing lawsuits: Numerous cities,
counties, and states have filed lawsuits to block these federal actions,
arguing they are unconstitutional. California, for instance, has been
joined by 34 other cities and counties in a lawsuit challenging the administration's
attempt to cut funding.
- Likely Supreme Court issues:
- Federal authority vs. states'
rights: The core of the legal battle is the constitutional division
of power between the federal government and state and local authorities.
States and localities argue the federal government cannot force them to
enforce federal immigration law, citing the Tenth Amendment.
- Funding cuts: The legality of using
federal funding as leverage to force compliance will likely be debated.
- Universal injunctions: A Supreme Court decision in June 2025, which limited the use of nationwide injunctions, will affect how these legal challenges proceed. Any injunctions will now likely be limited to the specific jurisdictions involved in the lawsuit, which is why more cities are joining existing litigation.
What to expect
- No immediate final word: Cases work
their way through the lower courts first, so a final Supreme Court
decision is not likely by the end of 2025.
- Continued conflict: The legal and
political conflict will continue for the foreseeable future. Federal
efforts to crack down on sanctuary jurisdictions are ongoing, but local
Democratic leaders are also holding firm.
- Significant impact: When the issue does reach the Supreme Court, the outcome could have a profound impact on the balance of power between the federal government and state and local governments, as well as on immigration enforcement across the country.
There is a high likelihood the Supreme Court will hear cases related to Trump's policies on sanctuary jurisdictions in 2025, with several new lawsuits already filed. However, the court has not yet agreed to hear a specific case on the topic. Legal challenges are working their way through lower courts, a prerequisite for being considered by the Supreme Court.
Developments in 2025
- Renewed federal crackdown: Following
his inauguration in January 2025, President Donald Trump issued new
executive orders targeting sanctuary jurisdictions. In February, his
administration refiled a lawsuit against Chicago to challenge its
sanctuary policies.
- Expansion of litigation: On October
1, 2025, CBS News reported that the Trump administration, through the
Department of Justice, had filed lawsuits against at least 15
jurisdictions over their sanctuary policies, targeting cities and states
including Minneapolis, St. Paul, and the state of Minnesota.
- Legal arguments: In the new wave of
lawsuits, the Department of Justice argues that local sanctuary policies
obstruct the enforcement of federal immigration laws, conflicting with the
U.S. Constitution's Supremacy Clause. Targeted jurisdictions have argued
that the federal government cannot force state and local officials to
enforce federal law, citing the Tenth Amendment.
- Lower court rulings: Courts have historically sided with states and cities, blocking the federal government from withholding funds from sanctuary jurisdictions. The current 2025 legal challenges are progressing through the lower federal courts. For instance, a lawsuit against sanctuary jurisdictions brought by the Trump administration in Chicago and California is being heard in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Historical context
During his first term (2017–2020), Trump's efforts to withhold federal funding from sanctuary cities were repeatedly blocked by lower courts and were not definitively addressed by the Supreme Court. The Biden administration later dismissed these pending cases. This earlier history indicates that the legal battles over sanctuary policies are likely to end up at the Supreme Court again.
Comments
It is likely that the Supreme Court will side with Federal Supremacy in the Sanctuary Status battle.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment